Introduction & Background
Our understanding of the mechanisms involved in gene expression has so far exceeded our appreciation of their complex and subtle regulation. Tissue specific transcription is controlled by transcription factors, binding to enhancers or promoters, activating or suppressing expression of genes. In addition to this, the packaging of DNA into chromatin and its subsequent organization has significant implications for the regulation of gene activity [
1]. The function of transcription factors therefore includes both stimulation of RNA polymerase via interactions with mediator complexes and regulation of chromatin accessibility via recruitment of histone-modifying enzymes or nucleosome-remodelling complexes [
2,
3]. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of higher-order chromatin architecture in the regulation of gene expression [
4,
5]. The fundamental role of chromatin remodelling in coordinating expression of multiple genes has also been established [
6‐
9]. Nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) are AT-rich DNA sequences involved with higher-order chromatin organization, long-range enhancer function, extension of chromatin modifications and dynamic tethering of chromatin loops [
10‐
17]. MARs have been implicated in the regulation of gene expression due to their proximity to transcriptionally active DNA [
18‐
23]. MARs form specific binding sites on the minor grove of the AT-rich DNA for proteins that recognize structure, rather than specific sequence. Furthermore, binding is thought to be primarily to the sugar-phosphate backbone without direct contact with specific bases [
24]. Hence, unlike classic transcription factors which target individual genes, AT-rich DNA binding proteins can have many potential binding sites on multiple genes [
25‐
28]. Several proteins have been identified that bind to MARs, including the Special AT-rich Sequence-Binding protein 1 (SATB1) [
24].
SATB1 acts as a cell-type specific genome organizer regulating gene expression and coordinating cellular delineation in the haematopoietic lineage [
29‐
31]. SATB1 is critical for differentiation and is expressed at a high levels in thymocytes [
24], whereas expression is down-regulated in mature T cells [
20,
29‐
33]. SATB1 ablation has been associated with disregulation affecting multiple genes in T-cells [
20,
32]. Critical genes involved in cell proliferation such as c-myc are also directly regulated by SATB1, and in SATB1-null thymocytes, c-myc cannot be induced in response to mitogen stimulation [
32]. Whilst SATB1 can function as a transcriptional activator [
30], repressor activity has been demonstrated for certain genes [
32,
34]. Involvement of SATB1 in other developmental and differentiation pathways has also been demonstrated [
35], including the control of neuronal differentiation within the developing CNS [
36,
37].
In addition to its emerging physiological role, SATB1 expression has recently been found to contribute to breast cancer growth and metastasis. Han et al. [
38] found that of 24 breast epithelial cell lines examined, SATB1 mRNA and protein expression was limited to those with metastatic phenotype. RNA-interference-mediated knockdown of SATB1 in aggressive cancer cells altered the expression of >1,000 genes, effectively reversing tumourigenesis by restoring breast-like acinar polarity, anchorage-dependent growth, inhibition of cellular proliferation and invasive capacity in vitro; and tumour growth and metastasis in vivo. On the contrary, SATB1 expression in non-aggressive cells induced the malignant phenotype and in vivo metastatic competence. The authors demonstrate that SATB1 orchestrates epigenetic modifications at target loci, up-regulating metastasis associated genes and down-regulating tumour suppressors. Expression in 28 primary breast tumours was found to be greatest in all poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinomas with only low-level expression in some moderately differentiated tumours and complete absence in adjacent normal tissue [
38]. Nuclear staining for SATB1 was also found to be of prognostic significance in a cohort of 1,318 breast cancer cases. Higher SATB1 expression levels were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) times using Kaplan-Meier analysis of 985 ductal carcinomas. Multivariate analysis confirmed SATB1 to be an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer [
38]. Zheng et al. [
39] have also found SATB1 expression in aggressive rather than non-aggressive breast cancer cells. Similarly, the introduction of SATB1 into non-metastatic cells led to the induction of invasive tumors in mice; whereas SATB1 silencing returned cells to their normal phenotype and prevented metastasis and tumor growth. The research implicates SATB1 as a master regulator of metastatic competence in breast cancer.
SATB2 is a close homologue of SATB1, recently associated with cleft palate and other craniofacial dysmorphologies [
40‐
42]. SATB2 is also a MAR-binding protein, encoding a cell type-specific transcription factor involved in the transcriptional regulation of large chromatin domains. It has been demonstrated to modulate immunoglobulin μ gene expression in pre-B cells [
10]. SATB2 has also been implicated as a developmental regulator of neuronal differentiation. In contrast to SATB1, SATB2 expression has been identified in both malignant and non-malignant cell lines [
38].
In this study, the expression profile of SATB1 and SATB2 is assessed in a cohort of women with breast cancer. In addition the levels of downstream genes including Interleukin 4 (IL-4), Interleukin 13 (IL-13) and MAF1 were determined. Transcript levels were evaluated against established pathological parameters and clinical outcome over a 10 year follow-up period.
Discussion
In the study by Han et al. [
38] SATB1 expression was found to be greatest in all poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinomas with only low-level expression in some moderately differentiated tumours and complete absence in adjacent normal tissue. Expression was not found to be restricted to late stage disease, but already present in a subset of early primary tumours without lymph node metastasis. SATB1 was found to be of high prognostic significance, independent of the lymph node status and nuclear staining was associated with shorter OS [
38]. In keeping with these results, we also found significantly higher levels of SATB1 mRNA in the breast cancer specimens compared to the background tissue and significant association with poor prognostic parameters including, increasing tumour grade, TNM stage and NPI. Although we observed a trend for tumours with higher SATB1 mRNA expression levels to be associated with shorter OS times, this failed to reach statistical significance. Similarly, significantly higher levels of SATB2 mRNA were found in the breast cancer specimens compared to the background tissue and expression was significantly associated with increasing tumour grade. In contrast to SATB1, tumours classified as having higher transcript levels of SATB2 were significantly associated with a poorer OS.
In-vitro and in-vivo studies have demonstrated that SATB1 can induce the malignant and metastatic phenotype in breast cells, through widespread alteration of gene expression profiles [
38]. In particular, targeted up-regulation has been demonstrated in poor prognosis genes associated with proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, degradation of the extra-cellular matrix and tumour invasion, such as metastasin (S100A4), VEGFB, matrix metalloproteases 2, 3 and 9, TGFB1, endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor subfamily members, including HER-2/NEU. Furthermore, specific down-regulation of several tumour suppressor genes including BRMS1, KAI1, NME1, and KISS1 has been reported [
38]. In our study, correlation between SABT1 mRNA expression and the downstream regulated genes IL-4 and MAF-1 was identified. IL-4 has recently been implicated in the resistance to cell death observed in epithelial tumours, including breast cancer. IL-4 appears to function as an autocrine survival factor by amplifying expression of anti-apoptotic proteins and preventing therapy related cell death. IL-4 blockade has been shown to decrease growth rate and sensitize cells to chemotherapy [
46]. MAF-1 has been demonstrated to be a key regulator of RNA polymerase (pol) III which produces essential components of the biosynthetic machinery and is therefore a key determinant of cell growth and proliferation [
47,
48]. MAF-1 has also been implicated in regulation of the transformation state of cells [
49]. Hence, expression of SATB1 could represent a singular event with profound implications for tumourigenesis and metastasis in human breast cancer. This would be consistent with the emerging interplay between epigenetics, chromatin remodelling and cancer [
50‐
52]. Tumourigenesis and metastasis represent key stages in the development and progression of human cancer. Both are multi-step processes where genetic alterations are associated with characteristic changes in phenotype. Acquisition of metastatic competence is the prelude to widespread dissemination, resulting in the conversion of a local pathology into a systemic disease with associated mortality. [
53,
54]. How cells are initiated along a pathway to malignancy and how malignant cells gain metastatic potential is not well understood. Conventionally, cells are believed to evolve through sequential and additive genetic changes resulting in 'gain of function' and metastatic capacity. However, breast carcinomas with known clinical outcomes have recently been associated with characteristic genetic profiles [
55‐
58]. Hence, some cells within the primary tumour may already have the requisite gene expression pattern. The contemporary viewpoint is that such expression profiles may be simultaneously acquired through specific master changes in global genomic organization [
38]. In keeping with this, SATB1 can bind to numerous genomic sites, influencing chromatin organization and orchestrating transcription of multiple genes.
The functional relevance of genomic organization, particularly towards transcription, requires the reconciliation of two distinct paradigms, one suggesting that genomic organization merely reflects nuclear processes including transcription, and the other proposing that dynamic genome organization plays a decisive role in its function [
59]. SATB1 represents a novel class of transcription regulator and has been frequently referred to as a genome organiser. SATB1 appears to serve a dual purpose, structurally as a component of chromatin architecture and functionally as a transcription factor [
38]. Chromatin remodelling is emerging as an important effector mechanism of epigenetic regulation. The role of SATB1 is therefore instrumental to the relationship between higher order chromatin organization and global transcriptional regulation [
60]. SATB1 is a MAR binding protein involved in targeting chromatin remodelling in a tissue-specific manner at specific transcriptionally active chromosomal sites. It interacts with AT-rich sequence motifs within core unwinding elements that become unpaired under conditions of torsional/superhelical stress. Such base-unpairing regions (BURs) augment the potential for enhancers to act over large distances [
10,
24,
28,
36,
37,
61‐
64]. The protein selectively tethers multiple genomic loci and is localized to characteristic 'cage-like' three dimensional protein scaffold that anchors loops of chromatin, forming a dynamic chromatin 'loopscape' [
20,
30,
60,
62]. By acting as a 'docking site' it recruits chromatin remodelling complexes and regulates histone modifications and nucleosome positioning over long stretches of DNA [
20,
30,
65,
66].
The regulation of the activity of MAR-binding proteins remains poorly understood. Post-translational modification of SATB1 may provide a subtle refining mechanism for regulation of chromatin architecture and gene transcription [
60]. In this way, SATB1 may act as repressor or activator depending upon the physiological context [
18,
19,
30,
67‐
69]. At an early stage of apoptosis, SATB1 is irreversibly inactivated by caspase 6 cleavage, resulting in rapid dissociation from chromatin and MARs [
70]. SATB1 is also one of the few nuclear proteins harbouring the PDZ protein-protein interaction domain, permitting interaction with many nuclear proteins [
20]. Intriguingly, SATB1 does not contain a classical nuclear localization signal and a novel N-terminus sequence motif has been found to mediate nuclear localization [
29]. In contrast to SATB1, SATB2 can be reversibly and dynamically modified by SUMOylation (covalent conjugation of the small ubiquitin-related modifier), which appears to modulate its activity as a transcription factor. SUMOylation is also involved in targeting SATB2 to the nuclear periphery [
10,
71,
72]. The structural similarity between SATB1 and SATB2 implies analogous roles in transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, these proteins are highly conserved across species [
36,
37,
40,
73]. Further studies are required to determine the genome-wide targets of SATB1 and the multitude of interacting factors recruited. Furthermore, the process underlying tissue specificity of regulated genes and the mechanisms of transcriptional up- or down-regulation will need to be fully elucidated to optimise the impact of any potential therapeutic manipulation strategies [
74]. Chromatin organizers are unlikely to be unique to breast cancer pathogenesis and study of other human cancers is warranted.
Limitations of the present study included the use of background parenchyma from breast cancer patients to provide 'normal tissue' for comparison. Ideally, such material should be derived from patients without breast cancer in order to avoid any 'field change' which may exist within cancer bearing tissues. Although the sample size and follow-up period were substantial, it is possible that a larger cohort may have influenced several results which approached, but failed to reach, statistical significance. Finally, in addition to the measurement of mRNA transcript levels, quantitative analysis of protein expression should be undertaken to ensure concordance.
Authors' contributions
NP – literature review, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing. WJ – primer design, RNA extraction, reverse transcription, quantitative PCR, statistical analysis. RM – study design and planning. RN-study design and planning. KM – study design, patient recruitment, statistical analysis, data interpretation, manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.