nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.04.2012 | Research article

Low expression levels of ATM may substitute for CHEK2 /TP53 mutations predicting resistance towards anthracycline and mitomycin chemotherapy in breast cancer

verfasst von: Stian Knappskog, Ranjan Chrisanthar, Erik Løkkevik, Gun Anker, Bjørn Østenstad, Steinar Lundgren, Terje Risberg, Ingvil Mjaaland, Beryl Leirvaag, Hrvoje Miletic, Per E Lønning

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research | Ausgabe 2/2012

Abstract

Introduction

Mutations affecting p53 or its upstream activator Chk2 are associated with resistance to DNA-damaging chemotherapy in breast cancer. ATM (Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated protein) is the key activator of p53 and Chk2 in response to genotoxic stress. Here, we sought to evaluate ATM's potential role in resistance to chemotherapy.

Methods

We sequenced ATM and assessed gene expression levels in pre-treatment biopsies from 71 locally advanced breast cancers treated in the neoadjuvant setting with doxorubicin monotherapy or mitomycin combined with 5-fluorouracil. Findings were confirmed in a separate patient cohort treated with epirubicin monotherapy. Each tumor was previously analyzed for CHEK2 and TP53 mutation status.

Results

While ATM mutations were not associated with chemo-resistance, low ATM expression levels predicted chemo-resistance among patients with tumors wild-type for TP53 and CHEK2 (P = 0.028). Analyzing the ATM-chk2-p53 cascade, low ATM levels (defined as the lower 5 to 50% percentiles) or mutations inactivating TP53 or CHEK2 robustly predicted anthracycline resistance (P-values varying between 0.001 and 0.027 depending on the percentile used to define "low" ATM levels). These results were confirmed in an independent cohort of 109 patients treated with epirubicin monotherapy. In contrast, ATM-levels were not suppressed in resistant tumors harboring TP53 or CHEK2 mutations (P > 0.5).

Conclusions

Our data indicate loss of function of the ATM-Chk2-p53 cascade to be strongly associated with resistance to anthracycline/mitomycin-containing chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Additional file 1: Cohorts and primers. Additional file 1 contains Table S1 with an overview of the patients' cohorts and Table S2 with a list of all primers used. (DOC 106 KB)

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/bcr3147) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

PEL designed the study and was the PI of all clinical studies. SK and PEL wrote the manuscript. SK, RC and BL performed and supervised laboratory analyses. SK and PEL performed statistical calculations. EL, GA, BØ, SL, TR and IM participated in designing and conducting the epirubicin - paclitaxel study, performed response evaluations, tumor sample collection and management of follow-up data together with PEL. HM performed the immunohistochemistry. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

5FU

5-fluoro-uracil

ATM

ataxia telangiectasia mutated

CHEK2

checkpoint kinase 2

FUMI

5-fluorouracil and mitomycin

MSP

methylation-specific PCRs

progressive disease

Ser

serine

SISA

Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis

Thr

threonine

USP

non-methylation-specific PCRs

WBC

white blood cells.

Introduction

Despite significant improvements in cancer therapy over the last decades, resistance towards chemotherapy remains the main obstacle to cure among patients suffering from solid tumors [1].

The molecular mechanisms causing chemo-resistance in breast cancer, as for most other cancer forms, are poorly understood. While Topoisomerase-II amplified tumors on average reveal enhanced anthracycline sensitivity compared to non-amplified tumors [2‐5], lack of Topoisomerase-II expression may not explain anthracycline resistance.

p53, the tumor suppressor protein encoded by the TP53 gene, plays a key role with respect to apoptosis but also senescence, growth arrest and DNA repair [6, 7]. Our group has previously linked mutations in TP53, (in particular those affecting the L2/L3 DNA binding domains), to resistance to anthracyclines and the related cytotoxic compound, mitomycin, in primary breast cancers [8‐10]. However, the observation that some tumors harboring wild-type TP53 revealed resistance towards anthracycline therapy made us hypothesize this could be due to inactivation of other genes acting up- or downstream in the p53 functional pathway [11, 12]. Excluding potential correlations between genetic and epigenetic alterations affecting cyclin-inhibitors and therapy resistance [8, 13, 14], subsequently, we detected non-sense mutations in the CHEK2 gene (coding for the Chk2 protein) in three patients with primary breast cancers revealing anthracycline resistance [8, 15]. Chk2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 20, inhibiting MDM2-p53 protein binding [16] but also at several sites located in the C-terminal domain of the p53 protein [17]. While Chk2 activates multiple downstream targets in addition to p53, and the p53 protein may be activated through multiple post-transcriptional events [17], the finding that CHEK2 mutations may substitute for TP53 mutations as a cause of chemo-resistance indicates Chk2 phosphorylation of the p53 protein to play a pivotal role executing cell death in response to anthracycline therapy in breast cancer.

Chk2 activation, in response to chemotherapy-induced double strand breaks, is mediated through the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) protein which phosphorylates Chk2 at Thr 68 in response to DNA damage caused by cytotoxic compounds or ionizing radiation [18, 19]. Further, ATM directly phosphorylates p53 at Ser 15, providing additional activation of p53 besides the Ser 20 phosphorylation [20, 21].

Based on the evidence above, we hypothesized that loss of ATM function could be a cause of anthracycline resistance in breast cancers harboring wild-type TP53 and CHEK2. While low expression of ATM has been found associated with a poor prognosis among breast cancer patients harboring wild-type TP53 tumors treated with DNA-damaging chemotherapy [22], notably the direct effect of ATM status on response to anthracycline therapy (predictive value) has not been addressed previously.

In this study, we performed complete ATM gene sequencing and determined ATM mRNA levels in breast tumor samples selected based on TP53 and CHEK2 mutation status and clinical outcome. All samples were from primary breast cancers treated with pre-surgical ("neoadjuvant") therapy in controlled studies from which TP53 and CHEK2 gene mutation status had been previously characterized and the direct response to chemotherapy (doxorubicin, 5FU/mitomycin or epirubicin) as well as long-term outcome for each individual patient determined. We found low levels of tumor ATM expression to predict chemo-resistance in tumors wild-type for TP53 and CHEK2 but not in tumors harboring TP53 or CHEK2 mutations. Importantly, these findings were corroborated by the findings that low ATM expression signaled a poor prognosis among patients harboring TP53 and CHK2 wild-type tumors, contrasting an improved prognosis in tumors harboring TP53/CHEK2 mutations. These findings indicate the ATM-chk2-p53 cascade to be an important pathway executing drug-induced cell death in breast cancers in vivo.

Materials and methods

Patients

For this study we analyzed samples selected from three prospective studies [8‐10]. The selection of tumors for this study was based on the patients' response to therapy and tumor TP53 and CHEK2 status, previously determined [8, 10]. The rationale was to analyze an optimal number of "poor" and "good" responders and tumors mutated versus wild-type for TP53/CHEK2. Since the majority of patients displayed partial response upon treatment and wild-type status for TP53 and CHEK2, only a subgroup of these were included for ATM analyses and statistical comparisons. In contrast, we included all tumors harboring TP53 /CHEK2 mutations and all tumors resistant to therapy.

The numbers of patients included in the different ATM analyses are listed in Table 1 with further details listed in Additional file 1 Table S1. Cohort 1 (n = 71) included a selection of 36 out of 91 patients enrolled in a prospective study exploring the mechanisms of resistance to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer [10] as well as all 35 patients from a similar prospective study evaluating the mechanisms of resistance to 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin (FUMI) [9]. In this cohort of 71 tumors, material for DNA sequencing, mRNA expression analysis and MLPA copy number analysis was available from n = 70, n = 69 and n = 66 tumors, respectively. For the first part of the study, these patients were statistically evaluated as an exploratory data set (Cohort 1).

Table 1

Patients included in ATM analyses

Cohort		ATM coding region			ATM promoter
No.	Therapy	Mutations	mRNA levels	Copy no.	Mutations	Methylation	Survival
		n	n	n	n	n	n
1	Doxorubicin	70	69	69	70	-	69
	FUMI
2	Epirubicin	41	109¹	-	41	109¹	109¹
3	Paclitaxel	38	114²	-	38	-	114²

¹ Among the 109 patients, two were omitted from statistical analyses as protocol violators.

² Among the 114 patients, 8 had non-evaluable response to therapy.

For validation purposes and inclusion of a group of patients treated with a non-anthracycline/mitomycin regimen, we analyzed samples from a study in which patients with primary breast cancers were randomized to pre-surgical treatment with epirubicin (Cohort 2; n = 109; validation cohort) versus paclitaxel (Cohort 3; n = 114; patients treated with a non-anthracycline-containing regimen) monotherapy [8, 23]. Out of the 109 epirubicin treated patients, 2 were omitted from statistical analyses as protocol violators (one sarcomatoid and one stage II tumor) and from the 114 paclitaxel treated patients, 8 were omitted from statistical analyses due to non-evaluable response to therapy, in most cases due to early termination of treatment because of paclitaxel toxicity (for details, see [8]). Here, ATM expression was determined in the whole cohort, while ATM gene sequencing was performed in subgroups of 41 (Cohort 2) and 38 (Cohort 3) individuals.

Before commencing chemotherapy, each patient participating in one of these trials had an incisional tumor biopsy as described previously [9]. All tissue samples were snap-frozen immediately on removal in the surgical theater.

Each of the studies was approved by the local Ethical Committee, and all patients gave written informed consent.

Nucleic acid isolation and cDNA synthesis

Genomic DNA was isolated from tumor biopsies using QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA was purified by Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA) extraction from snap-frozen tissue samples according to manufacturer's instructions. After extraction, the RNA was dissolved in DEPC treated ddH2O. First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using oligo-dT and Random Hexamer primers with the Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Mutation screening

Screening for mutation and small insertions/deletions was performed by PCR-amplification and subsequent sequencing of all the exons of the coding region of ATM [GenBank: NT 033899] as well as the previously described bidirectional promoter area [17]. All amplifications were performed using the Kod XL DNA polymerase system (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primers and thermal conditions for the primer annealing step are listed in Additional file 1 Table S2. Prior to sequencing, PCR products were purified using the ExoSAP-IT kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was done using BigDye version 1.1 cycle sequencing kit (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) with specific forward or reverse sequencing primers, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Thermal conditions were 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 10 seconds, annealing at 50°C for 5 seconds and elongation at 60°C for 4 minutes. Capillary electrophoresis, data collection and sequence analysis were performed on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3700). Resulting sequences from patient samples were analysed using Genebank accession u33841 as reference.

Quantitative PCR

Quantitative PCRs were performed using specific Hydrolysis Probes targeting ATM on a Light Cycler 480 instrument (Roche). Reaction mixes were made according to the instructions from the manufacturer of the kit Lightcycler 480 ProbesMaster (Roche). Relative mRNA expressions were normalized to rpP2 gene expression in a two-colour duplex reaction. Primers/probes for detection of ATM (5'-GCAGATGACCAAGAATGCAA-3', 5'- GGCCTGCTGTATGAGCAAAT-3' and 6FAM-TGGAAGAAGGCACTGTGCTCA-BBQ) and rpP2 (5'-gaccggctcaacaaggttat-3', 5'-ccccaccagcaggtacac-3' and Cy5-agctgaatggaaaaaacattgaagacgtc-BBQ), were designed to be used in the same conditions of real-time PCR amplification. After initial denaturation at 95°C for five minutes, samples were run through 50 cycles of the following conditions: Denaturation for 10 seconds at 95°C and elongation at 55°C for 25 seconds. All reaction data were converted into relative concentrations through the use of an internal standard curve in each run. Each analysis was performed in triplicate.

Copy number analyses

ATM gene copy numbers were determined by MLPA analysis using the SALSA MLPA P190 probemix (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Peak areas of all MLPA products resulting from ATM specific probes were normalized and compared to references as previously described [24].

Promoter methylation analyses

Genomic DNA from patients was modified by bisulfite conversion, using the EZ DNA Methylation Gold Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Primers were used to specifically amplify methylated and unmethylated DNA immediately upstream of the ATM transcription start site (for primer sequences, see [25]). Methylation- and non-methylation-specific PCRs (MSP and USP) were performed using the AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a 50 μl solution containing 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 0.2 μM of each primer and approximately 50 ng of modified genomic DNA. The thermocycling conditions for both the MSP and the USP were an initial 5 minutes of denaturation at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 57.6°C, and 30 sec at 72°C. Included in each run were a methylated control (CpGenome Universal Methylated DNA, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), an unmethylated control (modified DNA from healthy donors) and a negative control (water). After amplification, the PCR products were separated and visualized on a 3% agarose gel.

Immunohistochemistry

Sections of 5 μm were prepared from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a rabbit anti-human ATM monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For the staining procedure, the DAKO Envision HRP rabbit kit (DAKO, Glastrup, Denmark) with DAB as detection method was used. The scoring of stained section was performed using four grades related to proportion of positive tumor cells: 0: 0%; 1: 1 to 10%; 2: 11 to 50%; 3: > 50%.

Statistical analyses

Comparisons of the ATM mRNA expression levels were performed using the Mann-Whitney rank test (for independent samples). Comparisons of observed mutations between different groups of patients were performed using Fischer exact test. All P-values given are two-sided, and for Fischer exact test, cumulative. Multivariate analyses were performed by binary logistic regression, defining TP53- and CHEK2 mutations as categorical variables and ATM mRNA levels as a continuous variable. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier, and subsets of patients were compared using the log-rank test. Deaths for reasons other than breast cancer were treated as censored observations. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 15.0/PASW 17.0 software package (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) and/or Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA).

Results

ATM mutations in locally advanced breast cancer

ATM gene alterations recorded through sequencing (n = 149 tumors) and MLPA analysis (n = 69 tumors) in different breast cancer cohorts are summarized in Table 2 (see Materials and methods for cohort details). Most alterations found were of germline origin and previously observed by others [26‐29] in multiple patients, indicating these changes to be polymorphic variants rather than mutations contributing to a malignant phenotype.

Table 2

ATM mutations

Mutation	Exon	A. A change	Cohort 1 Dox Fumi n(%)	Cohort 2 Epi n(%)	Cohort 3 Pac n(%)	Germ line	Previous obs.¹
C146G	4	Ser 49 Cys	3 (4.3)	0 (0.0)	1 (2.6)	ND	Yes^2,3,4
C735T	8	-	2 (2.9)	4 (9.8)	1 (2.6)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
A737C	8	Asn 246 Thr	0 (0.0)	1 (2.4)	0 (0.0)	ND	No⁵
C1009T	9	Arg 337 Cys	1 (1.4)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	No	No⁵
A1792G	12	Ile 598 Val	1 (1.4)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	Yes	No⁵
T2572C	18	Phe 858 Leu	2 (2.9)	4 (9.8)	0 (0.0)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
C3161G	23	Pro 1054 Arg	5 (7.1)	5 (12.2)	1 (2.6)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
A3341G	24	Lys 1114 Arg	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (2.6)	Yes	No⁵
C4258T	30	Leu 1420 Phe	3 (4.3)	2 (4.9)	0 (0.0)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
T4324C	30	Tyr 1442 His	1 (1.4)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	Yes	No⁵
C4578T	31	-	8 (11.4)	5 (12.2)	9 (23.7)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
A5071C	35	Ser 1691 Arg	1 (1.4)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	ND	Yes^2,3,4
G5557A	38	Asp 1853 Asn	13 (18.6)	9 (22.0)	11 (28.9)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
T5793C	40	-	1 (1.4)	1 (2.4)	0 (0.0)	ND	Yes^2,3,4
C6217G	44	Leu 2073 Val	0 (0.0)	1 (2.4)	0 (0.0)	ND	No⁵
T7390C	51	Cys 2464 Arg	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (2.6)	Yes	Yes^2,3,4
del A 8432	59	Frameshift	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (2.6)	ND	No⁵

Overview of the ATM mutations observed in the cohorts of Doxorubicin/Fumi (n = 70), Epirubicin (n = 41) or Paclitaxel (n = 38) treated breast cancer patients.

¹ Data from Dörk et al., Thorstenson et al., Bretsky et al. and the Leiden Open Variation Database [29]

¹ Previously observed in Breast cancer

³ Common variant (considered non-pathogenic)

⁴ Pathogenic role unclear

Seven of the mutations observed have, to our knowledge, not previously been reported (Table 2). Each of these variants was observed in a single patient only. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were available for four of these patients. Out of these four, one mutation proved to be somatic, whereas three were also found in lymphocyte DNA, indicating the mutations to be of germline origin.

ATM mutations are not associated with chemo-resistance

We compared gene alterations in tumors progressing on therapy (PD) versus tumors not progressing (stable disease or an objective response) classified according to the UICC criteria [30] as previously described [10, 31]. The frequency of ATM mutations was similar among patients with progressive disease (PD) upon treatment and those responding to therapy in any of the cohorts analyzed (data not shown). Stratifying tumors into wild-type versus TP53/CHK2 mutated ones did not reveal any imbalance regarding ATM mutation incidence between these subgroups.

Assessing the possibility that some ATM variants in particular could be associated with therapy resistance, we compared individual mutations observed among PD-patients with those observed in responders. However, none of the individual mutations (Ser49Cys, Asp1853Asn, Phe858Leu or Pro1054Arg) was found at higher incidence among patients progressing on therapy as compared to responders.

We further assessed the potential impact of ATM mutations on response to paclitaxel monotherapy. Contrasting what has been recorded for the anthracyclines, TP53/CHEK2 mutations do not predict therapy resistance towards the taxanes [23]. Five out of the 11 analyzed patients displaying progressive disease upon paclitaxel monotherapy treatment harbored ATM mutations (compared to 10 out of 27 responders). Thus, no association between ATM mutations and resistance to paclitaxel therapy was recorded.

Low ATM expression levels predict chemo-resistance to doxorubicin and mitomycin but not to paclitaxel in tumors wild-type for TP53 and CHEK2

ATM mRNA levels were determined by qPCR in 69 out of the 71 doxorubicin or 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin treated patients (Cohort 1) from whom RNA were available (for two patients, one with partial response and one with stable disease upon treatment, sufficient amounts of RNA was lacking; Table 1). Results from these analyses revealed large differences in ATM mRNA levels in the cohort, with a 56.9-fold ratio between the highest and the lowest value recorded (Figure 1A).

No association between ATM mRNA levels and ATM mutation status was observed (P > 0.5; Mann-Whitney rank test). Further, since previous studies have indicated that concomitant ATM and p53 inactivation is underrepresented in breast tumors [22], we assessed the ATM levels among TP53 mutated versus wild-type tumors; no difference between the two groups was observed (P > 0.4).

Considering the 18 patients with progressive disease, these patients displayed a non-significant trend towards lower ATM mRNA levels as compared to the responders (P = 0.104; Mann-Whitney rank test), with 12 out of 18 expressing ATM levels below the median value of the cohort (P = 0.168; Fischer exact test).

To test the hypothesis that low ATM expression may be an alternative mechanism inactivating the p53 pathway, we compared ATM mRNA expression levels in tumors resistant to chemotherapy despite harboring wild-type TP53/CHEK2 (Group A Table 3; n = 5) to the other tumors (Group B + C + D; n = 64) in the same cohort (Cohort 1). ATM-levels were lower among tumors in Group A as compared to the tumors in the other three groups (P = 0.012). Stratifying the latter tumors (n = 64) into TP53/CHEK2 mutated (Group B + D; n = 40) and TP53/CHEK2 wild-type (Group C; n = 24) tumors, the tumors in the A group expressed lower ATM levels when compared to each of these two subgroups (P = 0.010 and 0.028, respectively). Notably, each of the tumors in Group A revealed an ATM expression level in the lower tertile of the total cohort.

Table 3

Grouping of tumors used for evaluation of ATM's impact on resistance to chemotherapy

	TP53/CHEK2status
	Wild-type	Mutated
Progressive disease	A	B
Responders	C	D

In contrast, no difference in ATM-levels between PD-tumors harboring TP53 or CHEK2 mutations (Group B) and the other tumors in this cohort was found (P > 0.5); neither did we record any difference in ATM levels between mutated tumors progressing on chemotherapy and mutated tumors responding to treatment (Group B vs. Group D; P > 0.5)

In the epirubicin treated validation cohort (n = 107, Cohort 2, Table 1), 6 out of 10 patients with progressive disease on therapy previously were found mutated in the TP53 or CHEK2 genes (Group B) [8], limiting the number of patients with a PD despite harboring wild-type TP53 and CHEK2 (Group A) to 4. Still, these four patients each revealed low ATM expression levels as compared to the rest of the tumors (n = 103; P = 0.092; Figure 1B), as well as when compared to the subgroups of other wild-type TP53/CHEK2 tumors (n = 79; P = 0.097) or tumors harboring TP53/CHEK2 mutations (n = 25; P = 0.094).

To evaluate whether the effect of low ATM status was specific to DNA-damaging chemotherapy, we analyzed the predictive impact of ATM expression levels on response to paclitaxel monotherapy (Cohort 3, Table 1). Here, we observed no difference in ATM expression levels between patients revealing primary resistance to paclitaxel with (n = 5) or without (n = 7) concomitant TP53/CHEK2 mutations and patients obtaining an objective response/stable disease (n = 102; P > 0.2 for both comparisons).

Low ATM expression levels may substitute for TP53/CHEK2 mutations as a cause of chemo-resistance

Postulating low ATM expression and mutations affecting TP53 and CHEK2 to be alternative mechanisms inactivating the p53 pathway (Figure 2A), we compared the frequency of tumors having a "hit" in this pathway (either a TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 mutation or low ATM expression) among chemo-resistant versus tumors responding to anthracycline/mitomycin chemotherapy. Defining low ATM as the levels expressed by the lower 20% percentile of the patients in the cohort, a "hit" in this pathway (either low ATM expression level or a CHEK2/TP53 mutation) correlated to therapy resistance (P = 0.0267; Table 4). Further, we evaluated the robustness of the model by performing repeated analysis using ATM cut-off values ranging between the 5% and 50% percentile of the cohort defining tumors with "low expression" for ATM (Figure 2B). Notably, the different models all revealed a statistically significant correlation between defects in the p53 pathway (defined as L2/L3-TP53/CHEK2 mutations or low level ATM expression) and therapy resistance defined as PD on treatment (P-values varying from 0.001 to 0.027; Figure 2B). In a multivariate analysis (logistic regression), L2/L3-TP53/CHEK2 mutations or low level ATM expression was also confirmed to be significantly associated with resistance to therapy (overall test of the model, P = 0.010).

Table 4

Correlation between alterations in TP53/CHEK2/ATM ("hit") and in vivo resistance to doxorubicin/FUMI

	Hit	Non-Hit
Progressive disease	14¹	4²
Responders	23³	28⁴
		P = 0.0267

Cohort 1 (Dox/Fumi)

¹ Patients lacking response to therapy/with mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

² Patients lacking response to therapy/without mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

³ Patients with response to therapy (SD, PR or CR)/with mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

⁴ Patients with response to therapy (SD, PR or CR)/without mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

To confirm this observation, similar analyses were performed on a validation cohort of patients having epirubicin monotherapy (Cohort 2, Table 1). We confirmed the observation that low ATM expression levels or mutations affecting either TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 to be associated with anthracycline resistance (P = 0.0074; Table 5). Using different cut-off values classifying between 5% and 50% of the tumors as "low ATM expressors", we confirmed the model to be robust in this cohort as well (P-values varying from 0.20 to < 0.01; notably, setting a cut-off between 5% and 25%, all P-values were < 0.05; Figure 2B; multivariate analysis: overall test of the model; P = 0.007).

Table 5

Correlation between alterations in TP53/CHEK2/ATM ("hit") and in vivo resistance to epirubicin

	Hit	Non-Hit
Progressive disease	7¹	3²
Responders	25³	72⁴
		P = 0.0074

Cohort 2 (Epirubicin)

¹ Patients lacking response to therapy/with mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

² Patients lacking response to therapy/without mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

³ Patients with response to therapy (SD, PR or CR)/with mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

⁴ Patients with response to therapy (SD, PR or CR)/without mutations in TP53 (L2/L3) or CHEK2 or low expression of ATM (lower 20% percentile of cohort)

ATM immunostaining

To evaluate whether the differences in ATM mRNA levels were reflected at the protein level, we performed immunohistochemical staining on samples from the initial cohort (Cohort 1, Table 1). While most samples revealing high mRNA levels displayed strong ATM protein staining, interestingly, some samples stained strongly despite expressing low mRNA levels; thus, there was a lack of statistical correlation between ATM mRNA and IHC-staining levels (P > 0.5). However, in the group of tumors with progressive disease and wild-type TP53 and CHEK2, one tumor only was found to stain strongly for ATM.

ATM gene copy number

Out of the 70 patients from Cohort 1 sequenced for point mutations, material for MLPA-analyses was available from 66 (all included among the 69 analyzed for ATM expression levels). While no larger intragenetic deletions or duplications were observed, 9 out of the 66 tumors harbored a reduced copy number for the entire ATM locus. No association between ATM reduced copy number and either ATM mRNA levels or response to therapy was observed (P > 0.2 and P > 0.4, respectively).

ATM promoter mutations and hypermethylations

The observed difference in ATM mRNA levels could be due to different mechanisms of promoter inactivation, including mutations or hypermethylations.

Screening for potential ATM promoter hypermethylation in the patients treated with epirubicin (Cohort 2; n = 109), none displayed methylation of the ATM promoter.

Next, we sequenced the promoter region from position -661 to +105 relative to the transcriptional start site (sequence NT_033899; [32]) in 70 tumors from Cohort 1, no mutations were recorded. The promoter area was found to exist as two distinct haplotypes differing in positions -635 (rs228589) and -10 (rs189037) relative to the transcriptional start site. Homozygosity for the NT_033899 haplotype -635A/-10G was observed in 15 patients (21.4%), 22 patients (31.4%) were homozygous for the -635T/-10A haplotype while 33 patients (47.1%) were heterozygotes. No difference in ATM expression levels between patients harboring the different genotypes were observed (P > 0.2; Kruskal-Wallis rank test). This finding was confirmed in Cohort 2 (data not shown).

Impact of c-myc amplifications

Our data indicate that events other than promoter alterations, like deregulation of trans-acting factors, may be responsible for the alterations in ATM expression levels. N-myc induces expression of miR-421, which in turn suppresses ATM levels [33]. However, while we found the C-myc gene to be amplified in 12 out 69 doxorubicin/FUMI-treated tumors, no correlation between C-myc amplification status and ATM expression levels were recorded (P > 0.4; Mann-Whitney test).

ATM mRNA levels are not associated with breast cancer subclasses

An interesting question is whether low ATM expression may correlate to other tumor characteristics. Among doxorubicin/mitomycin treated tumors analyzed here, 64 have previously been classified according to gene expression profiling [34, 35], defining 25 and 11 tumors belonging to the Luminal A and B class, respectively, 12 belonging to the ERBB2+ class, 11 basal-like, while 5 were found belonging to the normal cell-like class. No difference in ATM expression levels between tumors belonging to the different subclasses were recorded (data not shown).

ATM mRNA levels predict overall survival in breast cancer patients

Recently, Jiang and colleges suggested low ATM levels on a TP53 wild-type background to be associated with poor survival while low ATM predicted improved survival in patients harboring TP53 mutations [22]. While we detected a non-significant trend in Cohort 1 (including 69 patients only), we confirmed low ATM levels to predict a poor outcome in patients with tumors wild-type for TP53 and CHEK2 but to improve long-term outcome among patients with tumors harboring TP53 or CHEK2 mutations (Figure 3A, C). Further, we observed a significant differential effect of ATM levels on survival pending on TP53/CHEK2 mutation status in our larger confirmatory set (Cohort 2; Figure 3B, D; P = 0.007; interaction between TP53 status and ATM levels on survival P = 0.011).

In order to investigate whether these effects on long-term overall survival were of general prognostic nature or related to DNA damaging chemotherapy, we performed a similar analysis on patients enrolled in the paclitaxel treatment arm (Cohort 3). Here, we observed no effect of low ATM levels on prognoses either among patients with tumors wild-type or mutated for TP53/CHEK2 (data not shown). This suggests the effect of ATM level on long-term outcome may be related to treatment with DNA-damaging agents.

Discussion

The mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer remains poorly understood. While large studies have revealed a somewhat better response related to high Ki67 expression [36] and gene expression profiles, such as a high Oncotype-DX score [37, 38], these represent non-specific correlations related to different treatment regimens. While topoisomerase-II amplifications have been associated with improved sensitivity to DNA damaging agents [39], lack of topoisomerase-II expression may not explain anthracycline resistance in general.

We have previously shown mutations in TP53, in particular those affecting the DNA binding L2- or L3 domains, to predict resistance to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer [9, 10]. Further, exploring the p53 functional pathway, we found mutations in CHEK2, the gene coding for the p53 upstream activator Chk2, may substitute for TP53 mutations, causing drug resistance in tumors harboring wild-type TP53 [8]. Thus, the fact that some tumors harboring wild-type TP53 and CHEK2 revealed anthracycline resistance made us postulate that these tumors may have defects in other genes involved in the same pathway. While p53 activation in response to DNA damage involves ATM and Chk2 [19, 21, 26, 27], downstream activation of genes leading toward apoptosis or senescence involves multiple, possible redundant, pathways, including transcriptional dependent- as well as independent pathways [40‐44]. Thus, we hypothesized inactivation of ATM, but not genes acting downstream of p53, to be a mechanism hampering p53-induced cell death in some tumors.

Contrasting our expectations, mutations in the ATM gene did not correlate to chemo-resistance. Notably, most of the mutations detected are common variants [26‐28]. Among novel mutations observed in this study, we confirmed the mutation to be of germline origin in three out of four patients from whom WBC DNA was available. Thus, the mutations observed most likely have little impact on the malignant phenotype of the tumors in which they reside.

In contrast, we observed reduced ATM expression levels in tumors revealing chemo-resistance despite harboring wild-type TP53/CHEK2, indicating ATM low expression levels may substitute for TP53/CHEK2 mutations in this respect. Importantly, this result was corroborated by the finding that low ATM expression was associated with a poor long-term outcome for patients with tumors harboring wild-type TP53/CHEK2 but not among patients harboring TP53/CHEK2 mutations across the different cohorts. The hypothesis that this finding was due to the effect of DNA-damaging chemotherapy was substantiated by the finding of no effect of ATM expression levels on outcome among patients treated with paclitaxel monotherapy. In contrast, low ATM levels were associated with improved long-term survival in patients treated with anthracyclines/mitomycin harboring TP53/CHEK2 mutations. This observation is in line with the findings of Jiang et al. [22]. These authors found reduced ATM expression to improve outcome in patients with tumors revealing strong staining for p53 (a surrogate for TP53 mutations) but a poor prognosis for patients with weak p53 staining (a surrogate marker for wild-type gene status). Because their patients received adjuvant and not primary chemotherapy, direct assessment of chemo-sensitivity could not be applied in their model.

If confirmed in subsequent studies, the findings in the present work have important clinical implications. Given the strong correlation between defects in the ATM-Chk2-p53 pathway and resistance to DNA-damaging therapy, a screen for functional status in this pathway may be a valuable pre-treatment test, indicating whether or not a given patient is likely to respond to such therapy. Patients with an inactive ATM-Chk2-p53 pathway may be spared an unnecessary DNA-damaging treatment and instead given alternative therapy, for example, microtubule poisons.

Conclusions

Taken together, our data point to p53 and its upstream activators, Chk2 and ATM, as a functional pathway executing response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. If this cascade is disturbed, by TP53 or CHEK2 mutations or low ATM expression levels, response to therapy may be blunted. Thus, patients harboring tumors with these defects should receive alternative treatment.

Acknowledgements

Most of this work was performed in the Mohn Cancer Research Laboratory. We thank Gjertrud Iversen, Linda Ramsevik, Sandra H. Haugen, Elise de Faveri, Hildegunn Helle, Nhat Kim Duong, Narve Brekkå, Christine Eriksen and Einar Birkeland for technical assistance and David Wedge for statistical advice. This study was supported by grants from The Norwegian Cancer Society and The Norwegian Health Region West.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Cohorts and primers. Additional file 1 contains Table S1 with an overview of the patients' cohorts and Table S2 with a list of all primers used. (DOC 106 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Lonning PE: Breast cancer prognostication and prediction: are we making progress?. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18 (Suppl 8): viii3-7.PubMed

Bartlett JM, Munro AF, Dunn JA, McConkey C, Jordan S, Twelves CJ, Cameron DA, Thomas J, Campbell FM, Rea DW, Provenzano E, Caldas C, Pharoah P, Hiller L, Earl H, Poole CJ: Predictive markers of anthracycline benefit: a prospectively planned analysis of the UK National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT/BR9601). Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11: 266-274. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70006-1.CrossRefPubMed

Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E, Rasmussen BB, Overgaard J, Nielsen KV, Schonau A, Gunnarsdottir K, Olsen KE, Mouridsen H, Ejlertsen B: retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 7483-7490. 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.007.CrossRefPubMed

Muss HB, Thor AD, Berry DA, Kute T, Liu ET, Koerner F, Cirrincione CT, Budman DR, Wood WC, Barcos M, et al: c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 1260-1266. 10.1056/NEJM199405053301802. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1994, 331:211CrossRefPubMed

Pritchard KI, Shepherd LE, O'Malley FP, Andrulis IL, Tu D, Bramwell VH, Levine MN: HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 2103-2111. 10.1056/NEJMoa054504.CrossRefPubMed

Schmitt CA, Fridman JS, Yang M, Lee S, Baranov E, Hoffman RM, Lowe SW: A senescence program controlled by p53 and p16INK4a contributes to the outcome of cancer therapy. Cell. 2002, 109: 335-346. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00734-1.CrossRefPubMed

Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ: Surfing the p53 network. Nature. 2000, 408: 307-310. 10.1038/35042675.CrossRefPubMed

Chrisanthar R, Knappskog S, Lokkevik E, Anker G, Ostenstad B, Lundgren S, Berge EO, Risberg T, Mjaaland I, Maehle L, Engebretsen LF, Lillehaug JR, Lonning PE: CHEK2 mutations affecting kinase activity together with mutations in TP53 indicate a functional pathway associated with resistance to epirubicin in primary breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e3062-10.1371/journal.pone.0003062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Geisler S, Borresen-Dale AL, Johnsen H, Aas T, Geisler J, Akslen LA, Anker G, Lonning PE: TP53 gene mutations predict the response to neoadjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 5582-5588.PubMed

10.

Geisler S, Lonning PE, Aas T, Johnsen H, Fluge O, Haugen DF, Lillehaug JR, Akslen LA, Borresen-Dale AL: Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 2505-2512.PubMed

11.

Lonning PE: Genes causing inherited cancer as beacons to identify the mechanisms of chemoresistance. Trends Mol Med. 2004, 10: 113-118. 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.01.005.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Lonning PE, Knappskog S, Staalesen V, Chrisanthar R, Lillehaug JR: Breast cancer prognostication and prediction in the postgenomic era. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18: 1293-1306. 10.1093/annonc/mdm013.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Knappskog S, Chrisanthar R, Staalesen V, Borresen-Dale AL, Gram IT, Lillehaug JR, Lonning PE: Mutations and polymorphisms of the p21B transcript in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 908-910. 10.1002/ijc.22777.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Staalesen V, Leirvaag B, Lillehaug JR, Lonning PE: Genetic and epigenetic changes in p21 and p21B do not correlate with resistance to doxorubicin or mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 3438-3443. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0796.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Staalesen V, Falck J, Geisler S, Bartkova J, Borresen-Dale AL, Lukas J, Lillehaug JR, Bartek J, Lonning PE: Alternative splicing and mutation status of CHEK2 in stage III breast cancer. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 8535-8544. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207928.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Hirao A, Kong YY, Matsuoka S, Wakeham A, Ruland J, Yoshida H, Liu D, Elledge SJ, Mak TW: DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science. 2000, 287: 1824-1827. 10.1126/science.287.5459.1824.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Toledo F, Wahl GM: Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 909-923. 10.1038/nrc2012.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ahn JY, Schwarz JK, Piwnica-Worms H, Canman CE: Threonine 68 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 5934-5936.PubMed

19.

Matsuoka S, Huang M, Elledge SJ: Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science. 1998, 282: 1893-1897.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Canman CE, Lim DS, Cimprich KA, Taya Y, Tamai K, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Kastan MB, Siliciano JD: Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science. 1998, 281: 1677-1679.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Siliciano JD, Canman CE, Taya Y, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Kastan MB: DNA damage induces phosphorylation of the amino terminus of p53. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 3471-3481. 10.1101/gad.11.24.3471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Jiang H, Reinhardt HC, Bartkova J, Tommiska J, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H, Bartek J, Yaffe MB, Hemann MT: The combined status of ATM and p53 link tumor development with therapeutic response. Genes Dev. 2009, 23: 1895-1909. 10.1101/gad.1815309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Chrisanthar R, Knappskog S, lokkevik E, Anker G, Ostenstad B, Lundgren S, Risberg T, Mjaaland I, Skjonsberg G, Aas T, Schlichting E, Fjosne HE, Nysted A, Lillehaug JR, Lonning PE: Predictive and prognostic impact of TP53 mutations and MDM2 promoter genotype in primary breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin or paclitaxel. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e19249-10.1371/journal.pone.0019249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Berge EO, Knappskog S, Geisler S, Staalesen V, Pacal M, Borresen-Dale AL, Puntervoll P, Lillehaug JR, Lonning PE: Identification and characterization of retinoblastoma gene mutations disturbing apoptosis in human breast cancers. Mol Cancer. 2010, 9: 173-10.1186/1476-4598-9-173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ai L, Vo QN, Zuo C, Li L, Ling W, Suen JY, Hanna E, Brown KD, Fan CY: Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) gene in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: promoter hypermethylation with clinical correlation in 100 cases. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13: 150-156. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-082-3.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bretsky P, Haiman CA, Gilad S, Yahalom J, Grossman A, Paglin S, Van Den Berg D, Kolonel LN, Skaliter R, Henderson BE: The relationship between twenty missense ATM variants and breast cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003, 12: 733-738.PubMed

27.

Dork T, Bendix R, Bremer M, Rades D, Klopper K, Nicke M, Skawran B, Hector A, Yamini P, Steinmann D, Weise S, Stuhrmann M, Karstens JH: Spectrum of ATM gene mutations in a hospital-based series of unselected breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 7608-7615.PubMed

28.

Thorstenson YR, Roxas A, Kroiss R, Jenkins MA, Yu KM, Bachrich T, Muhr D, Wayne TL, Chu G, Davis RW, Wagner TM, Oefner PJ: Contributions of ATM mutations to familial breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 3325-3333.PubMed

29.

LOVD v.2.0 - Leiden Open Variation Database - online gene-centered collection and display of DNA variations. [http://www.lovd.nl]

30.

Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heusen JC, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1977, 35: 292-298. 10.1038/bjc.1977.42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Aas T, Borresen AL, Geisler S, Smith-Sorensen B, Johnsen H, Varhaug JE, Akslen LA, Lonning PE: Specific P53 mutations are associated with de novo resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. Nat Med. 1996, 2: 811-814. 10.1038/nm0796-811.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Byrd PJ, Cooper PR, Stankovic T, Kullar HS, Watts GDJ, Robinson PJ, Taylor AMR: A gene transcribed from the bidirectional ATM promoter coding for a serine rich protein: amino acid sequence, structure and expression studies. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5: 1785-1791. 10.1093/hmg/5.11.1785.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hu H, Du L, Nagabayashi G, Seeger RC, Gatti RA: ATM is down-regulated by N-Myc-regulated microRNA-421. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 1506-1511. 10.1073/pnas.0907763107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Sorlie T, Perou CM, Fan C, Geisler S, Aas T, Nobel A, Anker G, Akslen LA, Botstein D, Borresen-Dale AL, Lonning PE: Gene expression profiles do not consistently predict the clinical treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 2914-2918. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0126.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Eystein Lonning P, Borresen-Dale AL: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 10869-10874. 10.1073/pnas.191367098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Penault-Llorca F, Andre F, Sagan C, Lacroix-Triki M, Denoux Y, Verriele V, Jacquemier J, Baranzelli MC, Bibeau F, Antoine M, Lagarde N, Martin AL, Asselain B, Roche H: Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 2809-2815. 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2808.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, Ravdin P, Bugarini R, Baehner FL, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Winer EP, Hudis C, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Gralow JR, Yoshizawa C, Allred DC, Osborne CK, Hayes DF: Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11: 55-65. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino JP, Geyer CE, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N: Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 3726-3734. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson JC, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer: a project of the Programme on Clinical Oncology of the International Union Against Cancer, Geneva, Switzerland. Cancer. 1977, 39: 1289-1294. 10.1002/1097-0142(197703)39:3<1289::AID-CNCR2820390340>3.0.CO;2-F.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Chipuk JE, Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, Droin NM, Newmeyer DD, Schuler M, Green DR: Direct activation of Bax by p53 mediates mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Science. 2004, 303: 1010-1014. 10.1126/science.1092734.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Moll UM, Wolff S, Speidel D, Deppert W: Transcription-independent pro-apoptotic functions of p53. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005, 17: 631-636. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.007.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Nister M, Tang M, Zhang XQ, Yin C, Beeche M, Hu X, Enblad G, van Dyke T, Wahl GM: p53 must be competent for transcriptional regulation to suppress tumor formation. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 3563-3573. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208354.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Ryan KM, Vousden KH: Characterization of structural p53 mutants which show selective defects in apoptosis but not cell cycle arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 1998, 18: 3692-3698.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Villunger A, Michalak EM, Coultas L, Mullauer F, Bock G, Ausserlechner MJ, Adams JM, Strasser A: p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins puma and noxa. Science. 2003, 302: 1036-1038. 10.1126/science.1090072.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Low expression levels of ATM may substitute for CHEK2 /TP53 mutations predicting resistance towards anthracycline and mitomycin chemotherapy in breast cancer
verfasst von: Stian Knappskog
Ranjan Chrisanthar
Erik Løkkevik
Gun Anker
Bjørn Østenstad
Steinar Lundgren
Terje Risberg
Ingvil Mjaaland
Beryl Leirvaag
Hrvoje Miletic
Per E Lønning
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2012
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research / Ausgabe 2/2012
Elektronische ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3147

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Electronic supplementary material

Competing interests

Authors' contributions

Introduction

Materials and methods

Patients

Nucleic acid isolation and cDNA synthesis

Mutation screening

Quantitative PCR

Copy number analyses

Promoter methylation analyses

Immunohistochemistry

Statistical analyses

Results

ATM mutations in locally advanced breast cancer

ATM mutations are not associated with chemo-resistance

Low ATM expression levels predict chemo-resistance to doxorubicin and mitomycin but not to paclitaxel in tumors wild-type for TP53 and CHEK2

Low ATM expression levels may substitute for TP53/CHEK2 mutations as a cause of chemo-resistance

ATM immunostaining

ATM gene copy number

ATM promoter mutations and hypermethylations

Impact of c-myc amplifications

ATM mRNA levels are not associated with breast cancer subclasses

ATM mRNA levels predict overall survival in breast cancer patients

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

Authors' contributions

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Inhibition of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C results in loss of mesenchymal traits in metastatic breast cancer cells

Analysis of terminal duct lobular unit involution in luminal A and basal breast cancers

CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration is an independent favorable prognostic indicator in basal-like breast cancer

Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial

Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features

Effects of BRCA2 cis-regulation in normal breast and cancer risk amongst BRCA2 mutation carriers

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie