Introduction
microRNAs (miRNAs) constitute an evolutionarily conserved class of small, non-coding RNAs whose function are regulating expression of multiple genes either by translational suppression or gene degradation via interactions with 3′untranslated regions (UTR) of target mRNAs[
1]. It has been confirmed that miRNAs modulate many key cellular processes, such as cell growth, cycle, differentiation, and cell death[
2,
3]. Moreover, Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been identified in various types of cancer, and compelling evidence suggest that miRNAs function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors genes[
4,
5]. Recently, miRNAs have been discovered to have a role in progression and metastasis of human cancers[
6‐
11]. Furthermore, several clinical studies have observed correlations between miRNA expression and recurrence and survival[
12]. The miR-212, which locates at chromosome 17p13.3, was shown to be over-expressed in many cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer[
13], and oral carcinoma[
14], whereas in other tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma[
15], gastric cancer[
16,
17], colorectal cancer[
18], prostate cancer[
19], miR-212 was down-expressed. In the present study, we aimed at exploring the roles miR-212 played in PDAC and the potential mechanism. Using gain and loss of function assays, a pro-oncogenic function of miR-212 in PDAC was observed. Furthermore, the Hh signal pathway receptor PTCH1 was demonstrated to be a direct target of miR-212 in PDAC. Our findings provide an oncogenic role of miR-212 orchestrates in PDAC and its possible mechanism.
Materials and methods
Ethical approval of the study protocol
For the analyzed tissue specimens, all patients were given informed consent to use excess pathological specimens for research purposes. The protocols employed in this study and the use of human tissues was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Sixth People’s Hospital affiliated of Shanghai Jiaotong University and conducted in full accordance with ethical principles, including the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, and the local legislation. The manuscript was accompanied by a statement that the experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each subject and according to the above mentioned principles.
Human tissue specimens and cell lines
Twenty-two PDAC specimens were obtained from The Sixth People’s Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University. The matched normal gastric tissue samples were obtained from tissues that were located 5 cm away from the tumor margin. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Sixth People’s Hospital affiliated of Shanghai Jiaotong University.
The human pancreatic cancer cells, including PANC-1, SW1990, BxPC-3 were obtained from the Americacn Type culture Collection (ATCC, manassas, VA) and the normal human pancreatic duct epithelial cells were isolated from normal pancreatic tissues as previously described[
20]. Cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS (GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA), and were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO
2.
Quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from tissues and cells using Trizol regent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and the reverse transcription reactions were performed by random primers and a Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed using a standard SYBR Green PCR kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) protocol on Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the instructions. U6 was used as references for miR-212, GAPDH was used as references for PTCH1. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The 2-ΔΔCt method was used to quantify the relative levels of gene expression. The primer sequences were as follows: RT Primer: CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGGGCCGTGA, has-miR-212 forward: ACACTCCAGCTGGGTAACAGTCTCCAGTC; U6 SLRT: CTCAACTGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTCAGTTGAGAAAATATG, U6 forward: ACACTCCAGCTGGGCGCAAATTCGTGAAGC. PTCH1 forward: GCTTCCCGTGCTTTTGTCTT, reverse: CTGCAGCTCAATGACTT.
Transient transfection
miR-212 mimic, miR-212 inhibitor, negative control were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China) and the sequences were as follows: miR-212 mimic: sense (5′ to 3′) UAACAGUCUCCAGUCACGGCC, antisense (5′ to 3′) CCGUGACUGGAGACUGUUAUU. miR-212 Inhibitor: sense (5′ to 3′) GGCCGUGACUGGAGACUGUUA. Negative control: sense (5′ to 3′)UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT, antisense (5′ to 3′)ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 105 and cultured in medium without antibiotics for approximately 24 h before transfection. Cells were transiently transfected with miR-212 mimic, miR-212 inhibitor or negative control(NC), at a final concentration of 200nM. After 6 h incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, the medium was re-placed with fresh culture medium.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation analysis was performed with Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manual of the manufacturer. Briefly, PDAC cells were plated in 96-well plates in triplicate at 1 × 104 cells each well and cultured in the growth medium. Cells were examined at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. CCK-8 (10 μl) was added to each well at different time points. After an incubation of 1 h at 37°C, absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Five independent experiments were performed.
2000 of each transfected cells were plated in six-well plate and cultured for 14 days. Then cells were fixed and stained with methanol for 30 min, followed by 0.5% crystal violet for 20 min. Visible colonies were quantified in four different fields and the mean value was calculated.
Cell migration and invasion assays
The wound healing assay was used to examine cell migration. The migration status was determined by measuring the movement of cells into a scraped area created by a 200 μl pipette tip. After wound scratching, cells were cultured in media supplemented with 0.1% FBS to eliminate the effect of cell proliferation. The process of wound closure was photographed at 24 h. Cell invasion was examined using a extracellular matrix membrane (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cells were suspended in serum-free medium and placed in the top chambers, and complete medium containing 10% FBS was added to the bottom chambers. The chambers were then incubated for 12 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the noninvasive cells were gently removed from the top wells with a cotton-tipped swab and the chambers were fixed with methanol for 30 min. The chambers were then stained with crystal violet for another 30 min. Four random fields were counted per chamber using an inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan), and each experiment was repeated three times.
Luciferase activity assay
PANC-1 cells were co-transfected with miR-212 mimic or negative control (NC) and wild type (WT) or the mutated 3′UTR (Mut) of PTCH1. 48 h later, cells were collected and luciferase activity was assayed using dual-luciferase assay system (Promega, Wiscosin, WI).
Western blot analysis
Cells were washed with PBS and lysed for 10 min on ice in RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Protein concentration was measured using the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The protein fractions were resuspended in loading buffer and denatured at 100°C for 10 min. Total proteins (20 μg/lane) were separated on 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were then blocked in 5% fat-free milk in TBST buffer (0.1% Tween-20) for 2 h at room temperature. The rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibody was used in conjunction with 0.4 μg/ml of anti-species conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY), and bands were detected by chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Inc, Piscataway, NJ).
Immunohistochemistry
PTCH1 was detected in paraffin-embedded tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed according to the manufacturer instructions. each slide was deparaffinized in 60°C, followed by treatment with xylene and graded alcohol. After the antigen retrieval and being blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin, tissue slides were immunohistochemically stained by antibody against PTCH1 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA), then visualized by standard avidin–biotinylated peroxidase complex method. Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining and morphologic images were observed with Olympus BX51 microscope.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were analyzed using Student’s t-test. All analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0.
Discussion
Accumulating evidences have revealed that miRNAs participate in the progression of many types of cancer by targeting multiple genes which involved in the progression and metastasis[
21]. Thereby, identification of specific miRNAs may provide clues for the diagnosis and therapy of patients with cancer. Here, we found that the expression of miR-212 was significantly up-regulated in PDAC tissues and cells lines, consistent with the study of Park[
22]. Next, in vitro experiments were performed to test the pro-oncogenic roles of miR-212 played in PDAC. As we expected, a pro-proliferative, pro-migratory, pro-invasive effect of miR-212 was observed in PDAC cells, while miR-212 inhibitor suppressed this effect. Furthermore, we showed that PTCH1 was a direct target of miR-212 in PDAC cells, consistent with Li study, PTCH1 was a direct target of miR-212 in non-small lung cancer[
13].
PTCH1 is a member of the hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway[
23]. The Hh signaling pathway is crucial in the growth and patterning during embryonic development, while abnormal activation of Hh signaling pathway is highly involved in tumor progression and metastasis[
24,
25]. As a tumor suppressor gene, PTCH1 inhibits tumor cell growth and motility by blocking the Hh signaling pathway[
26]. PTCH1 is down-regulated in some malignant cancers, such as liver, breast, and esophageal cancer[
27‐
29]. The ectopic expression of PTCH1 may leads to the loss of its normal inhibitory function on Smo, another member of Hh signaling pathway, resulting in the abnormal activation of the Hh signaling pathway, as well as the downstream transcription factor Gli1. The abnormal activation of Hh signaling pathway can lead to the promotion of tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion[
30‐
32]. In this study, we showed that the expression level of miR-212 was inversely correlated with PTCH1 in PDAC tissues, and up-regulated PTCH1 could attenuate the pro-oncogenic effect induced by miR-212 in PDAC cells. These results indicated that the overexpression of miR-212 mediated PDAC cell growth, migration, and invasion may partially through inhibiting PTCH1 expression.
Conclusions
Taken together, this study showed that miR-212 was up-regulated in PDAC samples and cell lines, and both gain-of and loss of-function demonstrated that miR-212 enhanced cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, and invasion of PDAC cells. PTCH1 was identified as a target of miR-212, and up-regulated PTCH1 partially attenuated the pro-oncogenic effect or miR-212, indicating that miR-212 may act as an oncogene and miR-212/PTCH1 present a potential target for PDAC therapy.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CM, KN, BW, BD, YB, XH performed most of the experiments. KA designed the study. HZ, ZY and WW performed statistical analysis. KA supervised the study, and CM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.