Original Article

Characteristics of CPOE Systems and Obstacles to Implementation That Physicians Believe Will Affect Adoption

Authors: Dushyant Singh, MD, Sue Spiers, MT (ASCP), MBA, Brent W. Beasley, MD

Abstract

Background: Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) has the potential to decrease medical errors and improve quality. Our health system plans to implement CPOE in response to the ARRA HITECH Act.


Objectives: To determine (A) physicians' projections of the most important characteristics of a CPOE system that will affect their willingness to adopt CPOE, and (B) the obstacles they foresee in adopting CPOE.


Methods: All members of our health system's physician quality organization were invited to participate in a confidential survey.


Results: Two hundred twenty-four of 549 (41%) recipients responded to the survey. Respondents ranked "disruption in my work routine" (72%) and "improve efficiency in placing orders" (63%) as the two most important characteristics that would affect their utilization of CPOE. They believed CPOE would enable orders to be placed more efficiently (3.3, sd = 1.2), carried out rapidly (3.4, sd = 0.9), and have fewer errors (3.7, sd = 0.9). The most commonly cited obstacles to CPOE implementation were: Efficiency-Inefficiency (23%), Hardware Availability (12.7%), Computer Restrictions (10.8%), Training (8.8%), Simplicity - Ease of Use (8.5%), and Physician Buy-in (8.1%).


Conclusions: The majority of physicians believed CPOE would lead to a reduction of medical errors and more efficient patient care. However, physicians are highly concerned with how CPOE will affect their own work efficiency.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
 
2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Academy Press; 2001.
 
3. Sengstack PP, Gugerty B. CPOE systems: success factors and implementation issues. J Healthc Inf Manag 2004;18:36-45.
 
4. Butler J, Speroff T, Arbogast PG, et al. Improved compliance with quality measures at hospital discharge with a computerized physician order entry system. Am Heart J 2006;151:643-653.
 
5. Wolfstadt JI, Gurwitz JH, Field TS, et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:451-458.
 
6. Sobieraj DM. Development and implementation of a program to assess medical patients' need for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:1755-1760.
 
7. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:261-266.
 
8. Potts AL, Barr FE, Gregory DF, et al. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Pediatrics 2004;113:59-63.
 
9. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197-1203.
 
10. Nebeker JR, Hoffman JM, Weir CR, et al. High rates of adverse drug events in a highly computerized hospital. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1111-1116.
 
11. Aarts J, Berg M. Same systems, different outcomes-comparing the implementation of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2006;45:53-61.
 
12. Yu FB, Menachemi N, Berner ES, et al. Full implementation of computerized physician order entry and medication-related quality outcomes: a study of 3364 hospitals. Am J Med Qual 2009;24:278-286.
 
13. Bobb AM, Payne TH, Gross PA. Viewpoint: controversies surrounding use of order sets for clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:41-47.
 
14. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, et al. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2741-2747.
 
15. Medicare and Medicaid Programs. Electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422. Fed Regist 2010;75(144).
 
16. Lindenauer PK, Ling D, Pekow PS, et al. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry. J Hosp Med 2006;1:221-230.
 
17. Jones S, Moss J. Computerized provider order entry: strategies for successful implementation. J Nurs Adm 2006;36:136-139.
 
18. Fast Facts on US Hospitals. 2009 by Health Forum LLC, an affiliate of the American Hospital Association. Updated November 11, 2009. Available at: http://www.aha.org/aha/resource-center/Statistics-and-Studies/fast-facts.html. Accessed November 25, 2010.
 
19. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-11 Edition. Physicians and Surgeons. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos074.htm. Accessed November 24, 2010.
 
20. President and Commerce Secretary Announce Recipients of Nation's Highest Honor in Quality and Performance Excellence. National Institute of Standards and Technology. November 25, 2003. Available at: http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/2003baldrigewinners.cfm. Accessed November 24, 2010.
 
21. University of Kansas Hospital, Saint Luke's rank in top 50 for heart care, surgery. Kansas City Bus J. Friday, July 11, 2008. Available at: http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/stories/2008/07/07/daily33.html. Accessed November 24, 2010.
 
22. Holden RJ. Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:71-80.
 
23. Bartos CE, Butler BS, Penrod LE, et al. attitudes correlate with diminished power in the workplace. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008;6:36-40.
 
24. Schectman JM, Schorling JB, Nadkarni MM, et al. Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:711-717.
 
25. Cordero L, Kuehn L, Kumar RR, et al. Impact of computerized physician order entry on clinical practice in a newborn intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2004;24:88-93.
 
26. Stone WM, Smith BE, Shaft JD, et al. Impact of a computerized physician order-entry system. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:960-967.
 
27. Upperman JS, Staley P, Friend K, et al. The introduction of computerized physician order entry and change management in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Pediatrics 2005;116:e634-e642.