Introduction
Despite recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances, breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in females in affluent countries. Targeted therapy for breast cancer has focused on receptor tyrosine kinases of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR and ErbB) family, which provide critical checkpoints of cell fate decisions [
1,
2]. Aberrations in some members of this gene family rank among the most frequent oncogenic insults in breast cancer. The
HER2/neu proto-oncogene encodes a tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor (p185) of the ErbB family. It is overexpressed in about 20% to 40% of invasive breast carcinomas and in approximately 70% of
in situ ductal carcinomas.
HER2/neu overexpression usually is associated with a poor clinical prognosis [
3,
4].
HER2/neu has been an attractive target for another distinct type of targeted therapy: immune therapy. Although HER2/neu is expressed by malignant cells as a non-mutated self-antigen, immune tolerance is not absolute. Both HER2/neu-specific T-cell and antibody (Ab) responses have been detected in patients with HER2/neu-expressing cancers [
5‐
9]. Additionally, HER2-specific cytolytic T-lymphocyte response has been generated
in vitro with T cells from patients with HER2-expressing tumors [
6,
10‐
12].
Given their relative simplicity of manufacture and ability to be injected repeatedly, vaccines in a protein format are attractive for breast and other cancers. However, soluble HER2/neu protein as a vaccine has not been immunogenic and usually has failed to confer protection against HER2/neu-expressing tumors [
13‐
15]. Anti-tumor immunity can be enhanced when HER2 extracellular domain is fused to cytokines or combined with Abs fused to cytokines [
15]. Other efforts to improve immunogenicity include mannosylation of the HER2 protein by producing the recombinant protein in yeast [
16]. On the other hand, when antigen is directly targeted to antigen uptake receptors, efficient processing and presentation take place. HER2/neu protein has been incorporated into different vaccine platforms that directly target to antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Recently, several receptors, including B7-1/2 [
17,
18], CD11c [
19], CD40 [
20], mannose [
21], and Fcγ receptors [
22], have been tested for the delivery of HER2 antigen. Together, these studies suggest that, compared with non-targeted vaccinations, targeting HER2 to receptors expressed on APCs can improve HER2-specific T-cell responses and anti-tumor immunity against HER2-expressing tumor challenge in mouse models.
One of the dendritic cell (DC)-specific receptors that have not been explored for HER2 vaccination is the DEC-205 ('DEC', CD205) receptor, a type I C-type lectin [
23]. Expression of DEC in mice is abundant on CD8α
+ DCs, which have a superior capacity of cross-presentation [
24,
25]. Although other receptors on DCs can be targeted [
26,
27], DEC is the only receptor that has been visualized so far on the numerous DCs within the T-cell areas of human lymphoid organs [
28]. Targeting the DEC receptor leads to efficient endocytosis of antigens into endocytic vesicles containing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules. This results in antigen uptake and T-cell stimulation that are hundred-fold more efficient than fluid-phase or solute pinocytosis [
29‐
31]. Delivery of antigen to DEC
+CD8α
+ DCs
in vivo improves cross-presentation to CD8
+ T cells [
31,
32]. Increased antigen delivery efficiency through DEC significantly reduces the amount of protein required for the induction of T-cell immunity. Vaccine-induced T cells have cancer-resisting features, such as combined CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell immunity, production of T helper 1 (Th1)-type cytokines, and the ability to proliferate upon antigen re-challenge.
Previous studies have shown that ligation of DEC receptor by targeting Ab conjugated to antigen does not mature DCs but induces tolerance [
30,
33]. To overcome immune tolerance mediated by steady-state DCs, DC maturation adjuvants need to be included in the vaccine. Examples of potent adjuvants are synthetic double-stranded RNA, polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid (poly IC), and its more RNase-resistant analog stabilized with poly-L-lysine (poly ICLC). Both preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that poly IC and poly ICLC are superior adjuvants for induction of potent T-cell immunity. Longhi and colleagues [
34] showed that, compared with other Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, the TLR3 ligands poly IC and poly ICLC stand out as the most potent adjuvants for T-cell immunity when combined with DEC-gag monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunization in a mouse model. A recent clinical study by Caskey and colleagues [
35] demonstrated that poly ICLC can be a reliable and authentic viral mimic for inducing innate immune response and for use as a vaccine adjuvant in humans. Poly IC is under clinical investigation in combination with a DEC-targeted HIV protein vaccine in our lab (Caskey M et al unpublished results).
The aim of this study was to determine the immunogenicity of HER2 protein vaccine that targeted to DEC+ DCs in a preclinical mouse breast cancer model. To deliver HER2 protein to DEC+ DCs in situ, we genetically engineered the HER2 extracellular domain into mAbs specific for DEC and tested the immunogenicity of this fusion mAb in mice in combination with DC maturation stimuli. For the tumor vaccine study, we xeno-primed mice with HER2 protein followed by a neu-expressing tumor challenge.
Materials and methods
Mice
Animal experiments were designed to fulfill the ethical and scientific principles provided by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Rockefeller University (New York, NY, USA) (approved protocol 08117). Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and were 6 to 8 weeks of age. C57BL/6, BALB/c, FVB/N, and HLA-A2.1 transgenic mice in the C57BL/6 background - C57BL/6-Tg(HLA-A2.1)1Enge/J - were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). DEC-/- mice were generated and provided by Michel Nussenzweig (The Rockefeller University) and are available from The Jackson Laboratory. At least three mice per group were used in immunization experiments.
Cell lines
The neu-expressing mammary tumor cell line NT2.5 was derived from a spontaneous mammary tumor in female neu-N mice (FVB/N background). The cell line was established and kindly provided by Elizabeth M Jaffee (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA). NT2.5 tumor cells were grown in a previously defined breast media, which consisted of RPMI (Gibco, now part of Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 20% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% Na pyruvate, 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.02% gentamicin (Invitrogen Corporation), and 0.2% insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. The HER2 stably transfected tumor cell line, E0771/E2, was generously provided by Wei-Zen Wei (Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA). Anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5) and anti-CD8 (clone 2.43) hybridoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in accordance with its protocols.
Construction and production of fusion monoclonal antibody
DNA coding HER2 extracellular domain (amino acid 22-653) was cloned in frame into the COOH terminus of anti-DEC (DEC-HER2) or control IgG heavy chain (Ctrl Ig-HER2) as described previously [
30]. Fusion mAb was expressed by transient transfection in 293T cells and purified on protein G columns (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). Purified mAb was characterized by SDS-PAGE and Western blot by using anti-mouse IgG- horseradish peroxidase (IgG-HRP) (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) or anti-HER2 mAb (clone 42; BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose, CA, USA). Specific binding of the fusion mAb was verified by using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with mouse DEC receptor. Binding was detected by flow cytometry by using phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG mAb (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated mouse anti-HER2 mAb (clone 24D2; BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). All Abs had less than 0.125 endotoxin units per milligram in a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay (QCL-1000; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA).
Peptides
Overlapping (staggered by four amino acids) 15-mer peptides covering the HER2 and neu extracellular domain and HIV gag p24 protein were synthesized by Henry Zebroski in the Proteomics Resource Center of The Rockefeller University. The use of peptides overcomes, in large part, the need for antigen processing by APCs during the immune assays. The 161- and 147-member HER2 and neu peptide libraries were divided into seven and six pools, respectively.
Immunization
Mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 5 μg of DEC-HER2 or Ctrl Ig-HER2 fusion mAb in combination with 50 μg of poly IC (polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid) (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA). When indicated, a combination of 50 μg of poly IC and 25 μg of agonistic anti-CD40 mAb (clone 1C10) was used to mature DCs.
Intracellular cytokine staining
Bulk splenocytes were stimulated with specific peptide pools (2 μg/mL or indicated concentration) or medium alone in the presence of a co-stimulatory anti-CD28 mAb (clone 37.51) for 6 hours. Brefeldin A (10 μg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added for the last 5 hours to accumulate intracellular cytokines. Anti-CD28 mAb was used only in a 6-hour intracellular cytokine staining assay but not in other T-cell immune assays, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT), and CFSE (5,6-carboxy fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester) dilution assays. For functional avidity analysis, graded doses (10 to 0.0016 μg/mL) of peptides were used to re-stimulate splenocytes. After stimulation, cells were washed and then incubated with anti-CD16/CD23 mAb (clone 2.4G2) to block Fcγ receptor for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cells were stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua vitality dye (Invitrogen Corporation), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7), and Pacific blue-conjugated anti-CD3 (clone 17A2) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 20 minutes at 4°C. Cells were fixed, permeabilized (Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and stained with allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-interferon-gamma (anti-IFNγ), PE-conjugated anti-IL-2, and PECy7-conjugated anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) mAbs for 20 minutes at 4°C (BD Biosciences) and resuspended in stabilizing fixative (BD Biosciences). Data were collected by using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
CFSE dilution assay
A CFSE dilution assay was used to assess the proliferative capacity of T cells. Bulk splenocytes (2 × 107 cells/mL) were labeled with 2.5 μM CFSE (Invitrogen Corporation) in a 37°C water bath for 10 minutes. CFSE-labeled T cells were re-stimulated with pools of peptide (0.2 μg/mL) for 4 days, often in combination with intracellular cytokine staining of cells re-stimulated for the last 6 hours of culture.
Mouse interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot
Multi-screen-HA MAHA 54510 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) plates were coated with 10 μg/mL of purified rat anti-mouse-IFNγ mAb (clone R46A2; BD Biosciences) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed and blocked with PBS/1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at 37°C. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS)-purified CD8+ or CD4+ T cells (3 × 105) were cultured for 2 days with 1 × 105 purified CD11c+ spleen DCs pulsed with the peptide mix (1 μg/mL) or NT2.5 tumor lysate (10 μg/mL). Biotin-conjugated rat anti-mouse-IFNγ mAb (clone XMG 1.2, 2 μg/mL; BD Biosciences) was used as the detection Ab. After 2-hour incubation with detection Ab, spots were visualized with a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA), followed by diaminobenzidine as the substrate (Invitrogen Corporation). Spots were counted in an ELISPOT reader (Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH, Straβberg, Germany).
Mouse cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Splenic CD4+ and CD11c+ cells were purified by MACS. CD4+ cells (3 × 105) were incubated with 1 × 105 CD11c+ cells with peptide mix (2 μg/mL) in 96-well U-bottomed plates for 48 hours. Concentrations of IFNγ, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17 in supernatant were measured by Ready-Set-Go! ELISA sets (eBioscience).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-HER2/neu antibodies
To detect HER2-specific Ab response, we produced FLAG-HER2 soluble protein by transient transfection of 293T cells and purification with anti-FLAG affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich). The quality of FLAG-HER2 protein was verified by SDS-PAGE gel under non-reducing conditions (Figure S1 of Additional file
1). We coated high-binding ELISA plates (Nunc; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rochester, NY, USA) with 500 ng/mL (50 ng/well) of FLAG-HER2 overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed with PBS/0.1% Tween-20 and blocked with PBS/0.1% Tween 20/5% BSA for 1 hour at 37°C. Serial dilutions of serum were added to the plates and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Secondary goat anti-mouse IgG-specific Abs conjugated with HRP (SouthernBiotech) were added and visualized with tetramethylbenzidine (eBioscience) at room temperature for 5 to 10 minutes. To determine the IgG isotype, anti-mouse IgG1 or IgG2a Abs were used. The reported titers represent the highest dilution of sample showing an OD
450 (optical density at 450 nm) of higher than 0.1. The data were presented as the log
10 Ab titer. To determine whether serum IgG can bind to HER2/neu-expressing tumor cells, serial diluted serum was incubated with E0771/E2 (HER2
+) or NT2.5 (neu
+) tumor cells for 15 minutes at 4°C. Anti-mouse IgG-PE mAbs were used to detect the binding of serum IgG to tumor cells. Data were acquired by using a BD LSR II flow cytometer.
Tumor protection
FVB/N mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 5 μg of DEC-HER2 or Ctrl Ig-HER2 mAb together with 50 μg of poly IC on days 0 and 28. Poly IC alone (50 μg) was injected as a negative control. Ten days after the boost immunization, mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 × 106 NT2.5 tumor cells in the shaved right flank. Tumor size was measured three times every week by using a caliper. Tumor volumes were estimated according to the formula: length × (width)2 × 0.5. For survival analysis, tumor sizes of at least 500 mm3 were defined as the experimental endpoint. For Ab depletion, 200 μg of CD4 or CD8 mAbs or both were given to mice intraperitoneally after boost immunization 9, 6, and 3 days before tumor challenge. Isotype control rat IgG was given as a negative control. Efficiency of depletion was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of peripheral blood cells.
Statistical analysis
All analysis was performed by using Prism 4.0 GraphPad software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A two-sided Student t test (between two groups or conditions) was applied to compare statistical significance between peptide-specific responses and treatment groups of immunized mice. Survival studies were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant when the P value was less than 0.05.
Discussion
In this study, we found that delivery of the HER2 tumor antigen within DEC mAb allowed efficient immunization of HER2/neu-specific T cells at a low dose (5 μg of chimeric Ab or 2.7 μg of HER2 protein). We also demonstrated that vaccine-induced T-cell immunity significantly delayed neu-expressing tumor growth in mice.
To overcome the weak T-cell immunity that is typically elicited by HER2 protein vaccines, we delivered HER2 to the DEC
+ DCs
in vivo. High efficiency of targeting tumor antigen to DEC
+ DCs allows a significantly lower dose of protein to achieve potent CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell responses. We found that only a single dose of 5 μg of chimeric mAb (equivalent to 2.7 μg of HER2 protein) was able to induce strong CD4
+ T-cell immunity in mice (Figure
2). On the other hand, at the same dose, linking HER2 protein to an isotype control mAb was inefficient in inducing T-cell immunity. Similarly, studies from other groups have shown that usually a much higher dose of soluble HER2/neu protein is required to induce detectable T-cell immunity [
13‐
15,
17,
45]. Even at two doses of 50 μg, soluble HER2 protein induces only marginal T-cell immunity [
14]. The robust CD4
+ T-cell responses induced by vaccination are Th1-dominant, as measured by high IFNγ but low IL-4/IL-10/IL-17 production (Figure
2C). Increased Th1 immunity usually is associated with a better outcome in patients with cancer [
46,
47].
The efficient induction of CD4
+ T-cell responses by our vaccine approach is dependent on the expression of DEC receptor. In DEC
-/- mice, we did not detect significant HER2-specific T-cell immunity (Figure
3D). This result is consistent with our previous vaccination studies using other antigens [
32,
42]. The T-cell tolerance induced by steady-state immature DCs was overcome by administration of TLR3 agonist poly IC with the protein vaccine. We demonstrated that recognition of poly IC by its cellular receptors TLR3 and MDA5 is essential for the induction of HER2 immunity (Figure
3E) and this is consistent with our previous findings [
48]. We observed a slightly increased background response to HER2 when poly IC was combined with DEC-HER2 vaccination, but the background response significantly decreased at later time points (> 3 weeks) after immunization (unpublished results). The observed temporary general immune stimulation is most likely due to the bystander T-cell activation caused by the high amounts of IFNγ, IL-2, and TNFα secreted by the vaccine-induced T cells (Figure S3 of Additional file
3). These activated bystander T cells might in turn amplify vaccine-induced immune response against the tumor antigen and this would represent a beneficial outcome of our vaccine strategy.
Targeting HER2 to activated DCs enhanced not only the magnitude but also the quality of the CD4
+ T-cell responses in four ways. First, broad T-cell responses were developed in three MHC haplotypes (H-2
d, H-2
b, and H-2
q) tested here (Figure
3A and Table
1). Second, the vaccine-induced T cells produced multiple cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2), which are important in regulating the expansion of CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells (Figure S3 of Additional file
3). Third, the vaccine-induced HER2-specific CD4
+ T cells proliferated rigorously and secreted IFNγ upon antigen challenge (Figure
2B). Fourth, the HER2-specific CD4
+ T cells cross-reacted to rat neu antigen with similar functional avidity (Figure
5), despite the sequence differences between the two homologs.
The high quantity and quality of vaccine-induced CD4
+ T-cell responses have several implications for tumor immunotherapy. First, they can enhance the magnitude and longevity of CD8
+ T-cell immunity and promote infiltration of CD8
+ T cells into the tumor milieu [
49‐
51]. This is supported by vaccine studies reported by Knutson and colleagues [
52], who studied patients with breast cancer. The clinical data of the authors indicate that immunization with a peptide vaccine designed to stimulate CD8
+ T cells alone generates only low and short-lived immune responses [
52]. Second, HER2/neu-specific Th1 cells can home to the tumor site, secrete IFNγ and other inflammatory cytokines in the tumor microenvironment, and boost the function of macrophages and DCs [
53,
54]. Activation of APCs may increase processing and presentation of endogenous tumor antigens from dying cells, resulting in 'epitope spreading', which refers to the development of immunity to tumor antigens other than HER2/neu and which could halt the progression of HER2/neu-negative variants [
55]. Third, CD4
+ T cells are also cytotoxic directly against tumor cells [
56‐
58], although the tumor cells that we evaluated here lack MHC II (unpublished results).
Immunotherapy approaches that induce integrated CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell responses are desirable. Here, we show that DEC-HER2 induced not only strong CD4
+ T-cell responses but also significant CD8
+ T-cell responses at a low dose (Figure
4). These CD8
+ T cells proliferate rigorously upon re-stimulation with HER2 peptide
in vitro (Figure
4B). Importantly, using HLA-A2 transgenic mice, we found that CD8
+ T-cell responses can be induced in different MHC haplotypes (Figure
4C). The responding HER2 peptide pool 5 indeed contains two A2-restricted HER2 epitopes that have been described previously [
43,
44]. This result is consistent with previous findings that targeting protein to activated DCs, especially CD8α
+ DCs, can significantly enhance antigen cross-presentation to CD8
+ T cells [
27,
31,
59,
60].
Targeting HER2 to DEC
+ DCs induced not only integrated CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell responses but also serum Ab response (Figure
6). Importantly, HER2/neu-specific IgG induced by immunization can recognize naturally derived HER2/neu epitopes that are expressed on HER2/neu-expressing tumor cells (Figure
6B, C). Although HER2-specific Ab responses between DC-targeted or non-targeted HER2 protein were similar as assessed by titer and isotypes, the breadth and functional qualities of the Ab could be different.
Strong HER2-specific immunity induced by DEC-targeting immunization is translated into significant anti-tumor responses in a transplantable tumor model in FVB/N mice. Xeno-priming mice with 5 μg of DEC-HER2 protein in combination with poly IC significantly delayed the development of transplantable neu-expressing tumor (Figure
7). Vaccination not only delayed the growth of the tumors (Figure
7A) but also improved the long-term overall survival of the mice (Figure
7B). These results indicate that an integrated CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell immunity is the major tumor protection mechanism in neu-expressing tumor-challenged FVB/N mice (Figure
7C, D). These results are consistent with a previous report [
61].
We found that CD8
+ T cells are playing a more dominant role in tumor protection as depletion of CD8
+ T cells had a more dramatic effect on tumor growth and overall survival. Induction of HER2/neu-specific T-cell immunity was confirmed by
in vitro T-cell assays (Figure
7E, B). Interestingly, we observed a robust CD4
+ T-cell response when neu-expressing tumor-lysate-pulsed DCs were used as the antigen source. The response is even stronger than that using HER2/neu-peptide-pulsed DCs as stimuli. There are three possible explanations for this unexpected finding. First, the quantity of neu epitopes presented on DCs may be higher with tumor-lysate-pulsed DCs. Second, epitope spreading could be induced with DEC-HER2 vaccination. Therefore, the higher responses could represent a cumulative response against HER2/neu and other tumor antigens. Third, post-translational modifications (glycosylation and phosphorylation and so on) presented on naturally derived neu epitopes, but not on synthetic peptides, may boost T-cell recognition and enhance TCR signal strength, resulting in a stronger CD4
+ T-cell activation. In summary, our results show that targeting HER2 protein to activated DCs
in situ significantly enhances anti-tumor T-cell immunity, and we propose that this strategy provides a feasible approach for immunotherapy in patients with cancer.
Competing interests
RMS had financial interests in Celldex Therapeutics, Inc., which is developing DEC antibodies for human use. L-ZH and TK are current employees of Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
The contributions of the authors - with the exception of RMS, who supervised all aspects of this research and the preparation of this manuscript - are reflected in the order shown. BW performed most of the immune assays, animal experiments, and laboratory analysis and wrote the original manuscript. NZ performed flow cytometry assays and animal experiments and helped draft and edit the manuscript. L-ZH carried out molecular cloning and prepared HER2 soluble protein. LZ was responsible for fusion antibody production, animal tumor experiments, and mouse colony maintenance. JMYK was responsible for hybridoma cell culture and mAb purification. TK participated in data interpretation and was involved in drafting, critically reviewing, and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.