Elsevier

Journal of Endodontics

Volume 31, Issue 12, December 2005, Pages 845-850
Journal of Endodontics

Clinical Research
The Impact of Instrument Fracture on Outcome of Endodontic Treatment

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164127.62864.7cGet rights and content

Abstract

Adoption of rotary nickel-titanium instruments has renewed concerns regarding instrument fracture and its consequences. The frequency of instrument fracture and its impact on treatment outcome were determined from an analysis of specialist endodontic practice records involving 8460 cases. A case-control study of treatment outcomes was conducted on a subset of 146 teeth with a retained instrument fragment (plus 146 matched controls), for which clinical and radiographic follow-up of at least 1 year was available. Masked radiographs were assessed by two calibrated examiners. Overall prevalence of retained fractured instruments was 3.3% of treated teeth. In the case-control study, overall healing rates were 91.8% for cases with a fractured instrument and 94.5% for matched controls (p > 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). Healing in both groups was lower in teeth with a preoperative periapical radiolucency (86.7% versus 92.9%, p > 0.05). In the hands of skilled endodontists prognosis was not significantly affected by the presence of a retained fractured instrument.

Section snippets

Study Design

This study was divided into two parts: 1) a retrospective survey of all cases treated nonsurgically (including retreatment) over some 13.5 yr in two endodontic practices involving seven endodontists. The main objective was to determine the prevalence of retained fractured instruments following treatment; 2) the second part was based on all cases from part 1 for which clinical and radiographic follow-up for at least 1 yr was available. Specifically, it entailed a retrospective, case-control

Cohen's Kappa Values

The Kappa value for the interobserver agreement was κ = 0.73. The intraobserver Kappa values for the two raters were κ = 0.68 and 0.78. All three Kappa values were in the “substantial agreement” category (22).

Fracture Prevalence

Overall, 277 teeth from 8460 teeth were identified as containing one or more instrument fragments (total = 301 fragments), yielding a prevalence of all types of retained fractured endodontic instruments of 3.3%, from two specialist practices screened for the period January 1990 to May 2003

Discussion

The prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial is the gold standard by which all clinical research is judged because it represents the highest grade of evidence that can be used for the provision of evidence-based health care (9). However, the best level of evidence that can be realistically achieved for an evaluation of the impact of a procedural complication such as a fractured instrument on endodontic treatment outcome, is a case-control study; although, some would argue that a

Conclusions

a) The overall frequency of fractured endodontic instruments left in the root canal after treatment was found to be 3.3% of treated teeth and comprised 78.1% rotary NiTi files, 15.9% SS hand files, 4.0% paste fillers, and 2.0% lateral spreaders. The frequency of rotary NiTi instrument breakage was comparable to that previously reported for hand files.

b) In the hands of experienced operators, endodontic instrument fracture, in particular rotary NiTi, had no adverse influence on the outcome of

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following for their valuable assistance in the research project: Associate Professor Ian Gordon of the Statistical Consulting Centre, University of Melbourne, Drs. Vivian Jeng and Pairoj Linsuwanont of the School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, and all the endodontists—in particular, the practice principals Drs. Garry Nervo and Peter Parashos—of the participating endodontic practices for their cooperation, patience, and contribution of cases to

References (31)

  • StrindbergLZ

    The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: an analytical study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations

    Acta Odontol Scand

    (1956)
  • IngleJI et al.

    The Washington study

  • FoxJ et al.

    Filling root canals with files. Radiographic evaluation of 304 cases

    NY State Dent J

    (1972)
  • SackettD et al.

    Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM

    (1997)
  • ConcatoJ et al.

    Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs

    New Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • Cited by (202)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text