Background
Objectives
Methods
The Project
Study design
Randomization
Study evaluations
Indicator | Measure | Criterion met/expected change | Source, Year |
---|---|---|---|
In-hospital death rate within 30 days from admission to hospital | (%) | Differences in rates | Clinical Outcome Working Group, 1995, 1997; NHS Centre for Coding and Classification, 1990 |
In-hospital death rate within 30 days from stroke attack | (%) | Differences in rates | |
Post-discharge death rates (1, 3, 6, 12 months after discharge) | (%) | Differences in rates | |
In-patients length of stay | Days | Differences in means | Schmidt WP, 2003 |
Within 9 days length of stay in hospital patients' rate | (%) | Differences in rates | |
Pressure ulcers incidence rate | (%) | 0% | Clark M, 1991; Effective Health Care, 1995 |
Overall in-hospital complications rate | (%) | 4% | Adams HP Jr, 2003 |
Overall post-discharge complications rate | (%) | Differences in rates | |
Dependency at discharge | FIM scale | Differences in means | Gompertz P, 1993 Wade DT, 1987 |
Dependency at 6 months after stroke | FIM scale | Differences in means | Hardwood RH, 1994 |
Institutionalization at discharge | (%) | Differences in rates | Nikolaus T, 2000 Kalra L, 1995 |
In-hospital re-admission rate (within 30 days from discharge) | (%) | Differences in rates | Ebrahim S, 1987 Milne R, 1990 |
Return to pre-stroke functioning in daily life rate (with ADL/case mix adjustment) | (%) | Differences in rates | Early Supported Discharge Trialists (Cochrane 2005, Issue 2) |
Indicator | Measure | Criterion met/expected change | Source, Year |
---|---|---|---|
Information, advice and support from the multidisciplinary team given to the patients (and with their consent, to the carers) | (%) | Given to all the patients/relatives/care givers | SIGN 64, 2002 |
Use of referral protocols (to neurovascular clinics and admission to stroke unit) | (%) | Given to all the patients | NHS QIS (CSBS-PPI 2002) Clinical Standards, 2004; CHD/Stroke Task Force, 2001; SPREAD, 2005 |
Use of clinical protocols (at least 5 of the following) | (%) | Given to all the patients | CHD/Stroke Task Force, 2001; CSBS 2002; Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration, 1994; SIGN 13, 1997; European Atrial Fibrillation Trial, 1993; Hebert PR, 1997; SIGN 14, 1997; Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration, 1998 |
- Stroke treatment/management protocols | |||
- Antiplatelet/anticoagulant protocol | |||
- Diabetes treatment protocol | |||
- Atrial fibrillation therapy protocol | |||
- Blood pressure lowering protocol | |||
- Cholesterol lowering protocol | |||
- Suspected carotid stenosis protocol | |||
- Smoking cessation protocol | |||
Use of (local) admission to social services protocols | (%) | Given to all patients | Report to the Dept. of Health, 2000 |
Use of CT/MRI brain scan within 48 hours from admission | (%) | 80% | SIGN 14, 1997; Wardlaw JM, 2003 |
Aspirin treatment within 48 hours from admission | (%) | Given to all patients | Gubitz G (Cochrane 2003) |
Swallow screen test on day of admission | (%) | Given to all patients | SIGN 20, 1997 |
Blood pressure assessment | (%) | Given to all patients | Progress, 2001; NHS QIS (CSBS 2002); Clinical Standards, 2004 |
ECG/ECD within 24 hours from admission | (%) | Given to all patients | SIGN 13, 1997 |
Continuous monitoring within 48 hours from admission (see parameters below) | (%) | Differences in rates | SIGN 13, 1997; New Zealand Guidelines Group, 2003; Canadian Stroke Network and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, 2006 |
- Blood pressure | |||
- Glycaemia | |||
- Electrolitemia | |||
- Breath | |||
Before discharge total assessment (see parameters below) | (%) | Given to all patients | MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study, 2002, 2003; SIGN 24, 1998 |
- Tobacco smoke | |||
- Lipemia | |||
- Glycaemia | |||
Use of discharge plan (and communication) | (%) | Given to all the patients/relatives/care givers | SIGN 24, 1998 |
Use of SIGN guidelines-based discharge plan | (%) | SIGN 24, 1998 | |
Use of discharge summary and information (information pack) | (%) | RCPE, Consensus Panel, Nov 2000; SIGN 65, 2003 |
Indicator | Measure | Criterion met/expected change | Source, Year |
---|---|---|---|
Use of organized care | OCI | Differences in rates | Saposnik G, 2007 |
Admission to stroke unit | (%) | 100% | NHS QIS (CSBS 2002) Clinical Standards, 2004; CHD/Stroke Task Force Report, 2001; SIGN 13, 1997; SIGN 64, 2002 |
Stay in stroke unit within 24 hours after admission and until the end of in-hospital rehabilitation | (%) | 70% | |
Use of case managers (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses specialized in stroke care) | (%) | Given to all the patients | RCP IWP/S, 2000; SIGN 64, 2002 |
Use of stroke team | (%) | Given to all the patients | CHD/Stroke Task Force, 2001; SIGN 64, 2002 |
Assessment for rehabilitation needs by a member of the stroke team within 48 hours after admission | (%) | Given to all the patients | Brown M, 2000 |
Patients' needs assessment and planning rate for post-discharge services | (%) | Given to all the patients | RCPE, Consensus Panel, Nov 2000; NHS QIS Clinical Standards, 2004 |
Follow-up rate within 3 months after discharge (by specialist/stroke team) | (%) | Given to all the patients |