Article Data

  • Views 952
  • Dowloads 139

Original Research

Open Access

Effects of a Physical Therapy Protocol in Patients with Chronic Migraine and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Clinical Trial

  • Miriam Garrigós-Pedrón1,*,
  • Roy La Touche1,2
  • Pablo Navarro-Desentre3
  • Manuel Gracia-Naya4
  • Eva Segura-Ortí5

1Univ Autonoma Madrid, Ctr Super Estudios Univ La Salle, Inst Neurosci & Sci Movement INCIMOV, Dept Fisioterapia,Mot Brains Res Grp, Madrid, Spain

2Univ Hosp La Paz IdiPAZ, Inst Neurosci & Craniofacial Pain INDCRAN, Inst Hlth Res, Madrid, Spain

3Fisioterapia Coral Mustienes Pedrola, Zaragoza, Spain

4Hosp Univ Miguel Servet, Dept Neurol, Zaragoza, Spain

5CEU Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, Valencia, Spain

DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1912 Vol.32,Issue 2,June 2018 pp.137-150

Published: 30 June 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Miriam Garrigós-Pedrón E-mail: miriamgarrigos@hotmail.com

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effects of adding orofacial treatment to cervical physical therapy in patients with chronic migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods: A total of 45 participants with chronic migraine and TMD aged 18 to 65 years were randomized into two groups: a cervical group (CG) and a cervical and orofacial group (COG). Both groups continued their medication regimens for migraine treatment and received physical therapy. The CG received physical therapy only in the cervical region, and the COG received physical therapy in both the cervical and orofacial regions. Both groups received six sessions of treatment that consisted of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise in the cervical region or the cervical and orofacial regions. Scores on the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI) and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were primary outcome variables, and the secondary outcome variables were scores on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), pain intensity measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in the temporal, masseter (2 points, M1 and M2) and extratrigeminal (wrist) regions, and maximal mouth opening (MMO). Data were recorded at baseline, posttreatment, and after 12 weeks of follow-up. The α level was set at .05 for all tests and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for within- and between-group interactions. Results: There were 22 CG participants (13.6% men and 86.4% women) and 23 COG participants (13% men and 87% women). The ANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant differences for group × time interaction in CF-PDI, HIT-6 in the last follow-up, pain intensity, PPTs in the trigeminal region, and MMO (P < .05), with a medium-large magnitude of effect. No statistically significant differences were found in the PPTs of the extratrigeminal region or in the TSK-11 (P > .05). Conclusion: Both groups reported a significant improvement in CF-PDI, HIT-6, and pain intensity. Cervical and orofacial treatment was more effective than cervical treatment alone for increasing PPTs in the trigeminal region and producing pain-free MMO. Physical therapy alone was not effective for increasing the PPTs in the extratrigeminal region (wrist) or decreasing the level of TSK-11.

Keywords

manual therapy;migraine;physical therapy;temporomandibular disorders;therapeutic exercise

Cite and Share

Miriam Garrigós-Pedrón,Roy La Touche,Pablo Navarro-Desentre,Manuel Gracia-Naya,Eva Segura-Ortí. Effects of a Physical Therapy Protocol in Patients with Chronic Migraine and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Clinical Trial. Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache. 2018. 32(2);137-150.

References

1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine preva- lence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68:343–349.

2. Gonçalves DA, Dal Fabbro AL, Campos JA, Bigal ME, Speciali JG. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: An epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:270–278.

3. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and dis- ability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007;27:193–210.

4. Ciancaglini R, Radaelli G. The relationship between headache and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in the general population. J Dent 2001;29:93–98.

5. Okeson JP, de Leeuw R. Differential diagnosis of temporoman- dibular disorders and other orofacial pain disorders. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:105–120.

6. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia 2011;31:301–315.

7. Levin M. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD III)—Changes and challenges. Headache 2013;53:1383–1395.

8. Gonçalves DA, Camparis CM, Speciali JG, Franco AL, Castanharo SM, Bigal ME. Temporomandibular disorders are differentially associated with headache diagnoses: A con- trolled study. Clin J Pain 2011;27:611–615.

9. Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Lipton RB, Napchan U, Grosberg B, Ashina S, Bigal ME. Temporomandibular disorders and cu- taneous allodynia are associated in individuals with migraine. Cephalalgia 2010;30:425–432.

10. Watts PG, Peet KM, Juniper RP. Migraine and the temporoman- dibular joint: The final answer? Br Dent J 1986;161:170–173.

11. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examina- tions and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301–355.

12. Burstein R, Yarnitsky D, Goor-Aryeh I, Ransil BJ, Bajwa ZH. An association between migraine and cutaneous allodynia. Ann Neurol 2000;47:614–624.

13. Bigal ME, Ashina S, Burstein R, et al. Prevalence and charac- teristics of allodynia in headache sufferers: A population study. Neurology 2008;70:1525–1533.

14. Chichorro JG, Porreca F, Sessle B. Mechanisms of craniofa- cial pain. Cephalalgia 2017;37:613–626.

15. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Buse D, Scher A, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Acute migraine medications and evolution from episodic to chronic migraine: A longitudinal population-based study. Headache 2008;48:1157–1168.

16. Franco AL, Gonçalves DA, Castanharo SM, Speciali JG, Bigal ME, Camparis CM. Migraine is the most prevalent primary headache in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2010;24:287–292.

17. Gonçalves DA, Camparis CM, Speciali JG, et al. Treatment of comorbid migraine and temporomandibular disorders: A factorial, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:325–335.

18. Chaibi A, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Manual therapies for migraine: A systematic review. J Headache Pain 2011;12:127–133.

19. Chaibi A, Šaltyté Benth J, Tuchin PJ, Russell MB. Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine: A study protocol of a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008095.

20. Hernandez-Reif M, Dieter J, Field T, Swerdlow B, Diego M. Migraine headaches are reduced by massage therapy. Int J Neurosci 2009;96:1–11.

21. Tuchin PJ, Pollard H, Bonello R. A randomized controlled tri- al of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:91–95.

22. Gil-Martínez A, Kindelan-Calvo P, Agudo-Carmona D, Muñoz-Plata R, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, La Touche R. Therapeutic exercise as treatment for migraine and ten- sion-type headaches: A systematic review of randomised clini- cal trials [in Spanish]. Rev Neurol 2013;57:433–443.

23. Michelotti A, de Wijer A, Steenks M, Farella M. Home-exercise regimes for the management of non-specific temporomandibu- lar disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:779–785.

24. Moraes Ada R, Sanches ML, Ribeiro EC, Guimarães AS. Therapeutic exercises for the control of temporomandibular disorders. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18:134–139.

25. Tuncer AB, Ergun N, Tuncer AH, Karahan S. Effectiveness of manual therapy and home physical therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2013;17:302–308.

26. La Touche R, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Fernández-Carnero J, et al. The effects of manual therapy and exercise directed at the cervical spine on pain and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:644–652.

27. von Piekartz H, Lüdtke K. Effect of treatment of temporoman- dibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervicogenic head- ache: A single-blind, randomized controlled study. Cranio 2011; 29:43–56.

28. von Piekartz H, Hall T. Orofacial manual therapy improves cer- vical movement impairment associated with headache and features of temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial. Man Ther 2013;18:345–350.

29. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808.

30. De Hertogh WJ, Vaes PH, Devroey D, Truijen S, Duquet W, Oostendorp R. Management of headache disorders: Design of a randomised clinical trial screening for prognostic patient characteristics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:38.

31. van Ettekoven H, Lucas C. Efficacy of physiotherapy including a craniocervical training programme for tension-type headache; A randomized clinical trial. Cephalalgia 2006;26:983–991.

32. von Piekartz HJM. Craniofacial Pain: Neuromusculoskeletal Assessment, Treatment and Management. London: Elsevier, 2007.

33. Fernández de las Peñas C, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gerwin R. Cefalea tensional y de origen cervical: Fisiopatología, diag- nóstico y tratamiento. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson, 2010.

34. La Touche R, Pardo-Montero J, Gil-Martínez A, et al. Craniofa- cial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI): Development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire. Pain Physician 2014;17:95–108.

35. Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT). Qual Life Res 2003;12:913–933.

36. Gandek B, Alacoque J, Uzun V, Andrew-Hobbs M, Davis K. Translating the Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in 27 countries: Methodological and conceptual issues. Qual Life Res 2003;12:975–979.

37. Gómez-Pérez L, López-Martínez AE, Ruiz-Párraga GT. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). J Pain 2011;12:425–435.

38. Martin M, Blaisdell B, Kwong JW, Bjorner JB. The Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equiva- lent in nine languages. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1271–1278.

39. Rendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon SF, Bloudek LM, DeGryse RE, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:117.

40. Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Chao R, Mann JD, Devellis RF. Four methods of estimating the minimal important difference score were compared to establish a clinically significant change in Headache Impact Test. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:374–380.

41. Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across episodic and chron- ic migraine. Cephalalgia 2011;31:357–367.

42. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2: 1127–1131.

43. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual an- alog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153–1157.

44. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999;83:157–162.

45. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Emshoff I. Clinically important differ- ence thresholds of the visual analog scale: A conceptual mod- el for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity. Pain 2011;152:2277–2282.

46. La Touche R, París-Alemany A, von Piekartz H, Mannheimer JS, Fernández-Carnero J, Rocabado M. The influence of cra- nio-cervical posture on maximal mouth opening and pressure pain threshold in patients with myofascial temporomandibular pain disorders. Clin J Pain 2011;27:48–55.

47. La Touche R, Paris-Alemany A, Gil-Martinez A, et al. Masticatory sensory-motor changes after an experimental chewing test influenced by pain catastrophizing and neck-pain-related dis- ability in patients with headache attributed to temporomandib- ular disorders. J Headache Pain 2015;16:20.

48. Chesterton LS, Sim J, Wright CC, Foster NE. Interrater re- liability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresh- olds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain 2007;23:760–766.

49. Heredia-Rizo AM, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, et al. Masticatory mechanosensitivity, mouth opening and impact of headache in subjects with a history of orthodontics use: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2014;50:411–418.

50. Cleland J, Palmer J. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education on bilateral disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint: A single-case design. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004;34:535–548.

51. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flex- ible statistical power analysis program for the social, behav- ioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39:175–191.52. Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educ Psychol Meas 2016;33:107–112.

53. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

54. Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Gonçalves MC, Carvalho GF, et al. Additional effects of a physical therapy protocol on headache frequency, pressure pain threshold, and improvement perception in patients with migraine and associated neck pain: A random- ized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:866–874.

55. Chaves TC, Dach F, Florencio LL, et al. Concomitant migraine and temporomandibular disorders are associated with higher heat pain hyperalgesia and cephalic cutaneous allodynia. Clin J Pain 2016;32:882–888.

56. Costa YM, Porporatti AL, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Bonjardim LR, Speciali JG, Conti PC. Headache attributed to mastica- tory myofascial pain: Impact on facial pain and pressure pain threshold. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:161–168.

57. Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: Concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther 2001;6:72–81.

58. Cleland JA, Childs JD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Man Ther 2005;10:127–135.

59. Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL, MacDonald C, Childs JD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobi- lization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2007; 87:431–440.

60. Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. The initial effects of a cervi- cal spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain 1996;68:69–74.

61. Andersen LL, Andersen CH, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Mortensen OS, Zebis MK. Central adaptation of pain per- ception in response to rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain: Randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician 2012;15:385–394.

62. Beltran-Alacreu H, Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, La Touche R. Multimodal physiotherapy based on a biobehavioral ap- proach as a treatment for chronic tension-type headache: A case report. Anesth Pain Med 2015;5:e32697.

63. Izquierdo Pérez H, Alonso Perez JL, Gil Martinez A, et al. Is one better than another?: A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for patients with chronic neck pain. Man Ther 2014;19: 215–221.

64. McGrath P, Seifert CE, Speechley KN, Booth JC, Stitt L, Gibson MC. A new analogue scale for assessing children’s pain: An initial validation study. Pain 1996;64:435–443.

65. Lopez-Lopez A, Alonso Perez JL, González Gutierez JL, et al. Mobilizations versus manipulations versus sustain apophyse- al natural glide techniques and interaction with psychological factors for patients with chronic neck pain: Randomized con- trolled trial. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2015;51:121–132.

66. Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:2484–2491.

67. Coudeyre E, Tubach F, Rannou F, et al. Effect of a simple infor- mation booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: A non-randomized trial in a primary care setting. PLoS One 2007;2:e706.

68. de Jong JR, Vlaeyen JW, de Gelder JM, Patijn J. Pain-related fear, perceived harmfulness of activities, and functional limita- tions in complex regional pain syndrome type I. J Pain 2011;12: 1209–1218.

69. Leeuw M, Goossens ME, van Breukelen GJ, et al. Exposure in vivo versus operant graded activity in chronic low back pain patients: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Pain 2008;138:192–207.

70. George SZ, Fritz JM, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for pa- tients with acute low back pain: Results of a randomized clini- cal trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2551–2560.

71. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C, et al. The effect of graded activ- ity on patients with subacute low back pain: A randomized pro- spective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 1992;72:279–290.

72. van der Giessen RN, Speksnijder CM, Helders PJ. The effec- tiveness of graded activity in patients with non-specific low-back pain: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1070–1076.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index (SCI)

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)

BIOSIS Previews

Scopus

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top