Endoscopy 2008; 40(7): 572-575
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077398
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series

A.  Cardoso Ramos1 , A.  Murakami1 , M.  Galvão Neto1 , M.  Santana Galvão1 , A.  C.  Souza Silva1 , E.  Gonzalo Canseco1 , Y.  Moyses1
  • 1Gastro Obeso Center, São Paulo, Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 20 April 2008

accepted after revision 8 June 2008

Publication Date:
07 July 2008 (online)

Background and study aims: Extensive research has been conducted to develop natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a new approach to less invasive surgery. Our aim is to present the technique and initial prospective results of a transvaginal video-assisted laparoscopic approach to NOTES cholecystectomy in order to perform minimally invasive surgery without visible scars.

Patients and methods: From July 2007 to March 2008, 32 women underwent transvaginal video-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a transvaginal 10-mm 45 ° rigid bariatric optic through a 12-mm bariatric trocar and two abdominal trocars (2-mm and 5-mm). Data on the history, surgical time, complications, and recovery were recorded prospectively in each case.

Results: Mean age was 33 years (range 22 – 47 years); mean body mass index was 29 (range 20 – 42). Mean operative time was 38 minutes (range 18 – 50 minutes). Patients were discharged 6 hours after the procedure without the need for pain medication in the following days and returned to normal working activities within 24 hours of the procedure.

Conclusions: Transvaginal video-assisted NOTES cholecystectomy seems to be an efficient and safe approach to minimally invasive surgery, providing patients with a comfortable recovery with virtually no abdominal scars as a bridge to exclusively NOTES procedures.

References

  • 1 Graewin S J, Tran , KQ , Naggert J K. et al . Diminished gallbladder motility in rotund leptin-resistant obese mice.  HPB (Oxford). 2005;  7 139-143
  • 2 Burden V G. The clinical behavior of the normal and the diseased gall bladder.  Am J Surg. 1927;  3 556-563
  • 3 O’Conor J. The surgical treatment of cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy and choledochotomy: continuous out-door treatment.  Ann Surg. 1922;  76 201-204
  • 4 Dubois F, Barthelot B. Cholecystectomie par mini-laparotomie.  Nouv Presse Med. 1982;  11 1139-1141
  • 5 Kopelman D, Schein M, Assalia A. et al . Technical aspects of minicholecystectomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 1994;  178 624-625
  • 6 Oyogoa S O, Komenaka I A, Ilkhani R. et al . Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a community-based hospital perspective.  Am Surg. 2003;  69 604-607
  • 7 Litynski G. Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time.  JSLS. 1998;  2 341-346
  • 8 Mouret P. From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future perspectives.  Dig Surg. 1991;  8 124-125
  • 9 Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouriel J. et al . The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Am J Surg. 1991;  161 385-387
  • 10 Duca S, Bãlã O, Al-Hajjar N. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations.  HPB (Oxford). 2003;  5 152-158
  • 11 Wagh M S, Thompson C C. Surgery insight: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery – an analysis of work to date.  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  4 386-392
  • 12 Flora E D, Wilson T G, Martin I J. et al . A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting.  Ann Surg. 2008;  247 583-602
  • 13 Rao G V, Reddy D N, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2008;  18 361-370
  • 14 Bessler M, Stevens P D, Milone L. et al . Transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopically assisted.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  [Epub ahead of print]
  • 15 Zorrón R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni L C. et al . NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case.  Surg Innov. 2007;  14 279-283
  • 16 Bessler M, Stevens P D, Milone L. et al . Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1243-1245
  • 17 Branco Filho A J, Noda R W, Kondo W. et al . Initial experience with hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1245-1248
  • 18 Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S. et al . Surgery without scars. Report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.  Arch Surg. 2007;  142 823-827
  • 19 Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels H A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 913-915
  • 20 Marchesini J C, Baretta G, Mottin C C. et al . Hybrid transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy in a porcine model. Poster 227, 2008 Scientific session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 9–12 April 2008.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 191-293
  • 21 Gordts S, Watrelot A, Campo R. et al . Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  76 1238-1241
  • 22 Gordts S, Puttemans P, Gordts Sy. et al . Transvaginal laparoscopy.  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;  19 757-767
  • 23 Palanivelu C, Rajan P S, Rangarajan M. et al . Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 428-431

A. H. F. Murakami, MD 

Rua Barata Ribeiro, 237 - cj. 83/84 – Cerqueira Cesar
São Paulo – SP
CEP: 01308–000
Brazil

Fax: +55-11-32111200

Email: abelmurakami@terra.com.br

Email: abelmurakami@gmail.com

    >