Interleukin-1α expression precedes IL-1β after ischemic brain injury and is localised to areas of focal neuronal loss and penumbral tissues

Inflammation is recognised as a major contributor to the worsening of acute brain injury [1]. In particular two pro-inflammatory members of the IL-1 family of cytokines, IL-1α and IL-1β, are considered the major effectors of injury, and inhibiting their signalling with the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is protective in experimental models of stroke [1], and has shown promise as a treatment in clinical trials [2]. Mice in which both IL-1α and IL-1β have been deleted (IL-1α/β double KO) have markedly reduced damage in response to experimental stroke caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) [3]. However, the relative contribution of each cytokine to the evolution of the infarct is not clear since IL-1Ra inhibits both cytokines. The neuroprotective effects of IL-1Ra are reduced when administration is delayed beyond 3 h [4], suggesting that IL-1 expressed early after the insult is important. IL-1β mRNA is detected within 3-6 h after cerebral ischemia [5, 6], although there is very little direct evidence that IL-1β protein is produced, and almost no information is available about IL-1α. In this study we sought to determine the spatial distribution of IL-1α and IL-1β in the mouse brain early (4 h) and late (24 h) after stroke induced by MCAo. Such a study was required since strategies aimed at inhibiting inflammation in the brain will be dictated by the nature of the inflammatory mediators produced.

We first investigated whether IL-1 expression could be detected early (4 h after reperfusion) after ischemic brain injury, when little neuronal death is present compared to the 24 h reperfusion time. C57BL6/H mice (male, 12-16 weeks) were subjected to 60 min MCAo and 4 h reperfusion following which they were transcardially perfused with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. After cryoprotection brains were cut on a sledge microtome at a thickness of 20 μm and were stored in cryoprotectant solution until use. Immunoflourescence on these sections showed IL-1α expression (AF-400-NA, R & D Systems, 0.4 μg/mL) in microglia in the ipsilateral hemisphere as identified by co-staining for the microglial marker Iba-1 (019-19741, Wako, 1 μg/mL) (Figure 1A, B). At this time no IL-1β expression (AF-401-NA, R & D Systems, 0.4 μg/mL) was observed in these areas, with only a few non-microglial IL-1β-positive cells observed in the capsula interna, away from the core of the infarct, as reported previously [7]. No IL-1 expression was observed in the contralateral hemisphere, confirming that its expression was a result of the injury (Figure 1A). To further confirm early IL-1α expression after MCAo, we performed quantitative real-time PCR on tissue homogenates of the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres 4 h after reperfusion. A significant increase (P < 0.01) was observed in IL-1α expression, whereas we were unable to detect IL-1β expression at this time point (Figure 1F).

Only microglia of CX3CR1-GFP+/- mice (as used previously [7]) express GFP in the brain [8]. CX3CR1-GFP+/- mice were subjected to 60 min MCAo followed by 24 h reperfusion, when the evolution of the infarct is advanced and there is substantial neuronal death. Ramified, GFP-positive microglia-like cells in the ipsilateral hemisphere expressed IL-1α (Figure 2A). IL-1α-positive microglia were present in the cerebral cortex, the piriform cortex, the ventral striatum and the thalamus. Immunohistochemistry for IL-1α, with cresyl violet co-staining, localized IL-1α expressing microglia mainly to the penumbral tissue surrounding the infarct (Figure 2B). IgG cannot cross an intact blood brain barrier (BBB) and its presence in the brain parenchyma indicates BBB disruption and injury [9]. Staining of coronal brain sections from C57BL6/H mice (Figure 2C) and CX3CR1-GFP+/- mice (not shown) 24 h after MCAo for IL-1α and IgG (BA-2000, Vector Labs, biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG, 2 μg/mL; S-32356, Invitrogen, Alexa 594 conjugated streptavidin, 5 μg/mL) revealed that IL-1α expressing cells co-localized to areas of focal BBB damage, mainly near the penumbral regions of the ipsilateral hemisphere (Figure 2C). The localization of IL-1α expressing cells with injured brain tissue is also shown by the co-localization of IL-1α positive microglia (red) with areas of focal neuronal loss within the compromised tissue (absence of NeuN (MAB377, Millipore, mouse anti-NeuN 5 ug/mL)) (Figure 2D). IL-1α expressing microglia increased overall after 24 h reperfusion compared to the 4 h time point (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05, not shown) although the increase was not significant when comparing any particular brain regions. At 24 h IL-1β is expressed [7]. Thus the expression of IL-1α in microglia occurs early after an ischemic insult and is localized to areas of injury, mostly near peri-infarct regions.

IL-1α can be actively localized to cell nuclei [10] and in microglia this may represent a mechanism of inhibiting IL-1α release after hypoxic cellular injury [11]. 24 h after 60 min MCAo in CX3CR1-GFP +/- mice, microglia expressing GFP also expressed IL-1α that was localized to the nucleus in some cells (Figure 2Ei, ii), but not in others (Figure 2Eiii, iv). Confocal images (Leica TCS SP5 AOBS confocal microscope) were captured from these sections and were processed and analysed with Image J http://​rsb.​info.​nih.​gov/​ij. Regions of interest for quantification of mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) in whole microglia and microglial nuclei were selected using the GFP and DAPI signals respectively. MFIs were quantified for IL-1α and GFP in whole microglia using a maximum Z projection of the confocal image stack. Nuclear IL-1α and GFP MFIs were quantified in a confocal slice at the level of the nucleus. The fold enrichment of IL-1α and GFP in the nucleus were calculated as follows: Fold enrichment = MFI (nucleus)/MFI (whole cell). The fold enrichment data suggest that GFP was uniformly distributed throughout the cell (Figure 2F). However the spread of IL-1α enrichment throughout a cell was much broader suggesting that its localization between the nucleus and cytosol was regulated (Figure 2F). We have previously reported that IL-1α is retained in the nuclei of dead and dying cells [11], and also that microglia die in the infarct following MCAo [12]. Thus it is possible that microglia in an ischemic brain undergoing cell death processes may localize IL-1α to the nucleus to limit its release.

These data show that IL-1α is expressed by microglia at sites of brain injury within a relevant window of time at which blocking the effects of IL-1 are known to be neuroprotective [4]. At these times, IL-1β is not present suggesting that IL-1α is the active IL-1 isoform in mediating the early inflammatory period following ischemic brain injury. This is consistent with recent discoveries highlighting the earlier appearance of IL-1α in sterile inflammatory responses, with a later contribution from IL-1β [13], although functional evidence for a role of microglia-derived IL-1α in brain injury is not provided here. In cerebral ischemia the primary injury to brain cells is caused by the lack of blood supply and so can be considered sterile. Sterile inflammation is known as a major contributor to disease and injury [14], and IL-1α has become recognised as a major mediator of sterile tissue injury [15, 16]. Thus the data presented here extend our, and others, previous work showing that IL-1α is a key inflammatory cytokine following tissue injury. This study also extends our previous in vitro studies showing that the sub-cellular distribution of IL-1α is regulated under conditions of hypoxia, which may be relevant to the regulation of its release and sterile inflammatory responses [11].