Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Narrow band imaging (NBI) with optical magnification is useful in predicting colon polyp histology. As magnifying endoscopes are not routinely available, we investigated the use of NBI and high definition white light imaging in determining polyp histology, using images obtained with colonoscopes without optical magnification.

Patients and methods: Images (white light and NBI) of colon polyps less than 10 mm in diameter were collected prospectively from patients undergoing screening colonoscopy and digitally stored. Two endoscopists later reviewed all images and predicted polyp histology as neoplastic or non-neoplastic using a modified Kudo classification. Comparison was made with histopathology.

Results: Separate white light and NBI images of 80 polyps (49 neoplastic, 31 non-neoplastic) from 63 patients were recorded. Mean polyp size was 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (5.4 ± 2.2 neoplastic; 4.4 ± 1.8 non-neoplastic; P = 0.02). In a pooled analysis, NBI correctly predicted neoplastic histology in 93 of 98 images (sensitivity 95 %, positive predictive value [PPV] 94 %) whereas white light did so in 58 of 98 images (sensitivity 59 %, PPV 79 %). NBI correctly predicted non-neoplastic histology in 56 of 62 images (specificity 90 %, negative predictive value [NPV] 92 %) whereas white light did so in 47 of 62 images (specificity 76 %, NPV 54 %).

Conclusions: NBI without optical magnification was more accurate in predicting colon polyp histology compared with white light imaging. Image quality and confidence in histology were significantly higher in the NBI group. NBI without optical magnification may be useful in predicting colon polyp histology.

References

• 1 Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Church J. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 481-485
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Butterly L, Chase M, Pohl H. et al . Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 343-348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Emura F, Saito Y, Matsuda T. et al . Colorectal cancers less than 10 mm: should we look at small lesions during screening colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB199
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Chen S, Mouchli A, Chadalawada V. et al . Histopathology of small polyps removed in the videoendoscopic era.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB199
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rex D, Helbig C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 42-47
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T. et al . Colorectal tumors and pit pattern.  J Clin Pathol. 1994;  47 880-885
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Su M Y, Ho Y P, Chen P C. et al . Magnifying colonoscopy in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions.  Dig Dis Sci. 2004;  49 1123-1127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Mitooka H, Shirakawa K, Naka Y. et al . Differentiation of diminutive neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps by the pit patterns observed by magnifying colonoscope (abstract).  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 95
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T. et al . A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 48-53
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Davies J, Burke D, Olliver J R. et al . Methylene blue but not indigo carmine causes DNA damage to colonocytesin vitro and in vivo at concentrations used in clinical chromoendoscopy.  Gut. 2007;  56 155-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kondering M A, Fait E, Gaumann A. 3D microvascular architecture of pre-cancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the colon.  Br J Cancer. 2001;  84 1354-1362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M. et al . Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging.  J Biomed Opt. 2004;  9 568-577
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Chiu H M, Chang C Y, Chen C C. et al . A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.  Gut. 2007;  56 373-379
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Su M Y, Hsu C M, Ho Y P. et al . Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2711-2716
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y. et al . Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1094-1098
  Google Scholar
• 17 Muto T, Bussey H J, Morson B C. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.  Cancer. 1975;  36 2251-2270
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 East J E, Suzuki N, Swain D. et al . Vascular pattern intensity: a new classification system to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in the colon using narrow band imaging with magnification.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB238
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

B. BanerjeeMD 

Division of Gastroenterology
Washington University School of Medicine

660, South Euclid Avenue
Campus Box 8124
St. Louis, MO 63110
USA

Fax: +1-314-454-8289

Email: bbanerje@im.wustl.edu