A quantitative analysis of the acidosis of cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study

Metabolic acidosis is common in patients with cardiac arrest and is conventionally considered to be due essentially to hyperlactatemia [1‐6]. However, hyperlactatemia alone fails to explain the cause of metabolic acidosis in some patients [3]. Traditional measures using the anion gap, standard bicarbonate and standard base excess might help to understand this acidosis [7, 8]. However, they give little information about the mechanisms involved and the quantitative contribution of each variable [9‐12], especially in the presence of major changes in serum electrolytes and albumin concentration.

Recently, the Stewart–Figge methodology [13, 14] has been found to be useful in explaining and quantifying acid–base changes in clinical situations in which conventional analysis was deficient [15‐18]. This novel quantitative methodology might also provide useful insight into the factors responsible for the acidosis of cardiac arrest.

We proposed that hyperlactatemia is not the sole cause of cardiac arrest acidosis and that other factors participate significantly in its development. We tested this hypothesis by conducting a prospective study of patients admitted to the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital in Tokyo, Japan, and by applying quantitative principles to the assessment of their acid–base disorders.

This study took place in an Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital in Tokyo, Japan. We prospectively examined out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest admitted to the department from May 2003 to October 2003. Because of the anonymous and non-interventional manner of the study, informed consent was not obtained.

Cardiac arrest was defined as the absence of both spontaneous respiration and palpable pulse. Cardiac arrest was described as witnessed arrest if the collapse of a patient was witnessed by a bystander or the emergency ambulance service. All patients were resuscitated in accordance with the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care [19]. Data evaluated included age, sex, initial electrocardiographic rhythm at the scene, and possible cause. To compare the acid–base characteristics of these patients, we used a comparison group consisting of patients with minor injuries who were discharged within 2 days after admission. We used this group of patients as a comparison group because we routinely measured all variables required for the analysis such as lactate and phosphate in these patients.

Arterial samples were collected in heparinized plastic syringes and analyzed with a blood-gas analyzer (ABL 725; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) at the time of admission. The analyzer measured samples at 37°C. We collected the following data from the analyzer output: pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, standard base excess, lactate and ionized calcium. Blood samples were also analyzed at the hospital central laboratory for the measurement of multiple biochemical variables including sodium, potassium, total magnesium, chloride, albumin and phosphate (Hitachi 7350 and 7360; Hitachi Industry, Tokyo, Japan). No sodium bicarbonate was administered before blood sampling.

One hundred and five patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included in this study. The demographics of these patients are presented in Table 1. They had a mean age of 62.2 years and included 75 (71%) males and 30 (29%) females. Most of the patients had an initial rhythm of asystole (54%) or pulseless electrical activity (38%), and the number of witnessed arrests was 10 (10%). The main cause of collapse was cardiogenic (57%), followed by trauma (12%) and hanging (9%); 19% of the patients had a return of spontaneous circulation.

The acid–base variables in cardiac arrest and minor injuries are shown in Table 2. Except for sodium and SID_a, all variables were significantly different between the two groups. In brief, patients with cardiac arrest were acidemic (pH 6.90 versus 7.39; P < 0.0001), secondary to metabolic acidosis (standard base excess -19.1 versus -1.5 meq/l; P < 0.0001) compared with the comparison group. Patients with cardiac arrest were also hyperkalemic, hypochloremic, hyperlactatemic and hyperphosphatemic. The anion gap and SIG were also higher in patients with cardiac arrest.

Figure 1 shows the acid–base impact of each variable in patients with cardiac arrest compared with the comparison group. Lactate was the strongest determinant of acidemia, accounting for -11.8 meq/l of acidifying effect. However, SIG contributed -7.3 meq/l of acidifying effect and phosphate -2.9 meq/l. This acidemia was attenuated by the alkalinizing effect of several variables. A decrease in chloride had the strongest alkalinizing effect (+4.6 meq/l), followed by an increase in potassium (+3.6 meq/l) and a decrease in albumin (+3.5 meq/l).

It has been known for decades that patients with cardiac arrest invariably develop a severe metabolic acidosis [1‐6, 21‐23]. This acidosis has been thought secondary to hyperlactatemia [2]. However, the correlation between standard base excess and lactate has been reported to be poor, suggesting that other factors might participate in the pathogenesis of cardiac arrest acidosis [3]. The problem is that no previous studies quantitatively analyzed the cause of metabolic acidosis in these patients. We therefore sought to define and quantify acid–base status in these patients by applying the quantitative principles of acid–base analysis described by Stewart, Figge and colleagues [13, 14]. Using this methodology, we found that the causes of acidosis were much more complex than previously thought. Although lactate was the biggest contributor to metabolic acidosis and the development of acidemia in these patients, it accounted for only about 50% of it, whereas SIG and phosphate combined contributed an almost equal percentage (about 33% and 13%, respectively). However, this acidosis was associated with strong compensating responses, which attenuated its severity. These responses included hypochloremia, hyperkalemia, hypoalbuminemia and, to a smaller extent, hypermagnesemia and hypercalcemia.

A key finding was that patients with cardiac arrest had a disproportionately higher SIG than the comparison group (12.4 versus 5.1 meq/l; P < 0.0001). Although the source of this disproportionate increase in unmeasured anions was not specifically addressed, possible candidates include sulphate, urate, oxo acids, amino acids and other organic acids. Kaplan and colleagues reported increased SIG in patients with major vascular injury, another type of global tissue hypoperfusion [24]. It therefore seems that unmeasured anions are likely to be generated during global tissue hypoxic states.

Hyperphosphatemia in patients with cardiac arrest has been underemphasized as a contributor of acidosis (2.95 mmol/l in our study patients). Although causes of this abnormality remain unclear, transcellular shift, cellular injury and phosphate release might be responsible [25, 26]. Hyperphosphatemia is also related to other types of metabolic acidosis [27, 28]. However, because phosphate is not included in calculations of the anion gap, its impact on acid–base status is often poorly appreciated. The Stewart–Figge methodology can reveal its importance. For example, we previously reported that, in patients with acute renal failure, hyperphosphatemia accounted for about 20% of the difference in the acid–base status of patients compared with controls [29].

These acidifying effects were partly attenuated by a concomitant metabolic alkalosis, due mainly to hypochloremia, hyperkalemia and hypoalbuminemia. Their alkalinizing effects in cardiac patients were 4.6, 3.6 and 3.5 meq/l, respectively. The alkalinizing effects of hypercalcemia and hypermagnesemia accounted for less than 1 meq/l of alkalinizing effect. These abnormalities in four serum electrolytes and albumin can be explained by transcellular electrolyte shifts and, perhaps, previous co-morbidities. The existence of metabolic alkalosis in patients with cardiac arrest is not intuitive, unless each element is quantified and compared with a control.

There are several limitations in this study. First, only 10% of patients had their arrest witnessed and most of patients had an initial rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity. Furthermore, drug injection by the emergency ambulance service is not approved in Japan, which inevitably delays the start of advanced life support. Our results might therefore not be applicable to patients in other institutions or countries. However, published clinical studies examining acidemia during cardiac arrest in a quantitative manner are lacking, particularly in terms of patients who have no received advanced life support interventions. Our study presents the first quantitative acid–base analysis for this disorder. Furthermore, the lack of drug or fluid administration in the field provides a unique opportunity to study these disorders with minimal iatrogenic modifications.

Second, we used patients with minor injuries as a comparison group. Although they were well enough to be discharged from the hospital within 2 days, mild hyperlactatemia (2.5 mmol/l) was present in these patients. However, all other variables, including pH and bicarbonate, were in the normal ranges. Considering the large difference in lactate between the two groups (11.8 mol/l), this group of patients, although imperfect, seems adequate for comparison.

Third, fluid resuscitation had started just before or at the time of blood sampling in some patients. This might have affected acid–base status in both groups. Unfortunately, we did not collect precise information on such fluid administration (timing, amount or number of patients so treated) because of the logistic difficulty of collecting such detailed information while attempts were being made to save the life of the patients. This is a significant limitation of our study because some of the fluid given might have affected our findings. However, blood sampling was conducted 12 min on average after admission to the emergency room in both groups, and only small amounts of fluid resuscitation (acetate Ringer in both groups) would have been given to these patients before sampling. Although SIG might have been somewhat affected by acetate in the fluids, the difference in the amount of acetate Ringer given before blood sampling is unlikely to have been large enough to fully explain the significant difference in SIG between the two groups.

The last limitation was that, although we attempted to collect arterial samples, it was often difficult to distinguish which sample, arterial or venous, was actually collected from patients with cardiac arrest. Some of the differences we found might therefore have been due to the higher incidence of venous sampling in the cardiac arrest group. These difficulties are inherent in research in the emergency setting.

Using the Stewart–Figge methodology, we studied the acid–base status of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and found its pathogenesis to be complex. We found that lactate accounts for only 50% of the metabolic acidosis and consequent acidemia seen in such patients and that an increase in unmeasured anions and phosphate accounts for the rest. We also found that their acidifying effect was partly attenuated by the alkalinizing effect of hypochloremia, hyperkalemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypermagnesemia and hypercalcemia. The clinical and prognostic significance of these changes requires further investigation.