Introduction
Methotrexate (MTX) was first introduced into clinical practice as a chemotherapeutic agent more than six decades ago and the continued use of this older drug is evidence of its remarkable therapeutic effects [
1‐
3]. Treatment with MTX is a key reason for the transformation of acute childhood leukemias from being uniformly fatal to having long-term survival rates of 70% or more. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), MTX is considered a cornerstone of all therapies and its use is largely responsible for improved functional and structural outcomes in these patients [
4]. Even the newer biologic agents in RA are generally given in combination with MTX to maximize therapeutic effects [
5]. At the same time, the adverse events profile of MTX requires application of caution in its use. Pulmonary toxicity with MTX is a rare but potentially fatal disorder and decreases in bone density may be another long-term consequence of treatment, especially at higher doses used in chemotherapeutic regimens [
6].
The mechanisms of action of MTX are related at least in part to antiproliferative effects that are dependent on inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase and inhibition of nucleotide synthesis pathways [
7]. Other activities, including release of adenosine and inhibition of polyamines, are thought to contribute to the anti-inflammatory effects [
8]. Some actions of MTX also depend on stimulation of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induction of T lymphocyte apoptosis [
9]. In previous studies, we have shown that MTX treatment of patients with RA restores toward normal expressed levels of genes and associated proteins related to cell cycle checkpoint pathways [
10], and more recent studies suggest that expressed levels of genes related to folate metabolism also may be altered
in vivo by MTX [
11].
The many documented effects of MTX include stimulation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways. In some situations, such as pneumonitis and mucositis, enhanced cytokine production has been postulated to contribute to tissue damage [
12‐
14]. The loss of bone density seen after long-term treatment with MTX, which is a greater concern in chemotherapeutic than in anti-inflammatory regimens, also has been attributed to increased levels of cytokines and activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) [
15].
Our previous studies with MTX have been focused on effects in T lymphocytes, and have shown that these cells are primed by MTX for apoptosis by a JNK-dependent mechanism [
10,
16]. The objective of the present study was to examine effects of MTX on cells of monocyte lineage, utilizing the human line U937. Comparisons were made with another drug used for RA, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which acts through lysosomes including those in macrophages [
17]. The findings of the present investigation show that MTX enhances production of the inflammatory mediators IL-6 and IL-1. Whether this action of MTX contributes to some of the effects of this drug
in vivo in treated patients is discussed.
Methods
Materials
Methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), caffeine (CAFF), theophylline (THEO), folinic acid (FA) and parthenolide (PAR) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Secreted interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in culture supernatants were quantitated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) and results were expressed in standardized concentrations using reagents provided with these kits.
Cell preparation and culture
The human cell lines U937 (monocytes) and Jurkat (T lymphocytes) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and were maintained in suspension culture with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Cell viability was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion and by the Vybrant MTT Cell Proliferation Assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). MTT is 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide and is used to quantify numbers of cells in culture [
18]. Concentrations of MTX, HCQ, LPS and PAR ranged from 0.01 uM to 1 uM, as indicated in individual experiments. Of note, the concentration of MTX achievable after oral ingestion of a 20 mg tablet yields a plasma concentration of 0.1 uM after 10 hours [
10]. Cultures were incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 24 to 72 hours, as indicated in specific experiments. These studies were carried out in a human cell line and no institutional ethics approval or patient consent was required.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was purified from cell pellets using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Germantown, MD, USA) and quantitated with a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Preparation of cDNA was done using the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 100 to 200 ng RNA per synthesis reaction. RT-PCR analysis was performed for selected genes using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Life Technologies) with GAPDH as the housekeeping control gene with an ABI-7300 Real Time PCR instrument. Expression values are normalized to GAPDH levels using the following formula: 2(GAPDH Ct-Test gene CT).
Flow cytometry
Cells were suspended at 1 × 106/ml in phosphate-buffered saline with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% sodium azide and surface stained with PE-Cy-7-labeled anti-CD14 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Apoptosis was quantitated using the PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Pharmingen, BD Biosciences). This kit utilizes double-staining with PE Annexin V and 7-amino actinomycin D (7-AAD) to distinguish between viable cells and those that are undergoing apoptosis. Staining data were collected in a BD FACSCanto II in the Hershey Medical Center Flow Cytometry Core and FlowJo Software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyze the results.
Statistics
Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation of the mean. The significance between the two experimental groups was determined by Student’s t test or, for comparison of three or more groups, by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons tests used as post tests where indicated. The analyses and the graphics were done with Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Discussion
The findings reported here demonstrate proinflammatory effects of MTX on human monocyte/macrophage cells including gene upregulation and secretion of the cytokines IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha. The underlying mechanism appears to be consistent with an action on the NF-kB pathway rather than through adenosine receptors. Doses of MTX used in these studies are in a range that would be achievable with in vivo treatment of malignancies or autoimmune disease. So even though these are in vitro studies on a cell line, the results may have implications for actions of MTX in treated patients. Although no effects were observed on human peripheral blood cells (data not shown), localized tissue effects may contribute to some of the off-target actions of this drug.
These proinflammatory effects of MTX are of interest because this drug is widely used to treat inflammatory and autoimmune disorders including RA, psoriatic arthritis and inflammatory myopathies. Mechanisms by which the low-dose intermittent regimen has clinical effects in these diseases remain somewhat obscure. The earliest concept, borrowed from oncology applications, was that of anti-proliferative actions, thereby reducing the burden of inflammatory cells [
7]. Other potential mechanisms have been proposed, including interactions with adenosine signaling pathways and generation of ROS [
8,
19,
20]. In previous studies we have shown that MTX primes T cells for apoptosis, an action that is dependent on JNK signaling pathways [
16]. Overall, these effects likely result in a reduced inflammatory burden that translates into decreased levels of damage in treated patients.
However, other effects of MTX that have been reported appear to be directly contradictory to those that would be desirable for treatment of inflammatory conditions like RA. It is possible that these responses are relevant to some of the toxic, or off-target, effects of MTX that include bone loss, mucositis and pulmonary inflammation, especially at the higher doses used in chemotherapeutic regimens. Consistent with this is a short-term chemotherapy model in which MTX treatment in rats resulted in activation of NF-kB and increases in plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha [
15]. Other studies using MTX treatment in rats have shown induction of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 in the small intestine and these inflammatory cytokines likely mediate mucositis in the intestine and elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract [
12,
14]. Relevant to pulmonary toxicity is the finding MTX has been shown to enhance expression of IL-1beta and Il-8 in a human bronchial cell line via the p38 MAPK signaling pathway [
21]. Increased levels of these cytokines in localized areas of bone might explain why high doses of MTX have been associated with bone loss in oncology patients, although this has been rarely reported in patients treated with low-dose regimens for diseases like RA [
22,
23].
Although it might be anticipated or assumed that MTX would have negative regulatory effects on cytokine production, this in fact has not been clearly demonstrated in experimental models or in treated patients. An older investigation carried out prior to the availability of immunoassays failed to show inhibition of IL-1 secretion, although functional activity of the cytokine was reduced [
24]. It has been suggested that levels of IL-1 in the joint space of patients treated with MTX may be decreased due to changes in local production or composition of synovial cell populations; but changes in peripheral blood were not shown [
25]. Investigations into effects of MTX on IL-6 have had similar mixed results. In the murine glucose-6-phosphate isomerase-induced arthritis model, for example, treatment with MTX does not result in decreases in either IL-6 or TNF alpha [
26]. In a study of osteoblasts, MTX alone had no effect on IL-6 synthesis, but it was able to mediate decreased IL-6 production by these cells in response to other inflammatory mediators [
27]. This result suggests that the existing inflammatory milieu may impact cellular responses to MTX. Other findings suggest that the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 may be induced along with proinflammatory mediators, and perhaps the relative balance varies to impact the ultimate physiological effect [
13].
A limitation of our studies is that they were carried out in a cell line, and we did not observe stimulation of cytokine production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured with MTX (data not shown). However, monocyte lineage cells are only a small component of peripheral blood, and it is possible that effects of MTX on minor cell types, perhaps even subsets of circulating monocytes, are not sufficient to be measured in mixed cell populations. The concept that at least some cell types respond to MTX by activation of inflammatory pathways is consistent with the known adverse events of this treatment. It is possible that specialized monocyte/macrophages in tissue locations such as bone or mucosa might be more likely to generate inflammatory responses than cells in the circulation. Some manifestations in treated patients, including mucositis, are often tempered or blocked by the addition of folic acid supplements, which is consistent with the observed reversibility of the cytokine response with folinic acid. It is also possible that this is a dose-related effect of MTX and that the higher doses used in chemotherapeutic regimens are more likely to stimulate inflammatory pathways.
Another implication of the current findings is that if MTX stimulates production of even low levels of proinflammatory cytokines, this may be a reason why combining MTX treatment with cytokine blocker drugs is efficacious and has longer duration of drug survival than monotherapy treatments, at least in some patients [
5,
28]. Further studies to identify patients in whom this effect is significant could be useful to predict those who are more likely to benefit from addition of anti-cytokine agents to MTX.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
NJO designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. CFS assisted with data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. TMA analyzed the data and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.