Background
Methods
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
Author (Year) |
N
| Age range | Hyperopia definition | Response Rate (%) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | Age specific prevalence (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Location | |||||||
SE | |||||||
Zhao (2000) [10] | 5884 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 95.9 | 2.7 | Not available | Males: |
RESC | 5 years: 8.8% (2.4 – 15.2) | ||||||
Shunyi District, China | ca | 15 years: less than 2% | |||||
Females: | |||||||
5years: 19.6% (8.1 – 31.0) | |||||||
15 years: less than 2% | |||||||
He (2004) [11] | 4364 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 86.4 | 4.6 | 4.4 – 4.9 | 5 years: 17.0% (12.8 – 21.3) |
RESC | 6 years: 10.7% ( 6.4 – 15.1) | ||||||
Guangzhou, China | ca | 7 years: 4.0% (1.3 – 6.7) | |||||
8 years: 7.1% (3.9 – 10.4) | |||||||
9 years: 3.8 % (2.0 – 5.6) | |||||||
10 years: 4.6% (2.1 – 7.1) | |||||||
11 years: 3.5% (1.7 – 5.6) | |||||||
12 years: 2.0% (0.5 – 3.6) | |||||||
13 years: 3.4 % (1.6 – 5.2) | |||||||
14 years: 1.2% (0.3 – 2.1) | |||||||
15 years: 0.5% (0.0 – 1.3) | |||||||
Fan (2004) [12] | 7560 | 5-16 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 4.0 | Not available | Not available |
Right eye | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Hong Koong, China | |||||||
Zhan (2000) [13] | Xiamen city: 132 | 6-7 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | Xiamen city: 3.0 | 0.8 – 7.8 | Not available |
Xiamen | Right eye | Xiamen countryside: 1.9 | 1.4 – 2.3 | ||||
ca | Singapore: 2.7 | 0.8 – 6.9 | |||||
Xiamen city, Xiamen Countryside and Singapore, China | countryside: 104 | ||||||
Singapore: 146 | |||||||
Pi (2010) [14] | 3070 | 6-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 88.50 | 3.26 | 2.6 – 3.9 | 6 years: 9.21% (5.5 – 12.9) |
Yong Chuan District, Western China | At last one eye was hyperopic | 7 years: 7.7% (4.7 – 10.6) | |||||
8 years: 5.3% (2.9 – 7.7) | |||||||
cr | 9 years 3.1% (1.3 – 4.9) | ||||||
10 years: 3.5% (1.6 – 5.5) | |||||||
11 years: 1.2% (0.0 – 2.5) | |||||||
12 years: 0.7% (0.0 – 1.6) | |||||||
13 years: 0.3% (0.0 – 1.0) | |||||||
14 years: 1.1% (0.0 – 2.2) | |||||||
15 years: 0.9% (0.0 – 2.1) | |||||||
He (2007) [15] | 2454 | 12-18 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 97.6 | 1.20 | 0.8 – 1.6 | 13 years: 0.9% (0.1 – 3.1) |
RESC | 14 years: 1.5 % (0.5 – 2.5) | ||||||
ca | 15 years: 1.3 % (0.5 – 2.2) | ||||||
Yangxi County, China | 16 years: 1.0% (0.3 – 2.5) | ||||||
17 years: 0.0 | |||||||
Saw (2006) [16] | Malaysia: | 7-9 years | ≥ +2.00D | 83.3 | Malaysia:2.9 | 1.9 – 3.8 | Malaysia (N = 1752) |
7 years: 5.0% (3.0 – 7.0) | |||||||
8 years: 2.0% (0.7 – 3.3) | |||||||
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 1752 | RESC | Singapore: 1.7 | 1.2 – 2.4 | 9 years: 1.6% (0.4 – 2.8) | ||
Singapore | Singapore:1962 | ca | Singapore (N = 1962) | ||||
7 years: 2.1% (1.3 – 3.3) | |||||||
8 years: 1.9% (1.0 – 3.3) | |||||||
9 years: 0.8% (0.2 – 2.1) | |||||||
Goh (2005) [17] | 4634 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 83.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 – 2.1 | 7 years: 5.0% (3.0 – 7.0) |
RESC | 8 years: 2.0% (0.7 – 3.3) | ||||||
ca | 9 years: 1.6% (0.4 – 2.8) | ||||||
10 years: 1.4 % (0.1 – 2.6) | |||||||
11 years: 0.9 % (0.0 – 2.6) | |||||||
Gombak District, Malaysia | 12 years: 0.6% (0.0 – 1.2) | ||||||
13 years: 0.5% (0.0 – 1.1) | |||||||
14 years: 0.0 | |||||||
15 years: 0.9% (0.0 – 1.9) | |||||||
Pokharel (2000) [18] | 5067 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 2.1 | Not available | Not available |
RESC | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Mechi Zone, Nepal | |||||||
Gao (2012) [19] | 5527 | 12-14 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 89.8 | Urban: 1.4 | 0.1– 1.7 | Urban: |
At last one eye was hyperopic | Rural: 0.4 | 0.2 – 0.6 | 12 years: 0.7% (0.4 – 1.0) | ||||
13 years: 0.7% (0.4 – 0.9) | |||||||
Phnom Penhn and Kandal Provinces, Cambodia | cr | 14 years: 0.8% (0.3 – 1.3) | |||||
Casson (2012) [20] | 2899 | 6-11 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 87.0 | 2.8 | 1.9 – 3.7 | 6 years: 3.1% (1.7 – 5.1) |
RESC | 11years: 1.1% (0.3 – 2.9) | ||||||
cr | |||||||
Vientiane Province, Lao PDR | |||||||
Murthy (2002) [21] | 6447 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 92 | 7.4 | 6.0 – 8.8 | 5 years: 15.6 % (11.0 – 20.2) |
RESC | |||||||
cr | |||||||
New Delhi, India | 6 years: 13.0% (9.1 – 16.8) | ||||||
7 years: 10.7% (7.0 – 14.2) | |||||||
8 years: 8.5% (5.9 – 11.2) | |||||||
9 years: 6.6% (3.7 – 9.5) | |||||||
10 years: 5.2% (2.4 – 8.1) | |||||||
11 years: 7.8% (4.7 – 10.8) | |||||||
12 years: 5.0% (3.5 – 6.5) | |||||||
13 years: 3.3% (1.7 – 4.9) | |||||||
14 years: 4.4% (2.4 – 6.5) | |||||||
15 years: 3.9% (2.1 – 5.7) | |||||||
Dandona (2002) [22] Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India | 4074 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 92.3 | 0.68 | 0.4 – 1.0 | Rural: |
At last one eye was hyperopic | 7 years: 0.7% (0.0 – 1.2) | ||||||
8 years: 0.3% (0.0 – 0.8) | |||||||
9 years: 0.4% (0.0 – 1.0) | |||||||
cr | 10 years: 1.2% (0.1 – 2.3) | ||||||
11 years: 1.6% (0.4 – 2.8) | |||||||
12 years: 0.8% (0.0 – 1.5) | |||||||
13 years: 0.6% (0.0 – 1.4) | |||||||
14 years: 0.3% (0.0 – 1.1) | |||||||
15 years: 1.1% (0.0 – 2.6) | |||||||
Uzma (2009) [23] | Urban: 1789 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | Urban: 3.3 | 1.8 – 4.8 | Urban: |
Hyderabad, India | Rural: 1525 | At last one eye was hyperopic | Rural: 3.1 | 1.7 – 4.5 | 7 years: 4.6% (2.6 – 6.6) | ||
ca | 8 years: 2.0% (0.4 – 3.6) | ||||||
9 years: 1.7% (0.8 – 2.6) | |||||||
10 years: 1.3% (0.5 – 2.1) | |||||||
11 years: 2.2% (0.9 – 3.1) | |||||||
12 years: 0.4% (0.0 – 0.8) | |||||||
13 years: 0.2% (0.0 – 0.4) | |||||||
14 years: 0.0 | |||||||
15 years: 0.4% (0.0 – 0.8) | |||||||
Rural: | |||||||
7 years: 9.8% (6.6 – 13.0) | |||||||
8 years: 8.1% (5.4 – 10.8) | |||||||
9 years: 7.3% ( 3.7 – 10.9) | |||||||
10 years: 4.1% (2.1 – 6.1) | |||||||
11 years: 3.2% (1.9 – 4.5) | |||||||
12 years: 3.2% (1.6 – 4.8) | |||||||
13 years: 2.4% (0.9 – 3.9) | |||||||
14 years: 0.0 | |||||||
15 years: 0.0 | |||||||
Fotouhi (2007) [9] | 3673 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 96.8 | 16.6 | 13.6 – 19.7 | 7 years: 28.9% (22.6 – 35.2) |
Dezful, Iran | RESC | 8 years: 22.7% (16.4 – 28.9) | |||||
ca | 9 years: 16.7% (12.0 – 21.4) | ||||||
10 years: 12.4% (7.9 – 17.0) | |||||||
11 years: 12.9% ( 8.3 – 17.5) | |||||||
12 years: 16.9% (12.3 – 21.5) | |||||||
13 years: 14.1% (10.6 – 17.6) | |||||||
14 years: 13.0% (9.8 – 16.1) | |||||||
15 years: 10.3% (1.5 – 19.1) | |||||||
Hashemi (2010) [24] | 345 | 5-10 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 10 | Not available | Not available |
Tehran, Iran | Right eye | ||||||
ca | |||||||
Ostadimoghaddam (2011) [25] Mashhad, Iran | 639 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 19.05 | 15.7 – 22.4 | Not available |
At last one eye was hyperopic | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Rezvan (2012) [26] | 1551 | 6-17 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 76.8 | 5.4 | 4.3 – 6.5 | 8 years: 6.8% (2.7–11.0) |
Bojnourd, Iran | RESC | 9 years 8.2% (3.9–12.5) | |||||
ca | 10 years: 8.3% (4.1–12.6) | ||||||
11 years: 5.6 % (2.0–9.2) | |||||||
12 years: 3.8% (1.3–6.2) | |||||||
13 years: 2.3% (0.3–4.3) | |||||||
14 years: 2.5% (0.3–4.6) | |||||||
Yekta (2010) [27] | 2130 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 87.88 | 5.04 | 3.5 – 6.6 | 7 years: 8.9% (6.1 – 11.8) |
Shiraz, Iran | RESC | 8 years: 7.7% (1.9 – 13.5) | |||||
ca | 9 years: 4.8% (1.6 – 8.1) | ||||||
10 years: 7.0% (2.8 – 11.1) | |||||||
11 years: 2.1% (0.7 – 5.8) | |||||||
12 years: 3.0% (1.2 – 4.8) | |||||||
13 years: 2.2% (0.6 – 3.8) | |||||||
14 years: 5.9% (0.1 – 11.8) | |||||||
15 years: 0.0 | |||||||
Robaei (2005) [28] | 1765 | 6 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 9.8 | Not available | - |
Right eye | |||||||
ca | |||||||
SMS, Sydney, Australia | |||||||
Ip (2008) [29] | 4094 | 6 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | - | - | 6 years: 13.0% (9.1 – 16.8) |
SMS, Sydney, Australia | 12 years | Eye with greater refractive error | 12 years: 5.0% (3.5 – 6.5) | ||||
ca | |||||||
Ip (2008) [30] | 2353 | 11-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 3.5 | 2.8 – 4.1 | Not available |
SMS, Sydney, Australia | Both eyes | ||||||
ca | |||||||
Robaei (2006) [31] | 2353 | 12 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 75.3 | 5 | Not available | Not available |
Both eyes | |||||||
ca | |||||||
SMS, Sydney, Australia | |||||||
Grönlund (2006) [32] | 143 | 4-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 9.1md | Not available | Not available |
At last one eye was hyperopic | |||||||
Gothenburg, Sweden | ca | ||||||
Laatikainen (1980) [33] Uusimaa County, Finland | 822 | 7-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 9.7 | Not available | 7 – 8 years: 19.1% (13.0 – 25.1) |
Right eye | |||||||
cr | 9 – 10 years: 6.9% (3.5 – 10.3) | ||||||
11 – 12 years: 11.7% (7.5 – 15.9) | |||||||
14 – 15 years: 3.6% (1.1 – 6.1) | |||||||
O’Donoghue (2012) [34] Northern Ireland (NICER) | 1053 | 6-7 years | ≥ +2.00D | 62.0 in children 6–7 years 65.0 in children 12–13 years | 26 | 20 – 33 | 6-7 years: 26% (20–33) |
14,7 | 9.9 – 19.4 | 12-13 years: 14.7% (9.9 – 19.4) | |||||
12-13 years | RESC | ||||||
ca | |||||||
Logan (2011) [35] Birmingham, England (AES) | 596 | 6-7 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | Not stated | 12.3 | 8.8–15.7 | Not available |
5.4 | 2.8 – 8.0 | ||||||
12-13 years | Either/both eyes | ||||||
ca | |||||||
Naidoo (2003) [36] | 4890 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 87.3 | 2.6 | Not available | 5 years: 2.7% (0.6 – 4.8) |
RESC | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Durban area, South Africa | 6 years: 2.4% (0.7 – 4.1) | ||||||
7 years: 2.8% (0.9 – 4.7) | |||||||
8 years: 1.3% (0.1 – 2.6) | |||||||
9 years 2.9% (0.1 – 5.7) | |||||||
10 years: 3.4% (1.8 – 4.9) | |||||||
11 years: 3.5% (1.9 – 5.1) | |||||||
12 years: 3.2% (1.2 – 5.1) | |||||||
13 years: 2.9% (0.3 – 5.5) | |||||||
14 years: 1.9% (0.6 – 3.2) | |||||||
15 years: 0.7% (0.0 – 1.8) | |||||||
Maul (2000) [37] | 5303 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 2.00 D | 75.8 | 19.3 | Not available | Males: |
RESC | 5 years: 22.7% (18.0 – 27.4) | ||||||
ca | 15 years: 7.1% (3.5 – 10.6) | ||||||
Females: | |||||||
5years: 26.3% (22.0 – 30.6) | |||||||
15 years: 8.9% (3.7 – 14.1) | |||||||
La Florida, Chile | |||||||
Czepita (2008) [38] | Urban: 1200 | 10-14 years | ≥ + 1.50 D | Not stated | Urban: 7.1 | 5.6 – 8.5 | Urban (N = 1200): |
Right eye | Rural: 30.8 | 27.9 – 33.7 | 10 years: 8.3% (5.2 – 11.3) | ||||
cr | 11 years: 4.1% (1.6 – 6.6) | ||||||
12 years: 9.9% (5.8 – 14.0) | |||||||
13 years: 7.7% (4.3 – 11.1) | |||||||
14 years:5.3% (2.2 – 8.3) | |||||||
Rural (n = 1006) | |||||||
10 years: 33.3% (27.1 – 39.5) | |||||||
Czeczecin, Poland | Rural:1006 | 11 years: 28.4% (22.1 – 34.7) | |||||
12 years: 26.9% (20.9 – 32.9) | |||||||
13 years: 30.5% (24.4 – 36.5) | |||||||
14 years:36.4% (28.7 – 44.1) | |||||||
Kleinstein (2003) [39] CLEERE Study, USA | 2523 | 5-17 years | ≥ + 1.25 D in each meridian | Not stated | 12.8 | 11.5 – 14.1 | Not available |
Right eye | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Zadnik (2003) [40] | 2583 | 7-12 years | ≥ + 1.25 D§
| Not stated | 8.6 | Not available | Not available |
Right eye | |||||||
ca | |||||||
CLEERE Study, USA | |||||||
Dandona (1999) [41] | 599 | 0-15 years | ≥ + 1.00 D | Not stated | 41.14 | 24.9 – 58.0 | Not available |
Eye with higher refractive error | |||||||
Andhra Pradesh, India | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Shrestha (2011) [42] | 2236 | 5-16 years | ≥ + 1.00 D†
| Not stated | 20,3 | Not available | Not available |
Either/both eyes | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Jhapa, Nepal | |||||||
Czepita (2007) [43] | 4422 | 6-18 years | ≥ + 1.00 D | Not stated | 13.05 | Not available | 6 years: 36.5% (31.8 – 41.3) |
7 years: 19.2% (15.4 – 22.9) | |||||||
8 years: 17.4% (13.8 – 21.0) | |||||||
9 years 11.3% (8.3 – 14.3) | |||||||
10 years: 11.0% (8.0 – 14.0) | |||||||
11 years: 10.9% (8.0 – 14.0) | |||||||
12 years: 8.3% (5.6 – 10.9) | |||||||
13 years: 11.8% (8.1 – 15.5) | |||||||
14 years: 8.2% (5.3 – 11.2) | |||||||
15 years: 8.6% (5.4 – 11.8) | |||||||
16 years: 2.8% (0.6 – 5.1) | |||||||
17 years: 2.5% (0.3 – 4.7) | |||||||
18 years: 3.2% (0.7 – 5.7) | |||||||
Right eye | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Szczecin, Poland | |||||||
Vilareal (2003) [44] | 1035 | 12-13 years | ≥ + 1.00 D | Not stated | 6 | Not available | Not available |
ca | |||||||
Monterrey, Mexico | |||||||
Vilareal (2000) [45] | 1045 | 12-13 years | ≥ + 1.00 D | Not stated | 8.4% | Not available | Not available |
Right eye | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Götemborg area Sweden | |||||||
Hashemi (2004) [46] | 412 | 5-15 years | ≥ + 0,50 D | Not stated | 78.6 | 74.6 – 82.6 | Not available |
Right eye | |||||||
ca | |||||||
Tehran, Iran | |||||||
Dandona (2002) [47] | 2603 | 0-15 years | ≥ + 0,50 D | Not stated | 62.6 | 57.0 – 68.1 | Not available |
Eye with higher refractive error | |||||||
Andhra Pradesh, India | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Niroula (2009) [48] | 964 | 10-19 years | ≥ + 0,50 D‡
| Not stated | 1.24 | Not available | Not available |
Both eyes | |||||||
cr | |||||||
Pokhara, Nepal |
Results
Hyperopia prevalence by age in children
Gender and hyperopia in children
Author (Year) | Location | Hyperopia associated factors |
---|---|---|
Ip (2008) [29] | Sydney Myopia Study (SMS) |
GENDER: Age 6, girls were more hyperopic 15.5% (95%CI 12.7 – 18.4) than boys 10.9% (95%CI 8.5 – 13.2) (p = 0.005). Age 12, boys: 5.1% (95%CI 3.8–6.5), girls: 4.7% (95%CI 3.5–6.0), NS. |
Australia | ||
ETHNICITY: At age 6, more prevalent in European Caucasian 15.7% (95%CI 13.2–18.2) when compared with East Asian 6.8% (95%CI 4.0–9.5) and South Asian 2.5% (95%CI 0.0–7.5). East Asian, South Asian and Middle Eastern 8.4% (95%CI 1.6–15.2) do not present differences among their prevalence. At age 12, more prevalent in European Caucasian, 6.4% (95%CI 5.2–7.7) than East Asian 2.0% (95%CI 1.0–3.0). No difference between East Asian and Middle Eastern 7.4% (95%CI 2.7–12.0) and European Caucasian and Middle Eastern. | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: Age 12, Maternal Education, (p = 0.055). | ||
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: Age 6, Maternal Occupation, (p = 0.02). Home Ownership or Paternal Education or Employment (p > 0.1), after adjusted for demographic factors (gender, ethnicity, parental education, parental employment). Parental Employment was associated with moderate hyperopia (≥ + 2.00 D), (p = 0.02). | ||
Ip (2008) [30] | Sydney Myopia Study (SMS) |
GENDER: Age 11–15, no difference among boys 3.6% (95%CI 2.6–4.7) and girls 3.3% (95% CI 2.2–4.4). Age 12, girls showed a lower mean spherical equivalent (SE) (+0.39D) than boys (+0.58D), (p = 0.04). |
Australia | ||
ETHNICITY: European Caucasian 4.4% (95%CI 3.6–5.3) are more likely to have moderate hyperopia (≥ + 2.00 D) than East Asian 1.1% (95%CI 0.2–2.1), South Asian 0.0%(-) and other mixed ethnicity 1.7% (95%CI 0.0–3.6). Middle Eastern 6.1% (95%CI 1.5–10.7) are more likely to have moderate hyperopia than South Asian. There was no difference between European Caucasian and Middle Eastern. Age 12, Middle East showed a lower mean of SE (+0.71) than Caucasian (+0.82D) (p = 0.03). Caucasian had the highest mean SE (+0.82D) when compared to all ethnicities together (+0.04D), (p < 0.0001). | ||
Ip (2008) [59] | Sydney, Australia |
OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES: Age 12, greater time, (β coefficient = 0.03, p <0.0001), and weakly correlated with near-work activities (r =0.1, p < 0.0001). |
NEAR WORK ACTIVITIES: Parental Reports of Close Reading Distance (<30 cm) (p < 0.0001), after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and school type. | ||
Rose (2008) [8] | Sydney Myopia Study (SMS) |
OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES: Age 6 and 12, Greater Number of Hours, p = 0.009 and p = 0.0003 respectively, after adjustment for gender, ethnicity, parental myopia, near work, maternal and parental education, and maternal employment. |
Australia | ||
NEAR WORK ACTIVITIES: Age 12, Greater Levels of Near-work Activity, p =0.8. | ||
Maul (2000) [37] | La Florida, Chile |
AGE: 5–15, inverse relation (p < 0.05). |
GENDER: Age 5–15, girls OR = 1.21 (95% CI 1.03-1.43). | ||
Zhao (2000) [10] | Shunyi, China |
AGE: 5–15, inverse relation OR = 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.79). |
GENDER: Age 5–15, girls OR = 1.51 (95%CI 1.08-2.13). | ||
Zhan (2000) [13] | Xiamen city, Xiamen Countryside and Singapore, China |
RESIDENCE AREA: Age 6–7, Residence Zone, p = 0.50. |
He (2004) [11] | Guangzhou, China |
AGE: 5–15, inverse relation OR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.81). |
GENDER: Age 5–15, NS p = 0.233. | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: inverse relation OR = 0.81 (95%CI 0.66-0.98). | ||
Pi (2010) [14] | Yong Chuan District, Western China |
AGE: 6 – 15, inverse relation OR = 0.831 (95%CI 0.728-0.948), p < 0.01. |
GENDER: Age 6–15, χ2 = 2.977, NS p = 0.08. | ||
Dandona (2002) [47] | Andhra Pradesh, India |
AGE: 0 – 5, were more hyperopic than those 10 – 15, OR = 3.34 (95%CI 2.69–4.14), p < 0.05. and 6 – 9 were more hyperopic than 10 – 15, OR = 1.72 (95%CI 1.41–2.10), p < 0.05 |
GENDER: Age 0–15 OR:1.19 (95%CI 0.76 – 1.86), NS. | ||
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: Base Group: extreme lower income, Upper OR = 2.27% (95%CI 0.59 – 8.77), Middle OR = 2.21% (95%CI 0.89 – 5.50), Lower OR = 1.76% (95%CI 0.74 – 4.19).
RESIDENCE AREA: Two Rural Areas, OR = 2.84 (95%CI 2.16-3.75) and OR = 1.50 (95%CI 1.17-1.92) when compared with Urban. | ||
Laatikainen (1980) [33] | Uusimaa County, Finland |
AGE: 7–15 years, inverse relation, x2 = 28.617, p < 0.0005. |
Grönlund (2006) [32] | Gothenburg, Sweden |
AGE: 4 – 15, Correlation SE OD: r = -0.37, p < 0.0001 and SE OS: R = -0.33, p < 0.0001. |
GENDER: Age 4–15, SE OD (p = 0.61) and SE OS: (p = 0.85). | ||
OBS: The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the spherical equivalent (SE) was used in this study. | ||
Dandona (2002) [22] | Andhra Pradesh, India |
AGE: 7–15, NS. |
GENDER: Age 7–15, NS. | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: Education of the father (grade level achievement: none, 1–5, 6–12, 13–15, 15 or more), NS. | ||
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: Extreme Lower, Lower, Middle, Upper, NS. | ||
Dandona (1999) [41] | Andhra Pradesh, India |
AGE: 0 – 15, NS. |
GENDER: Age 0–15, NS. | ||
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: Extreme Lower, Lower, Middle, Upper, NS. | ||
Murthy (2002) [21] | New Delhi, India |
GENDER: Age 11–13, girls OR = 1.72 (95% CI 1.05-2.81). |
PARENTAL EDUCATION: Age 11–13, Child Education, inversely associated OR = 0.89 (95%CI 0.81-0.99). | ||
Hashemi (2004) [46] | Tehran, Iran |
AGE 5–15, inverse association, S p < 0.001. |
GENDER: Age 5–15, Boys, 78.6% (95%CI 74.6 – 82.6), Girls, 73.2 (95%CI 68.5 – 77.9), NS. | ||
Fotouhi (2007) [9] | Dezful, Iran |
AGE 7–15, inverse relation OR = 1.73 (95%CI 0.83-0.94), p < 0.001. |
GENDER: Age 7–15, boys 16.1% (95% CI 11.0–21.1), girls 16.1% (95%CI 11.0–21.1), NS. | ||
RESIDENCE AREA: Rural, OR = 2.0 (95%CI 1.09-3.65). | ||
Yekta (2010) [27] | Shiraz, Iran |
AGE: 7–15, inverse relation OR = 0.84 (95%CI 0.73-0.97), S, p = 0.021. |
GENDER: Age 7–15, boys: 5.17% (95%CI 3.19–7.15), girls, 4.90% (95%CI 2.32–7.48), NS, p = 0.863. | ||
Ostadimoghaddam (2011) [25] | Mashhad, Iran |
AGE: 5 – 15 inverse relation, S, (p < 0.001). |
GENDER: Age 5–15, NS, p = 0.724. | ||
Goh (2005) [17] | Gombak District, Malaysia |
AGE: 7–15, inverse relation OR = 0.72 (95%CI 0.62-0.82). |
GENDER: Age 7–15, boys, 1.7% (95%CI 1.1–2.3), girls, 1.4% (95%CI 0.8–2.1). | ||
ETHNICITY: Age 7–15, “other” ethnicities were more hyperopic OR = 3.72 (95%CI 1.34-10.35) than Malaysian and Chinese. No differences were found among Malaysian 1.5% (95%CI 1.1–1.9), Chinese 1.1% (95%CI 0.4–1.7) or Indian 2.0% (95%CI 0.1–3.9). | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: Parental with highest level of schooling, NS. | ||
Varma (2009) [56] | Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group (MEPEDS) |
AGE: 6 – 72 months, Hispanic children, inverse relation, (6–11 months) vs (60–72 months) OR = 1.46 (95%CI 1.08–1.98) (P = 0.0017). Age 6–72 months, African-American, NS. |
Los Angeles County, California USA |
ETHNICITY: Age 6–72 months, Hispanic were more hyperopic 27.1% (95%CI 24.0 – 30.1) than African-American 21.1% (95%CI 17.9 – 24.3), after controlling for age, S, p < 0.001. Age 6–11 months and 36–47 months Hispanic are more hyperopic 35.1% (95%CI 29.7 – 40.5) and 29.9% (95%CI 26.0 – 33.8) than African-American, 18.1% (95%CI 13.5 – 22.7) and 20.7% (95%CI 17.3 – 24.1) respectively. | |
Pokharel (2000) [18] | Mechi Zone, Nepal |
AGE: 5 – 15, as continuous variable, NS. |
GENDER: Age 5–15, girls OR = 1.44 (95%CI 1.02-2.03). | ||
Czepita (2007) [43] | Czeczecin, Poland |
AGE 6–18, negative correlation, Sr = 0.907, S, p < 0.001 |
GENDER: Age 6–18, boys 40.3%(95% CI 38.5 – 42.1) are more hyperopic than girls, 35.3% (95%CI 33.6 – 37.0). | ||
Naidoo (2003) [36] | Durban area, South Africa |
AGE: 5 – 15 years, NS. |
GENDER: Age 5–15, NS. | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: parent with the highest education (grade level achievement: none, 1–5, 6–12, 13–15, 15 or more), NS. | ||
Garner (1990) [60] | Island of Efaté, Republic of Vanatu, Melanesia |
AGE: 6 – 17, age groups Melanesian, NS. |
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
ETHNICITY: Age 6, Malaysian were more hyperopic than Melanesian. | |
Kleinstein (2003) [39] | Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study Group |
ETHNICITY: Age 5 – 17, white are more hyperopic 19.3% (95%CI 16.9 – 21.7) than Asians 6.3% (95%CI 4.1 – 8.4) and African-Americans 6.4% (95%CI 4.3 – 8.5), x2 = 236.15, S, p < 0.001. Age 5–17 white didn’t differ from Hispanics 12.7% (95% CI 9.7 – 15.7), NS, p = 0.48. Age 5–17 Asians and Africa-Americans, NS, p = 0.07. |
(CLEERE) Study | ||
Eutaw, Alabama; Irvine, California and Houston, Texas USA | ||
GENDER: Age 5–17, boys 12.6% (95%CI 10.8 – 14.4) are more hyperopic than girls 13.1% (95%CI 11.2 – 15.0). | ||
Zadnik (2003) [40] | Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study Group |
AGE: Age 6 to 7 and age 8 were more hyperopic than 9 to14, S, p < 0.0001. |
(CLEERE) Study | ||
Eutaw, Alabama; Irvine and Orinda, California and Houston, Texas USA | ||
Giordano (2009) [54] | Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study (BPEDS) |
ETHNICITY: 6 – 72 months, white are more hyperopic (≥ + 1.00) than African-American OR = 1.62 (95%CI 1.51-1.74). White, 6 – 11: 33.0% (95%CI 22.9 – 43.1), 12 – 23: 30.3% (95%CI 23.5 – 37.1), 36 – 47: 27.5% (95%CI 21.5 – 33.5), 48 – 59: 33.3% (95%CI 26.8 – 39.9) and 60 – 72: 31.5% (95%CI 24.5 – 38.4) months are more hyperopic (≥ + 2.00D) than African American at same age ranges, 21.2% (95%CI 12.4 – 30.0, 15.7% (95%CI 10.5 – 20.9), 16.2% (95%CI 11.5 – 20.9), 17.2% (95%CI 12.6 – 21.8) and 17.4% (95%CI 12.6 – 22.1) respectively. |
USA | ||
Borchert (2011) [61] | Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study (BPEDS) |
AGE: 6 – 72 months. Those 12 – 23 months and 24 – 35 months are more hyperopic than 60 – 72 months OR = 0.81(95%CI 0.68 – 0.97) and OR = 0.74 (95%CI 0.62 – 0.88) respectively. |
USA |
ETHNICITY: Age 6–72 months, Non-Hispanic white, children are more hyperopic than African-American OR = 1.63 (95%CI 1.43 – 1.87). Age 6–72 months, Hispanic white are more hyperopic than African-American OR = 1.49 (95%CI 1.32 – 1.68). | |
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: Age 6–72 months with Health insurance, OR = 1.51 (95%CI 1.12 – 1.69). | ||
O’Donoghue (2012) [34] | Northern Ireland Childhood Errors of Refraction |
AGE: 6 – 7 are more hyperopic 26% (95%CI 20–33) than 12 – 13 years, 14.7% (95%CI 9.9 - 19.4), p < 0.005. |
(NICER) |
GENDER: Age 6–7, NS. Age 13–13, S. | |
Northern Ireland | ||
Dirani (2010) [57] | The Strabismus, Amlyopia and Refractive Errors in Singaporean children |
AGE: 6 – 72 months, inverse relation, Age 6 – 11.9 months 15.7% (95%CI 10.6 – 22.2), Age 24 – 35.9 months 6.8% (95%CI 4.6 – 9.6), Age 36 – 47.9 months 5.1% (95%CI 3.3 – 7.3) and age 60 – 72 months 5.7% (95% CI 3.8 – 8.0), S, p trend = 0.001. |
(STARS) | ||
Singapura |
GENDER: Age 6–72 months, boys 6.6% (95%CI 5.1 – 7.7), girls: 9.4% (95%CI 7.9 – 11.1), NS, p = 0.75. | |
Casson (2012) [20] | Vientiane Province, Lao PDR |
GENDER: 6 – 11, NS, p = 0.95. |
Uzma (2009) [23] | Hyderabad, Índia |
GENDER: 7 – 15, Urban, boys 1.5% (95%CI 0.7–2.3), girls, 1.4% (95%CI 0.6–2.2). Rural, boys, 2.7% (95%CI 1.3–4.1), girls, 2.1% (95%CI 0.9–3.3), NS. |
RESIDENCE AREA: Age 8, 9, 12 and 13, Rural, are more hyperopic than urban, 8.1% (95%CI 5.4–10.8) v 2.0% (95%CI 0.4–3.6), 7.3% (95%CI 3.7–10.9) v 1.7% (95%CI 0.8–2.6), 3.2% (95%CI 1.6–4.8) v 0.4% (95%CI 0.0–0.8) and 2.4% (95%CI 0.9–3.9) v 0.2% (95%CI 0.0–0.4), respectively. | ||
Rezvan (2012) [26] | Bojnourd, Iran |
AGE: 6 – 17, inverse relation, S, p < 0.0001. |
GENDER: Age 6–17, boys, 4.4% (95%CI 2.8–5.9), girls, 6.1% (95%CI 4.5–7.7), NS. | ||
Saw (2006) [16] | Gombak District, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Singapore |
AGE: 7, Malaysian are more hyperopic (5%) than Singapore (2.1%), Prevalence difference, -22.9% (95%CI -24.8 to -20.9), S, p < 0.001. |
GENDER: Age 7–9, Malaysian boys are more hyperopic (3.2%) than Singaporean boys (1.3%), Prevalence difference, -21.9% (95%CI -23.3 to -20.6), p < 0.001. | ||
ETHNICITY: Age 7–9, Singaporean, are less hyperopic (1.7%) than Malaysian (2.9%), Prevalence difference, -21.1% (95%CI -22.1 to -20.2), p = 0.005. | ||
PARENTAL EDUCATION: Age 7–9, Completed Education Level of the Father, NS. | ||
OBS: Differences in the prevalence rates of hyperopia between Malaysia and Singapore were considered significant if the 95% confidence intervals of the differences in the prevalence rates did not cross zero and p values were <0.05. | ||
Logan (2011) [35] | Birmingham, England (AES) |
ETHNICITY: Age 6–7, White European are more hyperopic, 22.9% (95%CI 12.9% – 32.8%) than South Asian 10.3% (95%CI 6.2% - 14.4%) and Black African Caribbean 9.1% (95%CI 0.5 – 17.7). South Asian v Black African Caribbean, NS. Age 12 – 13, White European 10.4% (95%CI 4.8% – 16.1%) v South Asian 2.6% (95%CI 0.0 - 5.6%), NS. |
Czepita (2008) [38] | Szeczecin, Poland |
RESIDENCE AREA: Age 6–18, living in the city, are less hyperopic than those in the countryside, S, p < 0.001. |
Gao (2012) [19] | Phnom Penhn, Cambodia |
AGE: 12, 13 and 14, Prevalence Rates, 0.7% (95%CI 0.4–1.0), 0.7% (95%CI 0.4–0.9) and 0.8% (95%CI 0.3–1.3) respectively, NS. |
GENDER: Age 12–14, boys: 0.6% (95%CI 0.3–0.8), girls, 0.9% (95%CI 0.6–1.1), NS. | ||
RESIDENCE AREA: Age 12–14, urban, 1.4% (95%CI 0.1–1.7) v rural, 0.4% (95%CI 0.2–0.6), NS. | ||
Niroula (2009) [48] | Pokhara, Nepal |
GENDER: 10 – 19, boys, 1.48% (95%CI 0.3–2.6), girls, 1.02% (95%CI 0.1–1.9), NS. |