Abstract

A number of studies have investigated two common polymorphisms in the β2-adrenoceptor gene, Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27, in relation to asthma susceptibility. The authors performed a meta-analysis of each polymorphism, as well as haplotype analysis, for adult and pediatric populations separately, using published data, supplemented by additional data requested from the original authors. Individual analysis detected no effect of Arg/Gly16 in adults but did suggest a recessive protective effect of Gly16 for children, with an odds ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53, 0.96) compared with the other genotypes. Results for Gln/Glu27 in adults seem to indicate that heterozygotes are at decreased risk of asthma than either homozygote (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.87), although the studies are heterogeneous; in children, the Glu/Glu genotype has a decreased risk of asthma (odds ratio = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.99) compared with the other genotypes. Despite the proximity of these two polymorphic sites, the linkage disequilibrium coefficient of 0.41 was not high (p < 0.001). Haplotype analysis suggests that there may be an interaction between the two sites, with a lower risk of asthma associated with the Glu27 allele (compared with Gln27), and that this risk is modified by the allele at position 16.

One of the main thrusts of genetic epidemiology is to understand the genetic contribution to complex diseases such as cardiac disease, diabetes, and asthma. One of the most popular study designs in this area is a molecular association study in which a polymorphism is linked to the disease outcome, either in cases and controls or in a cohort. These studies are often limited by small sample sizes (1), so there is a role for meta-analysis in pooling these studies, particularly to detect the small effect sizes that may be associated with these polymorphisms.

The β2-adrenoceptor gene is a key gene to study in asthma. β2-Adrenoceptors are present on many airway cells, including smooth muscle cells which are hyperreactive in asthma, and β2-adrenoceptor agonists form a major treatment class in asthma. Functional polymorphisms of this gene may influence both disease susceptibility and treatment response in asthma.

A number of studies have investigated polymorphisms in the β2-adrenoceptor gene in relation to asthma. Two common polymorphisms are Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27; in the former polymorphism, glycine is substituted for arginine at codon 16 (Arg16→Gly) and, in the latter, glutamic acid is substituted for glutamine at codon 27 (Gln27→Glu) (2, 3). In vitro studies indicate that the Gly16 allele enhances agonist-induced down regulation of the receptor, whereas the Glu27 allele enhances resistance to down regulation (4, 5). It is plausible that these differences in receptor regulation influence the reactivity of airway smooth muscle in response to airway inflammation and thereby alter the risk of asthma. However, epidemiologic studies have yielded conflicting results, with the direction of the effects not always congruent with the in vitro results. Several narrative reviews of these two polymorphisms and asthma (46) have been conducted; however, neither a magnitude nor a mode of gene effect was provided in these reviews. Furthermore, new studies that examine this association have been reported since those reviews, and there have been new developments in the methodology of meta-analysis of genetic studies (1, 7, 8). We therefore performed a systematic review of the association between Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 and asthma with the following objectives: first, to estimate allele frequencies; second, to ascertain if there is an effect of these polymorphisms on asthma susceptibility, and if so to estimate the magnitude of that effect and the possible mode of inheritance (1, 7, 8); third, to determine linkage disequilibrium between these two polymorphisms; and fourth, to infer haplotypes of these polymorphisms and link them with asthma susceptibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search strategy

Embase and Medline databases (from January 1966 to March 2004) were searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Ovid search engines. The search strategy for allele frequency was as follows: beta2* AND prevalence AND gene. The search strategy for association between gene polymorphisms and asthma was the following: asthma AND (beta receptor or beta-2 or adrenoceptor) AND (polymorph* or mutation* or variant* or genotype*). Searching was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers (A. T. and M. M.).

Inclusion criteria

For allele frequency, any human studies that estimated the prevalence of β2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms at codon 16 (Arg/Gly16) and/or codon 27 (Gln/Glu27) and reported on ethnically homogeneous populations were included, regardless of size. For assessing association, human studies, regardless of sample size, were included if they met the following criteria:The reference lists of the articles retrieved were also reviewed to identify publications on the same topic. The most complete and recent results were used where there were multiple publications from the same study group.

  • β2-Adrenoceptor polymorphisms at codon 16 (Arg/Gly16) and/or codon 27 (Gln/Glu27) were determined. The wild-type alleles for these two polymorphisms were Arg and Gln, respectively.

  • The outcome was asthma (incident or prevalent), and there were at least two comparison groups, for example, asthma versus control (nonasthma) groups.

  • Participants could be either children or adults, but results should be reported separately.

  • There were sufficient results for extraction of data, that is, number of subjects for each genotype in asthma and control groups. Where eligible papers had insufficient information, we contacted authors by e-mail for additional information.

Data extraction

Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers (A. T. and M. M.) who used a standardized data extraction form. Any disagreement was adjudicated by a third author (J. A.). Covariables, such as mean age, gender, and ethnicity, were also extracted for each study.

Quality score assessment

The quality of studies was also independently assessed by the same two reviewers who used quality assessment scores that were modified from our previous meta-analysis of molecular association studies (7) (appendix table 1). These scores were based on both traditional epidemiologic considerations and genetic issues (1). Total scores ranged from 0 (worst) to 13 (best).

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed as follows. First, the frequency of Arg16 and Gln27 alleles in various ethnic groups was estimated by the inverse variance method, as described in the Appendix.

Second, estimation of the gene effect on asthma was performed by a logistic regression approach described previously (8). In brief, the steps were as follows. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed for each study by use of the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, and only in control groups. A Q test for heterogeneity was performed separately for three odds ratios (ORs), that is, Gly/Gly versus Arg/Arg (OR1), Arg/Gly versus Arg/Arg (OR2), and Gly/Gly versus Arg/Gly (OR3) for the Arg/Gly16 polymorphism and Glu/Glu versus Gln/Gln (OR1), Gln/Glu versus Gln/Gln (OR2), and Glu/Glu versus Gln/Glu (OR3) for the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism. If there was heterogeneity on at least one of these odds ratios, the cause of heterogeneity was explored by fitting a covariable (e.g., ethnicity, age, gender, or quality score) in a meta-regression model (911). If there was no heterogeneity, logistic regression analysis with the fixed-effect model was used to determine the gene effect; otherwise, the random-effect model was used to pool. A likelihood ratio test was used to gauge whether the overall gene effect was significant. If the main effect of the genotype was statistically significant, further comparisons of OR1, OR2, and OR3 were explored. These pairwise differences were used to indicate the most appropriate genetic model as follows.

  1. If OR1 = OR3 ≠ 1 and OR2 = 1, then a recessive model is suggested.

  2. If OR1 = OR2 ≠ 1 and OR3 = 1, then a dominant model is suggested.

  3. If OR2 = 1/OR3 ≠ 1 and OR1 = 1, then a complete overdominant model is suggested (also referred to as a “homozygous model” or “heterosis”).

  4. If OR1 > OR2 > 1 and OR1 > OR3 > 1 (or OR1 < OR2 < 1 and OR1 < OR3 < 1), then a codominant model is suggested.

Third, the gene effect was estimated by use of a newer, “parsimonious” approach detailed elsewhere (C. Minelli et al., University of Leicester, unpublished manuscript). In brief, this approach summarizes the genetic model in terms of a parameter lambda (λ), which is the ratio between log(OR1) (Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln) and log(OR2) (Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln). This parameter, which represents the heterozygote effect as a proportion of the homozygote variant effect, captures information about the genetic mode of action as follows: a recessive model if λ = 0, a dominant model if λ = 1, a codominant model if λ = 0.5, and homozygous or overdominant if λ is greater than 1 or less than 0. The two log odds ratios are modeled as either fixed or random effects, as described in the second statistical analysis enumerated above.

Once the best genetic model is identified, this model is used to collapse the three genotypes into two groups (except in the case of a codominant model) and to pool the results again. Sensitivity analyses were performed by including or excluding studies not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Fourth, with haplotype analysis, the haplotype frequencies of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms were inferred using the expectation-maximization algorithm (12). The odds ratio was then estimated by use of the profile likelihood. The linkage disequilibrium coefficient was then estimated (13). The likelihood ratio test was used to test whether the linkage disequilibrium was significant.

All analyses were performed using Stata software, version 8.0 (14), apart from the parsimonious approach, for which WinBugs 1.4 (15) with vague prior distributions was used. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, except for tests of heterogeneity where a level of 0.10 was used.

RESULTS

For pooling allele frequency, 67 studies were identified, of which 16 (1631) reported separate information for defined ethnic groups. Fourteen studies (2, 3, 3243) retrieved from the search for gene effect were also included.

Allele frequencies

Arg allele

To estimate the pooled frequency, we used data only from control groups where a case-control design was used or from the entire group where a cohort design was used. Twenty-six studies (2, 3, 17, 18, 2022, 24, 2643) reported Arg allele frequencies (table 1), with 13 studies of Caucasian adults, three of Caucasian children, four of Black adults, six of Oriental adults, two of Oriental children, and one of Semite (Jews/Arabs) adults. Of these, six were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, leaving 12 studies of Caucasians, three of Blacks, and seven of Orientals for pooling.

TABLE 1.

Estimation of the pooled prevalence of the Arg allele


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Arg allele frequency (no.)

% with Arg allele
Caucasian adults*
    Santillan (3)0.071,20852043
    Barr (2)0.5027416460
    Holloway (32)0.301827340
    Dewar (33)0.321,26848939
    Arnaiz (34)0.021024241
    Reihsaus (35)0.041123027
    Hakonarson (36)0.7536212735
    Rosmond (17)<0.00153423845
    Dallongeville (20)0.532,25885738
    Tang (21)0.062489538
    Aynacioglu (22)0.842088440
    Weir (30)1.0016810261
    Xie (31)<0.05†37617246
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.9053820638
    Binaei (38)0.1331013544
    Hopes (39)0.1283827933
Black adults
    Kotanko (18)<0.051626333
    Tang (21)0.5128614450
    Candy (24)0.3724611948
    Xie (31)1.0024612049
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)0.5027214051
    Sugaya (26)<0.0541416540
    Chang (27)0.1126013753
    Kim (28)0.3717811565
    Iwamoto (29)0.7123811548
    Xie (31)0.6920812259
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)0.481408158
    Lin (40)0.0629818261
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)
0.45
222
101
45.5

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Arg allele frequency (no.)

% with Arg allele
Caucasian adults*
    Santillan (3)0.071,20852043
    Barr (2)0.5027416460
    Holloway (32)0.301827340
    Dewar (33)0.321,26848939
    Arnaiz (34)0.021024241
    Reihsaus (35)0.041123027
    Hakonarson (36)0.7536212735
    Rosmond (17)<0.00153423845
    Dallongeville (20)0.532,25885738
    Tang (21)0.062489538
    Aynacioglu (22)0.842088440
    Weir (30)1.0016810261
    Xie (31)<0.05†37617246
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.9053820638
    Binaei (38)0.1331013544
    Hopes (39)0.1283827933
Black adults
    Kotanko (18)<0.051626333
    Tang (21)0.5128614450
    Candy (24)0.3724611948
    Xie (31)1.0024612049
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)0.5027214051
    Sugaya (26)<0.0541416540
    Chang (27)0.1126013753
    Kim (28)0.3717811565
    Iwamoto (29)0.7123811548
    Xie (31)0.6920812259
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)0.481408158
    Lin (40)0.0629818261
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)
0.45
222
101
45.5
*

Pooled prevalence (%): 42 (95% confidence interval (CI): 38.4, 45.7).

Not included in pooled prevalence.

Pooled prevalence: 49.2 (95% CI: 45.7, 52.7).

§

Pooled prevalence: 56.2 (95% CI: 51.9, 60.6).

TABLE 1.

Estimation of the pooled prevalence of the Arg allele


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Arg allele frequency (no.)

% with Arg allele
Caucasian adults*
    Santillan (3)0.071,20852043
    Barr (2)0.5027416460
    Holloway (32)0.301827340
    Dewar (33)0.321,26848939
    Arnaiz (34)0.021024241
    Reihsaus (35)0.041123027
    Hakonarson (36)0.7536212735
    Rosmond (17)<0.00153423845
    Dallongeville (20)0.532,25885738
    Tang (21)0.062489538
    Aynacioglu (22)0.842088440
    Weir (30)1.0016810261
    Xie (31)<0.05†37617246
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.9053820638
    Binaei (38)0.1331013544
    Hopes (39)0.1283827933
Black adults
    Kotanko (18)<0.051626333
    Tang (21)0.5128614450
    Candy (24)0.3724611948
    Xie (31)1.0024612049
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)0.5027214051
    Sugaya (26)<0.0541416540
    Chang (27)0.1126013753
    Kim (28)0.3717811565
    Iwamoto (29)0.7123811548
    Xie (31)0.6920812259
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)0.481408158
    Lin (40)0.0629818261
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)
0.45
222
101
45.5

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Arg allele frequency (no.)

% with Arg allele
Caucasian adults*
    Santillan (3)0.071,20852043
    Barr (2)0.5027416460
    Holloway (32)0.301827340
    Dewar (33)0.321,26848939
    Arnaiz (34)0.021024241
    Reihsaus (35)0.041123027
    Hakonarson (36)0.7536212735
    Rosmond (17)<0.00153423845
    Dallongeville (20)0.532,25885738
    Tang (21)0.062489538
    Aynacioglu (22)0.842088440
    Weir (30)1.0016810261
    Xie (31)<0.05†37617246
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.9053820638
    Binaei (38)0.1331013544
    Hopes (39)0.1283827933
Black adults
    Kotanko (18)<0.051626333
    Tang (21)0.5128614450
    Candy (24)0.3724611948
    Xie (31)1.0024612049
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)0.5027214051
    Sugaya (26)<0.0541416540
    Chang (27)0.1126013753
    Kim (28)0.3717811565
    Iwamoto (29)0.7123811548
    Xie (31)0.6920812259
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)0.481408158
    Lin (40)0.0629818261
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)
0.45
222
101
45.5
*

Pooled prevalence (%): 42 (95% confidence interval (CI): 38.4, 45.7).

Not included in pooled prevalence.

Pooled prevalence: 49.2 (95% CI: 45.7, 52.7).

§

Pooled prevalence: 56.2 (95% CI: 51.9, 60.6).

There was heterogeneity among the 12 Caucasian studies (

\({\chi}_{11}^{2}{=}109.96,\)
p < 0.001). The pooled frequency using the random effects model was 42.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval (CI): 38.4, 45.7). The pooled frequency among Blacks was 49.2 percent (95 percent CI: 45.7, 52.7), and this estimate was homogeneous (
\({\chi}_{2}^{2}{=}0.24,\)
p = 0.89). There was heterogeneity among Oriental studies (
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}18.79,\)
p = 0.01), and the pooled frequency was 56.2 percent (95 percent CI: 51.9, 60.6).

Gln allele

Twenty-six studies (3, 16, 17, 19, 20, 2225, 2743) reported the frequency of the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism, 12 studies of Caucasian adults, three of Caucasian children, three of Black adults, seven of Oriental adults, two of Oriental children, one of Jewish adults, and one of Polynesian adults (table 2). Three studies, all of Caucasians, did not observe Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and were not included in pooling.

TABLE 2.

Estimation of the pooled prevalence of the Gln allele


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Gln allele frequency (no.)

% with Gln allele
Caucasian adults*
    Arnaiz (34)<0.051025453
    Santillan (3)0.121,20897281
    Holloway (32)0.1318210759
    Dewar (33)0.581,26065652
    Reihsaus (35)0.191125751
    Hakonarson (36)0.0939820852
    Rosmond (17)0.4553231445
    Heckbert (19)0.818,8825,06957
    Dallongeville (20)<0.0012,9821,32144
    Aynacioglu (22)0.8120814268
    Weir (30)1.001689054
    Xie (31)0.0637624565
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.6953834364
    Hopes (39)0.3883843352
    Binaei (38)<0.0531025081
Black adults
    Heckbert (19)0.641,6161,31581
    Candy (24)0.7524620483
    Xie (31)0.7824619579
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)1.0027224891
    Kawamura (16)0.1683877292
    Kahara (23)1.0024823394
    Chang (27)0.5526024092
    Kim (28)0.5917615689
    Iwamoto (29)1.0023822193
    Xie (31)1.0020819393
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)1.0014012589
    Lin (40)1.0029826790
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)0.6621815069
Polynesian
    Duarte (25)
0.51
2,044
1,944
95

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Gln allele frequency (no.)

% with Gln allele
Caucasian adults*
    Arnaiz (34)<0.051025453
    Santillan (3)0.121,20897281
    Holloway (32)0.1318210759
    Dewar (33)0.581,26065652
    Reihsaus (35)0.191125751
    Hakonarson (36)0.0939820852
    Rosmond (17)0.4553231445
    Heckbert (19)0.818,8825,06957
    Dallongeville (20)<0.0012,9821,32144
    Aynacioglu (22)0.8120814268
    Weir (30)1.001689054
    Xie (31)0.0637624565
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.6953834364
    Hopes (39)0.3883843352
    Binaei (38)<0.0531025081
Black adults
    Heckbert (19)0.641,6161,31581
    Candy (24)0.7524620483
    Xie (31)0.7824619579
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)1.0027224891
    Kawamura (16)0.1683877292
    Kahara (23)1.0024823394
    Chang (27)0.5526024092
    Kim (28)0.5917615689
    Iwamoto (29)1.0023822193
    Xie (31)1.0020819393
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)1.0014012589
    Lin (40)1.0029826790
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)0.6621815069
Polynesian
    Duarte (25)
0.51
2,044
1,944
95
*

Pooled prevalence (%): 59.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6, 65.6).

Not included in pooled prevalence.

Pooled prevalence: 81.3 (95% CI: 79.7, 83.0).

§

Pooled prevalence: 91.9 (95% CI: 90.9, 92.9).

TABLE 2.

Estimation of the pooled prevalence of the Gln allele


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Gln allele frequency (no.)

% with Gln allele
Caucasian adults*
    Arnaiz (34)<0.051025453
    Santillan (3)0.121,20897281
    Holloway (32)0.1318210759
    Dewar (33)0.581,26065652
    Reihsaus (35)0.191125751
    Hakonarson (36)0.0939820852
    Rosmond (17)0.4553231445
    Heckbert (19)0.818,8825,06957
    Dallongeville (20)<0.0012,9821,32144
    Aynacioglu (22)0.8120814268
    Weir (30)1.001689054
    Xie (31)0.0637624565
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.6953834364
    Hopes (39)0.3883843352
    Binaei (38)<0.0531025081
Black adults
    Heckbert (19)0.641,6161,31581
    Candy (24)0.7524620483
    Xie (31)0.7824619579
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)1.0027224891
    Kawamura (16)0.1683877292
    Kahara (23)1.0024823394
    Chang (27)0.5526024092
    Kim (28)0.5917615689
    Iwamoto (29)1.0023822193
    Xie (31)1.0020819393
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)1.0014012589
    Lin (40)1.0029826790
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)0.6621815069
Polynesian
    Duarte (25)
0.51
2,044
1,944
95

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p value)

Total no.

Gln allele frequency (no.)

% with Gln allele
Caucasian adults*
    Arnaiz (34)<0.051025453
    Santillan (3)0.121,20897281
    Holloway (32)0.1318210759
    Dewar (33)0.581,26065652
    Reihsaus (35)0.191125751
    Hakonarson (36)0.0939820852
    Rosmond (17)0.4553231445
    Heckbert (19)0.818,8825,06957
    Dallongeville (20)<0.0012,9821,32144
    Aynacioglu (22)0.8120814268
    Weir (30)1.001689054
    Xie (31)0.0637624565
Caucasian children*
    Martinez (37)0.6953834364
    Hopes (39)0.3883843352
    Binaei (38)<0.0531025081
Black adults
    Heckbert (19)0.641,6161,31581
    Candy (24)0.7524620483
    Xie (31)0.7824619579
Oriental adults§
    Wang (42)1.0027224891
    Kawamura (16)0.1683877292
    Kahara (23)1.0024823394
    Chang (27)0.5526024092
    Kim (28)0.5917615689
    Iwamoto (29)1.0023822193
    Xie (31)1.0020819393
Oriental children§
    Leung (41)1.0014012589
    Lin (40)1.0029826790
Jewish/Arab adults
    Shachor (43)0.6621815069
Polynesian
    Duarte (25)
0.51
2,044
1,944
95
*

Pooled prevalence (%): 59.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.6, 65.6).

Not included in pooled prevalence.

Pooled prevalence: 81.3 (95% CI: 79.7, 83.0).

§

Pooled prevalence: 91.9 (95% CI: 90.9, 92.9).

There was heterogeneity among the 10 Caucasian studies (

\({\chi}_{9}^{2}{=}437.77,\)
p < 0.001), and the pooled frequency was 59.6 percent (95 percent CI: 53.6, 65.6). All Black studies were homogeneous (
\({\chi}_{2}^{2}{=}1.08,\)
p = 0.58), and the pooled frequency with the fixed model was 81.3 percent (95 percent CI: 79.7, 83.0). Seven Oriental studies were also homogeneous (
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}7.26,\)
p = 0.30), and the pooled frequency was 91.9 percent (95 percent CI: 90.9, 92.9).

Assessing association between gene polymorphisms and asthma

Across both Embase and Medline databases, 435 studies were identified in total, of which 113 were duplicates, leaving 322 study abstracts that were reviewed. From these, 30 studies seemed to be relevant, and therefore the full papers were retrieved. Sixteen studies were judged to have met the inclusion criteria, of which eight provided complete data in the paper. Requests for additional data on the other eight studies were made, of which four were granted. Two additional studies (36, 43) were identified by a known expert (D. D.), and the authors provided additional data. The characteristics of the adult and pediatric study populations, for example, mean age, gender, ethnicity, type of subjects, and allele frequency, are given in table 3.

TABLE 3.

General characteristics of studies included in pooling gene effects


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Year

Study design

Race

Mean age (years)

% female

Quality score
Adults
    Shachor (43)2003Case-controlJewish/Arab3853.05
    Arnaiz (34)2003CohortCaucasian281.99
    Santillan (3)2003Case-controlCaucasian37.315.013
    Barr (2)2001Case-controlCaucasian58.464.910
    Wang (42)2001Case-controlAsian33.061.713
    Hakonarson (36)2001Case-controlCaucasian47.556.36
    Holloway (32)2000Case-controlCaucasian31.454.96
    Dewar (33)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian18–70*54.06
    Reihsaus (35)1993Case-controlUnknown465
Children
    Martinez (37)1997Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.89
    Hopes (39)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.55
    Leung (41)2002Case-controlAsian10.855.05
    Binaei (38)2003Case-controlCaucasian1
    Lin (40)
2003
Cross-sectional
Asian
13.9

9

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Year

Study design

Race

Mean age (years)

% female

Quality score
Adults
    Shachor (43)2003Case-controlJewish/Arab3853.05
    Arnaiz (34)2003CohortCaucasian281.99
    Santillan (3)2003Case-controlCaucasian37.315.013
    Barr (2)2001Case-controlCaucasian58.464.910
    Wang (42)2001Case-controlAsian33.061.713
    Hakonarson (36)2001Case-controlCaucasian47.556.36
    Holloway (32)2000Case-controlCaucasian31.454.96
    Dewar (33)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian18–70*54.06
    Reihsaus (35)1993Case-controlUnknown465
Children
    Martinez (37)1997Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.89
    Hopes (39)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.55
    Leung (41)2002Case-controlAsian10.855.05
    Binaei (38)2003Case-controlCaucasian1
    Lin (40)
2003
Cross-sectional
Asian
13.9

9
*

Range.

TABLE 3.

General characteristics of studies included in pooling gene effects


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Year

Study design

Race

Mean age (years)

% female

Quality score
Adults
    Shachor (43)2003Case-controlJewish/Arab3853.05
    Arnaiz (34)2003CohortCaucasian281.99
    Santillan (3)2003Case-controlCaucasian37.315.013
    Barr (2)2001Case-controlCaucasian58.464.910
    Wang (42)2001Case-controlAsian33.061.713
    Hakonarson (36)2001Case-controlCaucasian47.556.36
    Holloway (32)2000Case-controlCaucasian31.454.96
    Dewar (33)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian18–70*54.06
    Reihsaus (35)1993Case-controlUnknown465
Children
    Martinez (37)1997Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.89
    Hopes (39)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.55
    Leung (41)2002Case-controlAsian10.855.05
    Binaei (38)2003Case-controlCaucasian1
    Lin (40)
2003
Cross-sectional
Asian
13.9

9

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Year

Study design

Race

Mean age (years)

% female

Quality score
Adults
    Shachor (43)2003Case-controlJewish/Arab3853.05
    Arnaiz (34)2003CohortCaucasian281.99
    Santillan (3)2003Case-controlCaucasian37.315.013
    Barr (2)2001Case-controlCaucasian58.464.910
    Wang (42)2001Case-controlAsian33.061.713
    Hakonarson (36)2001Case-controlCaucasian47.556.36
    Holloway (32)2000Case-controlCaucasian31.454.96
    Dewar (33)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian18–70*54.06
    Reihsaus (35)1993Case-controlUnknown465
Children
    Martinez (37)1997Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.89
    Hopes (39)1998Cross-sectionalCaucasian10.55
    Leung (41)2002Case-controlAsian10.855.05
    Binaei (38)2003Case-controlCaucasian1
    Lin (40)
2003
Cross-sectional
Asian
13.9

9
*

Range.

Arg/Gly16 polymorphism

Adult asthma.

Nine studies (2, 3, 3236, 42, 43) determined the association between Arg/Gly16 and asthma in adults (table 4). Total sample sizes for asthma and control groups were 1,331 and 1,872, respectively. Within the asthma group, the mean age was 41 (standard deviation: 11) years, and 49 percent were females. Within the control group, the mean age was 39 (standard deviation: 11) years, and 35 percent were females.

TABLE 4.

Genotype frequencies of the Arg/Gly16 polymorphism between asthma and control groups


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*1254453393791119
    Santillan (3)30345561638460443101318185
    Barr (2)1714936973813760516224
    Wang (42)1286252542213651386434
    Holloway (32)154342947789140173935
    Dewar (33)117331450535174074263180
    Reihsaus (35)*512851927562771633
    Hakonarson (36)323374515112718135218575
    Shachor (43)724613401911146255135
        Total1,3312546264511,872343909510
Children
    Martinez (37)383751815231353510888
    Leung (41)76582538137058223711
    Binaei (38)3810724715544346754
    Lin (40)80583435116957272517
    Hopes (39)102371154373173228147142
        Total
334

82
169
83
842

146
384
312

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*1254453393791119
    Santillan (3)30345561638460443101318185
    Barr (2)1714936973813760516224
    Wang (42)1286252542213651386434
    Holloway (32)154342947789140173935
    Dewar (33)117331450535174074263180
    Reihsaus (35)*512851927562771633
    Hakonarson (36)323374515112718135218575
    Shachor (43)724613401911146255135
        Total1,3312546264511,872343909510
Children
    Martinez (37)383751815231353510888
    Leung (41)76582538137058223711
    Binaei (38)3810724715544346754
    Lin (40)80583435116957272517
    Hopes (39)102371154373173228147142
        Total
334

82
169
83
842

146
384
312
*

Arnaiz and Reihsaus were not included in the pooled gene effect.

TABLE 4.

Genotype frequencies of the Arg/Gly16 polymorphism between asthma and control groups


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*1254453393791119
    Santillan (3)30345561638460443101318185
    Barr (2)1714936973813760516224
    Wang (42)1286252542213651386434
    Holloway (32)154342947789140173935
    Dewar (33)117331450535174074263180
    Reihsaus (35)*512851927562771633
    Hakonarson (36)323374515112718135218575
    Shachor (43)724613401911146255135
        Total1,3312546264511,872343909510
Children
    Martinez (37)383751815231353510888
    Leung (41)76582538137058223711
    Binaei (38)3810724715544346754
    Lin (40)80583435116957272517
    Hopes (39)102371154373173228147142
        Total
334

82
169
83
842

146
384
312

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Arg allele
Genotype (no.)
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Arg/Arg
Arg/Gly
Gly/Gly
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*1254453393791119
    Santillan (3)30345561638460443101318185
    Barr (2)1714936973813760516224
    Wang (42)1286252542213651386434
    Holloway (32)154342947789140173935
    Dewar (33)117331450535174074263180
    Reihsaus (35)*512851927562771633
    Hakonarson (36)323374515112718135218575
    Shachor (43)724613401911146255135
        Total1,3312546264511,872343909510
Children
    Martinez (37)383751815231353510888
    Leung (41)76582538137058223711
    Binaei (38)3810724715544346754
    Lin (40)80583435116957272517
    Hopes (39)102371154373173228147142
        Total
334

82
169
83
842

146
384
312
*

Arnaiz and Reihsaus were not included in the pooled gene effect.

The seven studies (2, 3, 32, 33, 36, 42, 43) that observed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were pooled. Heterogeneity was checked for OR1 (Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg), OR2 (Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg), and OR3 (Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly). Results indicated heterogeneity for OR1 and OR2 but not for OR3 (for OR1:

\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}14.14,\)
p = 0.03; for OR2:
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}13.98,\)
p = 0.03; for OR3:
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}10.38,\)
p = 0.11). Race was explored as a potential cause; however, heterogeneity was still present in all odds ratios after excluding the one study of Asians (42) and the one study of Semites (for OR1:
\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}8.85,\)
p = 0.07; for OR2:
\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}9.76,\)
p = 0.04; for OR3:
\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}7.84,\)
p = 0.10). Hence, these seven studies were pooled by use of logistic regression with the random-effects model. The overall gene effect was not significant (likelihood ratio (LR) = 0.01, p = 0.99), with the estimated OR1, OR2, and OR3 being 1.00 (95 percent CI: 0.80, 1.24), 0.99 (95 percent CI: 0.81, 1.22), and 1.01 (95 percent CI: 0.85, 1.20), respectively (table 5). Analysis using the parsimonious approach yielded very similar results: OR1 = 1.01 (95 percent CI: 0.79, 1.32), OR2 = 1.00 (95 percent CI: 0.79, 1.30), and λ = 0.15 (95 percent CI: −4.15, 4.99).

TABLE 5.

Determination of the genetic effects of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms on asthma


Genotype

Logistic regression

Model-free approach
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Arg/Gly16
    Adults
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.000.80, 1.241.010.79, 1.32
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.990.81, 1.221.000.79, 1.30
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly1.010.85, 1.20λ = 0.15−4.15, 4.99
    Children
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.750.50, 1.120.880.52, 1.20
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.080.76, 1.551.040.76, 1.54
        Gly/Gly vs.Arg/Gly0.700.51, 0.96λ = −0.16−3.85, 4.39
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg + Arg/Gly (recessive effect)0.710.53, 0.96
Gln/Glu27
    Adults
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1*)0.880.68, 1.140.970.75, 1.27
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2*)0.720.60, 0.850.880.63, 1.18
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3*)1.220.94, 1.60λ = 0.61−4.66, 5.54
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln + Glu/Glu (overdominant effect)0.730.62, 0.87
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1)0.620.36, 1.070.900.49, 1.22
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2)1.050.75, 1.481.020.76, 1.40
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3)0.590.35, 0.99λ = −0.04−3.63, 4.30
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu + Gln/Gln (recessive effect)
0.60
0.37, 1.00



Genotype

Logistic regression

Model-free approach
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Arg/Gly16
    Adults
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.000.80, 1.241.010.79, 1.32
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.990.81, 1.221.000.79, 1.30
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly1.010.85, 1.20λ = 0.15−4.15, 4.99
    Children
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.750.50, 1.120.880.52, 1.20
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.080.76, 1.551.040.76, 1.54
        Gly/Gly vs.Arg/Gly0.700.51, 0.96λ = −0.16−3.85, 4.39
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg + Arg/Gly (recessive effect)0.710.53, 0.96
Gln/Glu27
    Adults
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1*)0.880.68, 1.140.970.75, 1.27
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2*)0.720.60, 0.850.880.63, 1.18
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3*)1.220.94, 1.60λ = 0.61−4.66, 5.54
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln + Glu/Glu (overdominant effect)0.730.62, 0.87
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1)0.620.36, 1.070.900.49, 1.22
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2)1.050.75, 1.481.020.76, 1.40
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3)0.590.35, 0.99λ = −0.04−3.63, 4.30
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu + Gln/Gln (recessive effect)
0.60
0.37, 1.00


*

OR1, odds ratio of asthma with the preceding comparison of genotypes (OR2 and OR3 defined similarly).

TABLE 5.

Determination of the genetic effects of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms on asthma


Genotype

Logistic regression

Model-free approach
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Arg/Gly16
    Adults
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.000.80, 1.241.010.79, 1.32
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.990.81, 1.221.000.79, 1.30
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly1.010.85, 1.20λ = 0.15−4.15, 4.99
    Children
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.750.50, 1.120.880.52, 1.20
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.080.76, 1.551.040.76, 1.54
        Gly/Gly vs.Arg/Gly0.700.51, 0.96λ = −0.16−3.85, 4.39
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg + Arg/Gly (recessive effect)0.710.53, 0.96
Gln/Glu27
    Adults
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1*)0.880.68, 1.140.970.75, 1.27
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2*)0.720.60, 0.850.880.63, 1.18
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3*)1.220.94, 1.60λ = 0.61−4.66, 5.54
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln + Glu/Glu (overdominant effect)0.730.62, 0.87
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1)0.620.36, 1.070.900.49, 1.22
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2)1.050.75, 1.481.020.76, 1.40
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3)0.590.35, 0.99λ = −0.04−3.63, 4.30
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu + Gln/Gln (recessive effect)
0.60
0.37, 1.00



Genotype

Logistic regression

Model-free approach
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Adjusted odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Arg/Gly16
    Adults
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.000.80, 1.241.010.79, 1.32
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.990.81, 1.221.000.79, 1.30
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly1.010.85, 1.20λ = 0.15−4.15, 4.99
    Children
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg0.750.50, 1.120.880.52, 1.20
        Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg1.080.76, 1.551.040.76, 1.54
        Gly/Gly vs.Arg/Gly0.700.51, 0.96λ = −0.16−3.85, 4.39
        Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg + Arg/Gly (recessive effect)0.710.53, 0.96
Gln/Glu27
    Adults
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1*)0.880.68, 1.140.970.75, 1.27
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2*)0.720.60, 0.850.880.63, 1.18
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3*)1.220.94, 1.60λ = 0.61−4.66, 5.54
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln + Glu/Glu (overdominant effect)0.730.62, 0.87
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR1)0.620.36, 1.070.900.49, 1.22
        Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln (OR2)1.050.75, 1.481.020.76, 1.40
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu (OR3)0.590.35, 0.99λ = −0.04−3.63, 4.30
        Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu + Gln/Gln (recessive effect)
0.60
0.37, 1.00


*

OR1, odds ratio of asthma with the preceding comparison of genotypes (OR2 and OR3 defined similarly).

Sensitivity analysis was performed by including the two studies (34, 35) that did not observe Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; the results were similar in showing no genetic effect (LR2 = 0.41, p = 0.96).

Childhood asthma.

Five studies (3741) determined the association between the Arg/Gly16 polymorphism and asthma in children (table 4), and all observed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The total sample size was 334 with asthma and 842 controls.

No heterogeneity was detected for OR1 (Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Arg), OR2 (Arg/Gly vs. Arg/Arg), or OR3 (Gly/Gly vs. Arg/Gly) (for OR1:

\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}1.97,\)
p = 0.74; for OR2:
\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}1.38,\)
p = 0.85; for OR3:
\({\chi}_{4}^{2}{=}4.92,\)
p = 0.30). Logistic regression with the fixed-effect model was used to assess the overall gene effect, and this was close to the formal significance level (LR2 = 5.15, p = 0.08). The estimated OR1, OR2, and OR3 were 0.75 (95 percent CI: 0.50, 1.12), 1.08 (95 percent CI: 0.76, 1.55), and 0.70 (95 percent CI: 0.51, 0.96) (table 5). These estimates suggest a recessive protective effect of the Gly allele, and therefore Arg/Arg and Arg/Gly were combined and compared with Gly/Gly. The estimated odds ratio was 0.71 (95 percent CI: 0.53, 0.96); that is, children with the Gly/Gly genotype had about 29 percent lower risk of having asthma than did children with the Arg/Arg and Arg/Gly genotypes. Using the parsimonious approach gave similar results: OR1 and OR2 of 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.52, 1.20) and 1.04 (95 percent CI: 0.76, 1.54), respectively. The estimated λ was −0.16 (95 percent CI: −3.85, 4.39), close to what would be expected for a recessive model, that is, 0, although the confidence interval was wide.

Gln/Glu27 polymorphism

Adult asthma.

Eight studies (3, 3236, 42, 43) assessed the association between the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism and asthma in adult patients (table 6). The sample size was 1,162 for asthma and 1,745 for control groups. All studies except one (34) observed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and seven studies were therefore pooled to assess gene effect.

TABLE 6.

Genotype frequencies of the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism between asthma and control groups


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*12586243951141213
    Santillan (3)303882415396048038520217
    Wang (42)1289210819113691113221
    Holloway (32)153874976289159353719
    Dewar (33)1194933513551153134271106
    Reihsaus (35)51391326125651172316
    Hakonarson (36)324559217359199524811239
    Shachor (43)7273382951096950509
        Total1,1625804291531,745796729220
Children
    Martinez (37)386416175231649510432
    Hopes (39)10254246315317518315678
    Leung (41)769264120708955150
    Binaei (38)*377823122155811073612
    Lin (40)809165150698854141
        Total
333

192
119
22
842

394
325
123

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*12586243951141213
    Santillan (3)303882415396048038520217
    Wang (42)1289210819113691113221
    Holloway (32)153874976289159353719
    Dewar (33)1194933513551153134271106
    Reihsaus (35)51391326125651172316
    Hakonarson (36)324559217359199524811239
    Shachor (43)7273382951096950509
        Total1,1625804291531,745796729220
Children
    Martinez (37)386416175231649510432
    Hopes (39)10254246315317518315678
    Leung (41)769264120708955150
    Binaei (38)*377823122155811073612
    Lin (40)809165150698854141
        Total
333

192
119
22
842

394
325
123
*

Not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and not pooled.

TABLE 6.

Genotype frequencies of the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism between asthma and control groups


Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*12586243951141213
    Santillan (3)303882415396048038520217
    Wang (42)1289210819113691113221
    Holloway (32)153874976289159353719
    Dewar (33)1194933513551153134271106
    Reihsaus (35)51391326125651172316
    Hakonarson (36)324559217359199524811239
    Shachor (43)7273382951096950509
        Total1,1625804291531,745796729220
Children
    Martinez (37)386416175231649510432
    Hopes (39)10254246315317518315678
    Leung (41)769264120708955150
    Binaei (38)*377823122155811073612
    Lin (40)809165150698854141
        Total
333

192
119
22
842

394
325
123

Subjects, first author (reference no.)

Asthma group

Control group
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
No.
% with Gln allele
Genotype (no.)
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Gln/Gln
Gln/Glu
Glu/Glu
Adults
    Arnaiz (34)*12586243951141213
    Santillan (3)303882415396048038520217
    Wang (42)1289210819113691113221
    Holloway (32)153874976289159353719
    Dewar (33)1194933513551153134271106
    Reihsaus (35)51391326125651172316
    Hakonarson (36)324559217359199524811239
    Shachor (43)7273382951096950509
        Total1,1625804291531,745796729220
Children
    Martinez (37)386416175231649510432
    Hopes (39)10254246315317518315678
    Leung (41)769264120708955150
    Binaei (38)*377823122155811073612
    Lin (40)809165150698854141
        Total
333

192
119
22
842

394
325
123
*

Not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and not pooled.

Heterogeneity tests were negative for OR1 (Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln) and OR3 (Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu) but significant for OR2 (Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln) (for OR1:

\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}2.33,\)
p = 0.89; for OR3:
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}8.15,\)
p = 0.23; for OR2:
\({\chi}_{6}^{2}{=}18.47,\)
p = 0.01). A number of factors were explored, including race, but we could not identify the source of heterogeneity. We then pooled these studies by logistic regression with the random-effects model to assess the gene effect. The likelihood ratio test indicated that the overall gene effect was significant (LR = 14.64, p < 0.05). The estimated OR1, OR2, and OR3 were 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.68, 1.14), 0.72 (95 percent CI: 0.60, 0.85), and 1.22 (95 percent CI: 0.94, 1.60) (table 5).

The estimated OR1, OR2, and λ by the parsimonious approach were 0.97 (95 percent CI: 0.75, 1.27), 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.63, 1.18), and 0.61 (95 percent CI: −4.66, 5.54), respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed by adding the one study (34) not observing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and the gene effect was robust: The estimated OR1, OR2, and OR3 were 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.68, 1.13), 0.71 (95 percent CI: 0.60, 0.84), and 1.22 (95 percent CI: 0.95, 1.59), respectively This seems to indicate a homozygous or overdominant mode of effect, with heterozygotes being at lower risk of asthma than either homozygote. Pooling according to this model yielded an odds ratio of 0.73 (95 percent CI: 0.62, 0.87); that is, the chance of having asthma was about 27 percent less with Gln/Glu compared with Gln/Gln + Glu/Glu. Although this is a nonintuitive model, there is precedent for other genes acting in this manner (see Discussion); alternatively, this may be a spurious result due to the distribution of data and the possibility of interaction between the two polymorphic sites. We address this possibility further in the next section using haplotype analysis.

Childhood asthma.

There were five studies (3741) addressing the association between the Gln/Glu27 polymorphism and asthma in children (table 6). All studies observed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium except one (38).

The four studies observing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were pooled (37, 3941). Since the studies by Lin et al. (40) and Leung et al. (41) had cells with no counts, we added 1 for each cell for these two studies. There was no evidence of heterogeneity for OR1 (Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Gln), OR2 (Gln/Glu vs. Gln/Gln), or OR3 (Glu/Glu vs. Gln/Glu) (for OR1:

\({\chi}_{3}^{2}{=}0.47,\)
p = 0.93; for OR2:
\({\chi}_{3}^{2}{=}2.24,\)
p = 0.53; for OR3:
\({\chi}_{3}^{2}{=}1.51,\)
p = 0.68). Logistic regression with the fixed-effect model was then used to pool; the estimated OR1 and OR3 of 0.62 (95 percent CI: 0.36, 1.07) and 0.59 (95 percent CI: 0.35, 0.99), respectively, were similar, whereas the estimated OR2 of 1.05 (95 percent CI: 0.75, 1.48) was close to one (table 5). Although the overall gene effect was not significant (p = 0.12), there is the suggestion of a recessive protective effect. The Gln/Gln and Gln/Glu genotypes were therefore combined and compared with Glu/Glu. We found that the estimated odds ratio was 0.60 (95 percent CI: 0.37, 1.00); that is, children who had the Glu/Glu genotype were about 40 percent less likely to have asthma than were children who had genotype Gln/Glu or Gln/Gln. Sensitivity analysis was performed by including the study not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; this did not change the indication of a recessive protective effect (OR = 0.61, 95 percent CI: 0.38, 0.98). The parsimonious model was compatible with this effect, with an OR1 of 0.90 (95 percent CI: 0.49, 1.22), an OR2 of 1.02 (95 percent CI: 0.76, 1.40), and an estimated λ of −0.04 (95 percent CI: −3.63, 4.30). Hence, these results suggested a recessive protective effect of Glu, although neither model was statistically significant.

Haplotype analysis of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms

Three studies of adults provided data for haplotype analysis (3, 33, 36). The study by Weir et al. (30) reported inferred haplotype data among subjects who had only homozygous wild or mutant genotypes at one locus, so this study was not included in the present analysis. The expectation-maximization algorithm was applied to infer haplotypes for the three studies, and linkage disequilibrium was assessed. The estimated linkage disequilibrium coefficient was 0.48 (p < 0.001).

The haplotype frequency in asthmatics and controls is described in table 7. The three most common haplotypes were Arg/Gln (37.5 percent), Gly/Glu (31.7 percent), and Gly/Gln (28.2 percent). The estimated odds ratios were 0.39 (95 percent CI: 0.29, 0.58), 0.99 (95 percent CI: 0.74, 1.49), and 0.83 (95 percent CI: 0.62, 1. 24) for haplotypes Arg/Glu, Gly/Gln, and Gly/Glu compared with Arg/Gln. These numbers seem to indicate that, when Gln is present at position 27, the risk of asthma is the same regardless of what allele is present at position 16. However, with Glu at position 27, the risk of asthma is lower, and this decreased risk is modified by the allele at position 16, being lower with Arg16 than with Gly16.

TABLE 7.

Distribution of haplotype frequency of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms between asthma and control groups


Haplotype

Control group (n = 2,331)

Asthma group (n = 950)

Adjusted odds ratio*

95% confidence interval
No.
%
No.
%
Arg/Gln97837573391.00
Arg/Glu9131810.390.29, 0.58
Gly/Gln74128428290.990.74, 1.49
Gly/Glu
852
32
461
31
0.83
0.62, 1.24

Haplotype

Control group (n = 2,331)

Asthma group (n = 950)

Adjusted odds ratio*

95% confidence interval
No.
%
No.
%
Arg/Gln97837573391.00
Arg/Glu9131810.390.29, 0.58
Gly/Gln74128428290.990.74, 1.49
Gly/Glu
852
32
461
31
0.83
0.62, 1.24
*

Adjusted for study effect.

TABLE 7.

Distribution of haplotype frequency of Arg/Gly16 and Gln/Glu27 polymorphisms between asthma and control groups


Haplotype

Control group (n = 2,331)

Asthma group (n = 950)

Adjusted odds ratio*

95% confidence interval
No.
%
No.
%
Arg/Gln97837573391.00
Arg/Glu9131810.390.29, 0.58
Gly/Gln74128428290.990.74, 1.49
Gly/Glu
852
32
461
31
0.83
0.62, 1.24

Haplotype

Control group (n = 2,331)

Asthma group (n = 950)

Adjusted odds ratio*

95% confidence interval
No.
%
No.
%
Arg/Gln97837573391.00
Arg/Glu9131810.390.29, 0.58
Gly/Gln74128428290.990.74, 1.49
Gly/Glu
852
32
461
31
0.83
0.62, 1.24
*

Adjusted for study effect.

This effect modification is marked, and the confidence interval of the odds ratio for the Arg/Glu haplotype does not overlap with that of the Gly/Glu haplotype (table 7). Subjects who had haplotypes Arg/Glu and Gly/Glu were 61 percent and 17 percent less likely to have asthma than were subjects who had haplotype Arg/Gln. However, subjects with haplotype Gly/Gln had the same chance of asthma as did subjects with Arg/Gln.

DISCUSSION

The various results of the individual single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses and haplotype analyses are complex, but synthesizing the data overall seems to indicate the following. First, the Glu27 allele appears to be protective against asthma, reducing the risk of asthma by approximately 27 percent. This makes biologic sense because the Glu variant is resistant to down regulation in vitro, and it is possible that these individuals express higher β2-receptor levels in the context of inflammation. This was suggested in both adult and pediatric populations, although the genetic model in each was different.

Second, the protective effect of Glu27 may be due to the haplotype. It is probable that this is not an effect of this SNP in isolation but, instead, reflects a common haplotype that includes this allele. Drysdale et al. (44) investigated 13 SNPs in the human β2-adrenergic receptor gene promoter and coding regions in relation to responsiveness to β2 agonists. They found that, although there was no association when SNPs were analyzed individually, there was a clear relation between one of the common haplotypes (haplotype 2 in their paper, which included Glu27) and good response to β2 agonists in vivo, as well as increased messenger RNA levels and gene expression in vitro. Haplotypes that included Gln27 (e.g., haplotype 4 in their paper) had overall poorer response to β2 agonists and lower expression levels. Presumably, good response to exogenous agonists also reflects good response to endogenous agonists and, hence, a protective effect against asthma.

Third, the genetic model suggested by the data appears to be an overdominant protective effect of Glu27. This model is also called heterozygote advantage or positive heterosis, and although it may appear counterintuitive, a recent review indicates that this mode of action is perhaps more common than previously thought and cites numerous examples (45). Indeed, the IL12B promoter polymorphism has been associated with severity of asthma in children, and this also seems to observe a pattern of heterozygote advantage (46). The mechanism of such a model is still speculative but may include 1) advantages in having variation in a multimeric protein, such as better Vmax (47); 2) an allele with a selective advantage that is detrimental when homozygous (e.g., sickle cell and falciparum malaria); and 3) a greater range of expression of gene products and plasticity with heterozygotes than homozygotes (45). Alternatively, this may be a spurious result due to other untyped loci in the haplotypes analyzed.

Fourth, there may be interaction or synergism between different SNPs. The haplotype analysis raises the possibility that the position 16 polymorphism may be an effect modifier: The protective effect of Glu27 was accentuated with Arg16 compared with Gly16, although there was no independent effect of the position 16 polymorphism on its own. This would indicate that it may be difficult to predict a haplotype effect from its constituent SNPs.

Fifth, the linkage disequilibrium between position 16 and 27 polymorphisms is not high. This may be surprising given that they are only 30 nucleotides apart and there are no intervening introns. However, this is congruent with other studies indicating that recombination frequency is not strictly proportional to chromosomal distance, and it is sensitive to ancestral effects; for example, Drysdale et al. found that “some pairs of close sites have reduced levels of linkage disequilibrium relative to more spaced pairs of sites” (44, p. 10485).

The pooled allele frequencies at both the Arg16 and Gln27 sites confirm the presence of significant variation between racial groups and are similar to values generally recognized, for example, in ALFRED (Allele Frequency Database) (48). Although crude, these results do support a role of these polymorphisms in asthma susceptibility, given the varying incidence of asthma in these racial groups. Interestingly, the variation was more marked at the Gln27 locus than at Arg16, and it was the former that was more strongly implicated in asthma susceptibility in our results.

These findings must be taken with caution at the present time for a number of reasons. First, these estimates are obtained by pooling despite heterogeneity.

Second, the asthma phenotype was often not fully specified, and details of asthma diagnoses were often scanty. Future studies should clearly identify whether asthma cases were diagnosed from symptoms or on population screening, and they should include results of atopic testing, spirometry, or methacholine challenge. Without sufficient information in individual studies, the condition labeled as asthma in this meta-analysis is likely to be heterogeneous and may be contributing to the inconsistency of results.

Third, the haplotype results are very different from those found in the longitudinal Normative Aging Study cohort (49), where the Gly16/Gln27 haplotype had a protective effect compared with Arg16/Glu27 (a different reference genotype), whereas in our study there was an increased risk. This discrepancy, however, may be due to the fact that, in the latter, the outcome was airway hyperresponsiveness (which does not always correspond to asthma) and that the population was general, community-dwelling males screened with a methacholine challenge test, not diagnosed asthmatics.

Fourth, these findings do not take into account smoking status, since data were available from only two studies (3, 42). There are some indications that the genotype effects may be more apparent among nonsmokers (49).

Fifth, the findings in childhood and adult asthma are inconsistent. This may be due to chance, or, alternatively, there may be a genuinely different mode of action in adults compared with children, in that asthma is a clinically different disease in these two populations. Asthma in late childhood, which was the age range studied in these papers, is predominantly atopic in nature, more likely to be eosinophilic, more likely to be symptom diagnosed and episodic, and less likely to be associated with persistent airway hyperresponsiveness (4952). Since the Glu27 polymorphism is associated with less airway hyperresponsiveness (53), this may explain differences between the associations in adults and children. Alternatively, given the incomplete understanding of asthma pathogenesis, there may be pleiotropic effects of the β2-receptor at different stages or etiologies of disease. Indeed, one of us has observed such an age-specific association for another gene candidate in a population of children followed from childhood into early adult life (54).

In summary, these results are suggestive of a protective effect of the Glu27 allele, probably as part of a haplotype, and they raise the possibility of interactions with the position 16 alleles and possibly other SNPs. This warrants further investigation in larger studies. The clinical implications of these findings are not clear. These polymorphisms may be involved in both conferring the risk to develop asthma and influencing the response to β2-agonists; this has been the subject of a recent randomized crossover trial (55) and is the topic of an ongoing meta-analysis (56).

APPENDIX

The pooled prevalence was calculated as
\[{\bar{p}}{=}\frac{{\sum}w_{i}p_{i}}{{\sum}w_{i}},\]
where p̄ was the pooled prevalence of the allele, pi was the prevalence of the allele in each study, and wi was 1/var(pi), which was the weight of each study.
Heterogeneity of prevalences across studies was checked as follows:
\[Q{=}{\sum}w_{i}(p_{i}{-}{\bar{p}})^{2}.\]
The Q statistic follows a χ2 distribution with number of studies (k) − 1 df. If heterogeneity was present, between-study variation was then estimated as follows:
\[\mathrm{{\tau}}^{2}{=}\frac{Q{-}(k{-}1)}{{\sum}w_{i}{-}\frac{{\sum}w_{i}^{2}}{{\sum}w_{i}}}{\ }\mathrm{if}{\,}Q{>}k{-}l{\,}\mathrm{or}{\,}0{\,}\mathrm{otherwise}.\]
This was used to calculate a weight term that accounted for between-study variation:
\[w_{i}^{{\ast}}{=}\frac{1}{\mathrm{var}(p_{i}){+}\mathrm{{\tau}}^{2}},\]
and the pooled prevalence was estimated as follows:
\[\overline{p^{{\ast}}}{=}\frac{{\sum}w_{i}^{{\ast}}p_{i}}{{\sum}w_{i}^{{\ast}}}.\]
The 95 percent confidence interval was estimated as follows:
\[95{\,}\mathrm{percent}{\,}\mathrm{CI}{=}\overline{p^{{\ast}}}{\pm}\frac{1.96}{\sqrt{{\sum}w_{i}^{{\ast}}}}.\]
APPENDIX TABLE 1.

Scale for quality assessment of molecular association studies of asthma


Criteria

Score
Representativeness of cases
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population with clearly defined sampling frame2
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population without clearly defined sampling frame or with extensive inclusion/exclusion criteria1
    No method of selection described0
Representativeness of controls
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from the same sampling frame (ward/community) as cases2
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from a different sampling frame as cases1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of asthma
    Clearly described objective criteria for diagnosis of asthma2
    Diagnosis of asthma by patient self-report or by patient history1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of controls
    Controls were tested to screen out asthma, i.e., measured FEV1* or PEFR*2
    Controls were subjects who did not report asthma; no objective testing1
    Not described0
Genotyping examination
    Genotyping done under “blinded” condition1
    Unblinded or not mentioned0
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control group2
    Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium in control group1
    No checking for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium0
Association assessment
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics and adjustment for confounders2
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics without adjustment for confounders1
    Inappropriate statistics used0
Response rate
    Response rates for both groups are the same, i.e., to within 5%2
    Response rates are different, between 5% and 10%1
    Response rates are more than 10% different, or no mention of response rates0
Total


Criteria

Score
Representativeness of cases
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population with clearly defined sampling frame2
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population without clearly defined sampling frame or with extensive inclusion/exclusion criteria1
    No method of selection described0
Representativeness of controls
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from the same sampling frame (ward/community) as cases2
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from a different sampling frame as cases1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of asthma
    Clearly described objective criteria for diagnosis of asthma2
    Diagnosis of asthma by patient self-report or by patient history1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of controls
    Controls were tested to screen out asthma, i.e., measured FEV1* or PEFR*2
    Controls were subjects who did not report asthma; no objective testing1
    Not described0
Genotyping examination
    Genotyping done under “blinded” condition1
    Unblinded or not mentioned0
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control group2
    Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium in control group1
    No checking for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium0
Association assessment
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics and adjustment for confounders2
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics without adjustment for confounders1
    Inappropriate statistics used0
Response rate
    Response rates for both groups are the same, i.e., to within 5%2
    Response rates are different, between 5% and 10%1
    Response rates are more than 10% different, or no mention of response rates0
Total

*

FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.

APPENDIX TABLE 1.

Scale for quality assessment of molecular association studies of asthma


Criteria

Score
Representativeness of cases
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population with clearly defined sampling frame2
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population without clearly defined sampling frame or with extensive inclusion/exclusion criteria1
    No method of selection described0
Representativeness of controls
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from the same sampling frame (ward/community) as cases2
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from a different sampling frame as cases1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of asthma
    Clearly described objective criteria for diagnosis of asthma2
    Diagnosis of asthma by patient self-report or by patient history1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of controls
    Controls were tested to screen out asthma, i.e., measured FEV1* or PEFR*2
    Controls were subjects who did not report asthma; no objective testing1
    Not described0
Genotyping examination
    Genotyping done under “blinded” condition1
    Unblinded or not mentioned0
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control group2
    Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium in control group1
    No checking for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium0
Association assessment
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics and adjustment for confounders2
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics without adjustment for confounders1
    Inappropriate statistics used0
Response rate
    Response rates for both groups are the same, i.e., to within 5%2
    Response rates are different, between 5% and 10%1
    Response rates are more than 10% different, or no mention of response rates0
Total


Criteria

Score
Representativeness of cases
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population with clearly defined sampling frame2
    Consecutive/randomly selected from case population without clearly defined sampling frame or with extensive inclusion/exclusion criteria1
    No method of selection described0
Representativeness of controls
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from the same sampling frame (ward/community) as cases2
    Controls were consecutive/randomly drawn from a different sampling frame as cases1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of asthma
    Clearly described objective criteria for diagnosis of asthma2
    Diagnosis of asthma by patient self-report or by patient history1
    Not described0
Ascertainment of controls
    Controls were tested to screen out asthma, i.e., measured FEV1* or PEFR*2
    Controls were subjects who did not report asthma; no objective testing1
    Not described0
Genotyping examination
    Genotyping done under “blinded” condition1
    Unblinded or not mentioned0
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control group2
    Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium in control group1
    No checking for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium0
Association assessment
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics and adjustment for confounders2
    Assess association between genotypes and asthma with appropriate statistics without adjustment for confounders1
    Inappropriate statistics used0
Response rate
    Response rates for both groups are the same, i.e., to within 5%2
    Response rates are different, between 5% and 10%1
    Response rates are more than 10% different, or no mention of response rates0
Total

*

FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.

Editor's note: This paper is also available on the website of the Human Genome Epidemiology Network (http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/hugenet/).

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

1.

Attia J, Thakkinstian A, D'Este C. Systematic review of meta-analyses of molecular association studies: methodologic lesson for genetic epidemiology.

J Clin Epidemiol
2003
;
56
:
297
–303.

2.

Barr RG, Cooper DM, Speizer FE, et al. Beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism and body mass index are associated with adult-onset asthma in sedentary but not active women.

Chest
2001
;
120
:
1474
–9.

3.

Santillan AA, Camargo CA Jr, Ramirez-Rivera A, et al. Association between beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms and asthma diagnosis among Mexican adults.

J Allergy Clin Immunol
2003
;
112
:
1095
–100.

4.

Hall IP. Beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms and asthma.

Clin Exp Allergy
1999
;
29
:
1151
–4.

5.

Hall IP. Genetics and pulmonary medicine: asthma.

Thorax
1999
;
54
:
65
–9.

6.

Bracken MB, Belanger K, Cookson WO, et al. Genetic and perinatal risk factors for asthma onset and severity: a review and theoretical analysis.

Epidemiol Rev
2002
;
24
:
176
–89.

7.

Thakkinstian A, D'Este C, Eisman J, et al. Meta-analysis of molecular association studies: vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and BMD as a case study.

J Bone Miner Res
2004
;
19
:
419
–28.

8.

Thakkinstian A, McElduff P, D'Este C, et al. A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies.

Stat Med
2005
;
24
:
1291
–306.

9.

Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated.

BMJ
1994
;
309
:
1351
–5.

10.

Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

Stat Med
1999
;
18
:
2693
–708.

11.

Thompson SG, Smith TC, Sharp SJ. Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Stat Med
1997
;
16
:
2741
–58.

12.

Thakkinstian A, D'Este C, Attia J. Haplotype analysis of VDR gene polymorphisms: a meta-analysis.

Osteoporos Int
2004
;
15
:
729
–34.

13.

Chapman NH, Thompson EA. Linkage disequilibrium mapping: the role of population history, size, and structure. In: Rao DC, Province MA, eds. Genetic dissection of complex traits. New York, NY: Academic Press,

2001
:417–28.

14.

StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 8.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation,

2003
.

15.

Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. WinBUGS user manual. Cambridge, United Kingdom: MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health,

2001
.

16.

Kawamura T, Egusa G, Fujikawa R, et al. Gln27Glu variant of the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene is not associated with obesity and diabetes in Japanese-Americans.

Metabolism
2001
;
50
:
443
–6.

17.

Rosmond R, Ukkola O, Chagnon M, et al. Polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB2) in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in men.

J Intern Med
2000
;
248
:
239
–44.

18.

Kotanko P, Binder A, Tasker J, et al. Essential hypertension in African Caribbeans associates with a variant of the beta2-adrenoceptor.

Hypertension
1997
;
30
:
773
–6.

19.

Heckbert SR, Hindorff LA, Edwards KL, et al. Beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and risk of incident cardiovascular events in the elderly.

Circulation
2003
;
107
:
2021
–4.

20.

Dallongeville J, Helbecque N, Cottel D, et al. The Gly16→Arg16 and Gln27→Glu27 polymorphisms of β2-adrenergic receptor are associated with metabolic syndrome in men.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2003
;
88
:
4862
–6.

21.

Tang W, Devereux RB, Kitzman DW, et al. The Arg16Gly polymorphism of the β2-adrenergic receptor and left ventricular systolic function.

Am J Hypertens
2003
;
16
:
945
–51.

22.

Aynacioglu AS, Cascorbi I, Gungor K, et al. Population frequency, mutation linkage and analytical methodology for the Arg16Gly, Gln27Glu and Thr164Ile polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenergic receptor among Turks.

Br J Clin Pharmacol
1999
;
48
:
761
–4.

23.

Kahara T, Hayakawa T, Nagai Y, et al. Gln27Glu polymorphism of the beta2 adrenergic receptor gene in healthy Japanese men is associated with the change of fructosamine level caused by exercise.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract
2004
;
64
:
207
–12.

24.

Candy G, Samani N, Norton G, et al. Association analysis of beta2 adrenoceptor polymorphisms with hypertension in a Black African population.

J Hypertens
2000
;
18
:
167
–72.

25.

Duarte NL, Colagiuri S, Palu T, et al. Obesity, type II diabetes and the β2 adrenoceptor gene Gln27Glu polymorphism in the Tongan population.

Clin Sci (Lond)
2003
;
104
:
211
–15.

26.

Sugaya K, Nishijima S, Yamada T, et al. Molecular analysis of adrenergic receptor genes and interleukin-4/interleukin-4 receptor genes in patients with interstitial cystitis.

J Urol
2002
;
168
:
2668
–71.

27.

Chang TJ, Tsai MH, Jiang YD, et al. The Arg16Gly polymorphism of human beta2-adrenoreceptor is associated with type 2 diabetes in Taiwanese people.

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
2002
;
57
:
685
–90.

28.

Kim SH, Kim DJ, Seo IA, et al. Significance of beta2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korean subjects.

Metabolism
2002
;
51
:
833
–7.

29.

Iwamoto N, Ogawa Y, Kajihara S, et al. Gln27Glu β2-adrenergic receptor variant is associated with hypertriglyceridemia and the development of fatty liver.

Clin Chim Acta
2001
;
314
:
85
–91.

30.

Weir TD, Mallek N, Sandford AJ, et al. β2-Adrenergic receptor haplotypes in mild, moderate and fatal/near fatal asthma.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1998
;
158
:
787
–91.

31.

Xie HG, Stein CM, Kim RB, et al. Frequency of functionally important beta-2 adrenoceptor polymorphisms varies markedly among African-American, Caucasian and Chinese individuals.

Pharmacogenetics
1999
;
9
:
511
–16.

32.

Holloway JW, Dunbar PR, Riley GA, et al. Association of beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms with severe asthma.

Clin Exp Allergy
2000
;
30
:
1097
–103.

33.

Dewar JC, Wheatley AP, Venn A, et al. Beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms are in linkage disequilibrium, but are not associated with asthma in an adult population.

Clin Exp Allergy
1998
;
28
:
442
–8.

34.

Arnaiz NO, Kaufman JD, Daroowalla FM, et al. Genetic factors and asthma in aluminum smelter workers.

Arch Environ Health
2003
;
58
:
197
–200.

35.

Reihsaus E, Innis M, MacIntyre N, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding for the beta 2-adrenergic receptor in normal and asthmatic subjects.

Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
1993
;
8
:
334
–9.

36.

Hakonarson H, Bjornsdottir US, Ostermann E, et al. Allelic frequencies and patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for asthma and atopy in Iceland.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2001
;
164
:
2036
–44.

37.

Martinez FD, Graves PE, Baldini M, et al. Association between genetic polymorphisms of the β2-adrenoceptor and response to albuterol in children with and without a history of wheezing.

J Clin Invest
1997
;
100
:
3184
–8.

38.

Binaei S, Christensen M, Murphy C, et al. β2-Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms in children with status asthmaticus.

Chest
2003
;
123
:
375S
.

39.

Hopes E, McDougall C, Christie G, et al. Association of glutamine 27 polymorphism of β2 adrenoceptor with reported childhood asthma: population based study.

BMJ
1998
;
316
:
664
.

40.

Lin YC, Lu CC, Shen CY, et al. Roles of genotypes of beta2-adrenergic receptor in the relationship between eosinophil counts and lung function in Taiwanese adolescents.

J Asthma
2003
;
40
:
265
–72.

41.

Leung TF, Tang NL, Chan IH, et al. Distribution in allele frequencies of predisposition-to-atopy genotypes in Chinese children.

Pediatr Pulmonol
2002
;
34
:
419
–24.

42.

Wang Z, Chen C, Niu T, et al. Association of asthma with β2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism and cigarette smoking.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2001
;
163
:
1404
–9.

43.

Shachor J, Chana Z, Varsano S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of the beta-2 adrenergic receptor in Israelis with severe asthma compared to non-asthmatic Israelis.

Isr Med Assoc J
2003
;
5
:
821
–4.

44.

Drysdale CM, McGraw DW, Stack CB, et al. Complex promoter and coding region β2-adrenergic receptor haplotypes alter receptor expression and predict in vivo responsiveness.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
10483
–8.

45.

Comings DE, MacMurray JP. Molecular heterosis: a review.

Mol Genet Metab
2000
;
71
:
19
–31.

46.

Morahan G, Huang D, Wu M, et al. Association of IL12B promoter polymorphism with severity of atopic and non-atopic asthma in children.

Lancet
2002
;
360
:
455
–9.

47.

Gobeil S, Rodrigue MA, Moisan S, et al. Intracellular sequestration of hetero-oligomers formed by wild-type and glaucoma-causing myocilin mutants.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2004
;
45
:
3560
–7.

48.

ALFRED: the ALlele FREquency Database. New Haven, CT: Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine,

2005
. (http://alfred.med.yale.edu/alfred/index.asp).

49.

Litonjua AA, Silverman EK, Tantisira KG, et al. β2-Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and haplotypes are associated with airways hyperresponsiveness among nonsmoking men.

Chest
2004
;
126
:
66
–74.

50.

Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Saltos N. Heterogeneity of airway inflammation in persistent asthma: evidence of neutrophilic inflammation and increased sputum interleukin-8.

Chest
2001
;
119
:
1329
–36.

51.

Douwes J, Gibson P, Pekkanen J, et al. Non-eosinophilic asthma: importance and possible mechanisms.

Thorax
2002
;
57
:
643
–8.

52.

Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Hankin R, et al. Relationship between induced sputum eosinophils and the clinical pattern of childhood asthma.

Thorax
2003
;
58
:
116
–21.

53.

Ramsay CE, Hayden CM, Tiller KJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenoreceptor gene are associated with decreased airway responsiveness.

Clin Exp Allergy
1999
;
29
:
1195
–203.

54.

Srivastava P, Helms PJ, Stewart D, et al. Association of CCR5Δ32 with reduced risk of childhood but not adult asthma.

Thorax
2003
;
58
:
222
–6.

55.

Israel E, Chinchilli VM, Ford JG, et al. Use of regularly scheduled albuterol treatment in asthma: genotype-stratified, randomised, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Lancet
2004
;
364
:
1505
–12.

56.

Hancox B, Gibson P. Beta2-receptor polymorphism for improving long-term beta-agonist efficacy in asthma (protocol for a Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Oxford, United Kingdom: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,

2005
. (http://cochrane.bireme.br/cochrane/show.php?db=&mfn=&id=_ID_CD003276&lang=pt&dblang=).