Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1061504
Pregnancy Outcome in Isolated Single Umbilical Artery
Publication History
Publication Date:
18 March 2008 (online)
ABSTRACT
Our objective was to determine whether the rate of small for gestational age (SGA) infants and adverse perinatal outcome are increased in pregnancies diagnosed with an isolated single umbilical artery (SUA). We compared 297 pregnancies with a SUA diagnosed on routine obstetrical ultrasound with 297 pregnancies with a three-vessel cord control. Pregnancies complicated by major fetal anomalies were excluded. The rate of SGA, fetal death, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Data analysis were performed using the t-test and chi-square test. The sample size had 80% power to detect a 50% difference between groups assuming a SGA rate of 20% in the SUA group and 10% in the control, α = 0.05. Among the SUA group, in 21 neonates (7.1%) the presence of a SUA could not be confirmed by postnatal examination, and 21 (7.1%) had major congenital anomalies, leaving 255 for final analysis. In the control group, 8 of the 297 (2.7%) had major congenital anomalies, leaving 289 for final analysis. The incidence of SGA neonates was 35 of 255 (13.7%) in the isolated SUA group compared with 38 of 289 (13.1%) in the control group (p = 0.93). The composite perinatal outcomes (fetal death and/or SGA) were also similar between the groups (16.1% versus 14.5%; p = 0.72). We concluded that pregnancies with isolated SUA have a similar rate of SGA to those with 3VC.When a SUA is identified antenatally, a targeted ultrasound is warranted to rule out associated anomalies. Serial antepartum ultrasound for fetal growth is not necessary in managing pregnancies complicated by isolated SUA.
KEYWORDS
Single umbilical artery - pregnancy - fetal growth
REFERENCES
- 1 Callen P W. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 4th ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders 2000
- 2 Volpe G, Volpe P, Boscia F M, Volpe N, Buonadonna A L, Gentile M. “Isolated” single umbilical artery: incidence, cytogenic abnormalities, malformation and perinatal outcome. Minerva Ginecol. 2005; 57 189-198
- 3 Gornall A S, Kurinczuk J J, Konjec J C. Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter?. Prenat Diagn. 2003; 23 117-123
- 4 Robinson J N, Abuhamad A Z. Abdominal wall and umbilical cord anomalies. Clin Perinatol. 2000; 27 947-978
- 5 Goldkrand J W, Pettigrew C, Lentz S U, Clements S P, Bryant J L, Hodge J. Volumetric umbilical artery blood flow: comparison of the normal versus the single umbilical artery cord. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001; 10 116-121
- 6 Predanic M, Perni S C, Friedman A, Chevenak F A, Chasen S T. Fetal growth assessment and neonatal birth weight in fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105 1093-1097
- 7 Rinehart B K, Terrone D A, Taylor C W, Isler C M, Larmon J E, Roberts W E. Single umbilical artery is associated with an increased incidence of structural and chromosomal anomalies and growth restriction. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17 229-232
- 8 Bianchi D W, Crombleholme T M, D'Alton M E. Fetology. New York; McGraw-Hill 2000
- 9 Alexander G R, Himes J H, Kaufman R B, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States National Reference for Fetal Growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87(2) 163-168
- 10 Heifetz S A. Single umbilical artery: a statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1984; 8 345-378
- 11 Leung A K, Robson W L. Single umbilical artery. A report of 159 cases. Am J Dis Child. 1989; 143 108-111
- 12 Thummala M R, Raju T N, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33 580-585
Annette E BombrysD.O.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Cincinnati
231 Albert Sabin Way, Room 5052, Medical Sciences Building, PO Box 670526, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0526