Background
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension are strong risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) [
1]. In addition, postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia are considered to be risk factors for atherosclerotic disease [
2,
3]. Hypertension is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance, resulting in the development of DM in hypertensive patients [
4,
5]. If hypertension and DM coexist, the risk of cardiovascular disease increases by 2- to 3-fold [
6]. Therefore, medications for preventing new-onset of DM as well as for treatment of hypertension are important in non-diabetic patients with hypertension. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated the association between types of antihypertensive agents and incidence of new-onset of DM [
7]. The findings suggested that the association between anti-hypertensive agents and incident of DM was lowest for angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) [
7]. However, the anti-diabetic effect of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is unclear.
Azelnidipine, a novel long-acting dihydropyridines-based CCB, reduces blood pressure without increasing the heart rate in patients with hypertension [
8]. Azelnidipine has been reported to exhibit organ-protective effects, including anti-remodeling after myocardial infarction [
9], renoprotection [
10], and retarding atherosclerotic plaque progression [
11]. In addition, azelnidipine has several unique basic and clinical effects, including inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-induced interleukin (IL)-8 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells by blocking the generation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase-mediated reactive oxygen species [
12]; reduction in urinary protein secretion and urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) levels [
10]; and reduction in circulating advanced glycation end-product (AGE) and soluble form of AGE [
13]. Recent experimental studies demonstrated that azelnidipine improved glucose intolerance and lowered the risk of hyperglycemia-induced metabolic disorders in diabetic mice [
14,
15]. However, its effect on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in the clinical practice has not been studied.
We hypothesized that azelnidipine administration could improve glucose tolerance and insulin levels in non-diabetic patients with essential hypertension. We examined the levels of blood glucose and insulin after the 75 g oral glucose tolerance (OGTT), lipids, inflammatory markers, circulating number of progenitor cells, and endothelial functions after administration of two CCBs, azelnidipine and amlodipine in a prospective randomized crossover study.
Discussion
The adverse impact of new-onset DM in treated patients with essential hypertension is well established [
6]. It is well known that renin-angiotensin system-related agents such as ACE inhibitors and ARBs have potential for preventing new-onset of DM [
7,
20]. However, the effect of CCBs on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity has not been clearly elucidated, particularly in the clinical setting. The present study demonstrated that azelnidipine administration rather than amlodipine administration significantly ameliorated glucose intolerance and the inflammatory state in non-diabetic patients with essential hypertension. In addition, the number of circulating HPCs was significantly higher after azelnidipine administration than those after amlodipine administration. This study is, to the best our knowledge, a first report that demonstrates the beneficial effects of azelnidipine on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic patients with essential hypertension.
The reason why azelnidipine ameliorated glucose tolerance and insulin response in non-diabetic patients with essential hypertension should be discussed. Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that inflammation and oxidative stress play an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and/or DM as well as atherosclerosis [
21‐
24]. Activated proinflammatory cytokines and increased oxidative stress elicit damage to various organs. Indeed, increased concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines induce a shift toward impaired glucose tolerance [
23,
25]. In the present study, circulating levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP were lower after azelnidipine administration than those after amlodipine administration. A previous study also demonstrated that azelnidipine significantly decreased plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, IL-6, hsCRP, TNF-α, 8-epi-prostaglandin F
2α, and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in patients with diabetic nephropathy [
22]. Azelnidipine has been shown to prevent TNF-induced activation of endothelial cells and IL-8 expression via its antioxidative properties [
12,
26]. A recent study showed that azelnidipine even at a non-hypotensive dose improved glucose tolerance and superoxide production in the skeletal muscle of diabetic mice [
14]. Although direct evidence regarding oxidative stress is not available in the present study, the anti-inflammatory effect of azelnidipine may, at least in part, contribute to the improvement of glucose tolerance. However, in the subjects of upper median L-FABP/U-Cr values at baseline, the levels of L-FABP/U-Cr after azelnidipine administration were significantly lower than those after amlodipine administration (data not shown). A recent study reported no significant changes in fasting glucose levels after azelnidipine administration [
13]. Indeed, fasting blood glucose and HbA1 c levels did not show significant changes even after azelnidipine administration in the present study. However, 120-min glucose and insulin levels after azelnidipine administration were significantly lower than those after amlodipine administration. To evaluate any small changes in glucose and insulin metabolism, 75 g OGTT must be performed. Another possibility is inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system by azelnidipine treatment. Increased heart rate is a sign of the increased sympathetic activity [
27]. Increased heart rate is associated not only with multiple coronary risk factors, but also morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular diseases [
27]. Indeed, enhanced sympathetic tone could cause insulin resistance by β-adrenergic stimulation [
27]. It has been reported that dihydropiridine CCBs, even third generation CCB, such as amlodipine, increase plasma norepinephrine levels and the ambulatory heart rate [
28]. However, azelnidipine has been reported to prevent an increase in heart rate by inhibition of the sympathetic nerve center, rostral ventrolateral medulla [
29]. After azelnidipine administration, the heart rate was significantly reduced and was significantly lower than that after amlodipine administration in the present study. Therefore, the anti-sympathetic nervous system effect of azelnidipine may contribute to a favorable effect on glucose tolerance.
Several studies have reported decreased numbers of circulating progenitor cells such as endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and HPCs in patients with CAD as well as in patients at high-risk of cardiovascular diseases [
21,
30]. In the present study, the number of circulating HPCs after azelnidipine administration was significantly higher than after amlodipine administration. Most previous studies investigated the number of EPCs with respect to atherosclerotic disorders. However, a recent study reported that the numbers of HPCs, rather than EPCs, were associated with endothelial dysfunction as assessed by an intracoronary acetylcholine challenge test [
21]. Unfortunately, no internationally standardized set of criteria for EPC definition have yet been established. On the contrary, circulating HPCs are defined as CD34
+ and CD45
dim cells by the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering [
31]. Therefore, we measured the number of circulating HPCs using a standardized assay kit. A comparative study that measures the number of circulating EPCs using a standardized definition must be investigated in the future.
Vascular endothelial dysfunction contributes to the initiation and progression of arteriosclerosis and serves as a strong predictor of cardiovascular events [
32,
33]. We previously reported that slight elevations of glucose and insulin levels after 75 g OGTT are associated with the severity of CAD even in patients with normal glucose tolerance [
3]. Ceriello
et al. recently demonstrated that oscillating glucose levels have more deleterious effects than constant high glucose on endothelial function in diabetic patients [
34]. We also reported that postprandial hyperglycemia as well as hyperlipidemia induces endothelial dysfunction [
35]. In addition, improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia by α-glucosidase inhibitors prevents endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients with CAD [
35]. In the present study, no significant differences in endothelial function as assessed by the PAT ratio were observed after administration of the two drugs. Although the number of circulating HPCs was significantly increased after azelnidipine treatment, much longer time might be needed to improve endothelial dysfunction in this study population. Another possibility is the timing of endothelial function assessment. The changes in endothelial function at fasting may be relatively small compared with the changes in postprandial values [
35,
36]. Several non-invasive methods have been developed to measure endothelial function and the PAT ratio is one of the useful devices to assess endothelial function [
19]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the association between endothelial function and differences in CCBs in the next step.
There were several potential limitations in the present study. First, the sample sized was small. We conducted a randomized crossover study. Therefore, we believe that the differences between azelnidipine and amlodipine are reliable. Second, we assessed the effects of administration of each CCB for 12 weeks. Investigation of the impact of long-term effects, including postprandial parameters and clinical outcomes, is needed in the future. Third, as described above, the mechanisms by which azelnidipine ameliorated glucose tolerance after 75 g OGTT in non-diabetic patients with hypertension, has not been clearly elucidated. Fourth, we demonstrated the data of the PAT ratio in endothelial function analyse, but several parameters can be used to assess endothelial function. Fifth, the reproducibility of 75 g OGTT may require further examinations. However, all testing procedures were performed under the same conditions, including those of the start time, room temperature, and quite waiting place.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
KF participated in planning of the study, recruiting study subjects, and analysis. KS contributed at all stages drafted the manuscript. MH and HO participated in HPCs and EndoPAT. TakaK, KH, AK, RM, TakeK, and TM involved in recruiting study subjects and discussing of results. HD contributed in planning of the experiment and discussion of results as well as supervising the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.