skip to main content
10.1145/2838944.2838951acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrehabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Mirrorcle: Enhanced Visual Feedback to support Motor Learning in Low Back Pain

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

About 60 to 90% of the population has experienced low back pain (LBP) once in their life; yearly this is 5% of the population. Non specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is LBP without a specific cause that lasts longer than twelve weeks. Research has shown that exercise therapy is the most effective rehabilitation method; and can be enhanced by technological systems. This knowledge served as a base for the development of Mirrorcle. Mirrorcle is an interactive mirror that provides a set of exercises, designed for persons suffering from NSCLBP. By giving extrinsic feedback during and after the exercises, Mirrorcle enables patients to perform their exercises better and learn more from them. Five physiotherapists rated the credibility for the use of Mirrorcle in rehabilitation as high and the expectancy for good treatment results as moderate. A usability questionnaire and observation was done with one LBP patient. During this test, the usability of Mirrorcle was perceived positive.

References

  1. Dagenais, S., Caro, J., Haldeman, S. 2008. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J, 8, 8--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Freburger, J.K., Holmes, et al. D., Timothy, S. 2009. The Rising Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain. Carey Arch, 169(3), 251--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. van Middelkoop, M., Rubinstein, S.M., et al. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 24, 193--204. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hayden, J., van Tulder, MW., Malmivaara, A., Koes, B.W. 2011. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain (review). The Cochrane Collaboration. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Magill, R. 2007. Motor Learning and Control, Concepts and Applications. Eight edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shea, C.H., Kohl, R. M., Indermill, C. 1990. "Contextual Interference: Contributions of Practice," Acta Psychol, 73, 145--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ribeiro, D, Sole, G., Haxby Abbott, J., Milosavljevic, S. 2011. A rationale for the precision of extrinsic feedback towards management of low back pain.Man.Ther.16,301--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bonnechère, B. Jansen, B., Omelina, L., Da Silva, L. Mouraux, D., Rooze, M., Van Sint Jan, S. 2013. Patient Follow up using Serious Games. A feasibility study on low back pan patients. In: Games for Health. Proc. 3rd Eur. Conf. on Gaming and Playful Interaction in Healthcare. Ed. B. Schouten. Springer, Eindhoven, NL. 185--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huegli, A.S., Ernst, M.J., Kool, J., Rast, F.M., Rausch-Osthoff, A.K., Mannig, A., Oetiker, S., Bauer, C.M. 2015. Adherence to home exercises in non-specific low back pain. A randomised controlled pilot trial. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 19, 177--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kent, P., Laird, R., Haines, T. 2015 The effect of changing movement and posture using motion-sensor biofeedback, versus guidelines-based care, on the clinical outcomes of people with sub-acute or chronic low back pain-amulticentre, cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled, pilot trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 16--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, P.L., Lafleur, M.F., Malouin, F., Richards, C.L., Doyon, J. 2003. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage, 20, 1171--1180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Page, S.J., Szaflarski, J.P., Eliassen, J.C., Pan, H., Cramer, S.C. Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, 382--388. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wand, B.M., Tulloch, V.M., George, P.J., Smith, A.J., Goucke, R., O'Connell, N.E., Moseley, G.L. 2012. Seeing It Helps, Movement related Back Pain Is Reduced by Visualization of the Back During Movement. Clinical Journal of Pain, 28 (7), 602--608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Poitras S, Blais R, Swaine B, Rossignol M. 2005. Management of work-related low back pain: a population based survey of physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 85 (11), 1168--1181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. O'Sullivan, K., O'Sullivan, P., O'Sullivan, L., Dankaerts, W. 2012. What do physiotherapists consider to be the best sitting spinal posture? Manual Therapy, 17, 432--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ribeiro, D.C., Sole, G., Haxby Abbott, J., Milosavljevic, S. 2010. Extrinsic feedback and management of low back pain: A critical review of the literature. ManTher 16, 231--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutta. T. 2012. Evaluation of the Kinect sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 645--649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bekkering, G.E. et al. 2001. KNGF Richtlijn Lage-rugpijn. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie, 3 (111), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schönauer, C., Pintaric, T., Kaufmann, H., Jansen-Kosterink, S., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. 2011. Chronic Pain Rehabilitation with a Serious Game using Multimodal Input. Virtual Rehabilitation ICVR 2011, (pp.1--8). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Devilly, G.J. & Borkovec, T.D. 2000. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. Journal of Behav. Ther. and Exp Psych., 37, 73--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Webster, D. Celik, O. 2014. Systematic review of Kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mirrorcle: Enhanced Visual Feedback to support Motor Learning in Low Back Pain

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      REHAB '15: Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques
      October 2015
      176 pages
      ISBN:9781450338981
      DOI:10.1145/2838944

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader