Literature search
Data for this review were retrieved by searches of Pubmed, references from relevant articles and open-access websites of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). In order to verify the completeness of the PubMed database, we also performed the same key word searches with other databases (Web of Science, Embase, Pascal), but the results were virtually overlapping with regard to the subjects of interest, or supplied supplemental articles out of the scope of this review. The search was limited to English-language publications involving humans. The search has been performed in order to identify articles published between 1st Janury, 2002 and 1st March, 2013. In particular the search strategy used in the PubMed database was the following: “pertussis [Title] AND vaccine [Title]) AND (schedule [Title] OR strategy [Title] OR booster [Title] OR (cost [Title] AND effectives [Title]) OR efficacy [Title] OR pregnancy [Title] OR pregnant [Title] OR infants [Title] OR newborn [Title] OR adolescents [Title] OR (health-care [Title] AND worker [Title])) AND (hasabstract [text] AND “2003/02/16” [PDat] : “2013/02/12” [PDat] AND “humans” [MeSH Terms] AND English [lang])”. This search resulted in 132 articles which were reduced to 94 on the basis of titles and abstracts.
Types of pertussis vaccines currently available in Western countries
In developed countries whole cell pertussis vaccines (wP) are not used anymore, due to the high rates of reported adverse events. In the 1970s and 1980s acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines were demonstrated to be effective, but less reactogenic than wP vaccines. As a consequence aP are now adopted in Western countries [
19]. No preparation containing pertussis antigens alone is licensed in the United States or Europe to date [
20]. Several pertussis vaccines are available combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids plus, eventually hepatitis B virus and/ or
Haemophilus influenza type B and/or poliovirus antigens (i.e. Infarix, InfarixHepB, Infarix-hexa, Infarix-penta, Tetravac, Pentavac, Triacelluvax, Daptacel, Pentacel). They may include three antigens from purified
Bartonella pertussis bacteria: pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN) (i.e.: Infarix, Triacelluvax), or may be five-component vaccines additionally containing fimbrial antigen 2 (Fim2) and fimbrial antigen 3 (Fim3) (i.e. Daptacel, Pentacel) [
21,
22]. Currently, vaccines for the use in older subjects are also available (i.e. Boostrix, Adacel) containing reduced quantities (10-50%) of all antigens [
20] to decrease the risk of injection site reactions occurring more frequently after the fifth dose of DTaP [
23]. As an example, Boostrix is licensed for individuals from age 10 years onwards in the United States and from age 4 years onwards in Europe [
24], while Adacel is approved in those aged 11–64 years in the United States and in children (aged ≥ 4 years), adolescents and adults in Europe [
25].
Efficacy and effectiveness data
Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of pertussis vaccines have been retrieved (Table
1) [
19,
26,
27]. Among these latter, 6 RCTs, overall including more than 46,000 participants, have been previously analysed in a Cochrane systematic review [
19], demonstrating that the efficacy of multi-component (≥ three) aP vaccines is 84-85% in preventing typical whooping cough and 71-78% in preventing mild pertussis disease (Table
1) [
9,
19]. wP vaccines were found to be more efficacious than aP vaccines in some studies [
28,
29] but not in others [
30]. Multi-component (three or five) aP vaccines showed higher efficacy than one- and two-component aP vaccines against both typical and mild pertussis disease, while data were insufficient to establish whether there was a clinically significant difference between three- and five-component aP vaccines [
19]. Among the remaining two RCTs, not included in the Cochrane review, one study included about 83,000 children followed up for three years and the reported efficacy was 72.3% for the three component DTaP vaccine, 84.7% for the five component DTaP vaccine, and 89.1% for DTwP vaccine [
26]. In another RCT, after a 2.5 year follow-up, efficacy of a three-component aP vaccine was 92% (95% CI: 32-99%) in 2,781 healthy subjects aged 15–65 years [
27].
Table 1
Pertussis vaccine efficacy studies
AHGSPV 1988 | USA | Double bind parallel group RCT | Age 5 to 11 months | 2 doses (entry + 8 to 12 week later) | aP: JNIH7 | 78% (57-88%) |
aP: JNIH6 | 78% (58-89%) |
Trollfors 1995 | Sweden | Double bind parallel group \ RCT | Full term, healthy infants | 3 doses (3, 5, 12 months) | DTaP: Amvax | 71% (63-78%) |
Greco 1996 | Italy | Double bind parallel group RCT | Age 6 to 12 weeks and weight >3rd percentile | 3 doses (6 to 12, 13 to 20, and 21 to 28 weeks) | DTaP: SKB | 84% (76-89%) |
DTaP: CB | 84% (76-90%) |
DTwP: CON | 36% (13-50%) |
Gustafsson 1996 | Sweden | Double bind parallel group RCT | Age 2 to 3 months | 3 doses (2, 4, 6 months) | DTaP: SKB | 59% (51-66%) |
DTaP: CON | 85% (81-89%) |
DTwP: CON | 48% (37-58%) |
Simondon 1997 | Senegal | Parallel group RCT | Age 2 months | 3 doses (2, 4, 6 months) | DTaP: Pasteur-Merieux | 85% (66-93%) |
DTwP: Pasteur-Merieux | 96% (86-99%) |
Olin 1997 | Sweden | RCT | Age 2–3 months | 3 doses (3, 5, 12 months or 2, 4, 6 months) | 3-component DTaP | 72% |
5-component | 85% |
DTaP | |
DTwP | 89% |
PVSG 1998 | Germany | Parallel group RCT | Age 2 to 4 months | 4 doses (2 to 4, 4 to 6, 6 to 8, 12 to 14, and 15 to 18 months) | DTaP: Lederle/ Takeda | 79% (72-85%) |
DTwP: Lederle | 84% (77-89%) |
Ward 2006 | USA | Multicenter, double-blind RCT | Age 15 to 65 years | A single dose of a 3-component aP vaccine | aP (PT, FHA, PRN) | 92% (32-99%) |
Besides efficacy data reported in RCTs, a lot of information is available regarding vaccine effectiveness. In a US study, including more than 1,000 children, aged 6 months to 5 years, the estimated DTaP effectiveness was 83.6% for 1–2 doses, 95.0% for three doses and 97.7% for 4 or more doses [
31]. In a cross-sectional study conducted in 272,000 Australian adolescents (12–19 years) with a three-component Tdap showed a vaccine effectiveness of 78.0% (95% CI: 60.7-87.6) [
32].
Waning protection over years after aP vaccine has been reported, but data largely differ across studies. Laugauer and colleagues observed an effectiveness of 92% (95% CI: 84–9) for DTwP and 89% (95% CI: 79–94) for DTaP at 6 years follow up [
33]. In an Italian unblinded prospective study including 9,554 children, effectiveness was 78-81% depending on the vaccine type during the first 6 years of life [
22]. In a 1998–2009 UK study, vaccine effectiveness declined from 97.6% among infants 6–11 months of age to 83.7% among children 12–16 years of age (95% CI 69.5%–90.8%; p < 0.001) [
34]. In another UK observational study, however, effectiveness declined to 52% in the fifth year after vaccination and to 46% in the seventh year after vaccination [
35]. In a recent report from the 2010 California pertussis outbreak including about 170 paediatric cases, the reported vaccine effectiveness for a primary series and booster doses at 12–18 months and 4–6 years of age was 41% for children aged 2–7 years, but only 24% for children aged 8–12 years, suggesting waning immunity over time [
36]. In interpreting such results it should be considered that in some circumstances small coverage variations could markedly change effectiveness observed. For example, in the Campbell’ s study, effectiveness for patients aged 10–16 years who received the DTwP vaccine under the accelerated schedule would increase from 82% to 90% if coverage increased by one per cent, from 97.7% to 98.7% [
34].
Cost–effectiveness, cost-utility and economic impact model studies
In a recent review Millier and colleagues identified 13 cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and economic impact models regarding the impact of adolescent booster, one-time adult booster, adult decennial boosters and/or cocoon strategy. Adolescent booster was found to be a cost-effective strategy compared with no booster vaccination in all the nine considered studies [
82]. As an example, Purdy
et al. showed that immunizing adolescents aged 10–19 years would be the most economical strategy since it would prevent 0.7-1.8 million pertussis cases and save $0.6-1.6 billion over a decade in US [
74]. However, in another recent review including 16 studies using a dynamic model, adolescent vaccination was found to be cost effective, but not highly effective in protecting infants too young to be vaccinated [
83]. Similarly in another recent study, using an age-structured compartmental deterministic model, a single Tdap dose at age 11 years significantly would reduce the incidence of the disease within this age group, but would have a very low impact in infants [
84].
The conclusions concerning adult vaccination, alone or in combination with adolescent vaccination, are also contrasting. A US cost-benefit analysis concluded that, although more expensive than adolescent boosting, decennial adult booster vaccination could prevent 0.9-4.7 million adult cases of disease and save $1.3-6.4 billion every 10 years [
74]. In a recent study from Netherlands, combining an adolescent booster dose at the age of 10 years (most cost-effective age for a single adolescent booster dose) with an adult (18–30 years) booster dose resulted in favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (<€10,000/QALY) and the every 10 year booster dose resulted in an ICER of €16,900 per QALY [
85]. On the other hand, in a German study adult vaccination would be cost-saving only if the incidence were higher than 200 per 100,000 and Lee
et al. estimated that only 1.4% of cases would be prevented and adult booster strategy should not be adopted [
82,
86].
Available studies generally suggested the cost-effectiveness of the cocoon strategy, despite some conflicting results. In a Netherland study cocooning obtained by immunization of both parents was the most expensive intervention to implement but also the most effective. The base-case analysis suggested a reduction in the overall number of pertussis cases in infants by 26% [
87]. Coudeville
et al. in an economic evaluation including the dynamic population effects, concluded that the cocoon strategy complemented by a single booster dose was the most cost-effective one, and was associated with a 80% reduction of pertussis costs [
88]. Differently, in a study by Lee
et al., postpartum vaccination was found to be more costly than adolescent vaccination and would provide fewer health benefits [
82]. In a recent Canadian study Skowronsky
et al. suggest that parent immunization is inefficient and expensive in areas where disease incidence is low. In this setting the number needed to vaccinate should be at least 1 million to prevent 1 infant death, approximately 100,000 to prevent 1 infant ICU admission and more than 10,000 to prevent 1 infant hospitalization [
59,
89]. In Australia, Scuffham
et al. reported an ICER of AUS$787,504 per DALY (disability-adjusted life-year) avoided versus no current schedule [
90]. Parental vaccination would reduce pertussis cases, deaths and DALYs by 38.6%, 38.2%, and 38.3%, respectively. Nevertheless, it was not cost-effective, and dominated by the at-birth vaccination strategy [
82].
Regarding the vaccination of pregnant women, some data are available supporting this strategy as cost-effective [
39,
61]. In a recent US study immunization during pregnancy was found to prevent a greater number of infant cases and deaths than postpartum one [
91]. In a Netherland study the cost-effectiveness of cocooning and maternal vaccination were estimated to be similar, with ICERs of €4,600/QALY and €3,500/QALY, respectively [
87]. It should be considered that these studies may be affected by abstract assumptions about unreported cases, real incidence, other epidemiological data, costs associated with mild disease and herd immunity effects [
82].
New possible vaccines
Currently available vaccines have clearly major limits and new vaccines are under developing in order to better control this disease. New vaccines could include additional protective antigens. Possible candidates include the adenylate cyclase toxin, the autotransporte BrkA, and an antigen induced by iron starvation, named IRP1-3 [
21]. Another field of research is directed to develop a vaccine promoting the skewing of a predominant Th1 and Th17 immune response, which is the most effective [
75]. Garlapati
et al. studied a novel microparticle based vaccine formulation consisting of pertussis toxoid (PTd), polyphosphazene (PCEP), CpG ODN 10101 and synthetic cationic innate defence regulator peptide 1002 (IDR) against
Bordetella pertussis in mice. Even if protection against pertussis is mediated by both humoral and cell-mediated immunity, several studies demonstrated that the Th1 and Th17 cell-mediated immune responses to initial doses of pertussis vaccines correlate better with long-term immunity than antibody levels. Investigators concluded that immunization with PTd encapsulated into microparticles and adjuvanted with CpG ODN and IDR induced a strong shift towards Th1/Th17 responses, with long-term immunity [
75,
92].
Another future objective is the development of a more immunogenic and efficacious vaccine using different immunization route and/or live attenuated vaccines [
75]. Some researchers obtained a highly attenuated
Bordetella pertussis strain that was able to colonize the mouse respiratory tract and to provide full protection after a single intranasal administration. These results provided hope for the development of novel vaccination strategies that could be used in the very young children, even at birth [
93]. The intranasal route mimics the natural route of infection, stimulating mucosal immunity in addition to the systemic immune response. It could induce longer term protection than that offered by the currently marketed aP vaccines [
94].
However it should be considered that he current DTaP vaccines are the basis of the infant immunization series and to replace them with new vaccines will require testing of all the other antigens. Thus, their use in the clinical practice could be difficult to be achieved in a short time period [
21].