Abstract

We investigated the resolving power of the beta tubulin protein-coding gene (BT2) for systematic study of dermatophyte fungi. Initially, 144 standard and clinical strains belonging to 26 species in the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum, and Epidermophyton were identified by internal transcribe spacer (ITS) sequencing. Subsequently, BT2 was partially amplified in all strains, and sequence analysis performed after construction of a BT2 database that showed length ranged from approximately 723 (T. ajelloi) to 808 nucleotides (M. persicolor) in different species. Intraspecific sequence variation was found in some species, but T. tonsurans, T. equinum, T. concentricum, T. verrucosum, T. rubrum, T. violaceum, T. eriotrephon, E. floccosum, M. canis, M. ferrugineum, and M. audouinii were invariant. The sequences were found to be relatively conserved among different strains of the same species. The species with the closest resemblance were Arthroderma benhamiae and T. concentricum and T. tonsurans and T. equinum with 100% and 99.8% identity, respectively; the most distant species were M. persicolor and M. amazonicum. The dendrogram obtained from BT2 topology was almost compatible with the species concept based on ITS sequencing, and similar clades and species were distinguished in the BT2 tree. Here, beta tubulin was characterized in a wide range of dermatophytes in order to assess intra- and interspecies variation and resolution and was found to be a taxonomically valuable gene.

Introduction

Dermatophytes are currently classified in the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum, and Epidermophyton and are ecologically categorized as geophilic, zoophilic, or anthropophilic. About 30 of the known 40 species of dermatophytes can be listed as potential pathogens of humans and other mammals [1]. They have the ability to degrade keratin of hair, nails, and feathers; can produce superficial infections (dermatophytosis) of the skin of healthy human hosts; and can penetrate into deeper tissues in immunocompromised hosts [2]. Dermatophytosis is the most common fungal infection and one of the most common infectious diseases. Scales from the infected skin and nails transmit Anthropophilic species. In recent years, the incidence of nail dermatophytosis (onychomycosis) has increased and now accounts for up to 90% of toenail and 50% of fingernail disorders [3]. In industrialized nations, about 20% of the population aged >60 years and 50% of the population aged >70 years carry a fungal infection of the foot [4,5]. Treatment of onychomycosis imposes $43 million annually to the US healthcare system [6].

Identification of a dermatophyte to the species level is epidemiologically, ecologically, and therapeutically significant because of routes of infection (eg, M. canis infection originates from cats and dogs, while M. audouinii is transmitted between humans) and different treatment regimens (eg, tinea capitis caused by T. tonsurans requires shorter treatment than that caused by M. canis because the latter escapes drug exposure by producing arthroconidia outside the hair shaft [7]. Furthermore, there is a variable profile of in vitro antifungal susceptibility of microconidia and arthroconidia of T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, and T. equinum isolates [8–10].

Prior to the development of reliable molecular diagnostics, an accurate taxonomy of individual species was compulsory. During the last decade, progress has been made in the modern systematics of dermatophytes, nevertheless some pending issues remain. There are problems with accurate definition and characterization of dermatophytes that are not only relevant to phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic identity but also to clinical microbiology and epidemiology; one of these is the definition of species belonging to the T. mentagrophytes complex [11]. Different concepts of species based on phenotypical (morphological), ecological, and biological data have been compared with phylogeny [12]. Classic characteristics may be not only unstable or/and imprecise but also the genetic baseline for some phenotypic concepts may be unclear [7,12,13].

Phylogenetic analyses and the use of phylogenetic species concepts based on rDNA internal transcribe spacer (ITS) regions have improved the taxonomy, but confirmation and refinement using other genes are overdue [7]. Therefore, characterization of new genetic markers for dermatophyte group is needed. Beta tubulin is a monomeric globular protein involved in the generation of microfilaments; it has been used successfully for species delineation in other groups of fungi such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Scedosporium, and Phaeoacremonium [14–17]. The locus includes some introns, which are known to be good estimators for distinction of closely related species.

Since the beta tubulin gene has not systematically been used in dermatophyte taxonomy, our aim was to investigate the beta tubulin protein-coding gene (BT2) as a new genetic marker in order to evaluate its intra- and interspecies variation in dermatophytes. Several reference strains and clinical isolates, including a wide range of common and rare pathogenic species, were used for this purpose.

Materials and methods

Strains and isolates

A total of 144 strains consisting of 26 species of dermatophytes were used in sequence analysis of partial beta tubulin, comprising 109 reference and 35 clinical isolates (Table 1). The reference strains were obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS), Utrecht, the Netherlands, and the Teikyo University Institute of Medical Mycology (TIMM), Tokyo, Japan. The clinical isolates were recovered from a variety of specimens, including skin, nail, and hair, with proven dermatophytosis submitted to two medical mycology laboratories in Tehran, Iran. Species names used in this study were in concordance with the molecular-based taxonomy introduced by Gräser et al. [7].

Table 1.

Reference and clinical strains of dermatophytes used in this study for sequence analysis of partial beta tubulin gene.

SpeciesStrainInternal transcribe spacerBT2 accession no.Size of BT2 partial
accession no.sequence (bp)
Arthroderma vanbreuseghemiiJCM 1891JN134094JF731120789
Trichophyton interdigitaleNBRC 5974JN134103JF731087790
NBRC 5809JN134101JF731085792
NBRC 5812JN134102JF731086790
NBRC 5466JN134100JF731084790
CBS 102.68--790
CBS 116916--788
CBS 119445--789
CBS 130816JN134009JF731046792
CBS 130824JN134010JF731085792
CBS 130930JN134015JF731049792
CBS 130923JN134017JF731051792
CBS 130810JN134021JF731052790
CBS 130940JN134022JF731053790
CBS 130928JN134024JF731079792
CS 248JN133983JF731075790
CS 365JN133985JF731076790
CS 407JN133989JF731077790
CS 437JN133991JF731043790
CS 490JN133999JF731044790
CS 558JN134005JF731045790
CS 559JN134006JF731078790
CS 584JN134011JF731048790
CS 655JN134016JF731050790
CS 759JN134023-JF731054792
CS 781-JF731055790
T. tonsuransNBRC 5928JN134086JF731073790
NBRC 5945JN134087JF731074790
CBS 130924JN134080JF731068790
CBS 130822JN134085JF731071790
CBS 238.33--790
CS 768JN134084JF731070790
CS 782-JF731072790
T. equinumNBRC 31610JN134108JF731092790
CBS 270.66--790
CBS 634.82--790
CBS 100080EF043273-790
T. mentagrophytesCBS 106.67Z98000-796
CBS 764.84--797
CBS 318.56Z97995-796
T. schoenleiniiNBRC 8191JN134098JF731082798
NBRC 8192JN134099JF731083798
CBS 130812JN134097JF731081797
CBS 855.71Z98011-797
CS 20JN134096JF731080797
T. simiiCBS 417.65NR-103706-797
CBS 448.65--796
CBS 150.66--794
T. rubrumNBRC 5467JN134067JF731066794
NBRC 5808JN134068JF731067794
CBS 360.62--794
CBS 734.88--794
CBS 100237--794
CBS 130927JN134027JF731056794
CBS 130825JN134042JF731058794
CBS 130817JN134058JF731060794
CBS 130808JN134060JF731061794
CBS 130933JN134063JF731063794
CBS 130925JN134064JF731064794
CBS 130821JN134065JF731065794
CS 329JN134037JF731057794
CS 534JN134048JF731059794
CS 669JN134061JF731062794
T. violaceumNBRC 31064JN134106JF731090794
CBS 130937JN134104JF731088794
CS 352JN134105JF731089794
T. concentricumCBS 109404--797
CBS 109405--797
CBS 109407--797
CBS 173.40-797
T. verrucosumCBS 130944--
CBS 130945--
CBS 130947--
T. erinaceiCS 379JN134091JF731117796
CBS 511.73JX122302-797
CBS 344.79Z97996-797
A. benhamiaeJCM 1885JN134093JF731118797
(Trichophyton sp. of A. benhamiae)CS 269JN134088JF731114-797
CBS 809.72--798
CBS 623.66Z98015-798
CBS 280.83Z98016798
T. eriotrephonCS 361JN134089-798
CS 363JN134090-798
T. ajelloiIFO 31978JN134092JF731119723
CBS 130926JN134107JF731091723
Microsporum cookeiNBRC 7862JN134140JF731110770
SS 779JN134139JF731109770
CBS 129.67HQ825142-769
CBS 202.66DQ860714-769
CBS 337.74HQ825141-774
M. racemosumCBS 130935JN134142JF731108771
CBS 423.74HQ825139-770
CBS 102175HQ825138-770
M. canisNBRC 9182JN134129JF731103770
CBS 566.80--770
CBS 132.88--770
CBS 277.62--770
CBS 130811JN134125JF731099770
CBS 130931JN134126JF731100770
CS 674JN134128JF731101770
CS 730-JF731102770
M. ferrugineumNBRC 5831JN134137JF731106770
NBRC 6081JN134138JF731107770
CBS 457.80--770
CBS 131111JN134136JF731105770
CBS 427.63AJ252336-770
CBS 457.80AJ252335-770
CBS 118546--770
CBS 118547--770
CS 650JN134135JF731104770
M. audouiniiNBRC 6074JN134145JF731113771
CBS 280.63--771
CBS 332.68--771
CBS 119448--771
M. nanumJCM 1907JN134095JF731121797
CBS 321.61DQ860795-797
CBS 322.61--797
CBS 569.80DQ860796-796
CBS 633.82--796
CBS 728.88--796
M. persicolorNBRC 5975JN134144JF731112808
CBS 421.74--808
CBS 422.74--808
CBS 871.70--808
M. gypseum (A. gypseum)IFO 5948JN134133JF731097798
IFO 8228JN134134JF731098798
CBS 130820JN134130JF731093798
CBS 130936JN134131JF731094798
CBS 130939JN134132JF731095798
CBS 424.66--797
CS 718-JF731096798
M. gypseum (A. incurvatum)CBS 548.82--793
M. fulvumCBS 599.66--
CBS 287.55EF078472-
SS 672JN134143-
M. gallinaeCS 778JN134141JF731111775
Epidermophyton floccosumCBS 767.73--789
NBRC 9045JN134157JF731127789
CS 657JN134154JF731122789
CS 725-JF731123789
CS 739JN134155JF731124789
CS 750JN134156JF731125789
CS 752-JF731126789
M. amazonicumCBS 222.75--762
SpeciesStrainInternal transcribe spacerBT2 accession no.Size of BT2 partial
accession no.sequence (bp)
Arthroderma vanbreuseghemiiJCM 1891JN134094JF731120789
Trichophyton interdigitaleNBRC 5974JN134103JF731087790
NBRC 5809JN134101JF731085792
NBRC 5812JN134102JF731086790
NBRC 5466JN134100JF731084790
CBS 102.68--790
CBS 116916--788
CBS 119445--789
CBS 130816JN134009JF731046792
CBS 130824JN134010JF731085792
CBS 130930JN134015JF731049792
CBS 130923JN134017JF731051792
CBS 130810JN134021JF731052790
CBS 130940JN134022JF731053790
CBS 130928JN134024JF731079792
CS 248JN133983JF731075790
CS 365JN133985JF731076790
CS 407JN133989JF731077790
CS 437JN133991JF731043790
CS 490JN133999JF731044790
CS 558JN134005JF731045790
CS 559JN134006JF731078790
CS 584JN134011JF731048790
CS 655JN134016JF731050790
CS 759JN134023-JF731054792
CS 781-JF731055790
T. tonsuransNBRC 5928JN134086JF731073790
NBRC 5945JN134087JF731074790
CBS 130924JN134080JF731068790
CBS 130822JN134085JF731071790
CBS 238.33--790
CS 768JN134084JF731070790
CS 782-JF731072790
T. equinumNBRC 31610JN134108JF731092790
CBS 270.66--790
CBS 634.82--790
CBS 100080EF043273-790
T. mentagrophytesCBS 106.67Z98000-796
CBS 764.84--797
CBS 318.56Z97995-796
T. schoenleiniiNBRC 8191JN134098JF731082798
NBRC 8192JN134099JF731083798
CBS 130812JN134097JF731081797
CBS 855.71Z98011-797
CS 20JN134096JF731080797
T. simiiCBS 417.65NR-103706-797
CBS 448.65--796
CBS 150.66--794
T. rubrumNBRC 5467JN134067JF731066794
NBRC 5808JN134068JF731067794
CBS 360.62--794
CBS 734.88--794
CBS 100237--794
CBS 130927JN134027JF731056794
CBS 130825JN134042JF731058794
CBS 130817JN134058JF731060794
CBS 130808JN134060JF731061794
CBS 130933JN134063JF731063794
CBS 130925JN134064JF731064794
CBS 130821JN134065JF731065794
CS 329JN134037JF731057794
CS 534JN134048JF731059794
CS 669JN134061JF731062794
T. violaceumNBRC 31064JN134106JF731090794
CBS 130937JN134104JF731088794
CS 352JN134105JF731089794
T. concentricumCBS 109404--797
CBS 109405--797
CBS 109407--797
CBS 173.40-797
T. verrucosumCBS 130944--
CBS 130945--
CBS 130947--
T. erinaceiCS 379JN134091JF731117796
CBS 511.73JX122302-797
CBS 344.79Z97996-797
A. benhamiaeJCM 1885JN134093JF731118797
(Trichophyton sp. of A. benhamiae)CS 269JN134088JF731114-797
CBS 809.72--798
CBS 623.66Z98015-798
CBS 280.83Z98016798
T. eriotrephonCS 361JN134089-798
CS 363JN134090-798
T. ajelloiIFO 31978JN134092JF731119723
CBS 130926JN134107JF731091723
Microsporum cookeiNBRC 7862JN134140JF731110770
SS 779JN134139JF731109770
CBS 129.67HQ825142-769
CBS 202.66DQ860714-769
CBS 337.74HQ825141-774
M. racemosumCBS 130935JN134142JF731108771
CBS 423.74HQ825139-770
CBS 102175HQ825138-770
M. canisNBRC 9182JN134129JF731103770
CBS 566.80--770
CBS 132.88--770
CBS 277.62--770
CBS 130811JN134125JF731099770
CBS 130931JN134126JF731100770
CS 674JN134128JF731101770
CS 730-JF731102770
M. ferrugineumNBRC 5831JN134137JF731106770
NBRC 6081JN134138JF731107770
CBS 457.80--770
CBS 131111JN134136JF731105770
CBS 427.63AJ252336-770
CBS 457.80AJ252335-770
CBS 118546--770
CBS 118547--770
CS 650JN134135JF731104770
M. audouiniiNBRC 6074JN134145JF731113771
CBS 280.63--771
CBS 332.68--771
CBS 119448--771
M. nanumJCM 1907JN134095JF731121797
CBS 321.61DQ860795-797
CBS 322.61--797
CBS 569.80DQ860796-796
CBS 633.82--796
CBS 728.88--796
M. persicolorNBRC 5975JN134144JF731112808
CBS 421.74--808
CBS 422.74--808
CBS 871.70--808
M. gypseum (A. gypseum)IFO 5948JN134133JF731097798
IFO 8228JN134134JF731098798
CBS 130820JN134130JF731093798
CBS 130936JN134131JF731094798
CBS 130939JN134132JF731095798
CBS 424.66--797
CS 718-JF731096798
M. gypseum (A. incurvatum)CBS 548.82--793
M. fulvumCBS 599.66--
CBS 287.55EF078472-
SS 672JN134143-
M. gallinaeCS 778JN134141JF731111775
Epidermophyton floccosumCBS 767.73--789
NBRC 9045JN134157JF731127789
CS 657JN134154JF731122789
CS 725-JF731123789
CS 739JN134155JF731124789
CS 750JN134156JF731125789
CS 752-JF731126789
M. amazonicumCBS 222.75--762

All GenBank accession numbers listed belong to sequences achieved in the study.

BT2, beta tubulin protein-coding gene; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; CS, clinical strain; JCM, Japan Collection of Microorganisms; NBRC, NITE Biological Resource Center; SS, soil strain

Table 1.

Reference and clinical strains of dermatophytes used in this study for sequence analysis of partial beta tubulin gene.

SpeciesStrainInternal transcribe spacerBT2 accession no.Size of BT2 partial
accession no.sequence (bp)
Arthroderma vanbreuseghemiiJCM 1891JN134094JF731120789
Trichophyton interdigitaleNBRC 5974JN134103JF731087790
NBRC 5809JN134101JF731085792
NBRC 5812JN134102JF731086790
NBRC 5466JN134100JF731084790
CBS 102.68--790
CBS 116916--788
CBS 119445--789
CBS 130816JN134009JF731046792
CBS 130824JN134010JF731085792
CBS 130930JN134015JF731049792
CBS 130923JN134017JF731051792
CBS 130810JN134021JF731052790
CBS 130940JN134022JF731053790
CBS 130928JN134024JF731079792
CS 248JN133983JF731075790
CS 365JN133985JF731076790
CS 407JN133989JF731077790
CS 437JN133991JF731043790
CS 490JN133999JF731044790
CS 558JN134005JF731045790
CS 559JN134006JF731078790
CS 584JN134011JF731048790
CS 655JN134016JF731050790
CS 759JN134023-JF731054792
CS 781-JF731055790
T. tonsuransNBRC 5928JN134086JF731073790
NBRC 5945JN134087JF731074790
CBS 130924JN134080JF731068790
CBS 130822JN134085JF731071790
CBS 238.33--790
CS 768JN134084JF731070790
CS 782-JF731072790
T. equinumNBRC 31610JN134108JF731092790
CBS 270.66--790
CBS 634.82--790
CBS 100080EF043273-790
T. mentagrophytesCBS 106.67Z98000-796
CBS 764.84--797
CBS 318.56Z97995-796
T. schoenleiniiNBRC 8191JN134098JF731082798
NBRC 8192JN134099JF731083798
CBS 130812JN134097JF731081797
CBS 855.71Z98011-797
CS 20JN134096JF731080797
T. simiiCBS 417.65NR-103706-797
CBS 448.65--796
CBS 150.66--794
T. rubrumNBRC 5467JN134067JF731066794
NBRC 5808JN134068JF731067794
CBS 360.62--794
CBS 734.88--794
CBS 100237--794
CBS 130927JN134027JF731056794
CBS 130825JN134042JF731058794
CBS 130817JN134058JF731060794
CBS 130808JN134060JF731061794
CBS 130933JN134063JF731063794
CBS 130925JN134064JF731064794
CBS 130821JN134065JF731065794
CS 329JN134037JF731057794
CS 534JN134048JF731059794
CS 669JN134061JF731062794
T. violaceumNBRC 31064JN134106JF731090794
CBS 130937JN134104JF731088794
CS 352JN134105JF731089794
T. concentricumCBS 109404--797
CBS 109405--797
CBS 109407--797
CBS 173.40-797
T. verrucosumCBS 130944--
CBS 130945--
CBS 130947--
T. erinaceiCS 379JN134091JF731117796
CBS 511.73JX122302-797
CBS 344.79Z97996-797
A. benhamiaeJCM 1885JN134093JF731118797
(Trichophyton sp. of A. benhamiae)CS 269JN134088JF731114-797
CBS 809.72--798
CBS 623.66Z98015-798
CBS 280.83Z98016798
T. eriotrephonCS 361JN134089-798
CS 363JN134090-798
T. ajelloiIFO 31978JN134092JF731119723
CBS 130926JN134107JF731091723
Microsporum cookeiNBRC 7862JN134140JF731110770
SS 779JN134139JF731109770
CBS 129.67HQ825142-769
CBS 202.66DQ860714-769
CBS 337.74HQ825141-774
M. racemosumCBS 130935JN134142JF731108771
CBS 423.74HQ825139-770
CBS 102175HQ825138-770
M. canisNBRC 9182JN134129JF731103770
CBS 566.80--770
CBS 132.88--770
CBS 277.62--770
CBS 130811JN134125JF731099770
CBS 130931JN134126JF731100770
CS 674JN134128JF731101770
CS 730-JF731102770
M. ferrugineumNBRC 5831JN134137JF731106770
NBRC 6081JN134138JF731107770
CBS 457.80--770
CBS 131111JN134136JF731105770
CBS 427.63AJ252336-770
CBS 457.80AJ252335-770
CBS 118546--770
CBS 118547--770
CS 650JN134135JF731104770
M. audouiniiNBRC 6074JN134145JF731113771
CBS 280.63--771
CBS 332.68--771
CBS 119448--771
M. nanumJCM 1907JN134095JF731121797
CBS 321.61DQ860795-797
CBS 322.61--797
CBS 569.80DQ860796-796
CBS 633.82--796
CBS 728.88--796
M. persicolorNBRC 5975JN134144JF731112808
CBS 421.74--808
CBS 422.74--808
CBS 871.70--808
M. gypseum (A. gypseum)IFO 5948JN134133JF731097798
IFO 8228JN134134JF731098798
CBS 130820JN134130JF731093798
CBS 130936JN134131JF731094798
CBS 130939JN134132JF731095798
CBS 424.66--797
CS 718-JF731096798
M. gypseum (A. incurvatum)CBS 548.82--793
M. fulvumCBS 599.66--
CBS 287.55EF078472-
SS 672JN134143-
M. gallinaeCS 778JN134141JF731111775
Epidermophyton floccosumCBS 767.73--789
NBRC 9045JN134157JF731127789
CS 657JN134154JF731122789
CS 725-JF731123789
CS 739JN134155JF731124789
CS 750JN134156JF731125789
CS 752-JF731126789
M. amazonicumCBS 222.75--762
SpeciesStrainInternal transcribe spacerBT2 accession no.Size of BT2 partial
accession no.sequence (bp)
Arthroderma vanbreuseghemiiJCM 1891JN134094JF731120789
Trichophyton interdigitaleNBRC 5974JN134103JF731087790
NBRC 5809JN134101JF731085792
NBRC 5812JN134102JF731086790
NBRC 5466JN134100JF731084790
CBS 102.68--790
CBS 116916--788
CBS 119445--789
CBS 130816JN134009JF731046792
CBS 130824JN134010JF731085792
CBS 130930JN134015JF731049792
CBS 130923JN134017JF731051792
CBS 130810JN134021JF731052790
CBS 130940JN134022JF731053790
CBS 130928JN134024JF731079792
CS 248JN133983JF731075790
CS 365JN133985JF731076790
CS 407JN133989JF731077790
CS 437JN133991JF731043790
CS 490JN133999JF731044790
CS 558JN134005JF731045790
CS 559JN134006JF731078790
CS 584JN134011JF731048790
CS 655JN134016JF731050790
CS 759JN134023-JF731054792
CS 781-JF731055790
T. tonsuransNBRC 5928JN134086JF731073790
NBRC 5945JN134087JF731074790
CBS 130924JN134080JF731068790
CBS 130822JN134085JF731071790
CBS 238.33--790
CS 768JN134084JF731070790
CS 782-JF731072790
T. equinumNBRC 31610JN134108JF731092790
CBS 270.66--790
CBS 634.82--790
CBS 100080EF043273-790
T. mentagrophytesCBS 106.67Z98000-796
CBS 764.84--797
CBS 318.56Z97995-796
T. schoenleiniiNBRC 8191JN134098JF731082798
NBRC 8192JN134099JF731083798
CBS 130812JN134097JF731081797
CBS 855.71Z98011-797
CS 20JN134096JF731080797
T. simiiCBS 417.65NR-103706-797
CBS 448.65--796
CBS 150.66--794
T. rubrumNBRC 5467JN134067JF731066794
NBRC 5808JN134068JF731067794
CBS 360.62--794
CBS 734.88--794
CBS 100237--794
CBS 130927JN134027JF731056794
CBS 130825JN134042JF731058794
CBS 130817JN134058JF731060794
CBS 130808JN134060JF731061794
CBS 130933JN134063JF731063794
CBS 130925JN134064JF731064794
CBS 130821JN134065JF731065794
CS 329JN134037JF731057794
CS 534JN134048JF731059794
CS 669JN134061JF731062794
T. violaceumNBRC 31064JN134106JF731090794
CBS 130937JN134104JF731088794
CS 352JN134105JF731089794
T. concentricumCBS 109404--797
CBS 109405--797
CBS 109407--797
CBS 173.40-797
T. verrucosumCBS 130944--
CBS 130945--
CBS 130947--
T. erinaceiCS 379JN134091JF731117796
CBS 511.73JX122302-797
CBS 344.79Z97996-797
A. benhamiaeJCM 1885JN134093JF731118797
(Trichophyton sp. of A. benhamiae)CS 269JN134088JF731114-797
CBS 809.72--798
CBS 623.66Z98015-798
CBS 280.83Z98016798
T. eriotrephonCS 361JN134089-798
CS 363JN134090-798
T. ajelloiIFO 31978JN134092JF731119723
CBS 130926JN134107JF731091723
Microsporum cookeiNBRC 7862JN134140JF731110770
SS 779JN134139JF731109770
CBS 129.67HQ825142-769
CBS 202.66DQ860714-769
CBS 337.74HQ825141-774
M. racemosumCBS 130935JN134142JF731108771
CBS 423.74HQ825139-770
CBS 102175HQ825138-770
M. canisNBRC 9182JN134129JF731103770
CBS 566.80--770
CBS 132.88--770
CBS 277.62--770
CBS 130811JN134125JF731099770
CBS 130931JN134126JF731100770
CS 674JN134128JF731101770
CS 730-JF731102770
M. ferrugineumNBRC 5831JN134137JF731106770
NBRC 6081JN134138JF731107770
CBS 457.80--770
CBS 131111JN134136JF731105770
CBS 427.63AJ252336-770
CBS 457.80AJ252335-770
CBS 118546--770
CBS 118547--770
CS 650JN134135JF731104770
M. audouiniiNBRC 6074JN134145JF731113771
CBS 280.63--771
CBS 332.68--771
CBS 119448--771
M. nanumJCM 1907JN134095JF731121797
CBS 321.61DQ860795-797
CBS 322.61--797
CBS 569.80DQ860796-796
CBS 633.82--796
CBS 728.88--796
M. persicolorNBRC 5975JN134144JF731112808
CBS 421.74--808
CBS 422.74--808
CBS 871.70--808
M. gypseum (A. gypseum)IFO 5948JN134133JF731097798
IFO 8228JN134134JF731098798
CBS 130820JN134130JF731093798
CBS 130936JN134131JF731094798
CBS 130939JN134132JF731095798
CBS 424.66--797
CS 718-JF731096798
M. gypseum (A. incurvatum)CBS 548.82--793
M. fulvumCBS 599.66--
CBS 287.55EF078472-
SS 672JN134143-
M. gallinaeCS 778JN134141JF731111775
Epidermophyton floccosumCBS 767.73--789
NBRC 9045JN134157JF731127789
CS 657JN134154JF731122789
CS 725-JF731123789
CS 739JN134155JF731124789
CS 750JN134156JF731125789
CS 752-JF731126789
M. amazonicumCBS 222.75--762

All GenBank accession numbers listed belong to sequences achieved in the study.

BT2, beta tubulin protein-coding gene; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; CS, clinical strain; JCM, Japan Collection of Microorganisms; NBRC, NITE Biological Resource Center; SS, soil strain

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted and purified from fungal colonies using a previously described method [18]. Briefly, 10–20 mm3 of the fresh colonies grown on Sabouraud glucose agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) were added to 1.5-ml tubes that contained 300 μl of lysis buffer (200 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 25 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); 0.5% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate; and 250 mM NaCl) and crushed with a conical grinder (Micro Multi Mixer; IEDA Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for 1 min. The samples were incubated in a boiling water bath for 10 min, mixed with 150 μl of 3.0 M sodium acetate, kept at −20°C for 10 min, and centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was extracted once with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and once more with chloroform. The DNA in supernatant was precipitated with 250 μl isopropanol, washed with 300 ml of 70% ethanol, air dried, and rehydrated in 50 μl ultrapure water, and stored at −20°C until use.

Polymerase chain reaction

For ITS polymerase chain reaction (PCR), each mixture contained 2.5 μl of 10× reaction buffer, 0.5 μM of the forward ITS1 and the reverse ITS4 universal fungal primers [19], 400 μM of deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan), 1 μl of extracted DNA, and enough ultrapure water to reach a final reaction volume of 25 μl. The PCRs were programmed for preheating at 96°C for 6 min followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Five microliters of the PCR products were electrophoresed onto 1.5% agarose gel in Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer (Tris 40 mM, acetic acid 20 mM, EDTA 1 mM), stained with 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide, and observed and photographed under ultraviolet irradiation. Similar PCR conditions were used for amplification of beta tubulin gene except the oligonucleotide primers, which were the universal fungal primers T1 (5′-AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT-3′) [20] as the forward and Bt2b (5′-ACCCTCA-GTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′) [21] as the reverse primer.

Sequencing and sequence analysis

ITS and BT2 PCR products were purified using a QIAquick purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), subjected to ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and sequenced in both directions using the same primers (individually) as for the primary PCR by an automated DNA sequencer (ABI Prism 3730 Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems) and edited with MEGA5 [22] and Geneious (http://www.geneious.com) software. Levels of sequence identity matrix and sequence difference count in each target were calculated pairwise using BioEdit software (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html) or evaluated using the following formula: D = 1 − (M/L), where M is the number of shared positions and L is the total number of alignment positions compared [23]. The sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). ITS-rDNA was considered to be the molecular model for dermatophytes species designation [7]. Data were compared in GenBank using the BLASTn algorithm, and strain and sequence information provided with the reference strains from CBS (http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/dermatophytes/BioloMICSID.aspx) were evaluated.

Phylogenetic analyses

Multiple alignments of the beta tubulin gene sequences were made using BioEdit or Geneious software. The phylogenetic tree was built using MEGA5 software, and the tree topology was evaluated visually for congruence of species-rank clades with the following conditions: statistical method was maximum likelihood, test of phylogeny was bootstrap method with 1000 replication, substitution model was Tamura–Nei, and there were uniform rates among sites [23]. The bioinformatics data were analyzed and used to assess the inter- and intraspecies nucleotide variation of BT2 in all reference strains and clinical isolates used in this study.

Results

Strain designations and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of 109 reference and 35 clinical isolates representing 26 dermatophyte species used in this study are listed in Table 1. PCR amplification of BT2 was successful for all strains, and a single band with overall length of approximately 750 base pairs (bp) was observed on electrophoresis. Sequencing results showed that length ranged from 723 to 808 nucleotides (nt; Table 1). The smallest size was found in T. ajelloi with 723 nt and the longest in M. persicolor with 808 nt. Some species had identical size, for example, 790 nt for T. tonsurans and T. equinum (Table 1). Despite significant variation in BT2 amplicon length, size polymorphism did not allow species differentiation by gel electrophoresis.

Intraspecific sequence variation was found in some species; however, T. tonsurans, T. equinum, T. concentricum, T. verrucosum, T. rubrum, T. violaceum, T. eriotrephon, E. floccosum, M. canis, M. ferrugineum, and M. audouinii were invariant. Figure 1 shows the multiple DNA sequence alignment of BT2 sequences in the most common pathogenic dermatophytes. The sequence alignment reveals significant divergences, including substitution, insertion/deletion, and gaps throughout the sequences. Nevertheless, confident alignment was possible over the entire dataset using several nearly invariant regions, which could be useful for reliable pan-dermatophyte primer and probe design.

Figure 1.

Multiple sequence alignments of the partial beta tubulin gene sequence from various dermatophyte species and strains sequenced in this study. A dot indicates an identical nucleotide with respect to the top sequence; a dash indicates an insertion/deletion (indel) event.

Figure 1.

– continued

A sequence difference count matrix based on nucleotide pairwise comparison of the BT2 gene between representative dermatophyte species and strains is shown in Table 2. Sequence diversity among 26 dermatophyte species ranged from 0 to 229 nt. The species with the closest resemblance were Arthroderma benhamiae and T. concentricum and T. tonsurans and T. equinum with 100% and 99.8% identity, respectively, and the most distant species were M. persicolor and M. amazonicum. Strains of T. interdigitale (A. vanbreuseghemii) had the most intraspecies variability, 0–14 bp mismatching (98.2%–100% similarity); according to the results, six BT2 genotypes were found within the species. The distance range of BT2 sequence between T. interdigitale strains was 0.2%–1.8%. A low BT2 intrapopulation diversity of 0–2 bp was computed within the strains of M. gypseum with the genotype of A. gypseum. A significant BT2 interspecies diversity, ranging from 58 bp to 60 bp (7.3%–7.5% dissimilarity), was found among seven strains of A. gypseum and the only strain of M. gypseum with A. incurvatum genotype. The intraspecies pairwise distance variations as 1 nt (99.8% identity), 0–3 nt (99.6%–100% similarity), 0–4 nt (99.4%–100% similarity), 0–3 nt (99.6%–100% similarity), and 7–17 nt (99.7%–99%) were computed within the strains of T. ajelloi, M. cookei, M. nanum, M. persicolor, and M. racemosum, respectively. Trees constructed with BT2 and ITS sequences for representative strains of each species are shown in Figure 2. Some closely related species formed well-supported clades in the BT2 tree, such as T. interdigitale, T. tonsurans, and T. equinum (bootstrap value, 94%); A. simii, T. mentagrophytes, and T. schoenleinii (bootstrap value of 81%); T. rubrum and T. violaceum (bootstrap value, 100%); M. cookei and M. racemosum (bootstrap value, 100%); M. audouinii, M. canis, and M. ferrugineum (bootstrap value, 99%); and members of the A. benhamiae complex (bootstrap value, of 93%; Fig. 2A). Others, such as M. persicolor, E. floccosum, A. obtusum, and A. uncinatum, took relatively remote positions. Dermatophyte tree topologies were almost identical in BT2 and ITS (Fig. 1A, 1B).

Figure 2.

(A) Phylogenetic tree of 54 representative dermatophyte species and strains (different species and the same species but with at least one nucleotide difference) based on analysis of beta tubulin gene sequences. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura–Nei model. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree for the heuristic search was obtained automatically by applying neighbor–join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood approach and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [22]. (B) A smaller phylogenetic tree of 31 representative dermatophytes species based on analysis of internal transcribe spacer sequences. Note that the position of the complexes and species are almost same in both trees.

Figure 2.

– continued

Table 2.

Sequences difference count matrix based on pairwise sequence comparison of beta tubulin gene between representative dermatophytes investigated in this study.

Species1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
1Trichophyton mentID
2T. conce36ID
3Microsporum cook131140ID
4M. amaz217215210ID
5M. nanu9094134218ID
6M. cook13314218203133ID
7T. erinac401113821299139ID
8Arthroderma simii3391342219313643ID
9M. racem126135920413013132129ID
10A. incur8287132214731328785124ID
11M. racem1291388208134181361327128ID
12T. interd223513221193134392512783130ID
13M. canis140146151181160150145143151157152147ID
14T. schoe137132219911344121278313023142ID
15T. tonsu233612921096131402612486127314724ID
16T. ajelloi126196167145192165196195161182164187167192187ID
17T. rubru313913420998138423413187132361493237195ID
18M. racem13213713207137171331351413117130151133127163136ID
19M. gyps88971312247013198911276013190156899119695132ID
20M. ferru13814614818115614714514114615614714412140143165144145150ID
21T. interd224113421310013545271299113281502351904213096148ID
22T. eriotr381113621491140144113186132411513942197421369815147ID
23T. erinac389139211981402411318513538147393919539135971474412ID
24M. gallin145148134182150137146148130143134145105146146164144134147101151146146ID
25A. benh36014021595142114013387136351463836196401379714641119149ID
26A. vanbr2638130212951354129128851288150279186381309214712423914238ID
27M. persi77841292296912988801257012990170789119788131791629083861568494ID
28M. audo138148150184157149144141148154149143141391421691481471496145151146106148145163ID
29M. cook1291393208132171361328130713015213012716713312129147132135139132139128127151ID
30Epidermophyton flocco79891262168012390821197912494158809518886126771531009087139899678152124ID
31T. violac333913621010014044361338913438149343919321369714444444114639409014713588ID
32T. equin24371302129713241271258712841472511873812792144443401453710921421289640ID
Species1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
1Trichophyton mentID
2T. conce36ID
3Microsporum cook131140ID
4M. amaz217215210ID
5M. nanu9094134218ID
6M. cook13314218203133ID
7T. erinac401113821299139ID
8Arthroderma simii3391342219313643ID
9M. racem126135920413013132129ID
10A. incur8287132214731328785124ID
11M. racem1291388208134181361327128ID
12T. interd223513221193134392512783130ID
13M. canis140146151181160150145143151157152147ID
14T. schoe137132219911344121278313023142ID
15T. tonsu233612921096131402612486127314724ID
16T. ajelloi126196167145192165196195161182164187167192187ID
17T. rubru313913420998138423413187132361493237195ID
18M. racem13213713207137171331351413117130151133127163136ID
19M. gyps88971312247013198911276013190156899119695132ID
20M. ferru13814614818115614714514114615614714412140143165144145150ID
21T. interd224113421310013545271299113281502351904213096148ID
22T. eriotr381113621491140144113186132411513942197421369815147ID
23T. erinac389139211981402411318513538147393919539135971474412ID
24M. gallin145148134182150137146148130143134145105146146164144134147101151146146ID
25A. benh36014021595142114013387136351463836196401379714641119149ID
26A. vanbr2638130212951354129128851288150279186381309214712423914238ID
27M. persi77841292296912988801257012990170789119788131791629083861568494ID
28M. audo138148150184157149144141148154149143141391421691481471496145151146106148145163ID
29M. cook1291393208132171361328130713015213012716713312129147132135139132139128127151ID
30Epidermophyton flocco79891262168012390821197912494158809518886126771531009087139899678152124ID
31T. violac333913621010014044361338913438149343919321369714444444114639409014713588ID
32T. equin24371302129713241271258712841472511873812792144443401453710921421289640ID
Table 2.

Sequences difference count matrix based on pairwise sequence comparison of beta tubulin gene between representative dermatophytes investigated in this study.

Species1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
1Trichophyton mentID
2T. conce36ID
3Microsporum cook131140ID
4M. amaz217215210ID
5M. nanu9094134218ID
6M. cook13314218203133ID
7T. erinac401113821299139ID
8Arthroderma simii3391342219313643ID
9M. racem126135920413013132129ID
10A. incur8287132214731328785124ID
11M. racem1291388208134181361327128ID
12T. interd223513221193134392512783130ID
13M. canis140146151181160150145143151157152147ID
14T. schoe137132219911344121278313023142ID
15T. tonsu233612921096131402612486127314724ID
16T. ajelloi126196167145192165196195161182164187167192187ID
17T. rubru313913420998138423413187132361493237195ID
18M. racem13213713207137171331351413117130151133127163136ID
19M. gyps88971312247013198911276013190156899119695132ID
20M. ferru13814614818115614714514114615614714412140143165144145150ID
21T. interd224113421310013545271299113281502351904213096148ID
22T. eriotr381113621491140144113186132411513942197421369815147ID
23T. erinac389139211981402411318513538147393919539135971474412ID
24M. gallin145148134182150137146148130143134145105146146164144134147101151146146ID
25A. benh36014021595142114013387136351463836196401379714641119149ID
26A. vanbr2638130212951354129128851288150279186381309214712423914238ID
27M. persi77841292296912988801257012990170789119788131791629083861568494ID
28M. audo138148150184157149144141148154149143141391421691481471496145151146106148145163ID
29M. cook1291393208132171361328130713015213012716713312129147132135139132139128127151ID
30Epidermophyton flocco79891262168012390821197912494158809518886126771531009087139899678152124ID
31T. violac333913621010014044361338913438149343919321369714444444114639409014713588ID
32T. equin24371302129713241271258712841472511873812792144443401453710921421289640ID
Species1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132
1Trichophyton mentID
2T. conce36ID
3Microsporum cook131140ID
4M. amaz217215210ID
5M. nanu9094134218ID
6M. cook13314218203133ID
7T. erinac401113821299139ID
8Arthroderma simii3391342219313643ID
9M. racem126135920413013132129ID
10A. incur8287132214731328785124ID
11M. racem1291388208134181361327128ID
12T. interd223513221193134392512783130ID
13M. canis140146151181160150145143151157152147ID
14T. schoe137132219911344121278313023142ID
15T. tonsu233612921096131402612486127314724ID
16T. ajelloi126196167145192165196195161182164187167192187ID
17T. rubru313913420998138423413187132361493237195ID
18M. racem13213713207137171331351413117130151133127163136ID
19M. gyps88971312247013198911276013190156899119695132ID
20M. ferru13814614818115614714514114615614714412140143165144145150ID
21T. interd224113421310013545271299113281502351904213096148ID
22T. eriotr381113621491140144113186132411513942197421369815147ID
23T. erinac389139211981402411318513538147393919539135971474412ID
24M. gallin145148134182150137146148130143134145105146146164144134147101151146146ID
25A. benh36014021595142114013387136351463836196401379714641119149ID
26A. vanbr2638130212951354129128851288150279186381309214712423914238ID
27M. persi77841292296912988801257012990170789119788131791629083861568494ID
28M. audo138148150184157149144141148154149143141391421691481471496145151146106148145163ID
29M. cook1291393208132171361328130713015213012716713312129147132135139132139128127151ID
30Epidermophyton flocco79891262168012390821197912494158809518886126771531009087139899678152124ID
31T. violac333913621010014044361338913438149343919321369714444444114639409014713588ID
32T. equin24371302129713241271258712841472511873812792144443401453710921421289640ID

Discussion

Since a high degree of phylogenetic resolution is the primary benchmark used to determine the suitability of a locus for molecular systematic analysis [24], the suitability of partial beta tubulin gene sequencing for specifying the species boundaries among dermatophytes was targeted in this study. The taxonomy of dermatophytes has been changed fundamentally recently [7,18,25–28]; however, there are still some areas of conflict [29–31]. The recently proposed taxonomy principally relied on molecular species recognition inferred from ITS sequences [7]. In main traits, congruence with phenotypic species concepts was found, but sequence data have resulted in some controversies [30–32]. Previous studies indicated that protein-coding loci provide high resolution and support for fungal systematics [33,34], especially the BT2 gene [14–17]. A recent BT2 sequence–based study led to discovery of a new morphologically cryptic phylogenetic species within the M. cookei clade, M. mirabile [35]. Moreover, our recent partial sequencing of BT2 provided evidence that this locus is more useful for species discrimination of Arthroderma otae members [36] and it has the same value as ITS for differentiation of T. tonsurans and T. equinum [37]. Here we extended the BT2 partial sequencing to a spectrum of 26 dermatophyte species in order to perform species delineation.

It is known that most Trichophyton spp., especially the human-adapted species, are similar to each other in ITS. Sequence mismatching may be as low as a single nucleotide (SNP) exchange, as observed in ITS1 of the closely related species of the A. vanbreuseghemii complex, T. tonsurans and T. equinum [7,37,38]. However, the pairwise sequence comparison of BT2 in the ecologically differentiated species T. tonsurans and T. equinum also showed a single SNP difference. ITS sequence homology between A. vanbreuseghemii (anamorph T. interdigitale) and T. tonsurans/T. equinum strains was noted to be >98.6% [38]. Our BT2 pairwise comparison in this study revealed a similar range of 98.4% to 99.4% between T. interdigitale and T. equinum and 98.6% to 99.6% between T. interdigitale and T. tonsurans (Table 2). We attribute these findings to the significant variation among T. interdigitale strains of 0.2%–1.8% intraspecies dissimilarity in BT2. Among dermatophytes, T. interdigitale is the only dermatophyte taxon that unifies strains of both human- and animal-associated lineages [7] and, additionally, shows a high frequency of intragenomic polymorphism in ITS [39]. Recently, the taxonomic status of T. interdigitale was revisited by Beguin et al. [31]. Based on the phylogram inferred from a combined sequences dataset of three loci, including ITS, partial BT2, and Actin genes, they concluded that T. interdigitale cannot be considered to belong to A. vanbreuseghemii. In their analysis, the two taxa differed by one to six nucleotides across the ITS-rDNA. However, such minor genetic polymorphisms may be insufficient for separation of the mentioned taxa. In addition, there was no relationship between genotypes of ITS and mating behavior of T. interdigitale, including strains ranging from sexually active to inactive [29].

Our BT2-based phylogenic analysis showed that the genealogical relationships of species in the A. benhamiae complex were compatible with that inferred from the ITS cladogram. The intraspecies divergences were found to be 0, 0–1, 0, and 1–3 bp in ITS vs. 0, 0–8, 0, and 3 bp in BT2 for strains of T. concentricum, A. benhamiae, T. eriotrephon, and T. erinacei, respectively. The ITS sequence diversity between the strains of T. erinacei and A. benhamiae was reported to be up to 21 substitutions [25]. In the present study, sequence variation between two species ranged from 10 to 15 bp in ITS and 11 to 13 bp in BT2. In general, both ITS and BT2 regions could discriminate between the strains of all species in the complex at almost the same level of diversity (data not shown). BT2 sequencing could not distinguish between A. benhamiae (T. anamorph) and T. concentricum (99.9%–100% identity), two species that also were the nearest relatives to each other in our ITS genealogy (98.5%–99.7% similarity). These results corroborate the findings of Heidemann et al., who observed T. concentricum as the closest relative of A. benhamiae [26], and of Kawasaki et al., who found that the two mentioned species were not indistinguishable from each other by actin and topoisomerase II gene sequencing [32].

The status of our two strains of a very rare species, T. eriotrephon, on BT2 and ITS sequence analysis was interesting. Until recently, there was only a single clinical strain of this species (CBS 220.25), isolated in 1925 in Amsterdam from a patient with tinea corporis. In 2012 we encountered two new cases of this species in Iran [40]. Our strains were identical in both ITS and BT2 sequencing and showed complete ITS sequence homology to T. eriotrephon strain CBS 220.25. Together with those of T. erinacei and T. verrucosum, the sequences constituted a separate internode on the BT2 phylogram. Additionally, they had close similarity to T. erinacei, strain CS 379, in both ITS and BT2 regions and were remote from T. concentricum. This finding supports the possibility that the species has a zoophilic origin [26]. In the BT2 pairwise comparison of T. eriotrephon and its relatives (T. concentricum, A. benhamiae, T. verrucosum, and T. erinacei), five signature nucleotides unique to the taxon were identified.

Unfortunately, we did not obtain the full length of the BT2 sequence in the cattle-associated species, T. verrucosum; after alignment, a shorter 509-bp fragment was obtained in all three strains of the species. While the strains had intraspecies variation in ITS marker, no intraspecific variation was found in BT2; moreover, two species-specific barcode nucleotides were determined for the species. The location of T. verrucosum in both ITS and BT2 trees at a node with T. erinacei was almost the same and in consonance with those inferred from earlier studies [25,26]. Although the natural distribution of Arthroderma simii (anamorph T. simii), a monkey-associated species, is probably not as restricted as has previously been proposed [41], it is considered to be prevalent only in the Indian subcontinent where it was isolated from soil as well as from human and animal infections. The species was poorly studied, and its level of genetic biodiversity is unclear [7,42]. Sequence analysis of the ITS region and other genetic markers indicates that it is closely related to T. mentagrophytes sensu stricto and T. schoenleinii [18,43]. Based on new species concepts, the former zoophilic taxa, including T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum (associated with rodents), T. langeronii, and T. sarkisovii (both associated with camels), are now conspecific with T. mentagrophytes sensu stricto [7,25]. In our BT2 and ITS analyses, strains of these species were found in the same node and had intraspecies variation levels of 0–1 nt, except for A. simii strains, which had 2–6 nt variation in BT2. While the interspecies dissimilarities in ITS sequences varied with 5 bp between T. mentagrophytes and T. schoenleinii and with 15 bp between A. simii and T. schoenleinii (data not shown), a high degree of similarity was found in BT2 of three species, especially between T. mentagrophytes and T. schoenleinii (99.8% identity). These findings indicate that ITS-rDNA is more heterogeneous than BT2 in the strains of the A. simii complex, on the one hand, and supports the theory that T. schoenleinii possibly originated from camels, rather than rodents, on the other hand [26,43].

The phylogeny of the closely related species within the Arthroderma otae complex was discussed in our recent multilocus-based study [36]. Microsporum canis and M. ferrugineum were distinguished by 2 bp in ITS2, while M. audouinii differentiated from these two species by polymorphisms in both ITS1 and ITS2 [36,44]. The average pairwise sequence divergence between the three tested species was 5.33 nt for the ITS region, in comparison with 10.67 nt for BT2, suggesting that BT2 is more useful than ITS for species delineation in the A. otae complex.

The taxa around T. rubrum consisted of significant numbers of phenotypic species and varieties that were recently reclassified and found to be conspecific with T. rubrum or T. violaceum [28]. Trichophyton rubrum strains have relatively identical ITS sequences, and characteristic sites were found in both ITS1 and ITS2 [44]. In contrast, despite the presence of species-specific sequences in ITS1, T. violaceum strains have intraspecies diversity, especially in the number of TA motifs at the end of ITS2 region [28,44,45]. Our ITS sequencing from T. violaceum strains provided complementary support for this fact. The length of the consensus sequence for BT2 of T. rubrum and T. violaceum was the same (794 nt), but the two species differed in two signature nucleotides, that is, transitions in positions 173 and 376. Based on the fact that no intraspecies variation was found among strains of each species, the mentioned SNPs can act as molecular autapomorphies for species assignment of T. rubrum and T. violaceum isolates.

Epidermophyton floccosum, the type species of the genus Epidermophyton, has received limited attention in genetic analyses. Kawasaki et al., using restriction fragment length polymorphism of mitochondrial DNA, concluded that Epidermophyton could not be separated from the genera Trichophyton and Microsporum [46]. In contrast, Kano et al. found <1% intraspecies variation in the CHS1 gene among strains of E. floccosum and suggested that the species is genetically distinct from Trichophyton and Microsporum [47]. It was stated that E. floccosum is close to the anthropophilic Trichophyton species [25], while in our study, the taxon was paraphyletic to Microsporum in both ITS and BT2 trees. No intraspecific variation was found in the BT2 locus of our E. floccosum strains.

Intraspecies diversities with three BT2 genotypes were found in strains of each zoophilic species studied, M. nanum (teleomorph A. obtusum) and M. persicolor. Nonetheless, the species were found to have enough variation locating them at relevant clades on BT2 tree. Similarly, M. gallinae, which is located at a separate position, showed some BT2 heterogeneity. The so-called M. gypseum complex comprised two morphologically similar species, M. fulvum and M. gypseum. Microsporum fulvum (teleomorph A. fulvum) rarely causes infection [48]. Microsporum gypseum, the most common geophilic species implicated in dermatophytosis, has been linked to two teleomorphs, A. gypseum and A. incurvatum, which morphologically cannot be differentiated either from each other or from M. fulvum; however, genetically the three taxa are distinct [7,49]. Our BT2 analysis by maximum likelihood showed significant interspecies distances. We also investigated ITS with CHS1 partial gene sequences retrieved from GenBank (data not shown). Similar to BT2, large phylogenetic distances were found in ITS/CHS1 analyses, and the branching patterns were concordant in all trees, meaning that phylogenetically, three different species are involved. Members of the geophilic dermatophytes, which uncommonly cause infection in humans and animals, are known to show more genetic intraspecies variation and to have the highest mutual ITS distances [7,35]. In concordance with earlier studies, the soilborne species M. amazonicum and T. ajelloi were most distant in all trees. Investigated strains of M. cookei and M. racemosum showed three BT2 genotypes. Delimitation of the two species remains ambiguous because both ITS and BT2 datasets showed low resolution between the taxa, confirming results of Choi et al. [35]. In concordance with their findings, strain CBS 102175 was found once in M. cookei (BT2) and once in M. racemosum (ITS). Furthermore, CBS 337.74 was close to M. racemosum in BT2 but clustered with M. cookei in data from Choi et al. [35]. This discrepancy may be explained by the fact that the part of BT2 used for analysis by Choi et al. [35] was shorter (almost 450 bp) than the fragment analyzed in our study (nearly 770 bp).

The phylogeny derived from BT2 in this study aimed to provide a novel genetic marker as an alternative to ITS-rDNA and to evaluate its utility as a DNA barcoding tool. In general, phylogenetic species concepts of dermatophytes based on BT2 and ITS proved to be similar, with only very small inconsistencies found between the two phylogenies. The resolution of the two markers was in the same range. Closely related anthropophilic taxa are differentiated by limited numbers of mutations in both markers, but their congruence has reinforced existing species concepts. Study of other loci as well as more extensive taxon sampling of zoologic and geophilic species is necessary. Until a consensus classification system that is accepted by all mycologists is reached, it is recommended that the current taxonomy of dermatophytes based on ITS sequence data be retained.

This work was financially supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (grant 90–04–27–15673), Tehran, Iran and Teikyo University TIMM, Tokyo, Japan. We thank all personnel in the Molecular Biology Laboratory at TIMM and CBS.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper.

References

1.
Kanbe
T
Molecular approaches in the diagnosis of dermatophytosis
Mycopathologia
2008
, vol. 
166
 (pg. 
307
-
317
)
2.
Weitzman
I
Summerbell
RC
The dermatophytes
Clin Microbiol Rev
1995
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
240
-
259
)
3.
Ghannoum
M
Hajjeh
R
Scher
R
, et al. 
A large-scale North American study of fungal isolates from nails: the frequency of onychomycosis, fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns
J Am Acad Dermatol
2000
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
641
-
648
)
4.
Loo
DS
Onychomycosis in the elderly
Drugs Aging
2007
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
293
-
302
)
5.
Gräser
Y
Czaika
V
Ohst
T
Diagnostic PCR of dermatophytes—an overview
JDDG: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges
2012
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
721
-
725
)
6.
Elewski
BE
Onychomycosis: treatment, quality of life, and economic issues
Am J Clin Dermatol
2000
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
19
-
26
)
7.
Gräser
Y
Scott
J
Summerbell
R
The new species concept in dermatophytes—a polyphasic approach
Mycopathologia
2008
, vol. 
166
 (pg. 
239
-
256
)
8.
Nyilasi
I
Kocsubé
S
Krizsán
K
, et al. 
Susceptibility of clinically important dermatophytes against statins and different statin-antifungal combinations
Med Mycol
2013
(pg. 
1
-
9
)
9.
Bao
Y-q
Wan
Z
Li
R-y
In vitro antifungal activity of micafungin and caspofungin against dermatophytes isolated from China
Mycopathologia
2013
, vol. 
175
 (pg. 
141
-
145
)
10.
Coelho
LM
Aquino-Ferreira
R
Maffei
CML
Martinez-Rossi
NM
In vitro antifungal drug susceptibilities of dermatophytes microconidia and arthroconidia
J Antimicrob Chemother
2008
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
758
-
761
)
11.
Kac
G
Molecular approaches to the study of dermatophytes
Med Mycol
2000
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
329
-
336
)
12.
Guarro
J
Gené
J
Stchigel
AM
Developments in fungal taxonomy
Clin Microbiol Rev
1999
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
454
-
500
)
13.
Gräser
Y
De Hoog
S
Summerbell
R
Dermatophytes: recognizing species of clonal fungi
Med Mycol
2006
, vol. 
44
 (pg. 
199
-
209
)
14.
Gilgado
F
Cano
J
Gené
J
Guarro
J
Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudallescheria boydii species complex: proposal of two new species
J Clin Microbiol
2005
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
4930
-
4942
)
15.
Balajee
SA
Kano
R
Baddley
JW
, et al. 
Molecular identification of Aspergillus species collected for the transplant-associated infection surveillance network
J Clin Microbiol
2009
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
3138
-
3141
)
16.
Serra
R
Peterson
SW
Penicillium astrolabium and Penicillium neocrassum, two new species isolated from grapes and their phylogenetic placement in the P. olsonii and P. brevicompactum clade
Mycologia
2007
, vol. 
99
 (pg. 
78
-
87
)
17.
Mostert
L
Groenewald
JZ
Summerbell
RC
, et al. 
Species of Phaeoacremonium associated with infections in humans and environmental reservoirs in infected woody plants
J Clin Microbiol
2005
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
1752
-
1767
)
18.
Makimura
K
Tamura
Y
Mochizuki
T
, et al. 
Phylogenetic classification and species identification of dermatophyte strains based on DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions
J Clin Microbiol
1999
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
920
-
924
)
19.
White
TJ
Bruns
T
Taylor
J
Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics
PCR protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications
1990
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
315
-
322
)
20.
O'Donnell
K
Cigelnik
E
Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous
Mol Phylogenet Evol
1997
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
103
-
116
)
21.
Glass
NL
Donaldson
GC
Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes
Appl Environ Microbiol
1995
, vol. 
61
 (pg. 
1323
-
1330
)
22.
Tamura
K
Dudley
J
Nei
M
Kumar
S
MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0
Mol Biol Evol
2007
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
1596
-
1599
)
23.
Chilton
NB
Gasser
RB
Beveridge
I
Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of morphologically indistinguishable species within the Hypodontus macropi complex (Nematoda: Strongyloidea)
Int J Parasitol
1995
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
647
-
651
)
24.
Hofstetter
V
Miadlikowska
J
Kauff
F
Lutzoni
F
Phylogenetic comparison of protein-coding versus ribosomal RNA-coding sequence data: a case study of the Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota)
Mol Phylogenet Evol
2007
, vol. 
44
 (pg. 
412
-
426
)
25.
Gräser
Y
El Fari
M
Vilgalys
R
, et al. 
Phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Arthrodermataceae (dermatophytes) using sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region
Med Mycol
1999
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
105
-
114
)
26.
Heidemann
S
Monod
M
Gräser
Y
Signature polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer region relevant for the differentiation of zoophilic and anthropophilic strains of Trichophyton interdigitale and other species of T. mentagrophytes sensu lato
Br J Dermatol
2010
, vol. 
162
 (pg. 
282
-
295
)
27.
Gräser
Y
Kuijpers
A
Presber
W
De Hoog
G
Molecular taxonomy of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans
Med Mycol
1999
, vol. 
37
 (pg. 
315
-
330
)
28.
Gräser
Y
Kuijpers
A
Presber
W
De Hoog
G
Molecular taxonomy of the Trichophyton rubrum complex
J Clin Microbiol
2000
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
3329
-
3336
)
29.
Anzawa
K
Kawasaki
M
Hironaga
M
Mochizuki
T
Genetic relationship between Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii
Med Mycol
2011
, vol. 
52
 (pg. 
223
-
227
)
30.
Kawasaki
M
Verification of a taxonomy of dermatophytes based on mating results and phylogenetic analyses
Med Mycol
2011
, vol. 
52
 (pg. 
291
-
295
)
31.
Beguin
H
Pyck
N
Hendrickx
M
, et al. 
The taxonomic status of Trichophyton quinckeanum and T. interdigitale revisited: a multigene phylogenetic approach
Med Mycol
2012
, vol. 
50
 (pg. 
871
-
882
)
32.
Kawasaki
M
Anzawa
K
Wakasa
A
, et al. 
Different genes can result in different phylogenetic relationships in Trichophyton species
Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi
2008
, vol. 
49
 (pg. 
311
-
318
)
33.
Diezmann
S
Cox
CJ
Schönian
G
Vilgalys
RJ
Mitchell
TG
Phylogeny and evolution of medical species of Candida and related taxa: a multigenic analysis
J Clin Microbiol
2004
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
5624
-
5635
)
34.
Tanabe
Y
Saikawa
M
Watanabe
MM
Sugiyama
J
Molecular phylogeny of Zygomycota based on EF-1α and RPB1 sequences: limitations and utility of alternative markers to rDNA
Mol Phylogenet Evol
2004
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
438
-
449
)
35.
Choi
JS
Gräser
Y
Walther
G
, et al. 
Microsporum mirabile and its teleomorph Arthroderma mirabile, a new dermatophyte species in the M. cookei clade
Med Mycol
2012
, vol. 
50
 (pg. 
161
-
169
)
36.
Rezaei-Matehkolaei
A
Makimura
K
de Hoog
GS
, et al. 
Multilocus differentiation of the related dermatophytes Microsporum canis, Microsporum ferrugineum and Microsporum audouinii
Med Microbiol
2012
, vol. 
61
 (pg. 
57
-
63
)
37.
Rezaei-Matehkolaei
A
Makimura
K
De Hoog
GS
, et al. 
Discrimination of Trichophyton tonsurans and Trichophyton equinum by PCR-RFLP and by β-tubulin and Translation Elongation Factor 1-α sequencing. Med Mycol 2012; 50:
(pg. 
760
-
764
)
38.
Brasch
J
Logering
B
Graser
Y
Tinea capitis caused by Trichophyton equinum
Acta Derm Venereol
2009
, vol. 
89
 (pg. 
204
-
205
)
39.
Fréalle
E
Rodrigue
M
Gantois
N
, et al. 
Phylogenetic analysis of Trichophyton mentagrophytes human and animal isolates based on MnSOD and ITS sequence comparison
Microbiology
2007
, vol. 
153
 (pg. 
3466
-
3477
)
40.
Rezaei-Matehkolaei
A
Makimura
K
de Hoog
S
, et al. 
Molecular epidemiology of dermatophytosis in Tehran, Iran, a clinical and microbial survey
Med Mycol
2013
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
203
-
207
)
41.
Beguin
H
Goens
K
Hendrickx
M
Planard
C
Stubbe
D
Detandt
M
Is Trichophyton simii endemic to the Indian subcontinent?
Med Mycol
2013
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
444
-
448
)
42.
Kane
J
Summerbell
R
Sigler
L
Krajden
S
Land
G
Laboratory Handbook of Dermatophytes: A Clinical Guide and Laboratory Handbook of Dermatophytes and Other Filamentous Fungi from Skin, Hair, and Nails.
1990
Belmont, CA, USA
Star Publishing Company
43.
Probst
S
De Hoog
G
Graser
Y
Development of DNA markers to explore host shifts in dermatophytes
Stud Mycol
2002
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
57
-
74
)
44.
Li
HC
Bouchara
J-P
Hsu
MM-L
, et al. 
Identification of dermatophytes by sequence analysis of the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer regions
Med Microbiol
2008
, vol. 
57
 (pg. 
592
-
600
)
45.
Chang
J-C
Hsu
MM-L
Barton
RC
Jackson
CJ
High-frequency intragenomic heterogeneity of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer region in Trichophyton violaceum
Eukaryotic Cell
2008
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
721
-
726
)
46.
Kawasaki
M
Aoki
M
Ishizaki
H
Nishimura
K
Miyaji
M
Phytogeny of Epidermophyton floccosum and other dermatophytes
Mycopathologia
1996
, vol. 
134
 (pg. 
121
-
128
)
47.
Kano
R
Nakamura
Y
Watanabe
S
Tsujimoto
H
Hasegawa
A
Phylogenetic relation of Epidermophyton floccosum to the species of Microsporum and Trichophyton in chitin synthase 1 (CHS1) gene sequences
Mycopathologia
1999
, vol. 
146
 (pg. 
111
-
113
)
48.
Nouripour-Sisakht
S
Rezaei-Matehkolaei
A
Abastabar
M
, et al. 
Microsporum fulvum, an ignored pathogenic dermatophyte: a new clinical isolation from Iran
Mycopathologia
2013
, vol. 
176
 (pg. 
157
-
160
)
49.
Kawasaki
M
Ishizaki
H
Aoki
M
Watanabe
S
Phylogeny of Nannizzia incurvata, N. gypsea, N. fulva and N. otae by restriction enzyme analysis of mitochondrial DNA
Mycopathologia
1990
, vol. 
112
 (pg. 
173
-
177
)