Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Cost effectiveness of a general practice chronic disease management plan for coronary heart disease in Australia

Derek P. Chew A E , Robert Carter B , Bree Rankin C , Andrew Boyden D and Helen Egan D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

B Deakin University, Burwood Campus, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.

C Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.

D Heart Foundation Australia, Deakin, ACT 2600, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: derek.chew@flinders.edu.au

Australian Health Review 34(2) 162-169 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH09742
Submitted: 2 February 2009  Accepted: 3 July 2009   Published: 25 May 2010

Abstract

Background. The cost effectiveness of a general practice-based program for managing coronary heart disease (CHD) patients in Australia remains uncertain. We have explored this through an economic model.

Methods. A secondary prevention program based on initial clinical assessment and 3 monthly review, optimising of pharmacotherapies and lifestyle modification, supported by a disease registry and financial incentives for quality of care and outcomes achieved was assessed in terms of incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), in Australian dollars per disability adjusted life year (DALY) prevented.

Results. Based on 2006 estimates, 263 487 DALYs were attributable to CHD in Australia. The proposed program would add $115 650 000 to the annual national heath expenditure. Using an estimated 15% reduction in death and disability and a 40% estimated program uptake, the program’s ICER is $8081 per DALY prevented. With more conservative estimates of effectiveness and uptake, estimates of up to $38 316 per DALY are observed in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions. Although innovation in CHD management promises improved future patient outcomes, many therapies and strategies proven to reduce morbidity and mortality are available today. A general practice-based program for the optimal application of current therapies is likely to be cost-effective and provide substantial and sustainable benefits to the Australian community.

What is known about this topic? Chronic disease management programs are known to provide gains with respect to reductions in death and disability among patients with coronary heart disease. The cost effectiveness of such programs in the Australian context is not known.

What does this paper add? This paper suggests that implementing a coronary heart disease program in Australia is highly cost-effective across a broad range of assumptions of uptake and effectiveness.

What are the implications for practitioners?  These data provide the economic rationale for the implementation of a chronic disease management program with a disease registry and regular review in Australia.

Additional keywords: coronary heart disease management programs, coronary heart disease prevention.


Acknowledgements

This work was overseen by the National Heart Foundation of Australia CHD-GP Working Group. Members of the Working Group are as follows: Andrew Boyden (National Heart Foundation of Australia); Robert Carter (University of Melbourne); Derek Chew (Flinders University); Andrew Dalton (University of Melbourne, Adhealth); Helen Egan (National Heart Foundation of Australia); Lisa Gold (La Trobe University); Nancy Huang (National Heart Foundation of Australia); Jeanie McKenzie (National Heart Foundation of Australia); Bree Rankin (University of Melbourne); Anthony Scott (University of Melbourne); and Shiong Tan (General Practice and WA Health). We also acknowledge Peter Sexton and Eleanor Clune who reviewed and provided comments on this paper.


References


[1] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of death, Australia, 2007. Cat. no. 3303.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2009.

[2] Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002; 324 71–86.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 21 September 2006].

[14] Begg S , Vos T , Barker B , Stevenson C , Stanley L , Lopez AD . The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. PHE 82. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007.

[15] Steg PG,  López-Sendón J,  Lopez de Sa E,  Goodman SG,  Gore JM,  Anderson FA,  Himbert D,  Allegrone J,  Van de Werf F. External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 68–73.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[16] Vale MJ,  Jelinek MV,  Best JD. How many patients with coronary heart disease are not achieving their risk-factor targets? Experience in Victoria 1996–1998 versus 1999–2000. Med J Aust 2002; 176 211–5.
PubMed |

[17] Yusuf S,  Reddy S,  Ounpuu S,  Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001; 104 2746–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

[18] Miller DT,  Ridker PM,  Libby P,  Kwiatkowski DJ. Atherosclerosis: the path from genomics to therapeutics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49 1589–99.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

[19] Barile L,  Chimenti I,  Gaetani R,  Forte E,  Miraldi F,  Frati G,  Messina E,  Giacomello A. Cardiac stem cells: isolation, expansion and experimental use for myocardial regeneration. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007; 4(Suppl. 1): S9–14.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | CAS |

[20] Yusuf S,  Hawken S,  Ounpuu S,  Dans T,  Avezum A,  Lanas F,  McQueen M,  Budaj A,  Pais P,  Varigos J,  Lisheng L. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364 937–52.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[21] Vasan RS,  Sullivan LM,  Wilson PWF,  Sempos CT,  Sundström J,  Kannel WB,  Levy D,  D’Agostino RB. Relative importance of borderline and elevated levels of coronary heart disease risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142 393–402.
PubMed |

[22] Vale MJ,  Jelinek MV,  Best JD,  Dart AM,  Grigg LE,  Hare DL,  Ho BP,  Newman RW,  McNeil JJ. Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH): a multicenter randomized trial in patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 2775–83.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[23] Simons LA,  Ortiz M,  Calcino G. Persistence with antihypertensive medication: Australia-wide experience, 2004–2006. Med J Aust 2008; 188(4): 224–7.
PubMed |

[24] Redfern J,  Ellis E,  Briffa T,  Freedman SB. Modular prevention of heart disease following Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2006; 6 26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[25] Briffa TG,  Eckermann SD,  Griffiths AD,  Harris PJ,  Heath MR,  Freedman SB,  Donaldson LT,  Briffa NK,  Keech AC. Cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after an acute coronary event: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2005; 183(9): 450–5.
PubMed |

[26] Buxton M,  Caine N,  Chase D,  Connelly D,  Grace A,  Jackson C,  Parkes J,  Sharples L. A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(27): 1–164.
PubMed |

[27] Lord SJ,  Howard K,  Allen F,  Marinovich L,  Burgess DC,  King R,  Atherton JL. A systematic review and economic analysis of drug-eluting coronary stents available in Australia. Med J Aust 2005; 183 464–71.
PubMed |

[28] Britt H , Miller GC , Knox S , Charles J , Pan Y , Henderson J , Bayram C , Valenti L , Ng A , O’Halloran J . General practice activity in Australia 2004–05. General Practice Series no. 18. AIHW cat no. GEP18. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2005.