Respiration and The Airway
Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq™ laryngoscopes

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem346Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Background

The Airtraq™ laryngoscope is designed to allow visualization of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axes. We hypothesized that this new airway device would facilitate tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients. We compared tracheal intubation performance of standard Macintosh laryngoscope with the Airtraq™ laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.

Methods

One hundred and six consecutive ASA I–III morbidly obese patients undergoing surgery were randomized to intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope or the Airtraq™ laryngoscope. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized. If tracheal intubation failed within 120 s with the Macintosh or Airtraq™, laryngoscopes were switched. Success rate, Spo2, duration of tracheal intubation, and quality of airway management were evaluated and compared between the groups.

Results

Preoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. In the Airtraq™ group, tracheal intubation was successfully carried out in all patients within 120 s. In the Macintosh laryngoscope group, six patients required intubation with the Airtraq™ laryngoscope. The mean (sd) time taken for tracheal intubation was 24 (16) and 56 (23) s, respectively, with the Airtraq™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes, (P<0.001). Spo2 was better maintained in the Airtraq™ group than in the Macintosh laryngoscope group with one and nine patients, respectively, demonstrating drops of Spo2 to 92% or less (P<0.05).

Conclusions

In this study, the Airtraq™ laryngoscope shortened the duration of tracheal intubation and prevented reductions in arterial oxygen saturation in morbidly obese patients.

Keywords

airway
equipment, laryngoscope
oxygen, therapy

Cited by (0)