Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T05:48:48.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the ‘new worlds’ of (late?) retirement in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Dirk Hofäcker  and
Marge Unt
Dirk Hofäcker*
Affiliation:
Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES), University of Mannheim, Department A: European Societies and their Integration, Mannheim, Germany
Marge Unt
Affiliation:
Institute of International and Social Studies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: dirk.hofaecker@uni-due.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After a long period of promoting early retirement, European societies have recently started to implement various reforms aimed at fostering a longer working life. Yet cross-national variations in older workers' employment remain, as institutional path dependency, socio-economic climate and persistent retirement culture have not allowed all countries to implement reforms to the same degree. In our paper, we provide an up-to-date international overview of country-specific contexts that support or hinder the employment of older workers in European countries. To this end, we use information on labour market, pension, and welfare policies that affect older workers' employment opportunities and retirement decisions. Adding to previous research, we contrast these “structural” indicators with selected “cultural” evidence from the European Survey data (Eurobarometer, European Social Survey) reflecting recent trends in retirement-related attitudes, perceptions and preferences. The available data allow for an unusually broad geographical scope, encompassing both Western European and Eastern European societies. Using these data, we perform a hierarchical cluster analysis to identify the specific types of “retirement regimes”. Finally, we relate these “new worlds of retirement” to the differentiation of “early” versus “late” exit regimes suggested by earlier literature to identify the forerunners and laggards in the gradual transition towards later retirement in Europe.

Keywords

retirementlabour marketpensionsenlarged Europeactive ageingwelfare regime
Type
Research Notes
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 163 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, L. J. M., & de Jong, P. R. (1996). Evaluating the 1987 and 1993 social welfare reforms: From disappointment to potential success. In Aarts, L. J. M., Burkhauser, R. V., & de Jong, P. R. (Eds.), Curing the Dutch disease: An international perspective on disability policy reform (pp. 47–69). Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Abrams, D., Vauclair, C.-M., & Swift, H. (2011). Predictors of attitudes to age across Europe. Research Report No 735. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 44, Beverly Hills et al: Sage.Google Scholar
Banks, J., & Smith, S. (2006). Retirement in the UK. CMPO Working Paper 06/140. Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation.Google Scholar
Blöndal, S., & Scarpetta, S. (1999). The Retirement Decision in OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 202. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, H. P.-P., Buchholz, S., & Hofäcker, D. (Eds.). (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and late careers in society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, H. P., Buchholz, S., & Kurz, K. (Eds.). (2011). Aging populations, globalization and the labor market: Comparing late working life and retirement in modern societies. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Borchert, J. (1998). Ausgetretene Pfade? Zur Statik und Dynamik wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Regime. In Lessenich, S. & Ostner, I. (Eds.), Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus (pp. 137–176). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P., & Meyer, T. (2010). Britain: Exhausted voluntarism? The evolution of a hybrid pension regime. In Ebbinghaus, B. (Ed.), The varieties of pension governance: Pension privatization in Europe (pp. 265–291). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Buchholz, S. (2008). Die Flexibilisierung des Erwerbsverlaufs. Eine Analyse von Einstiegs- und Ausstiegsprozessen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Casey, B. H. (2012). The implications of the economic crisis for pensions and pension policy in Europe. Global Social Policy, 12(3), 246–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, W., & Himmelreicher, R. K. (2008). Erwerbsverlauf, Qualifikation und Rentenzugangsverhalten - Eine Analyse mit Daten des Forschungsdatenzentrums der Rentenversicherung [Employment biography, qualifications and retirement behaviour – an analysis based on data from the Research data archive of the German Pension Fund]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 41(5), 352–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conen, W. S., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2012). Employers’ attitudes and actions towards the extension of working lives in Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 33(6), 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, D., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2010). ‘Voluntary’ and ‘involuntary’ early retirement: An international analysis. Applied Economics, 42(4), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (2006). Reforming early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (2008). Comparative regime analysis: Early exit from work in Europe, Japan, and the USA. In Kenworthy, L. & Hicks, A. (Eds.), Method and substance in macrocomparative analysis (pp. 260–289). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B., & Hofäcker, D. (in press). Reversing early retirement in advanced welfare economies: Overcoming push and pull factors. Comparative Population Studies.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. (2012). Late careers in Europe: Effects of individual and institutional factors. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 550–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H., & Schmidt, C. (2011). Late careers and socio-economic structures in Europe. Chair of Population Studies Discussion Paper 10/2011. University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: University Press. 1999.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2011). Demography Report 2010: Older, more numerous and diverse Europeans [Commission Staff working Document]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2012). Employment policies to promote active ageing 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Employment Observatory. (2012). Employment Policies to Promote Active Ageing. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Parliament and Council. (2011). Decision No 940/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2011 on the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations (2012). Official Journal of the European Union from Sep 23, 2011, L 246/5–246/10.Google Scholar
Frey, M. (2010). The legal and institutional environment of the Hungarian Labour Market. In Fazekas, K., Lovász, A., & Telegdy, Á. (Eds.), The Hungarian labour market: Review and analysis 2010 (pp. 179–223). Budapest: Institute of Economics (IE HAS) and National Employment Foundation.Google Scholar
Gesthuizen, M., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2011). Late career instability and the transition into retirement of older workers in the Netherlands. In Blossfeld, H. P., Buchholz, S., & Kurz, K. (Eds.), Aging populations, globalization and the labor market: Comparing late working life and retirement in modern societies (pp. 65–89). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2001). Social assistance regimes: A cluster analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(2), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J., & Wise, D. A. (Eds.). (1999). Social security and retirement around the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, J., & Wise, D. A. (Eds.). (2004). Social security programs and retirement around the world: Micro estimation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guillemard, A.-M. (1991). Die Destandardisierung des Lebenslaufs in den westlichen Wohlfahrtssaaten. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 37(2), 620–639.Google Scholar
Guillemard, A.-M. (2003). France: Struggling to find a way out of the early exit culture. Geneva Papers on Risk and insurance, 28(4), 558–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (Hg.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofäcker, D. (2010). Older workers under Globalization: An international comparison of retirement and late-career patterns among older workers in Western industrialized countries. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofäcker, D., & Pollnerová, Š. (2006). Late careers and career exits. An international comparison of trends and institutional background patterns. In Blossfeld, H.-P., Buchholz, S., & Hofäcker, D. (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty, and late careers in society (pp. 25–53). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hofäcker, D., Schröder, H., Li, Y., & Flynn, M. (2013). Trends and determinants of work-retirement transitions in Germany, England and Japan. Paper prepared for the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management – August 9–13, 2013 – Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, C., & Edlund, J. (2008). Age and labour market commitment in West Germany, Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Work, Employment and Society, 22, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, C., & Svallfors, S. (2002). Production regimes and work orientations: A comparison of six Western countries'. European Sociological Review, 18(3), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itzin, C., & Phillipson, C. (1993). Age barriers at work: Maximising the potential of mature and older people. Solihull, Warwickshire: Metropolitan Authorities Recruitment Agency.Google Scholar
Jepsen, M., Foden, D., & Hutsebaut, M. (Eds.). (2002). Active strategies for older workers. Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
Kohli, M., Rein, M., Guillemard, A.-M., & van Gunsteren, H. (Eds.). (1991). Time for retirement: Comparative studies on early exit from the labor force. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lisiankova, K., & Wright, R. E. (2005). Demographic change and the European Union labour market. National Institute Economic Review, 194(1), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, T., De Vroom, B., Mirabile, M. L., & Øverbye, E. (Eds.). (2004). Ageing and the transition to retirement. A comparative analysis of European welfare states. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
MISSOC. (2012). Mutual Information System on Social Protection/Social Security: Comparative Tables. Retrieved September 1, 2012, from http://www.missoc.org/MISSOC/INFORMATIONBASE/COMPARATIVETABLES/MISSOCDATABASE/comparativeTableSearch.jspGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2013). OEDC Labour Market Statistics. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from stats.oecd.org/Google Scholar
Rieger, E. (1998). Soziologische Theorie und Sozialpolitik im entwickelten Wohlfahrtsstaat. In Lessenich, S. & Ostner, I. (Eds.), Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus (pp. 59–89). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Saar, E., Täht, K., & Unt, M. (2011). Late careers and labour market exit to retirement. In Saar, E. (Ed.), Towards a normal stratification order: Actual and perceived social stratification in post-socialist Estonia (pp. 143–176). Peter Lang Publishers House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Arnaud, S., & Bernard, P. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51(5), 499–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, H., Hofäcker, D., & Müller-Camen, M. (2009). HRM and the employment of older workers: Germany and Britain compared. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Development, 9(2), 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skugor, D., & Bekker, S. (2012). EEO Review ‘Employment policies to promote active ageing’: Belgium. Retrieved May 4, 2012, from http://www.eu-employment-observatory.net/explore.aspx?document=1247Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (2003). Older workers, employer behaviour and public policy. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 28(4), 553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Solinge, H., & Henkens, K. (2010). Living longer, working longer? The impact of subjective life expectancy on retirement intentions and behavior. European Journal of Public Health, 20(1), 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. (2009). Commentary: The emergence and application of active ageing in Europe. Journal of Ageing and Social Policy, 21(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, A., & Maltby, T. (2012). Active ageing: A strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(s1), S117–S130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, C. (2009). Mapping European Healthcare Systems. A comparative analysis of financing, service provision, and access to healthcare. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(5), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (2001). ISSP 1997: Work Orientations II [Codebook]. Cologne: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar