Background
Ovarian cancer has the highest death rate among all gynecological malignancies worldwide [
1]. Primary cytoreductive surgery alone or in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy is now widely advocated as the standard treatment for ovarian cancer patients [
2]. Nevertheless, despite the improvement in surgical procedures and the development of adjuvant therapy such as platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, intraperitoneal hyperthermic therapy and molecular targeted therapies, the long-term survival is still poor [
3,
4]. Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and the prognosis is variable. Some patients may experience better clinical outcomes than others [
5]. Therefore, the identification of factors that could help to predict the prognosis and individualize the treatment according to the stratification of risks may improve the survival of ovarian cancer patients.
In fact, ovarian cancer has been found to be closely related to inflammation [
6,
7]. Firstly, ovulation itself is a natural inflammatory process involving ovarian cortex cyclical rupture and healing, which is regarded as an underlying factor of ovarian cancer [
8,
9]. Secondly, patients who suffer endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease have an increase in the subsequent risk of ovarian cancer [
10,
11]. In contrast, oral contraceptives inhibiting ovulation reduce the risk of ovarian cancer [
11]. Additionally, tubal ligation or hysterectomy has been proven to offer protection against ovarian cancer by preventing the retrograde spread of proinflammatory factors from the lower genital tract to the ovaries [
10‐
12]. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory therapy can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer and extend the survival of ovarian cancer patients [
13,
14]. Given the close relationship between inflammation and ovarian cancer, several inflammation-based prognostic indices have been constructed to predict the clinical outcome. To date, the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) [
15], neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [
16] and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) [
17] were reported to display prognostic value in ovarian cancer patients.
The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CRP/Alb), consisting of CRP and albumin, was initially used to assess the outcome of patients with acute medical admissions and sepsis [
18,
19]. Recently, the prognostic ability of CRP/Alb has been reported in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [
20], gastric cancer [
21] and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [
22,
23]. Elevated preoperative CRP/Alb has been associated with the poor survival of patients with the aforementioned cancers. However, up to now, no study has been conducted to clarify the clinical significance and prognostic value of this marker in ovarian cancer.
Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the impact of preoperative CRP/Alb on the overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer and compared the predictive value of CRP/Alb, GPS, mGPS, NLR, PLR, prognostic index (PI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that increased CRP/Alb predicted the poor prognosis of OS in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, compared to the established inflammation-based prognostic indices GPS, mGPS and PNI, CRP/Alb displayed superior prognostic ability. These results are consistent with previous studies identifying CRP/Alb as predictors of outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma [
20], gastric cancer [
21] and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [
22,
23].
C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important acute phase response protein produced mainly by hepatocytes, whose levels rise in response to inflammation [
25]. Mc Sorley et al. reported that high circulating CRP levels may subsequently promote ovarian cancer [
26]. This conclusion was supported by a meta-analysis [
27]. Hefler et al. found that elevated CRP is associated with chemical resistance and poor survival in patients with ovarian cancer [
28]. The underlying mechanism is that CRP can accelerate angiogenesis based on increased circulating levels of vascular growth factors and circulating interleukin in cancer patients [
29,
30].
Albumin is also produced by the liver, which helps to maintain intravascular oncotic pressure, facilitate the transport of substances and scavenge free radicals. It is now considered an indicator of malnutrition. Hypoalbuminemia is related to a sustained systemic inflammatory response, either from the tumor itself or as a host response [
31]. Several studies have suggested that the progression of hypoalbuminemia is secondary to the serum elevation of CRP, as many cancer patients with hypoalbuminemia already have increased serum CRP levels [
32,
33]. Malnutrition, in turn, is related to poor prognosis in patients with cancer [
34]. Several previous studies reported that pre-operative low serum albumin levels are an independent predictor of poor survival in ovarian cancer [
35,
36]. Improvement in nutritional status is associated with better survival in ovarian cancer [
14] and other tumors [
37]. One of the reasons is that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response and the concomitant nutritional decline reduces patient tolerance to treatment toxicities and patient compliance with active treatment [
38].
CRP/Alb, which is obtained from the combination of CRP and albumin, may reflect both the inflammatory and nutritional state in cancer patients. Therefore, the presence of a chronic systemic inflammatory response and progressive nutritional decline is reflected by the elevated CRP/Alb, ultimately resulting in reduced survival.
Previous studies have established some possible prognostic factors in ovarian cancer. In particular, the adverse effect of postoperative residual tumor mass, tumor grade, peritoneal dissemination, and histological subtype on patients’ OS has been found in previously published studies [
39]. By univariate analysis, we have shown that tumor stage, postoperative residual tumor, histological subtype, ascites, CRP, hypoalbuminemia and age, as well as CRP/Alb, GPS, mGPS, PLR, PNI and PI, are predictors of OS in ovarian cancer. However, by using a Cox regression model of multivariate analysis, we found that only CRP/Alb remained as an independent prognostic marker for poor survival in patients with ovarian cancer along with residual disease, tumor stage and age, suggesting that CRP/Alb has a substantial impact on patient outcome. Surprisingly, albumin is no longer an independent predictor of OS, and age is a marginally significant predictor of OS (
p = 0.046), conflicting with a recent study [
36]. The reason for this difference is that our study included CRP/Alb. In fact, when CRP/Alb was excluded, albumin became an independent risk factor for OS (data not shown), indicating that CRP/Alb is a more powerful predictor than preoperative albumin. We noted that CRP/Alb correlated significantly with advanced tumor stage, residual tumor, increased CA-125 levels and the presence of ascites, suggesting that increased CRP/Alb may correlate with a more aggressive disease phenotype.
On established prognostic factors, postoperative residual tumor mass and ovarian tumor stage have been shown to be the most reliable predictors of outcome in ovarian cancer [
40]. Similar to other studies, while CRP/Alb was a significant predictor of OS in patients with ovarian cancer, residual tumor mass and tumor stage remained significantly more powerful predictors of survival, as the Hazard Ratio for residual tumor and tumor stage were 2.337 and 1.577, respectively, compared with the HR of 1.330 for CRP/Alb by multivariate analysis. Further, we analyzed the prognostic value of CRP/Alb combined with tumor stage and residual tumor mass. The combined effect was greater than the individual effect of either variable alone, indicating that CRP/Alb may be the complementary factor for tumor stage and residual tumor mass in predicting the survival in patients with ovarian cancer.
The prognostic significance of preoperative CA-125 levels in ovarian cancer remains controversial at present. A few publications have described an association between CA-125 levels before surgery and survival. Paramasivam et al. reported patients with early-stage ovarian cancer and a preoperative serum CA-125 more than 30 U/mL were significantly associated with impaired survival [
41]. Similar results were found by Kumar et al. [
42]. However, some studies failed to show a correlation between preoperative CA-125 and prognosis. Mury et al. concluded that the specificity of CA-125 to predict surgical outcome is low, and the prognostic value is questionable [
43]. Chi et al. reported that preoperative CA-125 did not predict the primary cytoreductive outcome of patients with advanced ovarian cancer [
44]. In the present study, we also could not define a reasonable cutoff value of CA-125 to predict survival outcome due to its low specificity. In addition, although CA-125 was correlated to overall survival in univariate analysis, it was no longer an independent predictor in multivariable analysis. Therefore, we inferred that the main value of CA-125 may be useful in monitoring disease recurrence instead of prognosis.
In addition, it is important to examine whether a new prognostic system is at least equivalent or superior to other current validated prognostic scoring systems. We, therefore, compared the prognostic ability of CRP/Alb with other established inflammation-based prognostic scores, such as GPS, mGPS NLR, PI, PLR and PNI. In the context of ovarian cancer, AUC analysis has shown that CRP/Alb was superior to other inflammation-based prognostic scores in terms of predictive accuracy, which is consistent with several previous studies in hepatocellular carcinoma [
20], gastric cancer [
21] and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [
22,
23].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate whether CRP/Alb is useful for predicting postoperative outcome in ovarian cancer patients, and we analyzed all seven of these parameters for the first time. Our results suggest that preoperative serum CRP/Alb might serve as a potentially clinically valuable marker in patients with ovarian cancer. Firstly, CRP/Alb has the advantage of being simple to measure, routinely available and well standardized. Secondly, increased CRP/Alb might correlate with a more aggressive disease phenotype, possibly using it to screen a subset of patients with bad prognosis requiring intense therapy. Thirdly, CRP/Alb displays superior prognostic ability compared to other inflammation-based scoring systems. Finally, CRP/Alb may be a complementary factor for tumor stage and residual tumor mass in predicting the survival in patients with ovarian cancer.
Although the present study shows the strong independent prognostic value of the CRP/Alb in ovarian cancer patients, the retrospective nature and the relatively small sample size from a single center should be acknowledged as potential limitations. However, the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and the level of statistical significance achieved for the prognostic traits tested in our series leave little doubt about the reliability and reproducibility of our findings.