Original Article
Dentofacial morphology and tongue function during swallowing*,**,*,**,*

https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.128865Get rights and content

Abstract

To understand the role of the tongue in the development of occlusion, we examined the relationship between tongue movements during swallowing and dentofacial morphology with ultrasonography, cephalometric radiography, and dental casts. Duration, magnitude, and speed of tongue movements were measured in 112 healthy adult volunteers and compared with their dentofacial morphology with a simple correlation analysis. The results showed that the movements of tongue during swallowing are related to dentofacial morphology, especially in the motion magnitude of the early final phase (phase IIIa), but that few correlations are found when analyzing the duration and the speed of swallowing. The results also showed that the intermaxillary vertical dimension is significantly and positively correlated with the motion magnitude of the tongue movements. Furthermore, we found that arch length increased with prolonged duration of swallowing. This study showed that the computer-aided B+M mode of ultrasonography combined with the cushion-scanning technique is a valuable tool for investigating the relationship between tongue movements during swallowing and dentofacial morphology. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:491-9)

Section snippets

Material and methods

One-hundred-twelve healthy volunteers (74 men, 38 women) ranging in age from 20 to 26 years (mean, 22 years) were chosen from the students and the medical staff at Taipei Medical University and the patients in the Department of Orthodontics of the University Hospital. They had no craniofacial deformities or signs of dysphagia or tongue functional disorders. Informed consent was obtained from all volunteers after a brief explanation of this study.

A noninvasive diagnostic technique,

Results

The means and standard deviations of the measurements of dentofacial morphology and the ultrasound measurements of tongue movements from the 112 subjects are shown in Tables II and III.

. Descriptive statistics of dentofacial dimension

VariableMeanSDMinMax
Component 1
 SN70.7 mm3.4 mm62.0 mm79.7 mm
 SAr41.4 mm4.1 mm31.3 mm51.6 mm
 NSAr122.7°4.8°112.4°132.7°
Component 2
 ArA90.6 mm5.3 mm79.0 mm105.2 mm
 SNA83.5°3.5°75.2°91.4°
Component 3
 NA65.1 mm3.6 mm56.5 mm73.0 mm
 Palatal depth27.1 mm2.7 mm21.0 mm35.0 mm
 AUFH

Evaluation of interrelationship between swallowing and dentofacial morphology

Results of the simple correlation analyses suggest the following trends. First, those who have greater motion magnitude of the early final phase (IIIa) during swallowing tend to have deeper palatal vaults, increased mandibular lengths, longer lower faces, larger overjets, more overerupted molars and incisors, more labially inclined maxillary incisors, decreased ANB angles and Wits appraisals, and shallow overbites. Second, those who have longer durations of swallowing appear to have increased

Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) there are significant correlations between tongue movement during swallowing and dentofacial morphology; (2) the movements of the tongue during swallowing are related to dentofacial forms especially in the motion magnitude of the early final phase; (3) the significantly correlated cephalometric measurement items were AB, AFH, ALFH, UHF/LFH, L1-L1′, L6-L6′, and OJ; (4) the intermaxillary vertical relationship and the mandibular molar

References (36)

  • R Lauder et al.

    Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging

    Angle Orthod

    (1991)
  • RG. Andrews

    Tongue thrusting

    J S Calif Dent Assoc

    (1960)
  • WE. Kortsch

    The tongue, implicated in Class II malocclusion

    J Wis Dent Soc

    (1965)
  • GN. Smirnoff

    A preliminary study of mandibular morphology and the measurement of lingual thrusting pressures in subjects exhibiting tongue thrust swallowing and anterior open bites

    Am J Orthod

    (1965)
  • RM. Ricketts

    Tonsils and dental abnormalities

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1965)
  • EP. Harvold

    The role of function in the etiology and treatment of malocclusion

    Am J Orthod

    (1968)
  • PJ. McLaughlin

    Orofacial myology: current trends

    Int J Orofacial Myol

    (1988)
  • ML. Hanson

    Orofacial myofunctional therapy: historical and philosophical considerations

    Int J Orofacial Myol

    (1988)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Description of tongue movements on swallowing patterns

      2020, Archives of Oral Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In swallowing studies, the characterization of tongue movement and its interaction with the palate in healthy subjects provides a baseline necessary for the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with alterations in their oral functions such as chewing (Iizumi, Yoshino, Kagaya, Hori, & Ono, 2018), swallowing (Kahrilas, Lin, Logemann, Ergun, & Facchini, 1993; Yagi, Fukuyama, & Soma, 2008), phonetics (Stone, Epstein, & Iskarous, 2004) and breathing (Wang, Di, Mona, Wang, & Hans, 2018). Moreover, morphofunctional alterations of structures of the oral cavity can be related with these analyses (Cheng, Peng, Chiou, & Tsai, 2002; Garrett, Araujo, & Baker, 2016; Maspero, Prevedello, Giannini, Galbiati, & Farronato, 2014; Smithpeter & Covell, 2010). The purpose of this study was to compare the different swallowing patterns regarding tongue movement during saliva swallowing in healthy participants.

    • Sagittal Measurement of Tongue Movement During Respiration: Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

      2019, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared with MRI and other imaging modalities, ultrasonography is safe and non-invasive and provides real-time imaging in wakefulness and sleep. It is increasingly used to image the upper airway (Kundra et al. 2011; for review, Stone 2005), to evaluate tongue movement in adults (e.g., Cheng et al. 2002; Chiang et al. 2003; Peng et al. 2003, 2007; Saigusa et al. 2006) and to measure the surface area of the tongue (Davidson 2003; Lahav et al. 2009) and tongue thickness (Capilouto et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2014). In adults with OSA, it is crucial to understand each potential contributing factor including upper airway anatomy and collapsibility, as well as dilator muscle action (Eckert et al. 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    aGraduate student, Department of Orthodontics, Graduate Institute of Oral Rehabilitation, College of Oral Medicine.

    **

    bAssociate professor, Department of Orthodontics, Graduate Institute of Oral Rehabilitation, College of Oral Medicine.

    *

    cProfessor, School of Public Health, College of Public Health and Nutritional Science.

    **

    dAssociate professor, Department of Orthodontics, Graduate Institute of Oral Rehabilitation, College of Oral Medicine.

    *

    Reprint requests to: Chien-Lun Peng, DDS, PhD, Department of Orthodontics, Graduate Institute of Oral Rehabilitation, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan; e-mail, [email protected].

    View full text