Background
Pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PA) is the most common histologic type of primary lung cancer [
1]. Since Noguchi et al. reported a histopathologic study of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma located in the peripheral lung, in which the tumor size was < 2 cm in diameter [
2], significant attention has been paid to the histologic classification of PA. In 2011, the subtypes of adenocarcinoma were newly proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS); the significance of histologic classification was reemphasized in this revision. According to this classification, the components of adenocarcinoma were classified into five major histologic components, depending on the growth pattern or shape of tumor: acinar, papillary, micropapillary, solid, and lepidic. The percentage of each histologic component was recorded in 5% increments; the subtype of the adenocarcinoma was accordingly determined by the occupancy rate. For the classification, since the five types of components are mixed in most invasive adenocarcinomas, the descriptor “predominant”, which indicated the highest occupancy component, was affixed to subtype labels [
3].
The majority of primary adenocarcinomas that occur in the peripheral lung have the radiologic appearance of a ground glass opacity nodule (GGN) at the incipient stage; in most cases, the lesion becomes more solid as the tumor grows [
4,
5]. Moreover, GGN lesions are primarily lepidic; as the size increased, this lepidic component gradually decreases and is replaced with acinar or papillary components. This type of change in the composition of cells in the tumor is considered to be a specific feature solely of PA; to date, the change in the tumor composition during growth has not been fully evaluated.
The most important prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer is its anatomical stage; this staging is commonly determined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage [
6]. However, since many cases with the same staging have different prognoses, it is difficult to determine an accurate prognosis solely by stage. Particularly because histologic components are mixed in lung adenocarcinomas, it should be considered that various tumor characteristics and prognostic factors are dependent upon the occupancy rate. Therefore, even though histologic analyses of adenocarcinomas have been conducted in the past, most of the studies were focused on a prognosis analysis of the five subtypes determined by their predominant component [
7,
8]. Furthermore, studies that conducted a prognosis analysis dependent upon the occupancy rates of tumor components are lacking. In view of this situation, we conducted a study to evaluate changes in the composition of adenocarcinoma components as the tumor grows; in addition, we analyzed the correlation between the occupancy rates of histologic components of the tumor in regard to prognosis.
Discussion
Adenocarcinoma of the lung has various subtypes and it is considered that diversified subtypes will have different prognoses. Following the proposal of a new histological classification of adenocarcinoma by IASLC/ATS/ERS in 2011, studies on its utility have been steadily published. Up to the present, some data were presented that histologic subtype is related to prognosis [
9]. According to Yoshizawa et al.’s analysis of the prognosis of 514 stage I adenocarcinoma patients, lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma showed the best prognosis and solid predominant, as well as micropapillary predominant adenocarcinomas, showed a poor prognosis [
10]. In cased where curative surgery was performed regardless of stage, Tsuta et al. analyzed the prognosis of adenocarcinoma subtypes and reported the following 5-year survival rates: lepidic, 93%; acinar, 67%; papillary, 74%; micropapillary, 62%; and solid-predominant, 58% [
8]. Darin et al. reported the following 5-year survival rates: papillary-predominant, 80%; lepidic-predominant, 71%; micropapillary-predominant, 55%; acinar-predominant, 43%; and solid-predominant, 39%. However both studies reported no statistically significant differences in the survival rate [
7]. Despite the probability of a significant difference dependent on the predominant component, no definitive data has been presented. This may be because even though adenocarcinoma subtypes are classified by their predominant components, more than 90% of adenocarcinomas fall into the category of a “mixed type”, consisting of diverse cell types [
2,
10,
11]. Thus, the components other than the predominant component might influence the prognosis. Studies up to the present have focused on the analysis of the predominant component. With this study, we investigated the extent of influence of the occupancy rate of each component on the progression and prognosis of the tumor.
Tumor progression can be defined by tumor size and lymph node metastases, in accordance with the TNM stage. In this study we investigated how histologic component occupancy rates changed as tumor size increased. It was confirmed with statistical significance that as tumor size increased, the rates of acinar and solid components increased, and the rate of lepidic component decreased. In cases with a micropapillary component, the rate of increase accelerated as tumor size increased; however, the rate of increase was not statistically significant. Cases with lymph node metastases exhibited similar results, and we found that the rates of solid and micropapillary components increased and the rate of lepidic component decreased with statistical significance as the N stage of lymph node metastases increased (N0, N1, and N2). In cases with an acinar component, the growth rate increased as the N stage increased; however, the increase did not reach statistical significance. In summary, we found that as the tumor progressed, the occupancy rate of the lepidic component decreased while that of the solid component increased.
Pleural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion are known prognostic factors of lung cancer. Cases with pleural invasion are considered to be one of factors influencing prognosis because pleural invasion is one of the factors included in the TNM stage [
12]. However, since pleural invasion is significantly influenced by the location and size of tumor, controversy exists regarding its role as a prognostic factor, especially in stage I cancer [
13]. In cases with lymphatic invasion and/or vascular invasion, there are many reports that suggest that the aforementioned factors have an influence on prognosis [
11,
14‐
18]. In this study, we comparatively evaluated the differences in the occupancy rates of histologic components in the two groups with and without pleural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion; we used logistic regression analysis to confirm the correlation between the rate and the degree of invasion. To evaluate the influence of the change in the occupancy rate of histologic component on invasion, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted with the covariates of age, sex, location of tumor, and size of tumor. By first evaluating the mean rate comparison, the groups with pleural invasion, lymphatic invasion, or vascular invasion all were found to have higher mean occupancy rates of micropapillary and solid components; in addition, they all were found to have lower occupancy rates of a lepidic component, compared with the group without those invasions. With logistic regression analysis, as the occupancy rate of the lepidic component increased, the probability of pleural invasion, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion decreased; in cases with a micropapillary component, as the occupancy rate of increased, the probability of lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion increased. In summary, these results suggested that the occupancy rates of the lepidic component and the micropapillary component were related to local invasion; thus, an increase of the lepidic component occupancy rate appears to be a good prognostic factor, while an increase of the micropapillary component occupancy appears to be a poor prognostic factor. The presence of a micropapillary component has been suggested to be a poor prognostic factor and the literature contains reports that the recurrence rate increased in the presence of a micropapillary component [
19‐
21]. However, no detailed studies are available on an increase of occupancy rate of micropapillary component and its influence on prognosis. In this regard, it appears that our study has significance in that a poor prognosis can be predicted in accordance with an increase of the occupancy rate.
Our data were relatively recent data, so we couldn’t analyzed 5-year overall survival. However, we performed 3-year disease free survival analysis. In multivariate analysis, an increase of micropapillary component occupancy and an decrease of lepidic component occupancy were significantly associated with recurrence. This results showed that the occupancy rates of micropapillary and lepidic components are related with prognosis.
All of the foregoing results contributed somewhat to the prediction of the characteristics and changes of the typical histologic components of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Each component would have different characteristics, which could influence the clinical course. If the occupancy rates of these histologic components were analyzed in detail and the characteristics in accordance with the change in the occupancy rates were revealed, individualization of a treatment protocol for adenocarcinoma could defined; thus, helping to maximize the benefits of the treatment.
Our study had several limitations. It is retrospective and single center. The patient sample was relatively small; this particularly impacted categorization by tumor size. Even though the classification was made in compliance with T stage criteria of TNM stage, the number of patients in the group > 5 cm was only 10; thus, the group was combined with the group ≥ 3 cm and < 5 cm. If the patient sample was larger, more size subdivisions could be made and more accurate results could have been attained; furthermore, this would increase the significance of the study. Long-term follow-up was not conducted. Long-term follow-up regarding the influence of each histologic component could provide a more detailed analysis of the recurrence rate and mortality.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
YM participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. KSK participated in the literature searching. KYL participated in the design and the pathologic analysis. SWS, YKK, JHK, and YSK participated in the design of the study. JKP conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.