Neuroendocrine and metabolic components of dopamine agonist amelioration of metabolic syndrome in SHR rats

Many vertebrate species in the wild exhibit annual cycles of metabolism, oscillating between seasons of obese, insulin resistance and lean, insulin sensitivity (reviewed in [1, 2]. The ability to anticipate a season of low food availability by the endogenous induction of the obese, insulin resistant state supports survival during such a subsequent season when food availability is scarce. During the obese, insulin resistant season, in the absence of ample carbohydrate in the environment, increased hepatic glucose output supports brain function while fat stores are utilized in insulin resistant peripheral tissues thereby sparing plasma glucose for utilization by the brain, which has a near absolute requirement for glucose as a fuel. The circadian rhythm of dopamine release at the region of the biological clock, the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), has been implicated in the regulation of peripheral insulin sensitivity and glucose and lipid metabolism in such seasonal mammals (reviewed in [1, 2]). The circadian peak of dopamine release at the region of the SCN in seasonal insulin sensitive animals is absent in seasonal insulin resistant animals [3] and ablation of this dopaminergic activity by SCN area site-specific neurotoxin application in seasonal or nonseasonal insulin sensitive animals induces a marked insulin resistant state [4]. Moreover, intraperitoneal or intracerebroventricular administration of bromocriptine, a potent dopamine D2 receptor agonist, to seasonal insulin resistant animals reverses the insulin resistance/glucose intolerance [5‐7]. Such bromocriptine treatment has been demonstrated to reduce both hepatic glucose and lipid production and secretion in seasonal insulin resistant animals [6, 8‐10]. Other studies have identified the ventromedial hypothalamus as an additional target for such metabolic influences of hypothalamic dopaminergic activity (potentially in concert with or resulting from such activity at the region of the SCN). Bromocriptine treatment of seasonal animals reduces elevated ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (S) neuronal activities [2] that are characteristic of the insulin resistant state across a variety of animal models of the condition [1] and that can induce the obese, insulin resistant condition in normal animals (via VMH NE and S infusion) through their regulation of the neuroendocrine axis (e.g., simultaneous increase in sympathetic tone, plasma insulin, glucagon and norepinephrine among other factors) without alteration of the diet [1, 11, 12].

However, we are still searching for insights into how these (hypothalamic or other) influences of bromocriptine affect regulatory biochemical pathways in liver that facilitate/mediate these simultaneous bromocriptine effects on glucose and lipid metabolism therein and systemically. Also, it is not known whether such bromocriptine effects on VMH neurochemistry are specific to seasonal animals or are a fundamental-general phenomenon of the insulin resistant state among mammals, across seasonal and non-seasonal animal models of insulin resistance alike. Moreover, the potential impact of bromocriptine treatment not merely on insulin resistance but rather upon the MS (insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hepatic inflammation) has not been fully investigated. This study therefore investigated the impact of bromocriptine treatment in the hypertensive, insulin resistant SHR rat on a) VMH neurochemistry known to regulate peripheral (hepatic) glucose and lipid metabolism, b) the broader malaise of MS (hypertension, obesity, fatty liver, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and pro-inflammatory state) that contribute to cardiometabolic risk and c) liver biochemical pathways operative in the (dys)regulation of hepatic glucose and lipid production, namely transcription factor or enzyme proteins modulating proinflammatory (SOCS3, NFκB, IKK, JNK), gluconeogenic (FOXO1-Ser256, PEPCK, G6Pase, PGC-1α) fatty acid oxidative (PGC-1α, PPARα), and lipogenic (SREBP-1, mTORC, PGC-1β, PPARγ) activities. Here we show that dopamine agonist treatment with bromocriptine at the onset of locomotor activity in SHR rats normalizes elevated levels of VMH noradrenergic and serotonergic activities associated with and known to induce insulin resistance and fattening in seasonal rodents. Such treatment also reduces hypertension, insulin resistance, fatty liver and several key hepatic transcription factors that induce hepatic pro-inflammatory pathways, gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis. The bromocriptine-induced reduction in hypertension is associated with and may be potentiated by its induced changes in VMH activity and reduced sympathetic tone. The bromocriptine-induced reduction in liver and adipose fat content is associated with and may derive in part from reductions of hyperinsulinemia, liver lipogenic responsiveness to insulin and pro-inflammatory pathways that potentiate lipogenic activity. The reduction in bromocriptine-induced insulin resistance is coupled to and may derive in part from reductions in hepatic transcription factors potentiating gluconeogenesis and fatty acid oxidation.

Effect of SHR vs Wistar background and of Bromocriptine in SHR rats on Daily VMH Extracellular Monoamine Metabolite Profiles.

Figure 1A shows the 22 hour pattern of extracellular MHPG in the VMH of freely moving SHR rats treated with either bromocriptine or vehicle for 14 days compared to that of normotensive Wistar controls. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a significant main effect of the bromocriptine treatment (F_{10, 80} = 2.340, P < 0.05). SHR rats exhibited elevated VMH NE release relative to Wistar normal controls (66% increase, P < 0.0001). However, timed daily bromocriptine administration significantly reduced VMH MHPG of SHR rats compared with vehicle treated SHR rats (65%, P < 0.0001).

Figure 1B shows the 22 hour pattern of extracellular HVA in the VMH of freely moving SHR rats treated with either bromocriptine or vehicle for 14 days compared to that of normotensive Wistar controls. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a significant strain treatment effect (F_{2, 80} = 10.069, P < 0.005) and a significant interaction effect between treatment and time of day (F_{20, 80} = 1.99, P < 0.02). SHR rats had significantly lower extracellular VMH HVA content compared with normal Wistar rats (29%, P < 0.001). However, extracellular VMH HVA content was not different between BC and vehicle treated SHR rats.

Figure 1C shows the 22 hour pattern of extracellular 5-HIAA in the VMH of freely living SHR rats treated with either bromocriptine or vehicle for 14 days compared to that of Wistar control animals. There was a significant effect of the interaction between treatment and time of day (F_{20, 80} = 2.555, P < 0.002) by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Post-hoc multiple-range test revealed a significant group difference on VMH 5-HIAA levels between SHR vehicle treated and BC treated (49% reduction by BC treatment; P < 0.0001) as well as between SHR and Wistar vehicle treated rats (53% reduction in Wistars; P < 0.0001). There was however, no significant difference on VMH 5-HIAA levels between SHR BC treated and Wistar rats.

This study is the first to demonstrate that dopamine agonist treatment ameliorates both major central and peripheral components of MS as evidenced by a simultaneous improvement in a range of neuroendocrine and metabolic pathologies including hypertension, obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, increased liver lipid content, and hepatic pro-inflammatory protein pathway activation. Available evidence suggests that such wide spread influences on metabolism are largely via the hypothalamic/neuroendocrine axis [1, 2, 10‐12, 14]. Intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of bromocriptine to seasonal insulin resistant hamsters reduces body fat store levels, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance. Information regarding the CNS targets for such icv dopamine agonist-induced improvements in seasonal insulin resistance indicates that modulation of monoamine activity at the hypothalamic VMH is at least one such CNS target [11, 12, 14] among others (reviewed in [1]). Seasonal insulin resistance is associated with elevations in VMH NE and 5HT activities and importantly, infusion of exogenous NE and 5HT to the VMH of seasonal insulin sensitive animals to raise these monoamine levels to those observed in seasonal insulin resistant animals induces marked insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction [12, 15] and this event has also been observed in non-seasonal animals as well [11]. Systemic bromocriptine treatment normalizes these VMH monoamine dysfunctions and insulin resistance in seasonal hamsters [14]. Also, preliminary data indicate that this influence of bromocriptine treatment to reduce insulin resistance can be largely attenuated by concurrent infusion of NE into the VMH (Cincotta, unpublished data). The present observations of a) increased VMH NE and 5HT activities in hypertensive, insulin resistant SHR versus normal Wistar rats and b) concurrent reductions in these VMH monoamine activities and amelioration of MS extend and corroborate these previous findings now in a non-seasonal, genetic model of MS and suggest that such hypothalamic aberrations may be a fundamental component of the neuroendocrine milieu supporting induction of MS. Several other animal models of insulin resistance including the ob/ob mouse, db/db mouse, Zucker fatty rat, and offspring of malnourished or insulin treated pregnant rats all exhibit increased noradrenergic turnover within the VMH (reviewed in [1]).

Where and how bromocriptine is acting to produce these VMH corrections in monoamine activities is unknown, however sites involved may include at the VMH itself, as well as at the area of and surrounding the SCN [3, 4] the biological circadian pacemaker for the organism that communicates directly and indirectly (via the locus coeruleus and nucleus tractus solitarius) with the VMH and several other hypothalamic centers to regulate glucose tolerance [1]. Diminished dopaminergic activity at the area of the SCN is characteristic of the seasonal insulin resistant state that is coupled with elevated VMH NE and 5HT activity levels [3] and neurotoxic lesion of dopaminergic neurons within this SCN area of insulin sensitive animals induces seasonal insulin resistance [4]. Interestingly, the SHR rat is well characterized as having reduced dopaminergic tone within the prefrontal cortex and ventrolateral stiatum [16, 17] and the current study now indicates that such is also the case within the VMH itself. We are currently investigating whether dopaminergic activities at the SCN are also reduced in these SHR rats as in seasonal insulin resistant states. We have observed such reduced dopaminergic activity at the SCN subsequent to high fat diet-induced insulin resistance [18].

Elevated VMH NE and 5HT activity produces a unique neuroendocrine profile characterized by increased plasma NE, epinephrine, glucagon, insulin, free fatty acid (FFA), triglyceride, and leptin levels, increased sympathetic/neuroendocrine drive for hepatic glucose output, adipose lipolysis, and vasoconstriction [11], as well as an increased insulin secretory response to glucose and hyperinsulinemia [11, 15] that, as a composite, represents the hallmark of the MS. This neuroendocrine profile in turn is coupled to and/or potentiates insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, hyperlipidemia, obesity (reviewed in detail in [1] and hypertension [19]. Moreover, consistent with the observed normalization in elevated VMH NE and 5HT activities in this study, plasma levels of insulin, glucose, leptin, NE, and C-Reactive Protein were all reduced, and that of adiponectin was elevated following bromocriptine treatment in SHR rats. Furthermore, consistent as well with these neuroendocrine changes, HOMA-IR calculations indicate a marked improvement in insulin resistance following bromocriptine treatment. Additionally, plasma adiponectin levels are inversely correlated with and protect against both insulin resistance and fatty liver [20‐22].

Likely due to decreased central (hypothalamic) dopaminergic tone as described above, SHR rats are hyperprolactinemic [23]. In turn, hyperprolactinemia has been demonstrated to potentiate fattening and insulin resistance in a variety of animal models and man (reviewed in [2]; [24‐29]). In this regard it is critical to appreciate that the circadian rhythm of plasma prolactin level differs in lean, insulin sensitive versus obese, insulin resistant animals [2]. More importantly, a marked circadian rhythm of metabolic responsiveness to prolactin exits in vertebrates such that injections of prolactin into lean, insulin sensitive animals at the time of day its level peaks in the blood of obese, insulin resistant animals induces the obese, insulin resistant state while injections of prolactin into obese, insulin resistant animals at the time of day its level peaks in the blood of lean, insulin sensitive animals produces a lean, insulin sensitive condition (reviewed in [2], [30, 31]). Elevations of plasma prolactin levels can potentiate MS via decreasing hypothalamic dopamine release [32] thereby altering its signaling to the SCN to potentiate MS as described herein and elsewhere [1] that includes increasing lipogenic responsiveness to insulin in the periphery [33‐35]. In the present study, bromocriptine, which is well known to effectively reduce hyperprolactinemia [36, 37], was administered daily just after the time of day of the normal circadian peak in plasma prolactin levels in lean, insulin sensitive rats [31] prior to the end of the photoperiod to re-establish the normal dopaminergic circadian input activity to the SCN. Such timed administration would also likely function to re-establish a more normal daily plasma prolactin profile as observed in insulin sensitive rats [31], though such plasma prolactin levels were not measured in this study. Consequently, the metabolic effects of timed daily bromocriptine treatment observed in this study may in part derive from a reduction of plasma hyperprolactinemia and normalization of the daily rhythm of plasma prolactin level towards that of lean, insulin sensitive rats.

It should be noted that several studies have defined an inhibitory effect of acute direct/autocrine/paracrine dopamine on beta cell glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in animals and man [38‐41], with a potential role for gastrointestinal L-DOPA as an endogenous source for such physiological beta cell dopamine responses that may potentiate hyperglycemia [41]. Moreover, acute administration of bromocriptine itself has been shown to produce such an inhibitory effect on beta cell GSIS potentially via noradrenergic α2 receptors [42]. While such observations of acute direct dopamine activity to inhibit beta cell GSIS and thereby potentiate hyperglycemia may seem at odds with a multitude of observations indicating that circadian timed chronic dopamine agonist therapy improves glucose intolerance and hyperglycemia, a careful consideration of the available evidence suggests a different scenario. In hyperinsulinemic glucose intolerant animals and man, chronic systemic timed bromocriptine treatment, that resets several hypothalamic circuits controlling metabolism [3, 4, 10‐12, 14], reduces post glucose/meal challenge glucose area under curve (AUC) and insulin AUC simultaneously [5, 6, 10, 14, 43, 44]. Importantly, this effect in such animals can be manifested with intracerebroventricular administration of bromocriptine at nearly one thousandth the effective systemic dose [10], and likely involves bromocriptine’s effect to reduce elevated VMH NE and S activities and Paraventricular nucleus (PVN) Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) levels (present study, [11, 12, 14, 45], that potentiate insulin resistance, direct hyperinsulinemia independent of insulin resistance, and increased beta cell GSIS concurrently [1, 11, 12, 15]. However, in animals where glucose dysmetabolism progresses from impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes with beta cell dysfunction, such chronic dopamine agonist treatment reduces hyperglycemia while actually improving (increasing) GSIS, including the beta cell response to glucagon like peptide-1 [46, 47].

A plausible biological organization worth investigating that may unify these findings is the possibility that central (hypothalamic) circadian dopamine activities regulate beta cell function and insulin sensitivity in a coordinated fashion that would include regulation of paracrine dopamine activity at the beta cell. Under this postulate, in insulin resistant states, low hypothalamic dopamine activity allows for (potentiates) 1) an altered beta cell response to external (e.g., autonomic) stimuli that facilitates hyperinsulinemia and increased GSIS, as previous studies indicate [15], that may include low paracrine beta cell dopamine activity and 2) neuroendocrine mechanisms (as described in this study) facilitating insulin resistance to thereby establish a coordinated and controlled steady state hyperinsulinemic, insulin resistant condition (as observed in seasonal animals in the wild). Contrariwise, with appropriate circadian time increased hypothalamic dopaminergic activity, the hypothalamic metabolic control output coordinates an appropriate level of beta cell GSIS that may include increased (normal) paracrine dopamine activity and peripheral insulin sensitivity to maintain normal fasting and glucose tolerance glucose levels. Such a hypothalamic control system may contribute to the hyperbolic relationship of the “disposition index” that relates level of beta cell GSIS to insulin sensitivity [48] and we are currently investigating this possibility.

Thus, these bromocriptine-induced changes in the hypothalamic-neuroendocrine axis as a composite may in part contribute to the observed bromocriptine-induced decrease in hypertension, liver fat content and insulin resistance in these SHR rats as described below.

To appreciate the impact of bromocriptine treatment on hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism observed in this study, one must first review the physiological relationship between these liver activities in normal and insulin resistant states. The physiological relationship between hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism differs markedly between insulin sensitive and insulin resistant states (reviewed in [49]). Under normal physiological conditions, circadian increases in hepatic lipogenesis are generally coupled to decreases in whole body and hepatic FFA oxidation and hepatic glucose output typically synchronized to the fed state or feeding phase of the day. Contrariwise, circadian decreases in lipogenesis are coupled to increased whole body and hepatic FFA oxidation and hepatic glucose output during the fasted state or circadian fasting phase of the day in rodents [2]. Such circadian organization of these metabolic activities synchronizes the animal with its daily cyclic environment of food availability and internal locomotor activity rhythm (food seeking/gathering, feeding/lipogenesis synchronized temporally as are sleeping/fasting/FFA oxidation), thereby enhancing survival potential [2]. By comparison, in insulin resistant states, hepatic lipogenesis, FFA oxidation, and hepatic glucose output are all simultaneously increased at their respective circadian peak activity times (reviewed in [1]). In studies of humans as well, hepatic insulin resistance respecting control of glucose production associates most often with increased, not decreased, hepatic lipid synthesis/content and FFA oxidation [50‐57]. Although a variety of genetic manipulations that result in increased hepatic FFA oxidation have been demonstrated to improve hepatic insulin resistance, primarily by decreasing hepatic lipid content (e.g., triacylglycerol, diacylglycerol, acyl-CoA, lysophosphatidic acid, and/or phosphatidic acid) [58‐64], hepatic FFA oxidation is a potent stimulus for gluconeogenesis, reactive oxygen species generation (ROS), inflammatory cytokine production and insulin resistance [17, 19‐22, 49‐55, 57, 65, 66]. Moreover, reduction of hepatic FFA oxidation by genetic manipulations that actually enhance fatty liver is still coupled to improved insulin sensitivity or glucose tolerance [67‐73], reviewed in [49]. In the SHR rat model investigated herein, as in human insulin resistant states such as obesity and fatty liver [50‐55, 57], insulin resistance is coupled to increased hepatic lipid content, FFA oxidative activity/capacity, and gluconeogenic activity/capacity.

In obese, hyperinsulinemic, insulin resistant states such as the aged SHR rat, increased hepatic fatty acid level resulting from increased adipose lipolysis and subsequent plasma FFA uptake, dietary fat intake and/or de novo lipogenesis can potentiate increased inappropriate hepatic fat accumulation (e.g., steatosis) and fatty acid oxidation with ensuing cellular pathological consequences, termed lipotoxicity [49, 56, 65, 74‐77], reviewed in [78, 79]. Lipotoxicity manifested as excess production of triacylglycerol intermediates (e.g., diacylglycerol, acyl-CoA, lysophosphatidic acid, phosphatidic acid) at specific and as yet poorly understood intracellular sites and/or overload in substrate driven fatty acid oxidation that ultimately results in incomplete fatty acid oxidation with the generation of oxidation intermediates (acid soluble intermediates) can facilitate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and subsequent pro-inflammatory protein synthesis such as NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 [65, 77, 80‐82]. Such increased fatty acid oxidation also induces an increase in mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle activity (though inadequate for the supply of fatty acids), increased gluconeogenic precursor generation, and subsequent respiratory dysfunction leading to increased generation of ROS [4, 8‐10, 50‐55, 57] that also stimulate such pro-inflammatory protein synthesis [55‐57, 83‐86] and stimulate PGC1 and FOXO1 synthesis [87], transcription factors that potentiate a further increased drive for FFA oxidation and gluconeogenesis [70, 74, 87‐97]. Increases in hepatocellular levels of ROS and these pro-inflammatory proteins can also potentiate insulin resistance respecting insulin inhibition of gluconeogenesis and can simultaneously facilitate hepatic lipogenesis as more fully discussed below.

Regarding the influence of hepatic NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 on gluconeogenesis, increased activity of any of these proteins can induce increased gluconeogenesis by inhibiting hepatic insulin signaling [53, 80, 81, 84, 98‐101] and either concurrently or independently potentiating activation of FOXO1α [77, 84], a key transcription factor for the induction of the gluconeogenic enzymes, G6Pase and PEPCK [93, 102] (and for the induction of enzymes that damage respiratory complexes leading to increased ROS production and subsequent insulin resistance) [103]. Increases in JNK transcription can be induced by incomplete FFA oxidation and ROS production, as described above, as well as by local or circulating cytokines [53, 99] and JNK is a strong stimulus for activation of FOXO1α [84]. Liver FOXO1α activation has been coupled to the insulin resistant diabetic phenotype [58‐64, 87, 104]. Moreover, hepatic PGC1α, a transcription factor that associates with FOXO1α to induce transcription of gluconeogenic enzymes, induces hepatic insulin resistance and is itself elevated in diabetes [89‐91, 93‐96, 105]. Increased PGC1α level is also a strong activator of fatty acid oxidation in liver and this increased activity can function to maintain the proinflammatory/gluconeogenic state by providing for excess fat oxidation as described above. Increases in hepatic SOCS3, by JNK or other cytokine/oxidative stress factors, contribute to increased hepatic glucose output by inducing insulin resistance (by inactivating IRS1/2 and/or inducing PGC1α and FOXO1) [106]. Low-level activation of NFκB stimulates the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα that can in turn a) stimulate the activation and/or synthesis of NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 and b) additionally directly inhibit the insulin signaling pathway [53, 80, 99, 101]. Therefore, simultaneous increases in NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 can contribute to a strong and potentially self-sustaining pro-gluconeogenic/pro FFA oxidative environment.

Activation of NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 also stimulates hepatic lipid production. Increases in hepatic JNK (via IL-6, TNFα, FFA, or oxidative stress) or NFκB can induce SOCS3 transcription that in turn can induce SREBP1, a potent transcription factor for several lipogenic enzymes within the liver [57]. Furthermore, this activity may be enhanced by PGC1β, a strong coactivator of SREBP1 to stimulate lipogenic gene expression [89‐91, 93‐96, 107]. Hepatic reduction of JNK or NFκB [108‐110] or suppression of SOCS3 [101] reduces fatty liver. Additionally, other studies have shown that increases in hepatic ROS level are also a stimulus for SREBP1 synthesis without effect on insulin signaling through IRS-1 or AKT [111‐114]. Hepatic insulin resistance is also coupled to enhanced liver PPARγ levels that function to increase lipid synthesis [115‐117]. It should be appreciated that hepatic gene knock-out studies, as opposed to suppression studies, for any one of these three proteins may yield results indicating exacerbation instead of reduction of the hepatic gluconeogenic/lipogenic phenotype due to overcompensation of redundant pro-inflammatory pathways [118], however the overwhelming composite of available evidence indicates that moderate reductions of elevated levels of these proteins towards the normal range is coupled to a reduction of the gluconeogenic/lipogenic liver phenotype as outlined above. Finally, another master regulator of hepatic lipogenesis, mTORC1, not only induces lipogenic activity but can potentiate insulin resistance via stimulation of SOCS3 expression [119], which can also stimulate lipogenesis via SREBP1 as described above. Therefore, moderate and simultaneous increases in hepatic ROS [111‐114] and/or NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 can interact to facilitate the induction and maintenance of a more gluconeogenic/FFA oxidative and lipogenic liver via simultaneous induction of the master activators of lipogenesis (PGC1β, SREBP1, and mTORC) and gluconeogenesis (FOXO1, PGC1α), concurrently with induction of FFA-oxidative activity (PGC1α, PPARα), activity of which in turn sustains the increase in ROS and pro-inflammatory protein environment and a vicious cycle is born. These ROS and proinflammatory proteins may be induced by a high fat diet (with consequent over-supply of FFAs to liver) [50‐55, 57] or by an altered neuroendocrine organization (e.g., low SCN dopamine and high VMH NE and 5HT activities) independent of a high fat diet that re-programs metabolism favoring a liver biochemistry inducing their production as in the SHR rats held on a regular (low-fat) diet in this study [1]. This neuroendocrine driven hepatic pro-inflammatory state may occur with even moderately increased antecedent incomplete FFA oxidation, mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress and ROS over-generation.

Although typically viewed as pathology, such an endogenous programmed mechanism for increased hepatic lipid and glucose production can have substantive survival benefits for animals in the wild during seasons of low food availability. During long seasons of low food (and glucose) supply, a programmed induction of increased hepatic lipogenesis and secretion, coincident with increased hepatic glucose output, under the setting of insulin resistance would allow for increased peripheral utilization of mobilized fat and CNS utilization of (hepatic) glucose (that has a predominant requirement for glucose as a fuel source) and such alterations in metabolism would increase odds of organismal survival under this environmental stress. Our previous work indicates that the seasonal obese, insulin resistant state, characterized by increased hepatic lipogenesis and glucose output, can be manifested by alterations in hypothalamic activities characterized by low dopaminergic tone at the area of the SCN and increased noradrenergic and serotonergic tone at the VMH without any alteration in diet [3, 4, 11, 12, 14, 15] and timed bromocriptine treatment reverses both this hypothalamic activity and the heightened hepatic lipogenic/gluconeogenic metabolic state [5, 6, 8‐10, 14].

In the present study, bromocriptine decreased abnormally elevated VMH NE and serotonin levels that are known not only to be associated with insulin resistance but actually to induce hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and fatty liver, increased noradrenergic drive to adipose leading to increased lipolysis (and FFA flux to liver), and increased plasma norepinephrine level potentiating increased gluconeogenesis [11, 12, 14, 15, 120]. Bromocriptine-induced decrease in liver lipid content resulting from decreased plasma insulin levels [5, 6, 10] and present study, decreased hepatic lipogenesis [6, 9] and/or decreased plasma FFA availability [5] may reduce over-stimulated fatty acid oxidation and subsequent incomplete fatty acid oxidation metabolites (acid soluble metabolites) and by-products (such as ceramides, acyl-CoAs, diacylglycerol, and lipid peroxides) [50‐55, 57, 78, 79] and subsequent mitochondrial derived ROS [78, 79] collectively thereby simultaneously reducing NFκB, JNK, and SOCS3 levels as observed in this study. Under conditions of insulin resistance, ablation or elimination of any one of these 3 pro-inflammatory protein pathways can be compensated for by up-regulation of the others with maintenance of insulin resistance [98, 101]. However this does not appear to be the case with bromocriptine treatment in this study. Bromocriptine reduced all three pro-inflammatory protein levels concurrently that resultantly can act to contribute to the observed bromocriptine-induced simultaneous reductions in the master activators of lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis as described above. The coupled effects of bromocriptine to concomitantly reduce liver activated FOXO1 (induced increase in FOXO1ser256), G6Pase, and PEPCK levels on the one hand and SREBP1, mTORC, PPARγ, and PGC1β levels on the other offer mechanisms by which bromocriptine treatment reduced both plasma glucose level and hepatic fat content, respectively. The effect of bromocriptine to reduce hepatic gluconeogenic capacity itself may derive in part from its induced reduction of hepatic FFA oxidative capacity as assessed by the reduced levels of hepatic PGC1α and PPARα in bromocriptine-treated animals, levels of which are elevated in insulin resistant states [50‐55, 57, 89‐91, 93‐96]. In addition to its effects to reduce hepatic PGC1α and PPARα, bromocriptine-induced decreases in plasma FFA and liver lipid synthesis may function to reduce liver FFA oxidative capacity and subsequently to reduce ROS production and inflammatory protein(s) synthesis in turn reducing insulin resistance and gluconeogenesis while also breaking the vicious positive feedback cycle on this pathway induced by the ROS.

Since bromocriptine can reverse insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and fattening by its i.c.v. injection, the present observed effects on hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism may be the indirect result of its treatment effects on the entire neuroendocrine axis, not only by influencing the VMH and SCN as described above and reducing neuropeptide Y and corticotropin levels in the paraventricular hypothalamus as previously described [45], and such is the topic of our ongoing investigation. Such centrally elicited effects of bromocriptine do not preclude any additional direct peripheral effects of the therapy to produce the results described herein and such considerations are the focus of our ongoing investigation. The bromocriptine effect on liver insulin signaling pathway proteins and redox status as it relates to its impact on lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis remain as yet undetermined and the results of this study suggest that such investigations are warranted. It should be appreciated that while the small reduction in food consumption with bromocriptine treatment observed in this study may contribute to its overall effects on metabolic status, such small reductions (in low fat content food) are not large enough to explain the large reductions in body fat, liver fat, insulin resistance, or hypertension, and indeed previous studies have demonstrated improvements in insulin resistance and body fat of bromocriptine treated animals without any change in feeding [5, 6, 10].

Respecting neuroendocrine impact on blood pressure in MS, reductions in hyperleptinemia and elevated plasma NE can interact to reduce vasoconstriction and hypertension (reviewed in [1]) and marked improvements in these plasma parameters and of hypertension were observed following bromocriptine treatment of SHR rats. Moreover, we have observed a strong hypertensive effect of VMH NE plus 5HT infusion into the VMH of normal rats [10] and in the present study bromocriptine treatment reduced elevated VMH NE and 5HT activities in these SHR rats to normal levels. Previous studies have likewise documented an anti-hypertensive effect of bromocriptine in SHR rats and investigations into mechanisms of this bromocriptine-induced effect suggest both complex central and peripheral actions of the agent to reduce sympathetic tone, plasma NE level, and vasoconstriction [106, 121‐127].

In summary, timed bromocriptine treatment reduces overactive noradrenergic and serotonergic activities at the VMH of hypertensive, obese, insulin resistant SHR rats, activities of which have previously been demonstrated to predispose to insulin resistance, hypertension, and fattening ([7], reviewed in [1]). This bromocriptine treatment also reduces hypertension and neuroendocrine stimuli for hepatic insulin resistance and lipid accumulation, particularly increased sympathetic drive, hyperinsulinemia, hyperleptinemia, and reduced plasma adiponectin. Its effects to reduce liver lipid content and gluconeogenic capacity at the level of the liver are coupled to a reduction of multiple activated pro-inflammatory protein pathways that concurrently induce transcriptional master activators of lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis. Simultaneously, such bromocriptine treatment also reduces major transcription factors that increase FFA oxidative capacity of the liver, which in and of itself may contribute to the drug-induced reduction in gluconeogenic enzyme levels. Available evidence suggests that these peripheral effects of bromocriptine are likely functionally linked to its impact on hypothalamic, particularly SCN and VMH activities.