Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2013

Open Access 01.01.2013 | Poster presentation

Evaluation of Circulation, Γ, as a quantifying metric in 4D flow MRI

verfasst von: Aaron T Hess, Malenka M Bissell, Steffan J Glaze, Alex Pitcher, Saul Myerson, Stefan Neubauer, Matthew D Robson

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Sonderheft 1/2013

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Background

4D flow MRI provide a wonderfully rich set of data for diagnosis and understanding of cardiac disease. Interpretation of this wealth of data can be challenging and it may be desirable to simplify it to make analysis manageable. We have observed interesting rotational behavior of blood in the aorta in a number of cardiac diseases. Circulation (Γ) is a metric used in fluid dynamics to quantify the rotational components of flow. This metric has not been reported before for 4D flow MRI and may provide a measurement that can be used diagnostically. The purpose of this work is to define the normal range of Γ in the ascending aorta and investigate its reproducibility.

Methods

Circumferential circulation is calculated as the integral of vorticity (ω) with respect to area within a transverse plane through the aorta, Γ= ∫∫ω dS (Stokes' theorem). Γ is a 3D vector, whose through plane component, ΓT, depicts the within plane (circumferential) rotation. ΓT was calculated in the ascending aorta at the level of the pulmonary artery, both at peak systole and during mean systole (-80 to 120 ms about peak). 35 healthy volunteers were assessed, mean age 36.7 ±17.6 years, range from 8 to 74 years old, 23 male and 12 female. Three volunteers were rescanned to assess repeatability. 4D Flow [1] was analyzed in EnSight (CEI, Apex, NC, USA) to calculate vorticity maps. A slice through the lumen was segmented to include only the blood pool, and a discrete integral with respect to voxel cross-sectional area was calculated in Matlab (Natick, MA, USA).

Results

Figure 1 demonstrates the segmentation on a velocity and vorticity map. In our group of 35 volunteers mean ±SD of ΓT was 2.71 ±2.78 mm2/s and 3.07 ±4.51 mm2/s for peak and mean systole respectively. Our three repeated scans have differences and means shown in table 1. They show that the intra-subject variation is less than the inter-subject variation, this supports the reproducibility of the method. Figure 2 demonstrates the range of circulations calculated. In patients with heart valve disease we have observed values of ΓT at peak as high as 67 and -80 mm2/s and over mean systole of 62 and -62 mm2/s.
Table 1
Mean and difference of repeated scans
Subject/Method
Difference mm2/s
Mean mm2/s
1/peak systole
1.81
1.50
2/peak systole
-1.02
8.66
3/peak systole
0.91
2.90
1/mean systole
-0.50
0.44
2/mean systole
0.93
15.44
3/mean systole
2.04
1.11

Conclusions

Circulation (ΓT) has been found to be straightforward to calculate and a robust means of quantitating the rotational flow characteristic in the ascending aorta. The normal range of values calculated here are found to be positive and low compared to those to those seen in disease which can be high or negative, which suggests that this approach may have high clinical sensitivity.

Funding

The MRC (UK), and the British Heart Foundation
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Literatur
1.
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of Circulation, Γ, as a quantifying metric in 4D flow MRI
verfasst von
Aaron T Hess
Malenka M Bissell
Steffan J Glaze
Alex Pitcher
Saul Myerson
Stefan Neubauer
Matthew D Robson
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-S1-E36

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2013

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.