Transactions of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: Indications and associated factors in nulliparous women*

Presented at the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Reno, Nev, February 5-10, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.117364Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To investigate factors that contribute to the increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age. Study Design: We reviewed demographic and ante- and intrapartum variables from a data set of term, nulliparous women who delivered at Brigham and Women's Hospital in 1998 (n = 3715). Results: Cesarean delivery rates increased with advancing maternal age (<25 years, 11.6%; ≥40 years, 43.1%). Older women were more likely to have cesarean delivery without labor (<25 years, 3.6%; ≥40 years, 21.1%). Malpresentation and prior myomectomy were the indications for cesarean delivery without labor that were more prevalent in our older population as compared to our younger population. Even among women with spontaneous or induced labor, cesarean delivery rates increased with maternal age (<25 years, 8.3%; ≥40 years, 30.6%). Cesarean delivery rates were higher with induced labor, and rates of induction rose directly and continuously with maternal age, especially the rate of elective induction. Cesarean delivery for failure to progress or fetal distress was more common among older parturients, regardless of whether labor was spontaneous or induced. Among women who underwent cesarean delivery because of failure to progress, use of oxytocin and length of labor did not vary with age. Conclusions: Older women are at higher risk for cesarean delivery in part because they are more likely to have cesarean delivery without labor. However, even among those women who labor, older women are more likely to undergo cesarean delivery, regardless of whether labor is spontaneous or induced. Part of the higher rate among older women who labor is explained by a higher rate of induction, particularly elective induction. Among women in both spontaneous and induced labor, cesarean delivery for the diagnoses of failure to progress and fetal distress was more frequent in older patients, although management of labor dystocia for these patients was similar to that for younger patients. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185: 883-7.)

Section snippets

Methods

Data for this evaluation were obtained from a database of all women who delivered at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Massachusetts) between January 1 and December 31, 1998. Because the risk of cesarean delivery varies according to parity and gestational age, we restricted our analyses to nulliparous patients with term pregnancies.

The database contains information from 9104 deliveries, including 3715 term nulliparous deliveries. Five nulliparous deliveries were excluded from the database

Results

In our population of 3715 term nulliparous patients, the risk of cesarean delivery rose continuously with age from 11.6% for women <25 years old to 43.1% for women ≥40 years old (Fig 1, P =.001).

. Women undergoing cesarean delivery before and after labor as a percentage of all term, nulliparous women delivering in each age group; P =.001 for trend for overall cesarean delivery rates and for trends of cesarean delivery rates with (shaded bars ) and without labor (open bars ).

This rise was

Comment

In our study of 3715 consecutive, term, nulliparous deliveries performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital in 1998, we found that the risk for cesarean delivery rose continuously with advancing age. A portion of this rise was attributable to an increased number of cesarean deliveries performed before or without labor among older women. Prior myomectomy and malpresentation were the indications for performing many of these cesarean deliveries without a trial of labor, and the prevalence of these

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

*

Reprints not available from author.

View full text