Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2014

Open Access 01.01.2014 | Poster presentation

Left ventricular function by echocardiography correlates poorly with cardiac MRI measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

verfasst von: Jonathan H Soslow, Larry W Markham, Benjamin Saville, Meng Xu, Bruce M Damon, David Parra

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Sonderheft 1/2014

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Background

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) causes skeletal muscle weakness and cardiomyopathy (CM). Current recommendations are for annual left ventricular (LV) function assessment after age 10 years. Although echocardiographic image quality in DMD patients can be affected by scoliosis and adipose tissue, recent reviews recommend echocardiography as the standard imaging modality. We hypothesized that objective and subjective LV functional assessment by echocardiography in DMD is suboptimal compared to cardiac MRI (CMR).

Methods

Twelve DMD patients prospectively enrolled; echocardiography and CMR performed median of 0 days apart (max 22 days). Echocardiography was performed by sonographers with DMD imaging expertise. Cardiologist blinded to CMR results measured the following echocardiographic parameters: 1) M-mode fractional shortening (MMFS); 2) 2-dimensional FS (2DFS), 3) biplane LV ejection fraction (LVEF); 4) single plane LVEF; 5) 3-dimensional LVEF; 6) peak circumferential strain (εcc ); 7) subjective LVEF. CMR measures included: 1) LVEF; 2) HARP εcc analysis of tagged images; 3) Subjective segmental function. Segmental assessments by echocardiography and CMR were performed using 17-segment model. Agreement between echocardiography and CMR assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman correlation; subjective LVEF evaluated with weighted kappa.

Results

Mean age was 15.8 years (range 10-27). Mean LVEF by CMR was 47.4 ± 8.9%; 8 patients had CM defined as LVEF < 55% (Table 1). Subjective echocardiographic image quality rated good in 4/12 (33.3%), average 2/12 (16.7%), poor 3/12 (25%) and inadequate 3/12 (25%); none rated excellent. For echocardiography, only MMFS was measurable in all patients. Only moderate correlations were seen between MMFS and CMR LVEF (r = 0.59, p = 0.042) and echocardiographic εcc and CMR εcc (ICC = 0.52, p = 0.045). A strong correlation was seen between 2DFS and CMR LVEF (r = 0.79, p = 0.033) but 2DFS was only obtainable in 58% of patients. No significant correlations were found between other measures, including subjective LVEF (Table 2). Subjective segmental assessment was possible in 202 of 204 segments by CMR and only 137 of 204 segments by echocardiography. Of 69 segments not visualized by echocardiography, 39 had abnormal wall motion by CMR. Inferior and inferolateral walls at mid-ventricular level were most common sites of wall motion abnormalities.
Table 1
Results of Objective Measures of LV Function
Measures of LV Function
Mean ± SD
N
Echocardiographic Measures
M-mode FS
24.5 ± 6.1
12
2-Dimensional FS
27.6 ± 3.9
7
Biplane LVEF
52.1 ± 8.1
4
4 chamber LVEF
44 ± 12.2
7
3-Dimensional LVEF
36.2 ± 13.3
5
εcc
-16.5 ± 4.4
8
CMR Measures
LVEF
47.4 ± 8.9
12
εcc
-12.9 ± 3.5
12
LV (left ventricular) SD (standard deviation) FS (fractional shortening) LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) εcc (peak circumferential strain)
Table 2
Comparison of Echocardiography and CMR measures of LV function
Echocardiographic Measures
Adequate Echocardiographic Image Quality (N = 12)
Correlation
P-value
  
CMR LVEF
 
M-mode FS
12/12 (100%)
0.591
0.042
2-Dimensional FS
7/12 (58.3%)
0.791
0.033
Biplane LVEF
4/12 (33.3%)
-0.072
0.531
4 chamber LVEF
7/12 (58.3%)
0.52
0.09
3-Dimensional LVEF
5/12 (41.7%)
0.282
0.168
Subjective global function
12/12 (100%)
0.083
0.35
  
CMR εcc
 
εcc
8/12 (66.6%)
0.521
0.045
LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) FS (fractional shortening) εcc (peak circumferential strain) 1Spearman Correlation 2Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 3Weighted Kappa

Conclusions

Objective and subjective echocardiographic measures of LV function were not possible in many DMD patients and had limited correlation with CMR. Only 3 studies were rated inadequate, suggesting that, even in the face of "adequate" imaging, functional analysis by echocardiography had suboptimal correlation and unrecognized wall motion abnormalities. These discrepancies could adversely impact patient care. We recommend early consideration for CMR for annual, accurate assessment of DMD function.

Funding

The project described was supported by: 1) The American Heart Association Clinical Research Program, Grant 13CRP14530007. 2) The National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06. 3) The Fighting Duchenne Foundation and the Fight DMD/Jonah & Emory Discovery Grant (Nashville, TN).
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Metadaten
Titel
Left ventricular function by echocardiography correlates poorly with cardiac MRI measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy
verfasst von
Jonathan H Soslow
Larry W Markham
Benjamin Saville
Meng Xu
Bruce M Damon
David Parra
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P306

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2014

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.