Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:34:16.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The CATCH Kids Club: a pilot after-school study for improving elementary students’ nutrition and physical activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Steve Kelder*
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Deanna M Hoelscher
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Cristina S Barroso
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Joey L Walker
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Peter Cribb
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Shaohua Hu
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, 7000 Fannin *2658, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email Steven.H.Kelder@uth.tmc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Although many school-based diet and physical activity interventions have been designed and evaluated, relatively few have been tested for the after-school setting. After-school day-care programmes at either elementary schools or private locations provide a ready-made opportunity for health programmes that may be difficult to incorporate into an already-full school day. The purpose of this paper is to report on a pilot study of an after-school adaptation of the CATCH (Coordinated Approach To Child Health) elementary school programme called the CATCH Kids Club (CKC).

Methods

The CKC was pilot-tested and formatively evaluated in 16 Texas after-school programmes: eight in El Paso and eight in Austin (four intervention and four reference sites each). Evaluation consisted of direct observation of moderate to vigorous physical activity during play time, self-reported food intake and physical activity, and focus group interviews with after-school programme staff.

Results

Students responded well to the physical activity and snack components and were less interested in the five-module education component. Routine staff training was a key variable in achieving proper implementation; the ideal would be a full day with repeated follow-up model teaching visits. Staff turnover was a logistic issue, as was programme leader readiness and interest in conducting the programme. Strong and significant effects were observed for the physical activity but not for the education component. The results of the physical education component suggest it is feasible, effective and ready for larger-scale evaluation or dissemination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Colchico, K, Zybert, P, Basch, CE. Effects of after school physical activity on fitness, fatness, and cognitive self-perceptions: a pilot study among urban, minority adolescent girls. American Journal of Public Health 2000; 90(6): 977–8.Google ScholarPubMed
2Obarzanek, E, Pratt, CA. Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS): new approaches to obesity prevention among young African-American girls. Ethnicity & Disease 2003; 13(Suppl. 1): S1–5.Google ScholarPubMed
3Hoelscher, DM, Mitchell, PD, Dwyer, J, Elder, JP, Snyder, P. How the CATCH Eat Smart Programs helps implement the USDA regulations in school cafeterias. Health Education & Behavior 2003; 30(4): 434–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Kelder, SH, Mitchell, PD, McKenzie, TL, Derby, C, Strikmiller, PK, Luepker, RV, et al. Long-term implementation of the CATCH physical education program. Health Education & Behavior 2003; 30(4): 463–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Parcel, GS, Perry, CL, Kelder, SH, Elder, JP, Mitchell, PD, Lytle, LA, et al. School climate and the institutionalization of the CATCH program. Health Education & Behavior 2003; 30(4): 489502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Kolbe, LJ, Kann, L, Brener, ND. Overview and summary of findings: School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000. Journal of School Health 2001; 71(7): 253–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Pride, . Questionnaire Report: 1996–1997 National Summary, Grades 6–12. Atlanta, GA: Pride, 1997.Google Scholar
8Luepker, RV, Perry, CL, McKinlay, SM, Nader, PR, Parcel, GS, Stone, EJ, et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Journal of the American Medical Association 1996; 275(10): 768–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Nader, P, Stone, EJ, Lytle, LA, Perry, CL, Osganian, SK, Kelder, SH, et al. Three year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 1999; 153(7): 695704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Perry, CL, Stone, EJ, Parcel, GS, Ellison, RC, Nader, PR, Webber, LS, et al. School-based cardiovascular health promotion: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Journal of School Health 1990; 60(8): 406–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Zucker, DM, Lakatos, E, Webber, LS, Murray, DM, McKinlay, SM, Feldman, HA, et al. Statistical design of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH): implications of cluster randomization. Controlled Clinical Trials 1995; 16(2): 96118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Hoelscher, DM, Day, RS, Lee, ES, Frankowski, RF, Kelder, SH, Ward, JL, et al. Measuring the prevalence of overweight in Texas school children. American Journal of Public Health 2004; 94(6): 1002–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hoelscher, D, Kelder, SH, Murray, N, Cribb, P, Conroy, , Parcel, P. Dissemination and adoption of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH): a case study in Texas. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2001; 7(2): 90100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
15McKenzie, TL, Nader, PR, Strikmiller, PK, Yang, M, Stone, EJ, Taylor, WC, et al. School physical education: effect of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Preventive Medicine 1996; 25(4): 423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16McKenzie, TL, Feldman, H, Woods, SE, Romero, KA, Dahlstrom, V, Stone, EJ, et al. Children's activity levels and lesson context during third-grade physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1995; 66(3): 184–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17McKenzie, TL, Strikmiller, PK, Stone, EJ, Woods, SE, Ehlinger, SS, Romero, KA, et al. CATCH: physical activity process evaluation in a multicenter trial. Health Education Quarterly 1994; (Suppl. 2): S73S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Sallis, JF, McKenzie, TL, Alcaraz, JE, Kolody, B, Faucetter, N, Roby, J, et al. The effects of a two-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports Play Active Recreation for Kids. American Journal of Public Health 1997; 87(8): 1328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19McKenzie, TL, Sallis, JF, Faucette, N, Roby, JJ, Kolody, B. Effects of a curriculum and inservice program on the quantity and quality of elementary physical education classes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1993; 64(2): 178–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Edmundson, E, Parcel, GS, Feldman, HA, Elder, J, Perry, CL, Johnson, CC, et al. The effects of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health upon psychological determinants of diet and physical activity behavior. Preventive Medicine 1996; 25(4): 442–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Edmundson, E, Parcel, GS, Perry, CL, Feldman, HA, Smyth, M, Johnson, CC, et al. The effects of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health intervention on psychosocial determinants of cardiovascular disease risk behavior among third-grade students. American Journal of Health Promotion 1996; 10: 217–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Hoelscher, DM, Day, RS, Kelder, SH, Ward, JL. Reproducibility and validity of the secondary level School-Based Nutrition Monitoring student questionnaire. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2003; 103(2): 186–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Little, RJ, Wang, Y. Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates. Biometrics 1996; 52(1): 98111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Murray, DM. Design and Analysis of Group-randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google ScholarPubMed
25US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 11 2000.Google Scholar
26Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.Google Scholar
27Kolbe, LJ. Education reform and the goals of modern school health programs. The State Education Standard 2002; (Autumn): 411.Google Scholar
28Osganian, SK, Hoelscher, DM, Zive, M, Mitchell, PD, Snyder, P, Webber, LS. Maintenance of effects of the Eat Smart School Food Service Program: results from the CATCH-ON Study. Health Education & Behavior 2003; 3(4): 418–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar