Elsevier

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volume 40, Issue 3, September 2002, Pages 287-293
Annals of Emergency Medicine

Radiology
Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma*,**,

https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.125708Get rights and content

Abstract

Study objective: A decision instrument based on 5 clinical criteria has been shown to be highly sensitive in selecting patients who require cervical spine imaging after blunt trauma, while simultaneously reducing overall imaging. We examine the performance of this instrument in the elderly and explore some of the common features of geriatric cervical spine injury (CSI). Methods: The National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted at 21 geographically diverse centers. We analyzed the performance of the NEXUS decision instrument among patients at least 65 years of age. Results: The study group consisted of 2,943 (8.6%) geriatric patients, representing 8.6% of the entire NEXUS sample. The rate of CSI was twice as great in these patients as it was in nongeriatric patients (4.59% versus 2.19%). Odontoid fractures were particularly common in geriatric patients, accounting for 20% of geriatric fractures compared with 5% of nongeriatric fractures. The frequency of patients meeting NEXUS criteria was similar in the 2 groups, with 14% of geriatric patients and 12.5% of nongeriatric patient classified as low risk. CSI occurred in only 2 low-risk geriatric patients, and these patients' injuries met our preset definition of a clinically insignificant injury. The sensitivity of the NEXUS decision instrument for clinically significant injury in the geriatric group was therefore 100% (95% confidence interval 97.1% to 100%). Conclusion: The prevalence of CSI, and especially odontoid fracture, is relatively increased among geriatric patients with blunt trauma. The NEXUS decision instrument can be applied safely to these patients, with an expected reduction in cervical imaging comparable with that achieved in nongeriatric patients. [Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:287-293.]

Introduction

Cervical spine injury (CSI) in blunt trauma represents a classic example of the frequent use of low-yield testing to detect a high-stakes diagnosis. Physicians obtain an estimated 800,000 cervical spine radiographs for victims of blunt trauma annually, of which approximately 2.4% are positive for CSI.1 The selective criteria proposed in the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) were developed to safely improve the yield of cervical spine radiography. In a large, prospective, observational study involving 34,069 patients, these criteria were shown to offer a potential 12.6% reduction in cervical spine radiographs, while maintaining a sensitivity of 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98.6% to 100%) for clinically significant CSI.1

The NEXUS decision instrument was derived and validated in a sample including patients of all ages. It is unclear whether these criteria retain their safety and efficacy in each age group. For example, geriatric patients, because of osteopenia, physical debility, and other age-related comorbid conditions, might be more vulnerable to CSI than their younger counterparts. Simultaneously, pain perception might be diminished in the elderly, which might diminish the effectiveness of individual criteria in identifying injuries. Other age-related neurologic conditions, such as dementia, could further confound interpretation of the NEXUS criteria in the elderly and significantly alter their operator characteristics and subsequent clinical utility.

This article examines the operator characteristics of the NEXUS decision instrument in the subset of geriatric patients in the NEXUS database. It also explores some of the common features of CSI found in this group.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

NEXUS was a multicenter, prospective, observational study of emergency department patients with blunt trauma for whom cervical spine imaging was requested. The NEXUS methodology has previously been described in detail2 and will be summarized here. The study was designed to test the validity of a previously derived set of low-risk criteria for CSI that included the absence of the following 5 findings: (1) evidence of intoxication, (2) posterior midline neck tenderness, (3) distracting painful

Results

There were 34,069 patients with suspected CSI enrolled in the study. The study sample had a mean age of 37 years (interquartile range 23 to 47 years) and included 19,700 (58%) male and 13,866 (42%) female patients. Sex was not recorded for 503 patients.

The study sample included 31,126 (91.4%) nongeriatric patients and 2,943 (8.6%) geriatric patients. In the nongeriatric group, a majority of patients (59%) were male, whereas there were more female (53%) than male patients among the geriatric

Discussion

The NEXUS study validated previously derived criteria that allow physicians to be selective in the use of radiographs in the evaluation of patients with blunt trauma. The decision instrument, applied to 34,069 patients undergoing cervical spine imaging, including 818 with CSI, had an overall sensitivity of 99.0% (95% CI 98% to 99.6%) for identifying any CSI and a sensitivity of 99.6% (95% CI 98.6% to 100%) for identifying clinically significant injury.1

Several features of geriatric trauma

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (88)

  • Management of the Geriatric Trauma Patient

    2024, Surgical Clinics of North America
  • Trauma in the Aging Population: Geriatric Trauma Pearls

    2023, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Canadian C-Spine Rule considers patients older than 65 years of age as a high-risk criterion and therefore recommends imaging for all older adults.90 For the NEXUS criteria, studies have shown variable sensitivity in older adults, ranging from 65.9% to 100%.91–93 Multiple studies have questioned the validity of this tool to rule out the need for imaging for older adults.91,93

  • Geriatric Trauma

    2021, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
  • Managing the Elderly Emergency Department Patient

    2019, Annals of Emergency Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Author contributions: MT and PG analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. WRM provided statistical advice. All authors contributed significantly to the manuscript's revision. MT takes responsibility for the paper for a whole.

**

Supported by grant R01 HS08239 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, formerly the Agency for Health Care Research and Policy.

Address for reprints: Michael Touger, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1W20 Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY 10461;,718-918-5852, fax 718-918-7459; E-mail [email protected]

View full text