Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2005; 93(01): 76-79
DOI: 10.1160/TH04-05-0323
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Mortality rates and risk factors for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in medical patients

Paul T. Vaitkus
1   Cardiology Division, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA and Clinical Research and Development, Pharmacia, Skokie, Illinois, USA
,
Alain Leizorovicz
2   Unité de Pharmacologie Clinique, EA 643, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
,
Alexander T. Cohen
3   Department of Academic Medicine, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK
,
Alexander G. G. Turpie
4   Department of Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences – General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Carl-Gustav Olsson
5   Verksamhetsområde Akutsjukvård, Universitetssjukhuset, Lund, Sweden Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
,
Samuel Z. Goldhaber
6   Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
,
for the PREVENT Medical Thromboprophylaxis Study Group › Author AffiliationsFinancial support: This study was supported by a grant from Pharmacia Corporation (USA).
Further Information

Publication History

Received 26 May 2004

Accepted after revision 26 October 2004

Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

The clinical importance of asymptomatic proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains uncertain and controversial. The aim of this retrospective,post-hoc analysis was to examine mortality and risk factors for development of proximal DVT in hospitalized patients with acute medical illness who were recruited into a randomized, prospective clinical trial of thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin (PREVENT).We analyzed 1738 patients who had not sustained a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event by Day 21 and who had a complete compression ultrasound of the proximal and distal leg veins on Day 21. We examined the 90-day mortality rates in patients with asymptomatic proximal DVT (Group I, N = 80), asymptomatic distal DVT (Group II, N = 118) or no DVT (Group III, N = 1540).The 90-day mortality rates were 13.75%, 3.39%, and 1.92% for Groups I–III, respectively. The difference in mortality between Group I and Group III was significant (hazard ratio 7.63, 95% CI = 3.8–15.3;p < 0.0001),whereas the difference between Groups II and III did not reach significance (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% CI = 0.41–4.45).The association of asymptomatic proximal DVT with increased mortality remained highly significant after adjusting for differences in baseline demographics and clinical variables. Risk factors significantly associated with the development of proximal DVT included advanced age (p = 0.0005), prior DVT (p = 0.001), and varicose veins (p = 0.04). In conclusion, the high mortality rate in patients with asymptomatic proximal DVT underscores its clinical relevance and supports targeting of asymptomatic proximal DVT as an appropriate endpoint in clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis.

Keywords

Venous embolism - deep vein thrombosis - proximal - prevention - dalteparin
 

  • References

  • 1 Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP. et al Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 2001; 119 (Suppl. 01) 132S-75S.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Haas SK. Venous thromboembolic risk and its prevention in hospitalized medical patients. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002; 28: 577-84.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD. et al Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001; 119 (Suppl. 01) 176S-93S.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C. et al Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1969; 2: 230-2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Meignan M, Rosso J, Gauthier H. et al Systematic lung scans reveal a high frequency of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 159-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (23) (Suppl. 01) I22-30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Moser KM, LeMoine JR. Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis?. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94 4 Pt 1 439-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Monreal M, Ruiz J, Fraile M. et al Prospective study on the usefulness of lung scan in patients with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 771-4.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Girard P, Decousus M, Laporte S. et al Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis: specificity of symptoms and perfusion defects at baseline and during anticoagulant therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 1033-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vaitkus PT, Leizorovicz A, Goldhaber SZ. Rationale and design of a clinical trial of a low-molecular- weight heparin in preventing clinically important venous thromboembolism in medical patients: the prospective evaluation of dalteparin efficacy for prevention of venous thromboembolism in immobilized patients trial (the PREVENT study). Vasc Med 2002; 7: 269-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AGG. et al A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 874-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. et al A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 409-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 1999; 353: 1386-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE. et al Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 663-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar