Introduction
Neuroblastoma, a paediatric cancer that originates from precursor cells of the sympathetic nervous system, is responsible for 15% of all childhood cancer deaths [
1]. Tumors display a high level of heterogeneity, with clinical outcome ranging from spontaneous regression without treatment, to rapid disease progression and mortality [
2,
3]. Patients are risk stratified according to the identification of several prognostic factors at diagnosis including; level of disease dissemination (defined by the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS)), age, histology, and presence of high-risk genetic features such as amplification of the
MYCN proto-oncogene and chromosomal gains (17q) and deletions (11q or 1p) [
1,
4]. Despite advances in treatment and disease management, the overall 5-year survival rates remain poor in high-risk disease (25-40%). Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms of neuroblastoma disease, and recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of high-risk neuroblastoma may contribute to a greater understanding of response to therapy and outcome, potentially leading to the identification of suitable therapeutic targets that may respond to novel agents [
5,
6].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short non-coding RNAs that have emerged as significant epigenetic regulators of cellular functions, predominantly through silencing of their target genes via direct complementary mRNA 3′UTR base pairing. Dysregulation of miRNAs has been reported in numerous cancers where individual miRNA behave in an oncogenic or tumor suppressor manner [
7,
8]. To date, several profiling studies have identified miRNAs that are associated with clinical outcome in neuroblastoma [
9‐
13] and specific miRNAs have been identified that regulate key processes such as apoptosis, differentiation, cell proliferation and cell invasiveness in neuroblastoma [
14‐
17].
MiR-497 was previously identified by our laboratory as a member of a miRNA expression signature that is predictive of neuroblastoma patient survival [
9], and has also been reported to play a tumor suppressor role in a variety of other cancers [
18‐
20]. Down-regulation of miR-497 has been reported in both multidrug resistant lung and gastric cancer cell lines, compared to non-resistant cell lines [
21]. Recently,
BCL2 (a known anti-apoptotic protein determined to be involved with neuroblastoma drug resistance) has been demonstrated as a direct target of miR-497 in neuroblastoma cells [
22], further highlighting an important tumor suppressor role of this miRNA in this cancer.
WEE1, a tyrosine kinase regulator of the cell cycle, is over-expressed in several cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer and is also associated with poor disease free survival in malignant melanoma [
23‐
25].
WEE1 expression has been demonstrated to prevent ovarian cancer cells from undergoing apoptosis in response to DNA damage [
26].
WEE1 inhibition, in breast cancer, results in a significant decrease in cell proliferation and increased apoptotic levels. This effect is mirrored by inhibition of
WEE1 in cells exposed to DNA damaging agents in glioblastoma [
27,
28].
Here we report that low miR-497 expression levels are associated with event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in our neuroblastoma cohort and describe a significant difference in miR-497 expression between MYCN-amplified (MNA) versus non-MYCN-amplified (non-MNA) tumors. We demonstrate that miR-497 over-expression results in significantly decreased cell viability through increased apoptotic rates in MNA neuroblastoma cells, in part, through the direct targeting of the 3′UTR of WEE1. Furthermore, we observe that higher than median WEE1 levels are significantly associated with poor EFS and OS in neuroblastoma and that siRNA knockdown of WEE1 in MNA neuroblastoma cell lines results in significant and profound levels of apoptosis, supporting an oncogenic role of WEE1 in neuroblastoma. Treatment of either miR-497 over-expressing cells or WEE1 inhibited cells with CDDP resulted in a significant increase in apoptotic rates in MNA neuroblastoma cells. The synergistic enhancement of CDDP induced apoptosis through miRNA or siRNA mediated WEE1 inhibition indicates a potential therapeutic strategy for high risk neuroblastoma.
Discussion
The dysregulation of miRNAs is a key mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma, with several tumor suppressor miRNAs having been identified [
11,
14‐
17,
30,
31]. Here we determined that expression of miR-497, another potential tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma, was significantly lower in high-risk
MYCN amplified tumors and that lower miR-497 expression was associated with worse EFS and OS in our patient cohort. Similarly, miR-497 expression has been associated with improved patient survival in other cancers, including breast and colorectal cancer (CRC), suggesting a wider tumor suppressor role for this miRNA [
18,
19]. Ectopic expression of miR-497 decreased breast cancer cell proliferation and increased apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines [
18,
19]. Similarly, we observed a significant increase in apoptosis in our MNA neuroblastoma cell lines following over-expression of miR-497
in vitro.
To date, the characterisation of miR-497 function has not been extensive, although several targets have been identified with a key role in cell cycle and survival pathways, including
BCL2,
CCND2 and
IGF1-R[
18,
21,
22]
. We have identified a novel target of miR-497,
WEE1 tyrosine kinase, an emerging novel therapy target and potent pro-survival protein in neuroblastoma.
WEE1, an important regulator at the G2 checkpoint, normally negatively regulates entry into mitosis through phosphorylation of Tyr15 on CDC2 [
29]. Several studies have identified that
WEE1 is essential for normal cell function and embryonic development [
32,
33].
WEE1 has been associated with survival in several other cancer types including glioblastoma, malignant melanoma and breast cancer [
25,
27,
28]. This is consistent with our findings as the analysis of
WEE1 expression levels in an independent cohort of 88 primary diagnostic neuroblastoma samples revealed a significant association of high
WEE1 expression with poor EFS and OS.
An interesting study on CD34
+ umbilical cord blood cells by Lei
et al., focused on the anti-apoptotic role of
WEE1. They showed that when these cells were treated with chemotherapeutic agents, including CDDP, the over-expression of
WEE1 supported cell viability and resulted in decreased apoptosis [
34]. Subsequent studies have identified that knockdown of
WEE1, including siRNA mediated knockdown or the use of the novel
WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775, successfully enhances the response to chemotherapy through abrogation of G
2 arrest and increased apoptosis [
28,
35]. The therapeutic application of combined MK-1775 and chemotherapy has been confirmed in preclinical studies and results of clinical studies evaluating MK-1775 are awaited [
36].
Russell et al., described how down-regulation of WEE1 protein in neuroblastoma MNA cell lines resulted in significantly increased apoptosis, making this an attractive potential target for novel therapy approaches in high-risk neuroblastoma [
37]. We determined that miR-497 directly targets and inhibits
WEE1 protein expression in neuroblastoma cell lines, resulting in increased apoptosis. Russell et al., reported that sensitivity to a
WEE1 inhibitor (MK-1775) correlated with MYCN dosage [
37], consistent with our findings that miR-497 inhibition of
WEE1 produced a more significant increase in apoptosis in MNA neuroblastoma cell lines compared to the non-MNA SK-N-AS cell line. Even siRNA mediated
WEE1 inhibition did not result in an apoptotic increase for SK-N-AS, although a significant reduction in cell growth occurred. However, following siRNA
WEE1 knockdown and treatment with CDDP, a significant increase in apoptotic levels was recorded in both MNA and non-MNA cell lines. The different phenotypic response observed between MNA and non-MNA cell lines following siRNA mediated inhibition of
WEE1 and ectopic expression of miR-497, when combined with CDDP, may be reasonably explained. siWEE1 is specifically designed and has been optimised for maximal knock-down of WEE1, whereas, miR-497, although directly targeting
WEE1, may act in concert with other regulatory factors. siRNA mediated knockdown of WEE1 is more potent than the knockdown of WEE1 observed following miR-497 over-expression (Figure
3C,
3D and Additional file
6: Figure S3B, S3Cf). Given the significantly increased level of WEE1 protein knockdown following transfection with siWEE1 when compared to the level of WEE1 protein knockdown following miR-497 over-expression, this may explain the significant increase in apoptotic levels in SK-N-AS when combined with CDDP treatment.
One of the main obstacles in cancer treatment is the resistance of cancer cells to anti-cancer therapy. miRNAs have been linked to the development of drug resistance in several cancers [
38]. Recently, we demonstrated that miR-204 increases sensitivity of neuroblastoma cells to CDDP, in part, through the down-regulation of BCL2 [
31]. MiR-497 has also been implicated in the development of multi-drug resistance in human gastric and lung cancer cell lines, at least in part, through targeting of anti-apoptotic BCL2 [
21]. BCL2 has also been demonstrated as a direct target of miR-497 in neuroblastoma [
22], although BCL2 knockdown alone only increases apoptosis in a cell line specific manner [
31].
Materials and methods
Primary neuroblastoma tumors
Primary neuroblastoma tumor samples (n=143) were obtained from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), Philadelphia, USA (n=112) or from Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (n=31) (Additional file
1: Table S1). Research was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the Royal College of Surgeons and Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin. Detailed miRNA expression profiling of this cohort of patients is described previously [
9]. An independent data set of 88 primary neuroblastoma tumors was also used as part of the analysis for this study. This data is readily available using the web based R2 microarray analysis and visualization platform from the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam (
http://hgserver1.amc.nl/cgi-bin/r2/main.cgi).
Cell culture and transfections
Neuroblastoma cell lines including Kelly and CHP-212 (MYCN amplified) and SK-N-AS (non-MYCN amplified) were purchased from the European Collection of Animal Cells. All lines were validated by short tandem repeat sequence genotyping and for presence of previously published genomic imbalances using array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH). Cell culture media was supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Pen/Strep.
MiR-497 mimics and scrambled control oligonucleotides (Ambion, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were transiently transfected in neuroblastoma cells at a final concentration of 30 nM by reverse transfection using siPORT™ Neo FX™ (Ambion). For siRNAs (siRNA negative control and siWEE1 final concentration 30nM (Ambion)), and in the co-transfection of luciferase reporter plasmids and miR mimics, cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).
Cell viability and apoptosis assays
Viability of cells was measured by MTS-formazan reduction using CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, and 96 hr post transfection. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a Synergy Multi-Mode Plate Reader (Boitek, Winooski, VT, USA). Apoptosis levels were demonstrated by Annexin-V staining and propidium iodide (PI) exclusion using the FITC Annexin-V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analysed using BD FACSDiva 4.0 Software. Caspase 3/7 activity was evaluated using the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 Assay (Promega) and luminescence recorded using a Synergy Multi-Mode Plate Reader (Boitek).
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cell lines using miRNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed using total RNA with primers specific for miR-497 or RNU48 control and TaqMan microRNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems Life Technologes, Carlsbad, California, USA). For gene expression analysis, reverse transcription was performed using High-Capacity reverse transcription kits (Applied Biosystems). Specific TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems) for
WEE1 and miR-497 were employed for expression analysis on the 7900 HT Fast Realtime System (Applied Biosystems). MiRNA and gene expression was normalised using the endogenous controls RNU48 and 18S respectively and relative quantities determined by the delta CT method [
39].
Western blot analysis
Total protein was analysed by western blotting using primary antibodies anti-WEE1 (B11) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A), followed by anti-mouse secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA USA) and anti-mouse alpha-tubulin loading control (Abcam,Cambridge, MA USA).
Luciferase reporter assay
Direct targeting of the WEE1 3′UTRs was determined by cloning of the 3′UTR seed region and mutated seed regions into separate psiCHECK™-2 vectors (Eurofins MWG Operon, Anzingerstr Ebersberg Germany). Renilla and firefly luciferase activities were measured using the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter kit (Promega) and luminescence recorded on a Synergy Multi-Mode Plate Reader (Boitek).
Cell cycle analysis
Cell cycle progression and proliferation was monitored using the Cell Cycle Assay Kit - Green Fluorometric at 48 hr post transfection (Abcam Cambridge, MA USA). Cells were acquired using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analysed using Weasel 3.1 Software
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) or MedCalc Version 12.2.1.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). A P-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant (* p < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.
Authors’ contributions
LC, JR, HH, IMB, MM, AK performed experiments; LC, JR and RLS made substantial contributions to the conception and design of experiments; LC, JR and RLS wrote the manuscript; all authors have made critical edits to the manuscript and have given final approval.