Repurposing CRISPR/Cas9 for in situ functional assays

  1. Jerry Pelletier1,4,5,8
  1. 1Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6 Canada,;
  2. 2Département de Biochimie et Médecine Moléculaire, Université de Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada;
  3. 3Département de Pathologie et de Microbiologie, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2, Canada;
  4. 4Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada;
  5. 5The Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada
    1. 6 These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • 7 Present address: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

    Abstract

    RNAi combined with next-generation sequencing has proven to be a powerful and cost-effective genetic screening platform in mammalian cells. Still, this technology has its limitations and is incompatible with in situ mutagenesis screens on a genome-wide scale. Using p53 as a proof-of-principle target, we readapted the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 (CRISPR associated 9) genome-editing system to demonstrate the feasibility of this methodology for targeted gene disruption positive selection assays. By using novel “all-in-one” lentiviral and retroviral delivery vectors heterologously expressing both a codon-optimized Cas9 and its synthetic guide RNA (sgRNA), we show robust selection for the CRISPR-modified Trp53 locus following drug treatment. Furthermore, by linking Cas9 expression to GFP fluorescence, we use an “all-in-one” system to track disrupted Trp53 in chemoresistant lymphomas in the Eμ-myc mouse model. Deep sequencing analysis of the tumor-derived endogenous Cas9-modified Trp53 locus revealed a wide spectrum of mutants that were enriched with seemingly limited off-target effects. Taken together, these results establish Cas9 genome editing as a powerful and practical approach for positive in situ genetic screens.

    Keywords

    Footnotes

    • Received August 27, 2013.
    • Accepted October 25, 2013.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Life Science Alliance