Background
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common histological subtype of adult kidney cancer [
1]. In general, ccRCCs at an early stage are curable by nephrectomy. However, some ccRCCs relapse and metastasize to distant organs, even if the resection has been considered complete [
2]. Even though novel targeting agents have been developed for treatment of ccRCC, unless relapsed or metastasized tumors are diagnosed early by close follow-up, the effectiveness of any therapy is restricted [
3]. Therefore, reliable prognostic criteria need to be established.
Not only genetic, but also epigenetic events appear to accumulate during carcinogenesis, and DNA methylation alterations are one of the most consistent epigenetic changes in human cancers [
4‐
6]. We and other groups have revealed that DNA methylation alterations participate in renal carcinogenesis and are significantly correlated with the clinicopathological diversity of ccRCCs [
7‐
11]. In addition, a distinct cancer phenotype known as the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), characterized by accumulation of DNA methylation at CpG islands, has been defined in well-studied cancers [
12,
13] such as those of the colorectum [
14] and stomach [
15], and shown to be significantly correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Although the relevance of the CIMP-positive phenotype in the context of ccRCCs has not yet been clearly defined [
16], our group very recently identified CIMP-positive ccRCCs based on genome-wide DNA methylation analysis [
7]. We also identified 17 genes, i.e.
FAM150A, GRM6, ZNF540, ZFP42, ZNF154, RIMS4, PCDHAC1, KHDRBS2, ASCL2, KCNQ1, PRAC, WNT3A, TRH, FAM78A, ZNF671, SLC13A5 and
NKX6-2, which are hallmarks of CIMP in ccRCCs [
7], using single CpG-resolution Infinium assay [
17]. The CIMP-positive ccRCCs in our cohort were clinicopathologically aggressive and associated with poorer patient outcome [
7], indicating that CIMP in ccRCCs might be applicable as a prognostic indicator.
However, in our previous study, CIMP-positive ccRCCs were identified using hierarchical clustering analysis based on DNA methylation profiles in the examined cohort [
7]. The DNA methylation status of entire promoter CpG islands, other than Infinium probe sites, in the CIMP marker genes has not been evaluated quantitatively. Therefore, to establish criteria for CIMP diagnosis that would be applicable to individual patients, CpG sites having the largest diagnostic impact should be identified in the entire promoter CpG islands of the CIMP marker genes based on quantification of DNA methylation levels. Moreover, appropriate cutoff values of DNA methylation levels need to be established for the identified CpG sites in order to discriminate CIMP-positive from CIMP-negative ccRCCs.
In the present study, we quantitatively evaluated DNA methylation levels at 299 CpG sites throughout the promoter CpG islands of the ccRCC-specific CIMP marker genes in 88 CIMP-negative ccRCCs and 14 CIMP-positive ccRCCs using the MassARRAY system. We then validated the prognostic impact of the established criteria for CIMP diagnosis in a validation cohort of 100 additional ccRCCs.
Discussion
Since the effectiveness of any therapy for relapsed or metastasized ccRCC is restricted unless it is diagnosed early by close follow-up after nephrectomy [
3], significant prognostic criteria need to be established. Unlike alterations of mRNA and protein expression, which can be easily affected by the microenvironment of cancer cells, DNA methylation alterations are stably preserved on DNA double strands by covalent bonds [
4,
5]. Therefore, DNA methylation levels at appropriate marker CpG sites would appear to be optimal prognostic indicators if evaluated quantitatively [
27].
The present learning cohort comprised 88 CIMP-negative ccRCCs and 14 CIMP-positive ccRCCs: CIMP in the learning cohort was identified using hierarchical clustering based on single CpG-resolution Infinium assay in our previous study [
7], which had revealed that CIMP-positive ccRCCs in the learning cohort were clinicopathologically aggressive tumors with a larger diameter, more frequent vascular involvement, infiltrating growth, and renal pelvis invasion, as well as having higher histological grades and pathological TNM stages than CIMP-negative ccRCCs [
7] (Additional file
1: Table S1). During the follow-up period after nephrectomy, the cancer-free and overall survival rates of patients with CIMP-positive ccRCCs in the learning cohort were significantly lower than those of patients with CIMP-negative ccRCCs in our previous study [
7], indicating that CIMP in ccRCCs might be applicable as a prognostic indicator.
We previously identified ccRCC-specific CIMP marker genes whose DNA methylation levels differed markedly between CIMP-negative and CIMP-positive ccRCCs based on the Infinium assay [
7]. Since hierarchical clustering is not applicable to clinical use, in the present study we attempted to establish criteria for CIMP diagnosis that would be applicable to patients admitted to hospitals on an individual basis. The DNA methylation status of all promoter CpG islands, even CpG sites other than the Infinium probe sites, in the CIMP marker genes was evaluated quantitatively using the MassARRAY system, which is known to be suitable for quantification of multiple CpG sites [
24]. Moreover, we carefully optimized the experimental conditions for MassARRAY analysis in order to avoid any PCR bias (Additional file
4: Table S4).
It was revealed that the entire promoter CpG islands in all the CIMP marker genes examined, i.e.
FAM150A, GRM6, ZNF540, ZFP42, ZNF154, RIMS4, PCDHAC1, KHDRBS2, ASCL2, PRAC, WNT3A, TRH, ZNF671 and
SLC13A5, were methylated in CIMP-positive ccRCCs without exception (Figure
1 and Additional file
7: Table S5). Within such promoter CpG islands, there were many CpG sites where DNA methylation levels were useful for discrimination of CIMP-positive ccRCCs in the learning cohort from CIMP-negative ccRCCs (Additional file
8: Table S6). We identified the top 23 CpG units whose AUC values were larger than 0.95 in ROC analysis, and the Youden index was used as a cutoff value for such discrimination in each CpG unit (Table
1). The sensitivity and specificity of each of the 23 CpG units was sufficient for such discrimination (Table
1 and Figure
2A). Moreover, combination of the 23 CpG units generated criteria with 100% sensitivity and specificity for discrimination of CIMP-positive ccRCCs in the learning cohort from CIMP-negative ccRCCs (Figure
2B).
As a validation cohort, an additional 100 ccRCCs that had not been previously subjected to Infinium assay or hierarchical clustering were analyzed. The distribution of DNA methylation levels at the 23 CpG units in the validation cohort (Figure
2C) was quite similar to that in the learning cohort (Figure
2B), indicating that distinct DNA methylation profiles of the 23 CpG units are reproducible in ccRCCs. In the validation cohort, 5 ccRCCs were diagnosed as CIMP-positive based on the criteria established in the present MassARRAY analysis (Table
1). CIMP-positive ccRCCs diagnosed in the validation cohort had significantly lower cancer-free and overall survival rates than those of CIMP-negative ccRCCs (Figure
3). Even after adjusting the grades and stages, the cancer-free and overall survival rates of patients with high-grade (grade 3/4) and high-stage (stage III/IV) CIMP-positive ccRCCs were significantly lower than those of patents with high-grade (grade 3/4) and high-stage (stage III/IV) CIMP-negative ccRCCs (Additional file
9: Figure S3). Moreover, CIMP-positive ccRCCs had a higher likelihood of both recurrence and disease-related death (hazard ratios 10.6 and 75.8, respectively). These data indicated that CIMP of ccRCCs can be reproducibly diagnosed using the criteria established in the present study, and that CIMP diagnosis is useful for prognostication of patients with ccRCCs.
Reproducible diagnosis of CIMP using the criteria established in the present study makes it possible to explore the molecular background of CIMP-positive renal carcinogenesis. Since CIMP-positive ccRCCs show clinicopathological aggressiveness and poorer outcome [
7], the molecular pathways participating in CIMP-positive renal carcinogenesis should be clarified and the therapeutic targets of CIMP-positive ccRCCs need to be identified. Even though we [
28] and another group [
29,
21] reported the results of multilayer omics analyses in ccRCCs, such reports did not focus on CIMP. Therefore we are now performing multilayer omics (i.e. genome (whole-exome), transcriptome and proteome) analyses of tissue specimens from CIMP-negative and -positive ccRCCs. Frequently affected molecular pathways that might potentially become therapeutic targets are now being identified in more aggressive CIMP-positive ccRCCs (unpublished data).
The criteria for CIMP diagnosis established in the present study may be useful for not only prognostication but also companion diagnostics for personalized medicine [
30]. If our CIMP diagnosis reveals CIMP-negativity in samples of tumor tissue obtained by nephrectomy, the risk of recurrence and metastasis would be considered low, and such patients would not require adjuvant therapy. On the other hand, if our CIMP diagnosis reveals CIMP-positivity, then the risk of recurrence and metastasis would be considered high. Therefore, close follow-up and frequent imaging diagnosis are recommended for early diagnosis of recurrence. In addition, inhibitors for frequently affected molecular pathways identified by multilayer omics analysis in CIMP-positive ccRCCs might be effective after recurrence. If further preclinical examinations support the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy using inhibitors for frequently affected molecular pathways in CIMP-positive ccRCCs, such adjuvant therapy may be recommended immediately after nephrectomy in patients with CIMP-positive ccRCCs.
Author’s contributions
EA and YK were responsible for the study design, development of the analysis plan and study management. YT, EA, and MG performed MassARRAY and statistical analyses. EA, MK, HF and YK collected tissue samples and performed clinicopathological analysis. YT, EA and YK interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.