Elsevier

Annals of Oncology

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 251-257
Annals of Oncology

original articles
gastrointestinal tumors
Randomized study of weekly irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (FUIRI) versus biweekly irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors Study

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn557Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Background

Irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) is accepted as a reference treatment for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a regimen without leucovorin (LV) (FUIRI) is not inferior to the standard FOLFIRI (response rate).

Patients and methods

Chemotherapy-naive patients with MCRC were randomized to receive either irinotecan (180 mg/m2 on day 1) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m2 bolus and 600 mg/m2 22-h infusion) + LV (200 mg/m2 on days 1–2) (FOLFIRI) every 2 weeks or irinotecan (80 mg/m2) + 5-FU (2.250 mg/m2 48-h infusion) (FUIRI) weekly.

Results

In all, 346 patients were included, 173 in each arm. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the response rates for FOLFIRI and FUIRI were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 64%] and 51% (95% CI 43% to 59%), respectively (P = 0.2809). No statistically significant differences were observed between FOLFIRI and FUIRI regarding median progression-free survival (8.3 versus 8.4 months; P = 0.4339) nor median overall survival (21.6 versus 19.2 months; log-rank test P = 0.2941). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent on FOLFIRI arm (27% versus 9%), while the proportion of diarrhea was higher on FUIRI arm (21% versus 42%).

Conclusion

FUIRI represents a valid alternative without LV to the FOLFIRI regimen as MCRC first-line treatment.

Keywords

colorectal cancer
5-fluorouracil
irinotecan

Cited by (0)