Background
Obesity in a major public health concern of the twenty first century because of its alarming upward trend in both developed and developing countries [
1,
2]. Obesity is already among the top 10 risks to human health worldwide [
3]. According to the WHO report, one in three of the world's adult population is overweight and almost one in 10 is obese. Additionally there are over 20 million children under age five who are overweight [
4]. Epidemiological survey used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of general obesity, and waist circumference (WC) and waist hip ratio (WHR) as measures of central/abdominal obesity. Both general and central obesity have been associated with a number of cardiometabolic abnormalities including prediabetes, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension (HTN), metabolic syndrome (MS) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [
5,
6]. Studies in Bangladeshi population have also found similar association at lower BMI, WC and WHR levels [
7‐
9]. The consequence of obesity is not only limited to health consequences but also has an immense effect on individual and national healthcare budget.
Population-based data on the prevalence of obesity and associated factors in Bangladeshi adults have been limited until recently. In 2010, WHO estimated the prevalence of over-weight/obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m
2) aged over 15 was 8.4 % in Bangladesh [
10]. In another study assessed the prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age in South Asia between 1996-2006 also reported increase trends of prevalence. Overweight/obesity prevalence increased from 2.7 % to 8.9 % among Bangladeshi women in 10 years [
11]. A recent urban study in Bangladesh has also found increased prevalence of overweight and obesity and it was much higher among those with higher socioeconomic status [
12].
Bangladesh is an agro-based rural country where a vast majority (72 %) of the national population lives in rural areas [
13], it is important to collect data on the prevalence of obesity and its associated factors. The purposes of the present study are to assess the prevalence of both general and central obesity and their associated factors in a rural Bangladeshi population.
We used the Asian-specific definition to define the prevalence of general and central obesity as it recently suggested by the International Association for the Study of Obesity and the International Obesity Task Force and International Diabetes Federation because of the observed differences in South Asian population [
14‐
16].
Results
Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the study populations was illustrated in Table
1. Among the total number of participants, 36.7 % (
n = 842) were male and 63.3 % (
n = 1451) were female participants. Females were younger as opposed to male subjects. Among the participants, 23.9, 30.6, 24.5 and 21 % were aged between 20 to 30 years, 31 to 40 years, 41 to 50 years and ≥51 years respectively. A major portion of the participants were Illiterate (45.2 %), and housewives (58.7 %), and 42.2 % and 41.6 % were from middle and low income groups respectively. 15.9 % and 15.1 % participants were cigarette smokers and physically inactive respectively. Mean calorie consumption was 1600 Kcal/day. 90.6, 32.9 and 8.5 % participants consumed recommended level of carbohydrate (>55 %), protein (≥15 %) and fat (>30 %) respectively.
Table 1
Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the study subjects (n = 2293)
Age | Total Participants | 2293 | 41.8 (41.2, 42.4) |
Male | 842 | 44.3 (43.3, 45.2) |
Female | 1451 | 40.4 (39.7, 41.1) |
Age group (year), % | 20-30 | 548 | 23.9 |
31-40 | 702 | 30.6 |
41-50 | 562 | 24.5 |
≥51 | 481 | 21.0 |
Education, % | Illiterate | 1037 | 45.2 |
Primary (0-5 class) | 419 | 18.3 |
Secondary (6-10 class) | 627 | 27.3 |
College (>10 class) & above | 210 | 9.2 |
Occupation, % | Farmer | 443 | 19.3 |
Business | 199 | 8.7 |
Skill labour | 112 | 4.8 |
Manual labour | 194 | 8.5 |
Housewives | 1345 | 58.7 |
Socioeconomic status, % | Low income (<6000 BDT) | 953 | 41.6 |
Middle income (6000-11000 BDT) | 967 | 42.2 |
High income (>11000 BDT) | 373 | 16.3 |
Smoking habit, % | Cigarette smoking | 365 | 15.9 |
Physical activity, % | Active | 1946 | 84.9 |
Inactive | 347 | 15.1 |
Calorie consumption | Total calorie intake (kcal/day) | 2293 | 1600 (1587-1613) |
Carbohydrate (>55 %) | 2077 | 90.6 |
Protein (≥15 %) | 754 | 32.9 |
Fat (>30 %) | 196 | 8.5 |
Age specific and age standardized prevalence of BMI levels were shown in Table
2. The age standardized prevalence of underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese were 14.3 %, 41.9 %, 17.7 %, and 26.2 %, respectively. No significant sex difference was observed for the prevalence of BMI levels. With increasing age in female, underweight group showed a significant increasing trend of low BMI.
Table 2
Age specific and age standardized prevalence of different Body Mass Index (BMI) levels (n =2293)
Underweight (BMI <18.5 Kg/m2) |
Total (n = 328) | 11.7 | 10.3 | 16.2 | 21.0 | 14.3 (12.9, 15.7) |
Male | 14.6 | 9.1 | 14.3 | 18.6 | 13.6 (11.3, 16.0) |
Female | 10.4 | 10.9 | 17.5 | 23.1a | 14.9 (12.1, 16.8) |
Normal weight (BMI 18.5- < 23 Kg/m2) |
Total (n = 960) | 46.2 | 39.2 | 41.1 | 41.8 | 41.9 (39.9, 43.9) |
Male | 44.2 | 41.4 | 41.1 | 42.9 | 42.3 (38.9, 45.7) |
Female | 47.0 | 38.9 | 41.1 | 40.8 | 41.5 (38.9, 44.1) |
Overweight (BMI 23- < 25 Kg/m2) |
Total (n = 405) | 18.6 | 17.1 | 17.6 | 17.5 | 17.7 (16.1, 19.2) |
Male | 18.8 | 19.8 | 17.9 | 19.9 | 19.1 (16.5, 21.8) |
Female | 18.5 | 15.7 | 17.5 | 15.4 | 16.8 (14.9, 18.7) |
Obese (BMI ≥25 Kg/m2) |
Total (n = 600) | 23.7 | 33.5 | 25.1 | 19.8 | 26.2 (24.4, 27.9) |
Male | 22.4 | 29.7 | 26.8 | 18.6 | 25.1 (22.1, 28.0) |
Female | 24.0 | 35.3 | 23.9 | 20.8 | 26.8 (24.5, 29.0) |
Age specific and age adjusted mean of body mass index (BMI) by different levels were shown in Table
3. The age adjusted mean of underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese and overall were 17.1, 20.8, 23.9, 27.7 and 22.4 kg/m
2 respectively. Significant difference between the two sexes was noticed in the age adjusted mean of obese group (27.3 kg/m
2 in male and 27.9 kg/m
2 in female;
P < 0.05).
Table 3
Age specific and Age adjusted mean of Body Mass Index (BMI) by different levels (n = 2293)
Underweight (N =328) |
Total | 17.1 (16.8, 17.3) | 17.5 (17.3, 17.7) | 17.1 (16.9, 17.4) | 16.7 (16.5, 16.9) | 17.1 (16.9, 17.2) |
Male | 17.0 (16.5, 17.5) | 17.6 (17.2, 18.1) | 17.2 (16.7, 17.7) | 16.8 (16.4, 17.2) | 17.1 (16.9, 17.3) |
Female | 17.1 (16.8, 17.4) | 17.5 (17.2, 17.7) | 17.1 (16.8, 17.4) | 16.7 (16.4, 17.2) | 17.1 (16.9, 17.2) |
Normal weight (N = 960) |
Total | 20.8 (20.6, 20.9) | 20.8 (20.6, 20.9) | 20.9 (20.7, 21.0) | 20.8 (20.6, 23.0) | 20.8 (20.7, 20.9) |
Male | 20.7 (20.4, 21.0) | 20.8 (20.6, 21.1) | 20.8 (20.5, 21.1) | 20.8 (20.5, 21.0) | 20.8 (20.7, 20.9) |
Female | 20.8 (20.6, 21.0) | 20.8 (20.6, 20.9) | 20.9 (20.7, 21.1) | 20.8 (20.6, 21.1) | 20.8 (20.7, 20.9) |
Overweight (N = 405) |
Total | 23.9 (23.8, 24.1) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.1) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) |
Male | 23.9 (23.7, 24.1) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.2) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) | 23.9 (23.7, 24.0) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) |
Female | 24.0 (23.8, 24.1) | 24.0 (23.8, 24.1) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.1) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) | 23.9 (23.8, 24.0) |
Obese (N = 600) |
Total | 27.6 (27.2, 28.0) | 27.9 (27.6, 28.2) | 27.6 (27.2, 28.0) | 27.3 (26.8, 27.7) | 27.7 (27.5, 27.9) |
Male | 27.3 (26.6, 27.9) | 27.3 (26.9, 27.7) | 27.4 (26.7, 28.1) | 27.1 (26.3, 27.8) | 27.3 (27.0, 27.6) |
Female | 27.3 (27.0, 28.3) | 28.2 (27.8, 28.6) | 27.7 (27.2, 28.2) | 27.4 (26.9, 28.0) | 27.9 (27.7, 28.1)b |
Overall (N = 2293) |
Total | 22.6 (22.2, 22.9) | 23.4 (23.1, 23.7) | 22.5 (22.2, 22.8) | 21.8 (21.4, 22.1) | 22.4 (22.3, 22.5) |
Male | 22.3 (21.7, 22.8) | 23.1 (22.6, 23.5) | 22.6 (22.1, 23.1) | 21.8 (21.3, 22.3) | 22.3 (22.2, 22.4) |
Female | 22.7 (22.3, 23.1) | 23.5 (23.2, 23.9) | 22.4 (21.9, 22.8) | 21.7 (21.2, 22.2) | 22.4 (22.3, 22.5) |
Age specific and age standardized prevalence of central obesity based on Waist circumference (WC) and Waist hip ratio (WHR) were shown in Table
4. The age standardized prevalence of central obesity following WC and WHR were 39.8 % and 71.6 % respectively. Central obesity by WC and WHR were more in female than male. Age specific prevalence of central obesity, for both WC and WHR showed significant sex differences. The prevalence of central obesity by WHR demonstrated that a significant increasing trend of central obesity among female subjects with increasing age.
Table 4
Age specific and age standardized prevalence of central obesity based on Waist circumference (WC) and Waist hip ratio (WHR)
Central Obesity by WC (cm) |
Total (M ≥90 & F ≥80) | 34.9 | 46.3 | 41.6 | 33.9 | 39.8 (37.9, 41.7) |
Male (≥90 cm) | 16.4 | 28.9 | 29.9 | 19.9 | 24.3 (21.4, 27.1) |
Female (≥80 cm) | 42.8 | 54.9 | 49.4 | 45.8 | 48.7 (46.2, 51.3)b |
Central Obesity by WHR |
Total (M ≥0.90 & F ≥0.80) | 66.6 | 73.1 | 73.8 | 72.6a | 71.6 (69.8, 73.4) |
Male (≥0.90) | 43.6 | 64.7 | 63.4 | 60.6a | 58.4 (55.2, 61.8) |
Female (≥0.80) | 76.5 | 77.2 | 80.8 | 82.7a | 79.1 (76.9, 81.1)b |
Age specific and age adjusted mean of waist circumference (WC) and waist hip ratio (WHR), by sex was shown in Table
5. The age adjusted mean of central obesity following WC and WHR were 80.5 cm and 0.88 respectively. Significant difference by gender was noted in the age adjusted mean of central obesity by WC (81.8 cm in male and 79.7 cm in female;
P < 0.05) and WHR (0.91 in male and 0.86 in female;
P < 0.05). This was also observed in age specific mean of central obesity, both WC and WHR groups including the mean of central obesity following WC and WHR among age groups.
Table 5
Age specific and age adjusted mean of Waist circumference (WC) and Waist hip ratio (WHR), by sex
Central Obesity by WC (cm) |
Total (M ≥90 & F ≥80) | 79.2 (78.4, 80.1) | 81.8 (81.6, 82.6) | 81.0 (80.1, 81.8) | 79.5 (78.4, 80.4)a | 80.5 (80.1, 80.9) |
Male (≥90 cm) | 80.0 (78.4, 81.5) | 83.1 (81.9, 84.3) | 82.8 (81.4, 84.1) | 80.8 (79.4, 82.2) | 81.8 (81.1, 82.5) |
Female (≥80 cm) | 78.9 (77.9, 79.9) | 81.2 (80.2, 82.2) | 79.8 (78.7, 80.9) | 78.2 (76.8, 79.7)a | 79.7 (79.2, 80.3)b |
Central Obesity by WHR |
Total (M ≥0.90 & F ≥0.80) | 0.86 (0.85, 0.87) | 0.88 (0.86, 0.89) | 0.89 (0.88, 0.90) | 0.89 (0.88, 0.90)a | 0.88 (0.87, 0.89) |
Male (≥0.90) | 0.89 (0.87, 0.90) | 0.91 (0.90, 0.92) | 0.92 (0.91, 0.93) | 0.91 (0.90, 0.92) | 0.91 (0.90, 0.93) |
Female (≥0.80) | 0.85 (0.84, 0.86) | 0.86 (0.85, 0.87) | 0.87 (0.86, 0.88) | 0.87 (0.86, 0.88)a | 0.86 (0.85, 0.87)b |
Table
6 showed middle age, medium and high SES, irrespective of education levels, physical inactivity, high consumption of carbohydrate, protein and fat, were some significant risk indicator for general and central obesity in both unadjusted and adjusted models. In addition, females had significant higher risk for central obesity. Smoking was found to have a protective effect for both general and central obesity.
Table 6
Association between general (BMI ≥25 Kg/m2) and central obesity (WC: M ≥90 & F ≥80) and socio-demographic and dietary factors in the surveyed population aged ≥20 years
Age (years) |
20-30 | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
31-40 | 1.62 (1.26, 2.08) | 1.63 (1.25, 2.13) | <0.001 | 1.61 (1.28, 2.02) | 1.69 (1.32, 2.16) | <0.001 |
41-50 | 1.08 (0.82, 1.42) | 1.22 (0.84, 1.49) | 0.431 | 1.33 (1.05, 1.70) | 1.56 (1.20, 2.03) | 0.001 |
≥51 | 0.79 (0.59, 1.07) | 0.75 (0.54, 1.03) | 0.075 | 0.96, (0.74, 1.24) | 1.05 (0.79, 1.38) | 0.741 |
Sex |
Male | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
Female | 1.13 (0.93, 1.38) | 1.05 (0.81, 1.35) | 0.739 | 2.96 (2.45, 3.57) | 3.70 (2.86, 4.79) | <0.001 |
Education |
Higher | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
Secondary | 2.85 (1.85, 4.39) | 2.34 (1.49, 3.67) | <0.001 | 3.32 (2.32, 4.74) | 2.13 (1.47, 3.91) | <0.001 |
Primary | 2.81 (1.78, 4.47) | 2.84 (1.79, 4.51) | <0.001 | 2.65 (1.79, 3.90) | 2.65 (1.79, 3.91) | <0.001 |
Illiterate | 2.33 (1.49, 3.65) | 2.87 (1.86, 4.42) | <0.001 | 2.12 (1.47, 3.09) | 3.32 (2.33, 4.74) | <0.001 |
SES |
Low | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
Medium | 1.68 (1.35, 2.08) | 1.69 (1.35, 2.12) | <0.001 | 1.41 (1.17, 169) | 1.59 (1.30, 1.94) | <0.001 |
High | 3.62 (2.78, 4.70) | 3.42 (2.60, 4.50) | <0.001 | 2.52 (1.98, 3.22) | 2.91 (2.24, 3.81) | <0.001 |
Smoking |
No | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
Yes | 0.51 (0.38, 0.68) | 0.48 (0.34, 0.68) | <0.001 | 0.75 (0.57, 0.96) | 0.70 (0.51, 0.97) | 0.031 |
Physical activity |
active | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
inactive | 1.42 (1.10, 1.82) | 1.58 (1.17, 2.14) | 0.003 | 1.80 (1.42, 2.48) | 1.78 (1.32, 2.39) | <0.001 |
CHO intake (%) |
≤55 % | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
>55 % | 2.72 (1.99, 3.93) | 2.78 (2.00, 4.00) | <0.001 | 2.97 (2.76, 3.72) | 2.87 (2.04, 4.05) | <0.001 |
Protein intake (%) |
<15 % | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
≥15 % | 1.45 (1.11, 1.76) | 1.25 (1.01, 1.55) | 0.039 | 1.52 (1.25, 1.63) | 1.26 (1.02, 1.56) | 0.036 |
Fat intake (%) |
<30 % | Ref | Ref | | Ref | Ref | |
≥30 % | 2.20 (1.35, 2.79) | 1.78 (1.19, 2.65) | 0.005 | 2.18 (1.85, 2.67) | 1.78 (1.19, 2.67) | 0.005 |
Discussion
This current study was undertaken to explore the prevalence of overweight, obesity and central obesity (abdominal obesity) and their associated socio-demographic and lifestyle determinants in a rural Bangladeshi population aged ≥ 20 years and older.
For this current study, we have used newly proposed cut-off levels for Asian population for defining general and central obesity. Evidence shows that Asian Indians including Indian [
21], Pakistani [
22], Sri Lankan [
23] and Bangladeshi [
7‐
9] generally have a lower BMI than many other ethnic population, but the association between BMI and cardiometabolic risk factors is as strong as in any other population. The risk of diabetes and other cardiometabolic factors were significant for Bangladeshi populations with a BMI of >21 kg/m
2 [
7‐
9] and this has been confirmed by studies in other Asian populations [
21‐
23]. WHO also recommend, a BMI of 18.5–22 kg/m
2 is considered healthy for Asian populations [
24]. Similarly, lower central obesity cut- off levels have also been recommended for the South Asians [
16,
21].
The age standardized prevalence of overweight (BMI 23-24.9 kg/m
2) and obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m
2) in current study were 17.7 and 26.2 % respectively. The prevalence of obesity documented in this study was comparatively higher than previous studies in Bangladesh conducted in different time points using different anthropometric cut-off levels [
11,
25]. The rate was also found higher than rural areas of China, Greece and north India [
26‐
28]; however, they used WHO cut-off levels for western population. In this study, age standardized prevalence of central obesity based on WC (M ≥90 & F ≥80 cm) and WHR (M ≥0.90 & F ≥0.80) were 39.8 % and 71.6 % respectively. The rate of central obesity was higher than general obesity in our study which indicate a significant portion of the population may not classified as obese on BMI levels. Hence, it has been suggested that a single BMI cut-off level for both male and female might not be adequate to define general obesity. Gender, age and ethnic specific BMI levels for defining general obesity might be preferable.
Study demonstrated that high prevalence of obesity was positively associated with female sex, middle age, higher educational and economic status, physical inactivity and some dietary habits in South Asian region [
29]. For instance, similar findings were observe in our study except education level. In our study, the prevalence of obesity is slightly higher in female than male, while overweight is more prevalent in male. Our results are in agreements with the study conducted in Pakistan [
30], South India [
31] and Ghana [
32] where prevalence of obesity was found to be higher among female than male. However, in Japan, male were more obese than female [
33]. In the present analysis, rate of central obesity was also higher in female participants which is consistence with the study conducted in south India [
31]. Increased parity, menopause, high rate of oral contraceptive pill intake and low level of cigarette smoking could be the possible contributors of high level of central obesity in females. Study findings indicate that our study population are at risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Findings emphasis the need for effective intervention with community based approaches to prevent and treat obesity.
We have observed that the highest prevalence of obesity in South Asians is observed in the middle aged (30-50 years) group, whereas in the western countries prevalence tends to increase progressively with age [
34]. The highest prevalence was reached in the middle-aged (30-40 years) group in our study. In this study, we have found that people with lower levels of education and higher socioeconomic status had the higher rate of obesity. Similar finding was supported by other studies conducted in Australia, Greece, and Canada [
35,
36,
28], although the cause in our study is not clear. Further long term well design study are needed to know the exact cause of this contrasting finding between education and SES. Possible hypothesis could be, majority of participants are farmers, businessmen, manual labors and housewives, and for these formal education are not mandatory. Due to continued economic growth and huge development in agricultural sectors in last few years now they have a good income. They can afford foods but due to lack of proper education they are not aware of healthy diet. They mainly eat rice, hydrogenated oil and sugar. All of these are known to increase the risk of weight gain. Evidence shows the global epidemic of obesity has resulted mainly from societal factors that promote increased availability of high-fat energy-dense foods, excess carbohydrate based diet, and physical inactivity. Physical inactivity, high intake of carbohydrate, protein and fat, were significant risk indicators for general and central obesity in our study.
Smoking was protective factor for general and central obesity in our study which is consistence with the studies were conducted in Australia, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland [
35,
37‐
39]. Possible biological mechanism may explain the inverse association between smoking and obesity. Study has shown that smoking increase resting metabolic rate and thermogenesis, but also reduce energy intake and since it provides the smoker with a diminished sense of taste and smell, which makes food less attractive and therefore less is consumed which ultimately cause less weight gain [
29].
The strength of the study that it was a large scale population based study where response rate was 79.0 %. Bias was taken care of by random sampling. Anthropometric measurements were done by the highly trained interviewers. The present study had several limitations. The major limitation was the cross-sectional design, which cannot establish causal relations. Therefore, we cannot say the identified risk factors are causally associated with both general and central obesity. Subject exclusion based on self-reported personal medical history was another limitation of the present study. The study was conducted in a rural area of Bangladesh adjacent to capital Dhaka city. Hence, the result may be interpreted with caution.
Conclusion
It is apparent that obesity is increasing even in rural adult population. In rural Bangladeshi population, the rate of general and central obesity was high among both sexes with the use of newly proposed cut off points for Asian population. Central obesity was more in females than males. Gender, diet, physical activity, education level, SES, and smoking were associated with the prevalence of obesity. Along with socio-economic determinants, our rural population are less likely to receive counseling regarding healthy diet and exercise habits may place them in a more vulnerable position with respect to developing obesity over time. Nationally representative and longitudinal follow-up studies including all the possible influences are needed to confirm the risk indicators for obesity found in this study. The study indicates that intervention program is needed to identify practical, effective and acceptable methods for prevention of obesity. Finally, Government policy makers and other health related stakeholders should consider obesity as a growing public issue and therefore, an urgent need for national program to reduce obesity and associated comorbidity and mortality.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
TS, BB were involved in designed the protocol, carried out the field work, performed the data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. NCD participated in drafting the manuscript. HM, AK and AH participated in the design of the study and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.