Skip to main content
Log in

Ligament Mechanics During Three Degree-of-Freedom Motion at the Acromioclavicular Joint

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of effective treatment and reconstruction procedures for injuries to the soft tissues around the acromioclavicular (AC) joint relies on a comprehensive understanding of overall joint function. The objective of this study was to determine the magnitude and direction of the in situ forces in the AC capsular and coracoclavicular ligaments as well as the resulting joint kinematics during application of three external loading conditions while allowing three degree-of-freedom joint motion. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the in situ forces in the soft tissue structures and the resulting joint kinematics. The clavicle translated 5.1±2.0, 5.6±2.2, and 4.2±1.9 mm during application of a 70 N load in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions, respectively, representing almost a 50% increase over previous studies using similar load magnitudes. In response to an anterior load, the magnitude of in situ force in the superior AC ligament (35±18 N) was found to be greater (p<0.05) than the force in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. In contrast, the magnitude of in situ force in the conoid (49±22 N) was significantly greater (p<0.05) than all other ligaments in response to a superior load. Additionally, the directions of the force vector representing the conoid and trapezoid were different, being located in opposing quadrants of the posterior axis of the scapula with this loading condition. Our data suggest that the kinematic constraints placed on the AC joint during loading affect the resulting joint motion and that the magnitude and direction of force in each ligament are affected by the coupled motions that occur. Based on the differences in magnitude and direction of the in situ force in the coracoclavicular ligaments with each loading condition, surgical procedures should reconstruct these ligaments in a more anatomical manner or treat them separately to prevent joint degeneration. © 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC00: 8719Rr, 8719Ff, 8719St, 8780Rb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Allman, Jr., F. L. Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J.Bone Jt.Surg., Am.Vol. 49:774–784, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bargren, J. H., S. Erlanger, and H. M. Dick. Biomechanics and comparison of two operative methods of treatment of complete acromioclavicular separations. Clin.Orthop.Relat.Res. 130:267–272, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess, A. Profile analysis of the Wechsler intelligence scales: A new index of subtest scatter. Br.J.Clin.Psychol. 30:257–263, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cadenat, F. M. The treatment of dislocations and fractures of the outer end of the clavicle. Int.Clin.27:145–169, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Codman, E. A. The Shoulder, Boston, MA: Thomas Todd, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Debski, R. E., P. J. McMahon, W. O. Thompson, S. L. Woo, J. J. P. Warner, and F. H. Fu. A new dynamic testing apparatus to study glenohumeral motions. J.Biomech.28:869–874, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DePalma, A. F. Surgery of the Shoulder, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eskola, A., S. Vainionpaa, S. Korkala, S. Santavirta, M. Gronblad, and P. Rokkanen. Four-year outcome of operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. J.Orthop.Traum5:9–13, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flatow, E. L. The biomechanics of the acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular and scapulothoracic joints. Instruct.Course Lectures 42:237–245, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujie, H., G. A. Livesay, and S. L.-Y. Woo. The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: A new methodology. J.Biomech.Eng.117:1–7, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fujie, H., K. Mabuchi, S. L. Woo, G. A. Livesay, S. Arai, and Y. Tsukamoto. The use of robotics technology to study human joint kinematics: A new methodology. J.Biomech.Eng. 115:211–217, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fukubayashi, T., P. A. Torzilli, M. F. Sherman, and R. F. Warren. An in-vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee: Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J.Bone Jt.Surg., Am.Vol.64:258–264, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuda, K., E. V. Craig, K. N. An, R. H. Corfield, and E. Y. S. Chao. Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint. J.Bone Jt.Surg., Am.Vol.68:434–440, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hollis, J. M., S. Takai, D. J. Adams, S. Horibe, and S. L.-Y. Woo. The effects of knee motion and external loading on the length of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL): A kinematic study. Trans.ASME, Ser.C: J.Heat Transfer113:208–214, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huba, G. J. How unusual is a profile of test scores? J.Psychoed.Assessment4:321–325, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huba, G. J. Statistics for computer based test interpretations: Bivariate and multivariate uniqueness. Educ.Psychol.Meas.46:331–334, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Wichern. Comparison of several multivariate means. In: Applied Multivarate Statistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998, pp. 210–272.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karduna, A. R. Kinematics of the glenohumeral joint: Influences of muscle forces, ligamentous constraints, and articular geometry. J.Orthop.Res.14:986–993, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson, J., H. Arnarson, and K. Sigurjonsson. Acromio-clavicular dislocations treated by coracoacromial ligament transfer. Arch.Orthop.Trauma Surg.106:8–11, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, S., A. Sethi, and A. K. Jain. Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocation using the coracoacromial ligament and coracoclavicular fixation: Report of a technique in 14 patients. J.Orthop.Trauma9:507–510, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, K.-W., R. E. Debski, C.-H. Chen, S. L.-Y. Woo, and F. H. Fu. Functional evaluation of the ligaments at the acromioclavicular joint during anteroposterior and superoinferior translation. Am.J.Sports Med.25:858–862, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Livesay, G. A., H. Fujie, S. Kashiwaguchi, D. A. Morrow, F. H. Fu, and S. L. Woo. Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann.Biomed.Eng.23:467–474, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Livesay, G. A., T. W. Rudy, S. L. Woo, T. J. Runco, M. Sakane, G. Li, and F. H. Fu. Evaluation of the effect of joint constraints on the in situ force distribution in the anterior cruciate ligament. J.Orthop.Res.15:278–284, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Post, M. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of acromioclavicular dislocations. Clin.Orthop.Relat.Res.200:234–247, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pronk, G. M., F. C. T. van der Helm, and L. A. Rozendaal. Interaction between the joints in the shoulder mechanism: The function of the costoclavicular, conoid and trapezoid ligaments. Proc.Inst.Mech.Eng., Part H:, 1993.

  26. Rockwood, C. A., Jr. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint, in fractures in adults, edited by C. A. Rockwood, and D. P. Green. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997, pp. 1341–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rudy, T. W., G. A. Livesay, S. L. Woo, and F. H. Fu. A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to deter-mine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J.Biomech.29:1357–1360, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salter, E. G., R. J. Nasca, and B. S. Shelley. Anatomical observations on the acromioclavicular joint and supporting ligaments. Am.J.Sports Med.15:199–206, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stam, L., and I. Dawson. Complete acromioclavicular dislo-cations: treatment with a Dacron ligament. Injury22:173–176, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Taft, T. N., F. C. Wilson, and J. W. Oglesby. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J.Bone Jt.Surg., Am.Vol.69:1045–1051, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Urist, M. R. Complete dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. The nature of the traumatic lesions and effective meth-ods of treatment with an analysis of 41 cases. J.Bone Jt.Surg.28:813–837, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debski, R.E., Parsons, I.M., Fenwick, J. et al. Ligament Mechanics During Three Degree-of-Freedom Motion at the Acromioclavicular Joint. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 28, 612–618 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1304848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1304848

Navigation