Background
“Gut health” is a term increasingly used in the scientific literature and by the food industry. It covers multiple positive aspects of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, such as the effective digestion and absorption of food, the absence of GI illness, normal and stable gut microbiota, effective immune status and a state of well-being [
1].
Gut microbiota is composed of different bacterial species, which are involved in the metabolism of nutrients, the maturation of the intestinal epithelium, vasculature and lymphoid tissue, and protection against pathogens [
2]. The composition of the intestinal microbiota varies along the gastrointestinal tract in its different compartments [
3] and also within specific compartments. For instance, the mucosa seems to harbor a different microbiota than the lumen and very few microorganisms are in direct contact with the epithelium [
4]. The majority of bacteria in the adult gut are non-sporing anaerobes, the most numerous include
Bacteroides spp.,
Bifidobacterium spp.,
Eubacterium spp.,
Clostridium spp.,
Fusobacterium spp., and various gram-positive cocci. Bacteria that are present in lower numbers include
Enterococcus spp.,
Enterobacteriaceae, methanogens, and dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria [
5,
6].
Currently, how to maintain intestinal health is a major challenge in medicine. There are many strategies to improve gut health, such as the consumption of a balanced diet that includes large quantities of vegetables [
7] and moderate consumption of red meat [
8]. Other options involve using the intestinal microbiome or GI barrier modulators, such as probiotics or prebiotics [
9]. Indeed, it has been shown that chronic bowel diseases, such as IBD, are associated with adherence of commensal bacteria to the otherwise sterile intestinal epithelium [
10]. Selected probiotics might prevent the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal mucosa [
11] or restore leaky gut by improving the molecular composition of tight junctions [
12].
Some strains of
Bifidobacterium and
Lactobacillus have been associated with improved health, resulting in the emergence of probiotics science, the delivery of specific bacteria to the colon or the administration of dietary components that promote the growth of specific bacteria with defined metabolic functions [
13].
The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME
®) is an
in vitro system proven to be a very useful model for nutrition studies, in terms of analysis of the intestinal microbial community composition [
14‐
16]. This study aimed to evaluated the interactions of
Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL1014 with native microbiota after passing through simulated stomach and small intestine conditions. Finally, the capacity to temporarily modulate the intestinal microbiota after oral administration was investigated using SHIME
® reactor.
Methods
Preparation of L. acidophilusCRL 1014 cells
At weekly intervals, a pure culture of
L. acidophilus CRL 1014 (CERELA, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina) was inoculated into De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Acumedia, Baltimore, USA). Cultures were harvested during the exponential growth, after, they were centrifuged (4000 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and washed with sterile peptone water. The
L. acidophilus CRL1014 cells were kept at the concentration of 10
8 CFU/mL in sterile peptone water until use [
17].
Long-term SHIME®run
The SHIME
® is a simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem [
18,
19] in which environmental conditions (pH, residence time, inoculum, and temperature) are controlled to resemble those found in vivo. A SHIME
® system consists of five double-jacketed vessels, simulating the stomach, the small intestine, and the ascending, transverse and descending colon, with a total retention time of 72 h (Additional file
1: Figure S1). The reactor setup and the composition of the liquid feed (Table
1), which entered the system three times per day, were previously described by Possemiers et al. [
14].
Table 1
Ingredients (g) employed for each liter of the basal feed used in the Shime reactor
Arabinogalactan (Sigma, USA) | 1.0 |
Pectin (Sigma, USA) | 2.0 |
Xylan (Sigma, USA) | 1.0 |
Potato starch (Unilever, Brazil) | 3.0 |
Glucose (Sigma, USA) | 0.4 |
Yeast extract (Sigma, USA) | 3.0 |
Peptone (Sigma, USA) | 1.0 |
Mucin (Sigma, USA) | 4.0 |
Cystein (Sigma, USA) | 0.5 |
Sterile distilled water | qsp |
The three colon vessels of the SHIME® reactor were inoculated with bacteria from a fecal sample of a healthy 22-year-old adult female with no history of antibiotic treatment 6 months prior to the study. Aliquots (10 g) of fresh fecal samples were diluted and homogenized with 100 mL of sterilized phosphate buffer (0.1 mol/L, pH 7), containing 1 g/L sodium thioglycolate as the reducing agent.
The microbial inoculum was stabilized over a period of 2-wk on a carbohydrate-based medium and allowed to adapt to the specific environmental conditions of the ascending, transverse and descending colon, in terms of pH range, retention time and available carbon sources [
14,
15]. Upon stabilization, the SHIME
® run included 2- wk of basal period (to quantify all steady-state bacterial parameters which were used as starting point to evaluate the effect of a specific treatment), and a 4-wk of treatment period, in which 5 mL of 10
8 CFU/mL of
L. acidophilus CRL 1014 were added once per day to the stomach compartment. Finally, a 2-week washout period without the addition of
L. acidophilus CRL 1014 was observed.
Microbiological analysis
At weekly intervals, throughout the entire experimental period, (basal, treatment and washout), 5 mL samples were collected from the reactors for microbiological examinations. The analysis of the intestinal microbiota composition was based on the enumeration of total aerobic and anaerobic bacteria,
Enterococcus spp.,
Lactobacillus spp.,
Bifidobacterium spp., enterobacteria, and
Clostridium spp. One mL of a sample taken from each reactor was suspended in 99 mL of peptone water. Serial dilutions were prepared and inoculated into selective culture media, as follows: total aerobic and anaerobic counts: Standard Methods agar (Acumedia, Baltimore, USA; 37°C/48 h);
Enterococcus spp.: KF
Streptococcus agar (Acumedia, Baltimore, USA; 37°C/48 h) [
16];
Lactobacillus spp.: MRS agar (Merck, Germany; 37°C/48 h, under anaerobiosis). For
Bifidobacterium spp. counts was used the Bifidobacterium formulated medium BIM-25 (Difco, France; 37°C/72 h, Anaerobic System, Probac, Brazil) according Munoa & Pares [
20], Enterobacteria: MacConkey agar (Acumedia, Baltimore, USA; 37°C/48 h) and
Clostridium spp.: RCA Agar (Difco, France; 37°C/48 h, Anaerobic System, Probac, Brazil) [
21].
Analysis of short-chain fatty acids and ammonium
Once a week, throughout the entire experimental period (basal, treatment and washout), samples were collected from the reactors for analysis SCFA and ammonium. The analysis was carried out in triplicates.
Every week, the levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were determined from samples collected from the reactors and frozen to -20°C. The SCFA were extracted with diethyl ether and determined using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame-ionization gas detector, a capillary split/splitless injector and an HP-INNOWAX column with a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm inlet (Shimadzu GC2010), using hydrogen as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.56 mL/min. The temperatures of the column, injector and detector were 170, 250 and 280°C, respectively [
22].
The ammonia content was determined using a selective ion meter (710A model, Orion) coupled to an ammonia selective-ion electrode (Orion 95–12). The apparatus was calibrated using 0.1 M standard ammonium chloride solutions, at the concentrations of 10, 100, and 1000 mg/L of ammonia. To every 25 mL of sample, 0.5 mL of ISA solution (Ionic Strength Adjuster, Orion – a pH-adjusting and ionic force solution) was added. All measurements were carried out at 25°C [
23].
Composition of the Lactobacilluscommunity
DNA was extracted from 2 mL of sample using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA yield was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Willmington, USA).
DGGE analysis
The diversity of the
Lactobacillus community in samples taken throughout model operation was assessed by DGGE. To prevent a low amplicon yield a nested PCR approach was used as previously described [
24]. This involved a first round of PCR with primers Bact27f (5′-GTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) [
25] and 1492R (5′- CGG CTA CCT TGT TAC GAC-3′) [
26], followed by a second PCR with primers Lab159f (5′-GGAAACAGATGCTAATACCG-3′) and Lab677-GCr (5′-GCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCACGGGGGGGCACCGCTACACATGGAG-3′) [
24].
PCR was performed using the GoTaq® Green Master Mix kit (Promega, USA). Samples were amplified in a Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) by using the following program: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at primer-specific temperature for 40 s, elongation at 72°C for primer-specific time, and extension at 72°C for 5 min, followed by a final cooling to 4°C. The annealing temperature and elongation time was set at 52°C/1.30 min with primers Bact27f and 1492r and 60°C/1 min with primers Lab159f and Lab677-GCr. The PCR products that were used as templates in nested PCR were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, USA).
DGGE analysis of PCR amplicons was based on the protocol described by Muyzer et al. [
27] by using the DCode System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercμles, CA, USA). Electrophoresis was done as described previously [
24] in an 8% polyacrylamide gel with a denaturant gradient of 30–50% (100% was defined as 40% formamide and 7 M urea) for 16 h at 85 V in a 0.5× TAE buffer at a constant temperature of 60°C. Gels were stained with silver nitrate by the method of Sanguinetti et al. [
28], scanned at 400 d.p.i., and further analyzed by the BioNumerics 6.0 software (Applied Maths). The distance matrices of each DGGE based on the Pearson correlation similarity coefficient to cluster the samples was analyzed using the BioNumerics software (Applied Maths).
Bands of interest in the lactobacilli community fingerprint were excised from the gel and transferred into 25 μl of TE buffer, and incubated overnight at 37°C to allow diffusion of the DNA. Two microliters of the eluted DNA were used for reamplification with the GC-clamped primer by using the conditions described above and the PCR products generated were checked by DGGE. Only PCR products which yielded a single band and comigrated with the original band were purified by the QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, USA) and were subjected to DNA sequence analysis at the genomic facilities of The Human Genome Research Center (HGRC), at the University of São Paulo. BLAST searches were performed to determine the closest known relatives of the partial rRNA gene sequence obtained in GenBank.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The sequences of the 16S rDNA fragments were deposited in the GenBank database. The accession numbers of the 4 sequences are as follows (band code in parentheses): KF054352 (lac1), KF054351 (lac2), KF054353 (lac3) and KF054350 (lac4).
Statistical analysis
The significance of all results was investigated with one-way ANOVA, and individual means were compared using the Tukey’s test (p < 0.01), using the statistical software Sigma Stat 5.0.
Discussion
The intestinal microbiota is located in difficult-to-access areas of the digestive tract. Therefore, as it requires invasive methods for collection, it is a limiting factor for a more precise analysis [
29]. An investigative alternative is the use of continuous or semi-continuous models simulating the large intestine. The continuous models were validated based on the intestinal contents of sudden death victims [
30]. The advantages of this model include ease-of-use, the possibility of using radioactive substances and low cost [
29].
The appropriate selection of probiotic strains forms the basis for further development of supplements and food products, as well as for planning future clinical trials.
In vitro studies are useful for evaluating the safety and efficiency of probiotic strains. Recent advances in science have revealed many mechanisms by which probiotics exert health-promoting effects in humans and laboratory animals [
6]. In this paper, we evaluated the interactions of
Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL1014 with the native microbiota, using the Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME
®).
The results with plate count showed that the
L. acidophilus CRL1014 strain is able to modulate the native intestinal microbiota.
Lactobacillus spp. and
Bifidobacteruim spp. were increased during the treatment period. The population of
Clostridium spp. was increased 2–3 cycles log during the treatment period in the three regions of the colon evaluated. Bacteria belonging to this genus may be harmful, due to their metabolic activity and the pathogenic character of some species [
31].
Clostridium species may be involved in inflammatory processes of intestinal diseases [
32]. In a previous study with
E. faecium CRL 183, the same behavior was observed [
33]. However, according to Possemiers et al. [
34], high clostridia counts are not necessarily associated with negative health effects, as many members of the Clostridia group are associated with the production of health-promoting short chain fatty acids.
Structural analysis of the colon lactobacilli populations using PCR-DGGE showed that administration of L. acidophilus CRL 1014 affected the lactobacilli populations. Clustering of the lactobacilli DGGE patterns showed that samples from the treatment period were grouped together. The DGGE and sequencing analysis also showed that the Lactobacillus acidophilus effect was not restricted to the ascending colon alone, but was also visible in the distal colon vessels. After the end of the treatment period, it was possible to observe the higher similarity values (97.73%) between treatment and washout periods in the colon ascendant. Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 1014 probably temporarily colonized the simulated gut, while the overall ecological characteristics of the indigenous microbiota were modulated and preserved.
In this study, beneficial effects of
L. acidophilus CRL 1014 were observed in terms of microbial metabolism. Production of SCFA is considered beneficial to the host, because these compounds protect against pathogens [
35], stimulate the immune responses [
36], decrease cholesterol synthesis [
37], enhance muscular contractions [
38], and may protect the colon against cancer development [
39].
In all vessels, increased amounts of SFCA (acetate, propionate and butyrate) during the treatment period were observed. The rate and amount of SCFA production depend on the species and number of microorganisms present in the colon, the substrate source, and the gut transit time. The acid with the highest production was acetate. SCFAs are readily absorbed. Acetate, the main SCFA in the colon, is readily absorbed and transported to the liver and, therefore, is less metabolized in the colon. Acetate also enters the peripheral circulation to be metabolized by peripheral tissues [
40,
41].
Specific SCFA may reduce the risk of developing gastrointestinal disorders, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Acetate, the main SCFA in the colon, can increase cholesterol synthesis after absorption. However, propionate, a gluconeogenerator, can inhibit cholesterol synthesis. Therefore, substrates that are able to decrease the acetate: propionate ratio may reduce serum lipids and possibly cardiovascular disease risk [
42].
The ability to reduce serum cholesterol is a highly desirable attribute of probiotic cultures as a dietary component [
43]. Certain strains of
L. acidophilus have the ability to assimilate cholesterol. This was shown by the appearance of cholesterol in the cells during growth, which was associated with decreases in the concentrations of cholesterol in the growth medium [
42]. In a previous study, our researcher group observed the ability of
Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 1014 to remove 13% of the cholesterol
in vitro[
43]. Binding of cholesterol with bile acids and inhibition of micelle formation combined with the effect of fermentation on short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production were mechanisms that had been proposed to explain the potential cholesterol-lowering effects of
L. acidophilus strains [
44,
45].
A significant increase in butyrate concentration was observed in the vessels simulating the transverse and descendant colon. The same results were observed in recent investigation with
Enterococcus faecium CRL 183 [
33]. Butyrate is considered the preferred fuel of the epithelial cells of the colon, which derive 70% of their energy from the oxidation of this substrate. Butyrate also reduces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), TNF-β, interleukine-6 (IL-6), and IL-1β through activation of the nuclear growth inhibiting factor kB (NF-kB) [
42]. In addition, it has been proposed that butyrate reduces the risk of colon cancer, due to its ability to inhibit the genotoxic capacity of nitrosamines and hydrogen peroxide, as well as to induce different levels of apoptosis, differentiation and cessation of the cellular cycle of colon cancer in animal models [
46].
Other important observation in terms of the metabolic activity was the ammonium ion production, which is a marker for proteolytic activity of the microbial population. In the ascending and descending colon, a significant (p < 0.01) reduction (29.8 and 20.5%, respectively) in the ammonium ion production during
L. acidophilus treatment was observed. Usually, colon cancer occurs in the distal parts, because of higher concentrations of more hazardous compounds due to proteolysis and a higher pH, it is often the goal to extend sugar fermentation towards the distal parts of the colon [
47]. During the treatment with
L. acidophilus decrease proteolytic activity of the microbial population was observed.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
KS and EAR designed the experiment and wrote the research article. MAT performed the SFCA experiments. KS and MLVM performed the molecular and data analyses. All authors listed here were involved in drafting the manuscript and they have read and approved the final version for publication.