Clinical Investigation
Age-Specific Cancer Incidence Rates Increase Through the Oldest Age Groups

https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000281Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

In the United States, from 2005 to 2009, nearly 8% of all cancers diagnosed and 15% of cancer deaths occurred in individuals aged 85 years and older (85 + age group). With the aging of the U.S. population, an analysis of incidence of cancer in the elderly population may provide information for clinical care and resource allocation.

Materials and Methods

Previously reported data were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 18 Registry for years 2000 to 2010 and Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) for years 2004 to 2008. Cancers included invasive cases only, except for nonmalignant meningiomas, and rates were per 100,000.

Results

The age-specific cancer incidence rate (IR) increases with age until a decrease in the 85 + age group. IR for all cancers combined for this age group was 2,317 per 100,000. Statistically, males had significantly higher IR compared with females (3,194 versus 1,911 [P  0.0001]). Blacks had an IR similar to whites (2,255 versus 2,340 [P = 0.12]). Despite a drop in the overall IR in this oldest age group, IR for certain cancers continued to increase. Among these cancers, gastrointestinal cancers like colorectal, pancreatic and stomach had the highest incidence and mortality rates.

Conclusions

This study contributes to measuring cancer burden in the oldest old population. In certain cancers, including meningiomas, the IR continues to rise with advancing age. Management of cancer in elderly is challenging and screening persons in the 85 + age group for frailty very thoroughly may help guide decisions of palliative versus aggressive therapies.

Section snippets

MATERIALS AND METHODS

overall age-specific and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality rates were obtained to determine age-related patterns. Incidence and mortality rates were obtained online from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) website.4 Specifically, data were extracted from the SEER 18 Registry and included invasive cancer cases newly diagnosed in the years 2000 to 2010. Age-specific rates for malignant and nonmalignant meningiomas were obtained from the

RESULTS

Cancer IRs increase with advancing age and peak at 80 to 84 years (2500 per 100,000) before beginning to decline in the 85 + age group (2340 per 100,000) (Figure 1).4 Despite this, certain cancers continue to increase in incidence even after age 85 years (Table 1), which brings to attention the need to continue screening for these cancers in the elderly population and also emphasizes the role of age in the etiology of these cancers.

DISCUSSION

We obtained data from the SEER research cancer registry, which encompasses about 28% of the U.S. population, and included all those cancer sites available in the SEER registry with the exception of meningioma. Mortality rates may have been affected by other variables not included in the SEER registry, such as comorbid conditions, treatment efficacy and tolerance as well as biologic differences8 in the oldest age group.

Overall age-specific IR in the oldest age group declines. This could be

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes to measuring cancer burden in the oldest old population with use of SEER and CBTRUS data. We demonstrate that incidence of certain cancers continues to climb through the oldest old population, despite an overall drop in cancer IR in this age group. Gastrointestinal cancers like colorectal, pancreas and stomach had the highest incidence and mortality rates among these cancers.

REFERENCES (25)

  • M. Bonafe et al.

    What studies on human longevity tell us about the risk for cancer in the oldest old

    Exp Gerontol

    (2002)
  • S. Franceschi et al.

    Cancer epidemiology in the elderly

    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

    (2001)
  • H.B. Muss

    Cancer in the elderly: a societal perspective from the United States

    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)

    (2009)
  • C.A. Werner

    The older population: 2010 (2010 census briefs)

    (2011)
  • N. Howlader et al.

    SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2009 (vintage 2009 populations). Based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2012

    (2012)
  • S.L. Murphy et al.

    Deaths: preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics reports (table 6: expectation of life at selected ages by race, Hispanic origin, race for non-population, and sex: United States, preliminary 2010), in National Vital Statistics Reports

    (2012)
  • Surveillance and Epidemiology End Results (SEER) Incidence. SEER eighteen: (2000–2009). SEER*FastStat Database....
  • CBTRUS

    Statistical Report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2004–2008, in Central Brain Tumor Registry of United States (CBTRUS)

    (2012)
  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Mortality (2000-2009). SEER* Fast Stats. Available at:...
  • B.J. McCarthy et al.

    Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma

    J Neurosurg

    (1998)
  • N.A. Berger et al.

    Cancer in the elderly

    Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc

    (2006)
  • C. Harding et al.

    Peak and decline in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence at old ages

    Cancer

    (2012)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Alemtuzumab outcomes by age: Post hoc analysis from the randomized CARE-MS studies over 8 years

      2021, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, thyroid AE incidences across age groups were generally similar and consistently above 40% in the CARE-MS population. These findings support monitoring of patients of all age groups according to the established Risk Management Plan/Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy procedures, and suggest a need for enhanced monitoring in older patients due to increased age-associated risks for AEs such as malignancy (Dong and Fu, 2014; El Chakhtoura et al., 2017; Marrie et al., 2015; Montecino-Rodriguez et al., 2013; Ragonese et al., 2017; Schweitzer et al., 2019; Thakkar et al., 2014; Ventura et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017). It is important to note that alemtuzumab-associated AEs in clinical trials and postmarketing experience include IARs, increased frequency of infection and the potential for opportunistic infections, secondary autoimmunity (thyroid disorders, ITP, nephropathies, autoimmune cytopenias, autoimmune hepatitis, and other less common autoimmune events), acute acalculous cholecystitis, and cardiovascular and pulmonary events possibly related to infusion.

    • Safe Delivery of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Thymic Carcinoma Located on the Outflow Graft of a Left Ventricular Assist Device

      2021, JTO Clinical and Research Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) improves survival rates for patients with severe heart failure.1 Because cancer incidence increases with age,2 there is a risk of developing cancer subsequent to the implantation surgery. Therefore, safe treatment of cancer in patients with LVAD is an important concern for thoracic oncologists.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    JPT and JLV were supported by the National Cancer Institute (R03CA156561). The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, June 1–5, 2012, Chicago, IL.

    View full text