- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
P. Miller, J. R. F. Gladman, A. L. Cunliffe, S. L. Husbands, M. E. Dewey, R. H. Harwood, Economic analysis of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people, Age and Ageing, Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2005, Pages 274–280, https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afi058
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Objective: to measure the cost-effectiveness of an early discharge and rehabilitation service (EDRS) in Nottingham, UK.
Design: data were collected during a randomised controlled trial.
Methods: cost and cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted from the perspective of service providers (health and social services) over a period of 12 months. Resource variables included were the EDRS intervention, the initial acute hospital admission (from randomisation), readmission to hospital, hospital outpatient visits, stays in nursing and residential homes, general practitioner contact, community health services and social services. The effectiveness measure was the EuroQol EQ-5D score, from which quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were calculated. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as cost per QALY gained.
Results: at 12 months the mean untransformed total cost for the EDRS was £8,361 compared to £10,088 for usual care, a saving of £1,727 (P = 0.05). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed a high probability that the EDRS was cost effective across a range of monetary values for a QALY.
Conclusions: the Nottingham EDRS was likely to be more cost effective than usual care.
Comments