Probing Computation in the Primate Visual System at Single-Cone Resolution

Literature Cited

1. Aho AC, Donner K, Hyden C, Larsen LO, Reuter T 1988. Low retinal noise in animals with low body temperature allows high visual sensitivity. Nature 334:348–50
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ala-Laurila P, Rieke F. 2014. Coincidence detection of single-photon responses in the inner retina at the sensitivity limit of vision. Curr. Biol. 24:2888–98
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amthor FR, Grzywacz NM. 1991. Nonlinearity of the inhibition underlying retinal directional selectivity. Vis. Neurosci. 6:197–206
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arathorn DW, Yang Q, Vogel CR, Zhang Y, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A 2007. Retinally stabilized cone-targeted stimulus delivery. Opt. Express 15:13731–44
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baccus SA. 2007. Timing and computation in inner retinal circuitry. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69:271–90
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barlow HB. 1956. Retinal noise and absolute threshold. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46:634–39
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barlow HB, Levick WR. 1965. The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J. Physiol. 178:477–504
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baylor DA, Nunn BJ, Schnapf JL 1984. The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. J. Physiol 357:575–607
   [Google Scholar]
9. Berntson A, Smith RG, Taylor WR 2004. Transmission of single photon signals through a binary synapse in the mammalian retina. Vis. Neurosci. 21:693–702
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boehm AE, Levi DM, Privitera CM, Roorda A 2017. Mapping the spatial extent of perceptive fields for flicker adaptation using retinally stabilized stimuli. J. Vis. 17:18 Abstr .)
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brainard DH, Williams DR, Hofer H 2008. Trichromatic reconstruction from the interleaved cone mosaic: Bayesian model and the color appearance of small spots. J. Vis. 8:15
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brindley GS. 1970. Physiology of the Retina and Visual Pathway Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins. , 2nd ed..
13. Brown SP, He SG, Masland RH 2000. Receptive field microstructure and dendritic geometry of retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 27:371–83
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bruce KS, Harmening WM, Langston BR, Tuten WS, Roorda A, Sincich LC 2015. Normal perceptual sensitivity arising from weakly reflective cone photoreceptors. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 56:4431–38
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bruce KS, Harmening WM, Roorda A, Sincich LC 2014. Cone-by-cone threshold variability in the human retina Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Society for Neuroscience Washington, DC: Nov 15–19
16. Carroll J, Gray D, Roorda A, Williams DR 2005. Recent advances in retinal imaging with adaptive optics. Opt. Photonics News 16:36–42
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chichilnisky EJ. 2001. A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network Comput. Neural Syst. 12:199–213
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chichilnisky EJ, Baylor DA. 1999. Receptive-field microstructure of blue-yellow ganglion cells in primate retina. Nat. Neurosci. 2:889–93
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cohn TE. 1974. New hypothesis to explain why increment threshold exceeds decrement threshold. Vis. Res. 14:1277–79
    [Google Scholar]
20. Coletta NJ, Williams DR. 1987. Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4:1503–13
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cooper B, Lee BB, Cao DC 2016. Macaque retinal ganglion cell responses to visual patterns: harmonic composition, noise, and psychophysical detectability. J. Neurophysiol. 115:2976–88
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crook JD, Davenport CM, Peterson BB, Packer OS, Detwiler PB, Dacey DM 2009. Parallel ON and OFF cone bipolar inputs establish spatially coextensive receptive field structure of blue-yellow ganglion cells in primate retina. J. Neurosci. 29:8372–87
    [Google Scholar]
23. Crook JD, Peterson BB, Packer OS, Robinson FR, Troy JB, Dacey DM 2008. Y-cell receptive field and collicular projection of parasol ganglion cells in macaque monkey retina. J. Neurosci. 28:11277–91
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dacey DM. 2004. Origins of perception: retinal ganglion cell diversity and the creation of parallel visual pathways. The Cognitive Neurosciences MS Gazzaniga 281–301 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. , 4th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dacey DM, Crook JD, Packer OS 2014. Distinct synaptic mechanisms create parallel S-ON and S-OFF color opponent pathways in the primate retina. Vis. Neurosci. 31:139–51
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dacey DM, Diller LC, Verweij J, Williams DR 2000. Physiology of L- and M-cone inputs to H1 horizontal cells in the primate retina. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17:589–96
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dacey DM, Lee BB. 1994. The blue-ON opponent pathway in primate retina originates from a distinct bistratified ganglion cell type. Nature 367:731–35
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dacey DM, Lee BB, Stafford DK, Pokorny J, Smith VC 1996. Horizontal cells of the primate retina: cone specificity without spectral opponency. Science 271:656–59
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dalimier E, Dainty C. 2010. Role of ocular aberrations in photopic spatial summation in the fovea. Opt. Lett. 35:589–91
    [Google Scholar]
30. Davila KD, Geisler WS. 1991. The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea. Vis. Res. 31:1369–80
    [Google Scholar]
31. Dawis S, Shapley R, Kaplan E, Tranchina D 1984. The receptive field organization of X-cells in the cat: spatiotemporal coupling and asymmetry. Vis. Res. 24:549–64
    [Google Scholar]
32. De Monasterio FM, Gouras P, Tolhurst DJ 1975. Trichromatic color opponency in ganglion cells of rhesus monkey retina. J. Physiol. 251:197–216
    [Google Scholar]
33. De Valois RL, De Valois KK 1993. A multistage color model. Vis. Res. 33:1053–65
    [Google Scholar]
34. Demb JB. 2007. Cellular mechanisms for direction selectivity in the retina. Neuron 55:179–86
    [Google Scholar]
35. Demb JB, Zaghloul K, Haarsma L, Sterling P 2001. Bipolar cells contribute to nonlinear spatial summation in the brisk-transient (Y) ganglion cell in mammalian retina. J. Neurosci. 21:7447–54
    [Google Scholar]
36. Derrington AM, Krauskopf J, Lennie P 1984. Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate-nucleus of macaque. J. Physiol. 357:241–65
    [Google Scholar]
37. Devries SH, Baylor DA. 1997. Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. J. Neurophysiol. 78:2048–60
    [Google Scholar]
38. Diamond JS. 2017. Inhibitory interneurons in the retina: types, circuitry, and function. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 3:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
39. Doi E, Gauthier JL, Field GD, Shlens J, Sher A et al. 2012. Efficient coding of spatial information in the primate retina. J. Neurosci. 32:16256–64
    [Google Scholar]
40. Donner K. 1992. Noise and the absolute thresholds of cone and rod vision. Vis. Res. 32:853–66
    [Google Scholar]
41. Dunn FA, Rieke F. 2006. The impact of photoreceptor noise on retinal gain controls. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16:363–70
    [Google Scholar]
42. Endeman D, Kamermans M. 2010. Cones perform a non-linear transformation on natural stimuli. J. Physiol. 588:435–46
    [Google Scholar]
43. Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG. 1984. Functional characteristics and diversity of cat retinal ganglion cells. Basic characteristics and quantitative description. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25:250–67
    [Google Scholar]
44. Field GD, Chichilnisky EJ. 2007. Information processing in the primate retina: circuitry and coding. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30:1–30
    [Google Scholar]
45. Field GD, Gauthier JL, Sher A, Greschner M, Machado TA et al. 2010. Functional connectivity in the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors. Nature 467:673–77
    [Google Scholar]
46. Field GD, Rieke F. 2002. Nonlinear signal transfer from mouse rods to bipolar cells and implications for visual sensitivity. Neuron 34:773–85
    [Google Scholar]
47. Field GD, Sampath AP. 2017. Behavioural and physiological limits to vision in mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372:20160072
    [Google Scholar]
48. Field GD, Sampath AP, Rieke F 2005. Retinal processing near absolute threshold: from behavior to mechanism. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67:491–514
    [Google Scholar]
49. Freeman J, Field GD, Li PH, Greschner M, Gunning DE et al. 2015. Mapping nonlinear receptive field structure in primate retina at single cone resolution. eLife 4:e05241
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gauthier JL, Field GD, Sher A, Greschner M, Shlens J et al. 2009a. Receptive fields in primate retina are coordinated to sample visual space more uniformly. PLOS Biol 7:747–55
    [Google Scholar]
51. Gauthier JL, Field GD, Sher A, Shlens J, Greschner M et al. 2009b. Uniform signal redundancy of parasol and midget ganglion cells in primate retina. J. Neurosci. 29:4675–80
    [Google Scholar]
52. Geisler WS. 1984. Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1:775–82
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gollisch T. 2013. Features and functions of nonlinear spatial integration by retinal ganglion cells. J. Physiol. Paris 107:338–48
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gollisch T, Meister M. 2010. Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina. Neuron 65:150–64
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gouras P. 1968. Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells. J. Physiol. 199:533–47
    [Google Scholar]
56. Harmening WM, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A, Sincich LC 2012. Measurement and correction of transverse chromatic offsets for multi-wavelength retinal microscopy in the living eye. Biomed. Opt. Express 3:2066–77
    [Google Scholar]
57. Harmening WM, Tuten WS, Roorda A, Sincich LC 2014. Mapping the perceptual grain of the human retina. J. Neurosci. 34:5667–77
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hecht S, Shlaer S, Pirenne MH 1942. Energy, quanta, and vision. J. Gen. Physiol. 25:819–40
    [Google Scholar]
59. Helmholtz H. 1896. Treatise on Physiological Optics New York: Dover
60. Hering E. 1964 (1878). Outline of a Theory of the Light Sense, transl LM Hurvich, D Jameson Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
61. Hochstein S, Shapley RM. 1976. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Physiol. 262:265–84
    [Google Scholar]
62. Hofer HJ, Blaschke J, Patolia J, Koenig DE 2012. Fixation light hue bias revisited: implications for using adaptive optics to study color vision. Vis. Res. 56:49–56
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hofer HJ, Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M, Williams DR 2005a. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. J. Neurosci. 25:9669–79
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hofer HJ, Chen L, Yoon GY, Singer B, Yamauchi Y, Williams DR 2001. Improvement in retinal image quality with dynamic correction of the eye's aberrations. Opt. Express 8:631–43
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hofer HJ, Singer B, Williams DR 2005b. Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment. J. Vis. 5:444–54
    [Google Scholar]
66. Jang J, Paik SB. 2017. Interlayer repulsion of retinal ganglion cell mosaics regulates spatial organization of functional maps in the visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 37:12141–52
    [Google Scholar]
67. Johnson RE, Kerschensteiner D. 2014. Retrograde plasticity and differential competition of bipolar cell dendrites and axons in the developing retina. Curr. Biol. 24:2301–6
    [Google Scholar]
68. Koenig DE, Hart NW, Hofer HJ 2014. Adaptive optics without altering visual perception. Vis. Res. 97:100–7
    [Google Scholar]
69. Koenig DE, Hofer HJ. 2011. The absolute threshold of cone vision. J. Vis. 11:21
    [Google Scholar]
70. Krauskopf J, Srebro R. 1965. Spectral sensitivity of color mechanisms: derivation from fluctuations of color appearance near threshold. Science 150:1477–79
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kuffler SW. 1953. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16:37–68
    [Google Scholar]
72. Kuo SP, Schwartz GW, Rieke F 2016. Nonlinear spatiotemporal integration by electrical and chemical synapses in the retina. Neuron 90:320–32
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lee BB, Cooper B, Cao D 2017. The spatial structure of cone-opponent receptive fields in macaque retina. Vis. Res. 151:141–51
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lee BB, Shapley RM, Hawken MJ, Sun H 2012. Spatial distributions of cone inputs to cells of the parvocellular pathway investigated with cone-isolating gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29:A223–32
    [Google Scholar]
75. Li PH, Field GD, Greschner M, Ahn D, Gunning DE et al. 2014. Retinal representation of the elementary visual signal. Neuron 81:130–39
    [Google Scholar]
76. Liang JZ, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF 1994. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11:71949–57
    [Google Scholar]
77. Liang JZ, Williams DR. 1997. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14:2873–83
    [Google Scholar]
78. Liang JZ, Williams DR, Miller DT 1997. Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14:2884–92
    [Google Scholar]
79. Liu JK, Schreyer HM, Onken A, Rozenblit F, Khani MH et al. 2017. Inference of neuronal functional circuitry with spike-triggered non-negative matrix factorization. Nat. Commun. 8:149
    [Google Scholar]
80. Liu YS, Stevens CF, Sharpee TO 2009. Predictable irregularities in retinal receptive fields. PNAS 106:16499–504
    [Google Scholar]
81. Maheswaranathan N, Kastner DB, Baccus SA, Ganguli S 2018. Inferring hidden structure in multilayered neural circuits. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14:8e1006291
    [Google Scholar]
82. Makous W, Carroll J, Wolfing JI, Lin J, Christie N, Williams DR 2006. Retinal microscotomas revealed with adaptive-optics microflashes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47:4160–67
    [Google Scholar]
83. Martin PR, Lee BB, White AJR, Soloman SG, Ruttiger L 2001. Chromatic sensitivity of ganglion cells in the peripheral primate retina. Nature 410:933–36
    [Google Scholar]
84. McMahon MJ, Lankheet MJM, Lennie P, Williams DR 2000. Fine structure of parvocellular receptive fields in the primate fovea revealed by laser interferometry. J. Neurosci. 20:2043–53
    [Google Scholar]
85. Münch TA, da Silveira RA, Siegert S, Viney TJ, Awatramani GB, Roska B 2009. Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit. Nat. Neurosci. 12:1308–16
    [Google Scholar]
86. Olveczky BP, Baccus SA, Meister M 2003. Segregation of object and background motion in the retina. Nature 423:6938401–8
    [Google Scholar]
87. Passaglia CL, Troy JB, Ruttiger L, Lee BB 2002. Orientation sensitivity of ganglion cells in primate retina. Vis. Res. 42:683–94
    [Google Scholar]
88. Privitera CM, Sabesan R, Winter S, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A 2016. Eye-tracking technology for real-time monitoring of transverse chromatic aberration. Opt. Lett. 41:81728–31
    [Google Scholar]
89. Riccò A. 1877. Relazione fra il minimo angolo visuale e l'intensità luminosa. Mem. Soc. Spettrosc. Ital. 6:B29–58
    [Google Scholar]
90. Rodieck RW, Stone J. 1965. Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 28:833–49
    [Google Scholar]
91. Roorda A, Williams DR. 1999. The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature 397:520–22
    [Google Scholar]
92. Sabesan R, Hofer H, Roorda A 2015. Characterizing the human cone photoreceptor mosaic via dynamic photopigment densitometry. PLOS ONE 10:e0144891
    [Google Scholar]
93. Sabesan R, Schmidt BP, Tuten WS, Roorda A 2016. The elementary representation of spatial and color vision in the human retina. Sci. Adv. 2:e1600797
    [Google Scholar]
94. Sakitt B. 1972. Counting every quantum. J. Physiol. 223:131–50
    [Google Scholar]
95. Schmidt BP, Sabesan R, Tuten WS, Neitz J, Roorda A 2018. Sensations from a single M-cone depend on the activity of surrounding S-cones. Sci. Rep. 8:8561
    [Google Scholar]
96. Schneeweis DM, Schnapf JL. 1999. The photovoltage of macaque cone photoreceptors: adaptation, noise, and kinetics. J. Neurosci. 19:1203–16
    [Google Scholar]
97. Schwartz GW, Okawa H, Dunn FA, Morgan JL, Kerschensteiner D et al. 2012. The spatial structure of a nonlinear receptive field. Nat. Neurosci. 15:1572–80
    [Google Scholar]
98. Shah N, Brackbill N, Tikidji-Hamburyan A, Rhoades C, Goetz GA et al. 2016. Novel model-based identification of retinal ganglion cell subunits Paper presented at Annual ARVO Meeting Seattle, WA: May 1–5
99. Sincich LC, Sabesan R, Tuten WS, Roorda A, Harmening WM 2016. Functional imaging of cone photoreceptors. Human Color Vision J Kremers, RC Baraas, NJ Marshall 71–104 New York: Springer Int.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Sincich LC, Zhang Y, Tiruveedhula P, Horton JC, Roorda A 2009. Resolving single cone inputs to visual receptive fields. Nat. Neurosci. 12:967–69
     [Google Scholar]
101. Smallman HS, MacLeod DIA, He S, Kentridge RW 1996. Fine grain of the neural representation of human spatial vision. J. Neurosci. 16:1852–59
     [Google Scholar]
102. Soo FS, Schwartz GW, Sadeghi K, Berry MJ II 2011. Fine spatial information represented in a population of retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 31:2145–55
     [Google Scholar]
103. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Cheng X 2002. Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19:2329–48
     [Google Scholar]
104. Thompson A, Gribizis A, Chen C, Crair MC 2017. Activity-dependent development of visual receptive fields. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 42:136–43
     [Google Scholar]
105. Thoreson WB, Mangel SC. 2012. Lateral interactions in the outer retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 31:407–41
     [Google Scholar]
106. Tinsley JN, Molodtsov MI, Prevedel R, Wartmann D, Espigule-Pons J et al. 2016. Direct detection of a single photon by humans. Nat. Commun. 7:12172
     [Google Scholar]
107. Turner MH, Rieke F. 2016. Synaptic rectification controls nonlinear spatial integration of natural visual inputs. Neuron 90:1257–71
     [Google Scholar]
108. Tuten WS, Cooper RF, Tiruveedhula P, Dubra A, Roorda A et al. 2018. Spatial summation in the human fovea: Do normal optical aberrations and fixational eye movements have an effect. ? J. Vis. 18:6
     [Google Scholar]
109. Tuten WS, Harmening WM, Sabesan R, Roorda A, Sincich LC 2017. Spatiochromatic interactions between individual cone photoreceptors in the human retina. J. Neurosci. 37:9498–509
     [Google Scholar]
110. Tuten WS, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A 2012. Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope-based microperimetry. Optom. Vis. Sci. 89:563–74
     [Google Scholar]
111. van Rossum MCW, Smith RG 1998. Noise removal at the rod synapse of mammalian retina. Vis. Neurosci. 15:809–21
     [Google Scholar]
112. Wässle H, Boycott BB, Rohrenbeck J 1989. Horizontal cells in the monkey retina: cone connections and dendritic network. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1:421–35
     [Google Scholar]
113. Westheimer G. 2012. Optical superresolution and visual hyperacuity. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 31:467–80
     [Google Scholar]
114. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1977. Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity. Vis. Res. 17:941–47
     [Google Scholar]
115. Williams DR. 1985. Aliasing in human foveal vision. Vis. Res. 25:195–205
     [Google Scholar]
116. Williams DR. 1988. Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye. Vis. Res. 28:433–54
     [Google Scholar]
117. Williams DR. 2011. Imaging single cells in the living retina. Vis. Res. 51:1379–96
     [Google Scholar]
118. Williams DR, Sekiguchi N, Haake W, Brainard D, Packer O 1991. The cost of trichromacy for spatial vision. From Pigments to Perception: Advances in Understanding Visual Processes A Valberg, BB Lee 11–22 New York: Plenum Press
     [Google Scholar]
119. Winter S, Sabesan R, Tiruveedhula P, Privitera C, Unsbo P et al. 2016. Transverse chromatic aberration across the visual field of the human eye. J. Vis. 16:149
     [Google Scholar]
120. Wool LE, Crook JD, Troy JB, Packer OS, Zaidi Q, Dacey DM 2018. Nonselective wiring accounts for red-green opponency in midget ganglion cells of the primate retina. J. Neurosci. 38:1520–40
     [Google Scholar]
121. Yin L, Masella B, Dalkara D, Zhang J, Flannery JG et al. 2014. Imaging light responses of foveal ganglion cells in the living macaque eye. J. Neurosci. 34:6596–605
     [Google Scholar]
122. Zhou ZJ, Lee S. 2008. Synaptic physiology of direction selectivity in the retina. J. Physiol. 586:4371–76
     [Google Scholar]