Background: Spiritual healing, probably the oldest documented paramedical intervention, is a neglected area of research. In order to conduct further research into the effects of healing, a valid and reliable outcome measure is needed that captures the experience of individuals receiving healing (healees) and is not burdensome to complete. We aimed to develop such a measure. Methods: A mixed methods design was used. Focus groups and cognitive interviews were used to generate and refine questionnaire items grounded in the experiences and language of healees (Study 1). The resulting questionnaire was tested and its formal psychometric properties were evaluated (Study 2). Participants were recruited from a spiritual healing sanctuary and via individual healers (including registered spiritual healers, Reiki practitioners, healers affiliated with churches). Results: In Study 1, 24 participants took part in 7 focus groups and 6 cognitive interviews. 29 common effects were identified and grouped into 7 discrete dimensions that appeared to characterize potentially sustainable effects reported by participants following their experiences of spiritual healing. In Study 2, 393 participants returned completed baseline questionnaires, 243 of whom completed the questionnaire again 1–6 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis generated 5 subscales, based on 20 of the items: outlook, energy, health, relationships and emotional balance. These subscales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Three of the subscales and the whole questionnaire demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Conclusions: We have produced a psychometrically sound healing impact questionnaire that is acceptable to healees, healers and researchers for use in future evaluations of spiritual healing.

Keywords:
Outcome assessment, Quality of life, Spiritual therapies, Qualitative research
1.
Walach H: Entanglement model of homeopathy as an example of generalized entanglement predicted by weak quantum theory. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Natur- heilkd 2003;10:192–200.
2.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: Complementary and Alternative Medicine 6th Report. London, Stationary Office, 2000.
3.
Brooks A, Schwartz G, Reece K, Nangle G: The effect of Johrei healing on substance abuse recovery: a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med 2006;12:625–631.
4.
Miles P, True G: Reiki: review of a biofield therapy history, theory, practice, and research. Altern Ther Health Med 2003;9:62–72.
5.
Hull SK, Daaleman TP, Thaker S, Pathman DE: A prevalence study of faith-based healing in the rural southeastern United States. South Med J 2006;99:644–653.
6.
Richardson MA, Sanders T, Palmer JL, Greisinger A, Singletary SE: Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2505–2514.
7.
Joines W, Baumann S, Kim J, Zile J, Simmons C: The measurement and characterization of charge accumulation and electromagnetic emission from bio-energy healers. The Parapsychological Association Convention, Vienna, 2004, pp 445–448.
8.
Kelner M, Wellman B: Complementary and alternative medicine: how do we know if it works? Healthc Pap 2003;3:10–28.
9.
Wetzel WS: Reiki healing: a physiologic perspective. J Holist Nurs 1989;7:47–54.
10.
Mackay N, Hansen S, McFarlane O: Autonomic nervous system changes during Reiki treatment: a preliminary study. J Altern Complement Med 2004;10:1077–1081.
11.
Wardell DW, Engebretson J: Biological correlates of Reiki Touchsm healing. J Adv Nurs 2001;33:439–445.
12.
Chida Y, Steptoe A, Powell LH: Religiosity/spirituality and mortality: a systematic quantitative review. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:81–90.
13.
Pohl G, Seemann H, Zojer N, Ochsner C, Luhan C, Schemper M, Ludwig H: Laying on of hands improves well-being in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2007;15:143–151.
14.
Tsang KL, Carlson LE, Olson K: Pilot crossover trial of Reiki versus rest for treating cancer-related fatigue. Integr Cancer Ther 2007;6:25–35.
15.
Potter P: Breast biopsy and distress: feasibility of testing a Reiki intervention. J Holist Nurs 2007;25:238–248.
16.
Walach H, Bosch H, Lewith G, Naumann J, Schwarzer B, Falk S, Kohls N, Haraldsson E, Wiesendanger H, Nordmann A, Tomasson H, Prescott P, Bucher HC: Effectiveness of distant healing for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised controlled partially blinded trial (EUHEALS). Psychother Psychosom 2008;77:158–166.
17.
Astin JA, Harkness E, Ernst E: The efficacy of ‘distant healing’: a systematic review of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:903–910.
18.
Abbot N: Healing as a therapy for human diseases: a systematic review. J Complement Integr Med 2000;6:159–169.
19.
Wardell DW, Weymouth KF: Review of studies of healing touch. J Nurs Scholarsh 2004;36:147–154.
20.
Lee MS, Pittler MH, Ernst E: Effects of reiki in clinical practice: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:947–954.
21.
van der Vaart S, Gijsen VMGJ, de Wildt SN, Koren G: A systematic review of the therapeutic effects of Reiki. J Altern Complement Med 2009;15:1157–1169.
22.
Herron-Marx S, Price-Knol F, Burden B, Hicks C: A systematic review of the use of reiki in health care. Altern Complement Ther 2008;14:37–42.
23.
So PS, Jiang Y, Qin Y: Touch therapies for pain relief in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD006535.
24.
Crawford CC, Sparber AG, Jonas WB: A systematic review of the quality of research on hands-on and distance healing: clinical and laboratory studies. Altern Ther Health Med 2003;9:A96–A104.
25.
Jain S, Mills PJ: Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best-evidence synthesis. Int J Behav Med 2010;17:1–16.
26.
Barlow F: The Experience of Proximate Spiritual Healing in Women with Breast Cancer Who Are Receiving Long-Term Hormonal Therapy; doctoral thesis, University of Southampton, 2010.
27.
The WHOQOL Group: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1569–1585.
28.
Skevington SM, Lofty M, O’Connell KA: The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299–310.
29.
WHOQOL SRPB Group: A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal beliefs as components of quality of life. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:1486–1497.
30.
Comrey AL, Lee HB: A First Course in Factor Analysis, ed 2. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
31.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics, ed 4. Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
32.
Health Survey for England. 2004. http://qb.soc.surrey.ac.uk/surveys/hse/04iqhse.pdf.
33.
Field A: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. London, Sage, 2000.
34.
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i: 307–310.
35.
Joffe H, Yardley L: Content and thematic analysis; in Marks DF (ed): Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London, Sage, 2004, pp 56–68.
36.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS-36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473–483.
37.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2006.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.