Introduction
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is an
Mr 95-kDa, cell surface-bound, type II transmembrane glycoprotein and belongs to the family of serine prolyl oligopeptidases. Comparison of amino acid sequences indicates that FAP is essentially identical to seprase [
1] and closely related to dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP IV), also known as CD26, another type II integral membrane protein [
2]. These exoproteases cleave NH
2-terminal dipeptides from polypeptides with l-proline or l-alanine in the penultimate position. In addition, FAP was found to bear collagenase activity
in vitro [
1,
3]. Peptidase activity of FAP, in addition to various families of proteolytic enzymes such as matrix or disintegrin metalloproteases that serve as major collagenases, contributes to extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation [
4,
5]. This not only is a fundamental property of normal tissue repair and remodelling but also is involved in the pathological processes of invasive growth. It correlates with the expression of FAP in granulation tissue of healing wounds and in more than 90% of human epithelial carcinomas [
6]. Consistent with its mesenchymal origin, FAP is also occasionally expressed by bone and soft tissue sarcomas [
7]. Immunohistochemical staining of colorectal carcinomas and breast cancer [
4,
8] confirmed the specific expression of FAP by tumour stroma fibroblasts but not by malignant cells themselves. In contrast, resting fibrocytes in normal adult tissue generally lack detectable FAP expression [
7].
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology and is characterised by hyperplasia and chronic inflammation of the synovial membranes that invade deeply into the articular cartilage and bone. Activated fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) in the lining layer of the synovium are among the dominant cell types involved in pannus formation and are key players in joint destruction [
9,
10]. Rheumatoid FLSs have been shown to proliferate in an anchorage-independent manner and express increased proliferation markers and matrix-degrading enzymes when compared with FLSs from patients with osteoarthritis (OA) [
11‐
13]. Expression of the CD44v7/8 epitopes contributes to the proliferative behaviour of FLSs obtained from patients with RA, whereas expression of variants containing v3 is linked with their increased invasive capacity [
14‐
16]. Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) have been shown to be essential for degradation of articular matrix, with MMP-1 and MMP-13 being important candidates for joint destruction in RA [
17,
18]. However, except for metallocollagenolytic activities, invasion of migratory fibroblasts into connective tissue involves serine types of cell surface proteases [
5]. Among the exoproteases that may cooperate with interstitial collagenase are groups of serine prolyl peptidases, including DPP IV/CD26 and FAP/seprase [
4,
19]. Gene expression signatures of FLSs demonstrate the association of a high inflammatory state of synovitis and the presence of a myofibroblast-like molecular phenotype [
20]. These myofibroblasts were identified in cultures from patients with RA [
21] as well as by immunohistochemical staining in the intimal lining layer of RA synovial tissues [
20].
Here, we report the concomitant involvement of FAP together with metalloproteases and CD44 variants in the lining layer of rheumatoid synovium contributing to the characteristics of FLSs with myofibroblastic phenotype. In addition, synovial tissue analysis revealed a strong correlation between inflammatory synovitis and FAP expression.
Materials and methods
Patients
Synovial tissues were collected during routine orthopaedic surgery from 10 consecutive patients with end-stage OA and 10 consecutive patients with refractory destructive RA who underwent joint replacement. The latter patient population fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA [
22]. The mean age of patients with RA was 62 years (eight females and two males). Mean laboratory parameters were erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 41 mm/hour and leucocyte count of 8.95 × 10
3 per microlitre, and 90% of patients were rheumatoid factor-positive. All patients gave informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the local ethics committees.
Cell lines and reagents
RPMI 1640 medium (supplemented with 10% [vol/vol] heat-inactivated foetal calf serum, penicillin [100 units per millilitre], streptomycin [0.1 mg/ml], and glutamine [0.3 mg/ml]) (all from Gibco, now part of Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as standard medium. HT1080 FAP-transfected (HT1080 FAP) and mock-transfected (HT1080 par) cells were previously described [
23]. The following antibodies were obtained from the following sources: Murine F19 (mouse anti-human FAP monoclonal antibody) was obtained from the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (New York, NY, USA). Anti-human CD90 (Thy-1; clone AS02) and biotin-SP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) were purchased from Dianova GmbH (Hamburg, Germany). Mouse anti-human CD44v3 (clone VFF-327) and CD44v7/8 (clone VFF-17) were purchased from Serotec Ltd. (Oxford, UK), and mouse anti-human smooth muscle actin (SMA) (clone 1A4) was obtained from Dako Denmark A/S (Glostrup, Denmark). Goat anti-human MMP-1 (C-18) and MMP-13 (D-17) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Biotinylated rabbit anti-goat IgG was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA).
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-assisted polymerase chain reaction
FAP- or mock-transfected HT1080 cells, tumour samples from patients with breast cancer, or a part of collected synovial tissue was homogenised immediately after surgery by using a tissue tearer, and total RNA was extracted (RNeasy; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. Total amount of RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry, and 500 ng was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis using RevertAid™ H Kit (Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). The following primers were used for amplification of specific cDNA fragments as described previously [
24]: The FAP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product was generated with 5'-GTTATTGCCTATTCCTATTATG-3' and 5'-GTCCATCATGAAGGGTGGAAA-3'. The MMP-1 PCR product was generated with 5'-CTGAAGGTGATGAAGCAGCC-3' and 5'-AGTCCAAGAGAATGGCCGAG-3'. The MMP-13 PCR product was generated with 5'-CTATGGTCCAGGAGATGAAG-3' and 5'-AGAGTCTTGCCTGTATCCTC-3'. The GADPH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) PCR product was generated with 5'-GTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTT-3' and 5'-CTCCTTGGAGGCCATGTGGGCCAT-3'. cDNA was amplified with 1.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase with 2.5 ml of 10× standard taq buffer (Thermopol; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in a final volume of 25 μl containing 0.5 μl of nucleosidtriphosphate (10 mM), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 μM), and Aqua dest. PCR amplification was carried out on a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, now part of Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following profile: 95°C for 5 minutes, annealing for 60 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. The number of cycles and the annealing temperature depended on the primers used: (a) FAP (55°C, 30 cycles), (b) MMP-1, (c) MMP-13 (62°C, 40 cycles), and (d) GADPH (62°C, 25 cycles). Aliquots (20 μl) of each PCR product were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualised by ethidium bromide staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell lines or breast cancer samples served as controls.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Measurement was performed on LightCycler detection systems (Roche, Heidelberg, Germany) using the relative quantification method with external standard (LightCycler technical note no. LC 10/update 2003; Roche). The endogenous control gene hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1; NM_000194) and the FAP gene (NM_004460) were measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR using the GenGlobe™ technology from Qiagen GmbH and an HPRT quantification kit (Roche). Design of specific HPRT and human FAP primers was executed by Qiagen GmbH (QuantiTect Primer Assay, QT00074963) and Roche. Assay conditions for the real-time PCR were adjusted using an optimised PCR protocol with the following profile: initial activating of Taq-polymerase at 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 35 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 15 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 20 seconds. Samples from all patients (10 patients with RA and 10 patients with OA), controls, and standards were run in triplicate. The amount of the housekeeping gene HRPT was used to correlate FAP expression employing LightCycler analysis software.
Immunohistochemistry
Remaining portions of collected samples were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT medium (Miles Diagnostics, Elkhart, IN, USA), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C for immunohistochemical analysis. Sequential 5-μm sections were placed on SuperFrost®Plus microscope slides (Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany). Slides were fixed in cold acetone (4°C for 10 minutes), air-dried, rehydrated in phosphate-buffered saline, and then blocked using a Biotin Blocking System (Dako North America, Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA). Before the primary antibody (anti-human FAP, anti-human Thy-1, or irrelevant isotype-matched IgG, 1:200, incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature; anti-human CD44v3, 1:50; anti-human CD44v7/8, 1:200; anti-human SMA, 1:50; and anti-human MMP-1, anti-human MMP-13, or irrelevant isotype-matched IgG, 1:100, incubated overnight at 4°C) was added, slides were blocked with rabbit serum from the Vectastain® ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories). The biotinylated secondary antibody (rabbit anti-mouse IgG [1:500] or rabbit anti-goat IgG [2 μg/ml]) and the preformed avidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase P-complex (ABC reagent) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The antibody-ABC complex was visualised with a 3-amino-9 ethylcarbazole (AEC) (Sigma-Aldrich)-based chromagen, resulting in a pink-brown colouration of antigen-positive cells. Simultaneous staining of FAP and SMA was performed using the DakoCytomation EnVision Doublestain-Kit (code K1395; Dako North America, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. FAP was stained first with DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidin) followed by colouration of SMA with fast red. All slides were counterstained for approximately 2 to 5 minutes with Meyer's haematoxylin. Final slide adjustment was performed using Adobe Photoshop Elements (Adobe Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Munich, Germany).
Statistics
Comparison of FAP gene expression measured by real-time PCR between synovial tissue samples taken from patients with end-stage OA or severe RA was performed with Mann-Whitney test (U test). P values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant.
Discussion
The main finding of our study is the demonstration that FAP is expressed by synovial fibroblasts in patients with RA and OA. It is well established that FAP is expressed mainly on the surface of mesenchymal cells that are involved in epithelium-mesenchyme interactions contributing to tissue remodelling. So far, FAP-expressing fibroblasts in human have been detected only in granulation tissue of healing wounds [
25], desmoplastic reactions [
26], and the reactive stroma of malignant tissue [
27]. Resting fibrocytes in normal adult tissue generally lack expression of FAP [
6]. However, observations from a clinical Phase I study with a humanised anti-FAP antibody might retrospectively lead to the conclusion that FAP could also be present in human joints. Studying the biodistribution of a humanised anti-FAP antibody in patients with advanced or metastatic FAP-positive cancer, a minor low-grade uptake in the knees and shoulders of three patients without clinical symptoms of arthritis was observed. Unfortunately, no further explanation or discussion of this observation was presented, and in particular it is unknown whether these patients were suffering from OA [
28].
Apart from the detection of FAP-positive FLSs in RA and OA, substantial differences between both diseases regarding this cell type are apparent. First, FAP-expressing FLSs in RA synovial tissue are more frequent and predominantly localised in the lining layer. Second, FAP expression by RA FLSs is mainly by FLSs of the myofibroblastic phenotype. Third, RA joints show an accumulation of MMP-1 and MMP-13, in concert with the v3 and v7/8 splice variants of CD44 in the synovial lining layer. In contrast, osteoarthritic joints show minor expression of MMPs and CD44 variants. Because FAP expression is much more pronounced in RA tissue, this might be related to the degree of synovial inflammation, as has been already demonstrated for MMPs and FAP in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). In mice, analysis of CIA gene expression profiles revealed a seven-fold increase in FAP, DPP IV, and MMP gene expression in inflamed paws as compared with non-inflamed paws [
29,
30]. Furthermore, DPP IV is a structural homologue to FAP, and seprase and FAP are known to build heteromeric complexes with DPP IV/CD26 to act coordinately in ECM breakdown [
5].
The fact that FLSs in the rheumatoid synovium express FAP intensively does not allow definitive conclusions regarding the functional enzymatic role in ECM degradation, because substrate specificity of FAP remains unknown [
31]. However, the probability of its contribution to exacerbating joint degeneration was recently discussed [
32] and is supported by our results. Characterisation of the synovial lining layer in patients with RA revealed that FAP expression is accompanied by accumulation of other degradation markers that are predominantly found in this area. MMP-1 and MMP-13 as well as the v3 and v7/8 splice variants of CD44 are instrumental in ECM remodelling in malignancies and are also already known to be present in the synovial membranes of diseased joints [
14‐
18]. In addition, fibroblasts of the myofibroblastic phenotype seem to be the major cell type expressing FAP in patients with RA. They are also an important source of other proteolytic enzymes and are generally thought to be responsible for ECM degradation [
20,
33,
34]. A reliable marker for identifying this subpopulation is anti-SMA. Immunohistochemistry revealed the expression of anti-SMA by FAP-positive FLSs in the intimal lining layer. The expression signature characterises the area of FAP-expressing myofibroblastic cells as the centre of high-inflammation activity in the rheumatoid synovium and discriminates from Thy-1-positive non-proliferating fibroblasts in the synovial matrix [
35].
The potential value of FAP as a therapeutic target in RA and OA is twofold. First, if the proteolytic activity of FAP contributes to ECM degradation, inhibition is an attractive goal. In this context, it needs to be noted that suppression of enzymatic activity resulted in potent antitumour effects and could augment antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in murine tumour models [
36,
37]. Second, FAP appears to be a valuable marker for the identification of FLSs with the highest proteolytic activity. The genetically stable and restricted expression of FAP [
6] leads to the establishment of several preclinical strategies for tumour therapy [
23,
38,
39]. The concept of anti-FAP antibody-based cancer immunotargeting has even been proven in a clinical Phase I dose-escalation study [
28].
Despite the elucidation of FLSs as key players in joint inflammation and proteolytic enzymes like MMPs as markers responsible for ECM degradation, no anti-fibroblast-directed therapy is currently available. Approaches to inhibit the joint-destructive process in RA by elimination or inhibition of one proteolytic enzyme did not produce sufficient results in clinical trials, regardless of supportive
in vivo results [
40‐
42]. The difference between the targeting strategies of these approaches and FAP-specific targeting results from the substantial potential of FAP as a specific marker for synovial fibroblasts in RA. Therefore, targeting strategies could involve both inhibiting the role of the enzyme in tissue remodelling and focusing antibody-mediated cytotoxic activity on this synovial cell type to eradicate a central cellular mediator of the joint-destructive process [
43].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
SB, MCJ, and CR helped to conceive, design, and coordinate the study and draft the manuscript. RD and FS helped to conceive the study and carried out synovial membrane preparations. AR coordinated human synovium collection and carried out immunohistochemistry and cell culture. EF performed the double-staining. AW and SK carried out preparation of cDNA, RT-PCR, and LightCycler PCR. SG and HD collected human synovial tissue from joint replacement surgery. UM-L helped to coordinate the study and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.