In Ethiopia, despite considerable improvement of measles vaccination, measles outbreaks is occurring in most parts of the country. Understanding the neighborhood variation in childhood measles vaccination is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. However, the spatial pattern of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) and its predictors are poorly understood. Hence, this study aimed to explore the spatial pattern and associated factors of childhood MCV1 coverage.
Methods
An in-depth analysis of the 2016 Ethiopia demographic and health survey data was conducted, and a total of 3722 children nested in 611 enumeration areas were included in the analysis. Global Moran’s I statistic and Poisson-based purely spatial scan statistics were employed to explore spatial patterns and detect spatial clusters of childhood MCV1, respectively. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with childhood MCV1.
Results
Spatial hetrogeniety of childhood MCV1 was observed (Global Moran’s I = 0.13, p-value < 0.0001), and seven significant SaTScan clusters of areas with low MCV1 coverage were detected. The most likely primary SaTScan cluster was detected in the Afar Region, secondary cluster in Somali Region, and tertiary cluster in Gambella Region. In the final model of the multilevel analysis, individual and community level factors accounted for 82% of the variance in the odds of MCV1 vaccination. Child age (AOR = 1.53; 95%CI: 1.25–1.88), pentavalent vaccination first dose (AOR = 9.09; 95%CI: 6.86–12.03) and third dose (AOR = 7.12; 95%CI: 5.51–9.18, secondary and above maternal education (AOR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.03–2.55) and media exposure were the factors that increased the odds of MCV1 vaccination at the individual level. Children with older maternal age had lower odds of receiving MCV1. Living in Afar, Oromia, Somali, Gambella and Harari regions were factors associated with lower odds of MCV1 from the community-level factors. Children far from health facilities had higher odds of receiving MCV1 (AOR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.12–1.61).
Conclusion
A clustered pattern of areas with low childhood MCV1 coverage was observed in Ethiopia. Both individual and community level factors were significant predictors of childhood MCV1. Hence, it is good to give priority for the areas with low childhood MCV1 coverage, and to consider the identified factors for vaccination interventions.
Hinweise
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
AIC
Akaike’s information criterion
AOR
Adjusted odds ratio
CI
Confidence intervals
COR
Crude odd ratio
DIC
Deviance information criterion
DPT-HepB-Hib
A combination vaccine containing diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus toxoid, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenza type b
EAs
Enumeration areas
EDHS
Ethiopian demographic and health survey
GIS
Geographic information system
ICC
Intra-cluster correlation
IR
Incidence rate
LLR
Log likelihood ratio
MCV1
First dose of measles-containing vaccine
MOR
Median odds ratio
PCV
Proportional change in variance
SD
Standard deviation
SNNPR
Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People Region
WHO
World health organization
Background
Measles is a very contagious respiratory disease caused by measles virus and spreads through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs or sneezes [1]. It is a vaccine preventable disease that can cause serious illness, lifelong complications and death. In 2014, it was estimated that 114,900 deaths due to measles had occurred globally, of which 73,914 deaths (93%) were occurred in Africa [2, 3]. Before starting measles vaccination program, nearly 90% of children aged under-15 years were infected with measles [4, 5]. In the era of expanded immunization program, the global measles deaths declined by three-fourth from 2000 to 2014 [2, 6, 7], but measles is still considered as a public health emergency that requires immediate notification and rapid public health response [5]. World Health Organization (WHO) has targeted a global elimination of measles to reduce annual incidence rates (IRs) to less than five cases per million population, which requires more than 90% coverage of at least one dose of Measles-Containing Vaccine (MCV1) by the end of 2015 and more than 95% coverage by 2020 in all countries [5]. In 2015, MCV1 coverage had reached 85% globally, and the measles deaths declined by 79% as compared to 2000 [4]. However, the 2015 measles vaccination goal was not met and measles IR remained relatively unchanged between 2013 and 2014 [2].
Ethiopia accounted for 3.4% of the estimated 20.8 million infants globally who did not receive MCV1 through routine immunization services in 2015 [8], and 9% of the global measles mortality is attributed to Ethiopia [6, 9]. In Ethiopia, childhood immunization coverage is improved through the combine effect of Reaching Every District (RED) approach, health extension program and implementation of Enhanced Routine Immunization Activities (ERIAs) [7, 10‐12]. It is expected that measles immunization coverage should have an inverse relation with the of the incidence rate of measles [13]. However, despite a considerable improvement of childhood MCV1 in Ethiopia, measles outbreaks are occurring continuously in most parts of the country. As the MCV1 coverage increased from 59% in 2005 to 84% in 2014 [4, 7, 9, 11, 14], the incidence rate of confirmed measles cases per 100,000 population increased from 0.6 in 2005 to 11.2 in 2014 [11]. This continuous occurrence of measles outbreak irrespective of measles vaccination could be attributed to spatial heterogeneity of measles vaccination [5, 11].
Anzeige
Spatial heterogeneity of measles vaccination coverage can delay measles elimination even in countries with high average nationwide vaccination coverages [15, 16].
Understanding the neighborhood variation in measles vaccination is crucial for evidence-based decision-making in meales perevention and control program and detecting spatial heterogeneity is useful to identify gaps in the performance of measles immunization programme that could not be identified through the routine monitoring of vaccination coverage [5]. However, studies are limited on the spatial pattern of childhood MCV1 and its associated factors in Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed to explore the spatial pattern of MCV1 and associated factors among children.
Methods
Study settings
The Ethiopia demographic and health survey (EDHS) is a national and subnational representative household survey, which is conducted every 5 year. Ethiopia is second most populous country in Africa, located in the horn of Africa. Administratively, Ethiopia is sub-divided into 11 geographical regions; each region is again sub-divided into zones, and zones into districts. The districts in-further are sub-divided into kebeles (the smallest administrative units). During the 2007 Ethiopian population and housing census, each kebele was sub-divided into enumeration areas (EAs), which were used as a sampling frame for the 2016 EDHS.
The health system of Ethiopia, which focuses on a preventive health care, is organized into three-health tire system: Primary health care unit (PHCU), general hospital and specialized hospital. Routine child immunization is primarily provided at PHCUs through static and outreach sites [17], and the availability of routine childhood vaccination services including measles vaccine in Ethiopia is 80% [18].
Anzeige
Study population and eligibility
Children aged 12–35 months living in the selected EAs were the study population. All children aged 12–35 months were included and children whose geographical locations were not available at the global positioning system (GPS) were excluded from this study. Hence, a total of 23 EAs, which consisted 133 children, were excluded from the analysis.
Sampling technique and sample size
The 2016 EDHS used a stratified, two-stage cluster sampling design using the enumeration areas (EAs) of the 2007 Ethiopian population and housing census (PHC) as the primary sampling unit (PSU) and households as the secondary sampling unit (SSU). In the first stage, 645 EAs (202 in urban areas and 443 in rural areas) were selected with probability proportional to EAs size (PPS) from the complete list of 84,915 EAs created for the 2007 PHC sampling frame. In the second stage of selection, a fixed number of 28 households per cluster were selected with an equal probability systematic selection from the newly created household listing. Finally, 16,650 households were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 98%. A total of 3722 children aged 12–35 months nested in 611 EAs were included in this analysis. The detailed methodology has been published in the 2016 EDHS final report [19].
Data source and extraction
The 2016 Ethiopia demographic and health survey datasets, which are publicly available to all registered users, were requested and downloaded from Measure DHS program website (https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin). Childhood MCV1 status and its potential predictor variables at individual and community level were extracted accordingly.
Study variables
Dependent variables
MCV1 vaccination status of the last child aged 12–35 months was the outcome variable of this study. If the child had received MCV1, it was classified as “Yes”, otherwise “No”, and the data was collected from written vaccination records (including the infant immunization card and other health cards), and mothers’ verbal reports.
Independent variables
Both individual and community level characteristics were considered as potential the potential predictor variables for MCV1. Table 1 depicted the potential predictor variables included in this study along with their categories. Individual-level (level I) variables include socio-demographic and economic characteristics, while community-level (level II) variables include the common characteristics of study subjects in an enumeration area such as region and place of residence.
Table 1
Independent variables and categorization
Variables
Categories
1. Individual level factors (level I)
Child characteristics
Age of child (months)
(1) 12–23; (2) 24–35
Sex of the child
(1) Male; (2) Female
Birth order
(1) 1; (2) 2–3; (3) 4–5; (4) 6+
Acceptance of the child
(1) Wanted then, (2) Wanted later & (3) Wanted no more
DPT1-HepB1-Hib1
(0) Not vaccinated; (1) Vaccinated
DPT3-HepB3-Hib3
0) Not vaccinated; (1) Vaccinated
Maternal/paternal characteristics
Mother’s age (years)
(1)15–19; (2) 20–34; (2) 35–49
Religion
(1)Orthodox; (2)Muslim; (3)Protestant; (4) Others
Mother’s education
(1) No education; (2)Primary; (3) Secondary and higher
Father’s education
1) No education; (2)Primary; (3) Secondary and higher
Clustering: An unusual aggregation of children with the same MCV1 status (vaccinated or unvaccinated) in a specific geographical area [20, 21].
Measles-containing vaccines (MCV): Vaccines containing antigens of measles only (M) or a combination of measles with rubella (MR), mumps (MM, MMR) and varicella (MMRV) vaccines [22].
Children who received MCV1: Children who received a one dose measles-containing vaccine for the first time at any time before the survey (based on the evidence from vaccination cards, health facility records, or the mother’s report) [19].
Exposure to mass media: Women were asked how often they read a newspaper, listened to the radio, or watched television per week. Those who responded at least once a week are considered to be regularly exposed to that form of media [19].
Data management and statistical analysis
We re-categorized children’s age, mother’s age, birth order, mother’s educational status, religion, number of under-five children, and mother’s relation to the head of the household to better suit with other studies for comparison. We used SaTScan 9.6 (https://www.satscan.org/) [23] and ArcGIS version 10.3 (http://www.esri.com/) for spatial analysis, and Stata version 14 (https://www.stata.com/) [24] for non-spatial statistical analysis.
Anzeige
Sample weights were applied to compensate for the unequal probability of selection between the strata that has been geographically defined. The detailed explanation of the weighting procedure can be found in the methodology of the EDHS final report [19].
Spatial Analysis: The aggregated MCV1 count data was joined to the geographic coordinates based on each EA unique identification code. To evaluate whether the pattern expressed is clustered, dispersed, or random across the study areas, global spatial autocorrelation was assessed with ArcGIS using the Global Moran’s I statistic (Moran’s I) [25]. When p-value indicates statistical significance, a positive Moran’s I index value indicates tendency toward clustering while a negative Moran’s I index value indicates tendency toward dispersion [25].
In the presence of positive global spatial autocorrelation, we employed Kulldorff’s method of purely spatial scan statistic using the discrete Poisson probability model in SaTScan to detect the local spatial clusters of areas with high or low childhood MCV1 coverages. “SaTScan™ is a trademark of Martin Kulldorff, and a software which was developed under the joint auspices of (i) Martin Kulldorff, (ii) the National Cancer Institute, and (iii) Farzad Mostashari of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene” [21, 23, 26]. SaTScan uses a circular window that moves systematically throughout the study area to identify statistically significant SaTScan clustering of areas with the same childhood MCV1 coverage. We used a maximum of 10% (to avoid the detection of large clusters) of the population at risk for the spatial cluster size and the analysis was done using standard Monte Carlo hypothesis testing with 999 Monte Carlo replicates. A cluster is statistically significant when its log likelihood ratio (LLR) is greater than the Standard Monte Carlo critical value (C.V) for 0.05 significance level or p-value < 0.05 [21, 23].
Multilevel logistic regression Analysis: The data of this analysis included 3722 children nested within 611 EAs. Hence, considering the hierarchical nature of the data, multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to identify community and individual level factors associated with childhood MCV1. Four models were fitted: the first model without any explanatory variable (empty model) to detect the existence of possible contextual effect (model I), the second model with individual-level variables (model II), the third model with community-level variables (Model III) and the fourth model (Model IV) with both the individual- and community-level variables. Model comparison was done using deviance information criteria (DIC) and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC). Finally, the fourth model (model IV) with the smallest value of the information criterion was selected as the final best fit model.
Anzeige
For measures of association (fixed effect), adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was used to declare statistical significance.
For measures of variation (random effects), Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), median odds ratio (MOR) and proportional change in variance (PCV) statistics were computed. ICC is a measure of within-cluster variation, the variation between individuals within the same cluster, and it was calculated using the formula: \( \mathrm{ICC}=\frac{V_A}{V_A+\frac{\uppi^2}{3}}=\frac{V_A}{V_A+3.29} \), where VA is the estimated variance in each model, which has been described elsewhere [27].
The total variation attributed to individual or/and community level factors at each model was measured by the proportional change in variance (PCV), which was calculated as \( \mathrm{PCV}=\frac{{\mathrm{V}}_A-{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{B}}}{{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{A}}} \), where VA = variance of the initial model, and VB = variance of the model with more terms [27].
The MOR is the median odds ratio between the individual of higher propensity and the individual of lower propensity when comparing two individuals from two different randomly chosen clusters and it measures the unexplained cluster heterogeneity, the variation between clusters by comparing two persons from two randomly chosen different clusters. It was computed using the formula: \( \mathrm{MOR}=\exp \left(\sqrt{2\ \mathrm{x}\ {\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{A}}}\ \mathrm{x}\ 0.6745\right)\approx \exp \left(0.95\sqrt{{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{A}}}\right) \), where VA is the cluster level variance [27, 28]. The MOR measure is always greater than or equal to 1. If the MOR is 1, there is no variation between clusters [29].
Anzeige
Ethical considerations
The data of the 2016 Ethiopia demographic and health survey was used for this study with a permission from the Measure DHS program after being registered and submiting a request with briefly stated objctives of the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Public Health of the University of Gondar and the ICF International Institutional Review Board. The data has been used only for this registered research and it could not be passed on to other researchers. The shape files for Ethiopia’s administrative boundaries were obtained from the openAFRICA website [https://africaopendata.org/dataset/ethiopia-shapefiles] [30]. The detaile of the ethical issues has been published in the 2016 EDHS final report, which can be accessed at: http://www.dhsprogram.com/publications [19].
Results
Characteristics of study participants and childhood MCV1 prevalence
Nearly half of the children (51%) were in the 12–23 months age group with the mean age of 23 months (± 7SD). Nearly 70% of the children had received pentavalent first dose vaccine (DPT1-HepB1-Hib1) and 49% of children had received third dose of pentavalent vaccine (DPT3-HepB3-Hib3). Over 63% of mothers of the children had no education, one-fourth of them were in the poorest wealth quintile, and 81% had no regular media exposure.
The overall prevalence of childhood MCV1 in Ethiopia was 54.3% (95% CI = 52.7–55.9). Relatively the highest MCV1 prevalence (94%) was in Addis Ababa town, and lowest in Afar region (29%). The distance to a health facility was a big problem in the three-fifth (60%) of respondents (Table 2).
Table 2
Percentage of children age 12–35 months who received MCV1 at any time before the survey (weighted) by background characteristics, Ethiopia, 2016
Background Characteristics
Total number of Children
Children who received MCV1
N
%
N
%
Individual level characteristics
Child Age (in Months) (Mean = 22.95 (SD ± 7.04)
12–23
1976
51.0
1069
54.1
24–35
1901
49.0
1036
54.5
Sex of child
Male
1935
49.9
1056
54.6
Female
1941
50.1
1049
54
Birth Order
1
753
19.4
451
59.9
2–3
1161
29.9
674
58.1
4–5
900
23.2
475
52.8
6+
1063
27.4
505
47.5
Wanted child
Wanted then
2832
73.1
1491
52.7
Wanted later
702
18.1
430
61.3
Wanted no more
343
8.8
183
53.5
DPT1-HepB1-Hib1 vaccine
Not vaccinated
1158
29.9
121
10.4
Vaccinated
2718
70.1
1984
73
DPT3-HepB3-Hib3 vaccine
Not vaccinated
1983
51.2
505
25.5
Vaccinated
1893
48.8
1599
84.5
Maternal age (years)
15–19
137
3.5
77
56.2
20–34
2850
73.5
1587
55.7
35–49
889
22.9
441
49.6
Religion
Orthodox
1349
34.8
887
65.8
Muslim
1530
39.5
617
40.4
Protestant
861
22.2
529
61.4
Othersa
136
3.5
71
52.2
Mother’s educational
No education
2474
63.8
1188
48
Primary
1100
28.4
669
60.8
Secondary & Higher
302
7.8
248
82.1
Husband/partner’s education (N = 3655)
No education
1746
47.8
820
47
Primary
1462
40.0
838
57.3
Secondary & Higher
447
12.2
319
71.4
Mother’s occupation
Did not work
2071
53.4
1024
49.4
Non-Professional
1731
44.7
1025
59.2
Professional
74
1.9
56
75.7
Father’s occupation (N = 3655)
Did not work
275
7.5
111
40.2
Nonprofessional
620
17.0
303
48.9
Professional
2760
75.5
1564
56.7
Maternal relation to the household dead
Wife
3091
79.7
1670
54
Head
406
10.5
224
55.2
Daughter
211
5.4
122
57.8
Othersb
169
4.4
89
52.7
Sex of the household head
Male
3314
85.5
1792
54.1
Female
562
14.5
312
55.5
Number of living children
0
1
684
17.6
413
60.4
2–3
1281
33.0
759
59.3
4–5
1022
26.4
529
51.8
6+
890
23.0
404
45.4
Maternal health care decision making (N = 3655)
Jointly with her husband
2439
66.7
1333
54.7
Husband/partner alone
727
19.9
351
48.3
By herself alone
479
13.1
286
59.6
Others
10
0.3
8
80
Wealth index
Poorest
965
24.9
412
42.7
Poorer
860
22.2
445
51.7
Middle
808
20.8
419
51.9
Richer
676
17.4
393
58.1
Richest
567
14.6
436
76.9
Mass Media Exposure
Not regular
3154
81.4
1601
50.8
Regular
722
18.6
504
69.7
Community level characteristics
Region
Addis Ababa
95
2.5
90
93.8
Tigray
279
7.2
227
81.1
Afar
42
1.1
12
28.6
Amhara
718
18.5
434
60.4
Oromia
1712
44.2
722
42.1
Somali
132
3.4
47
35.6
Benishangul Gumuz
43
1.1
32
76.2
SNNPR
818
21.1
517
63.1
Gambella
10
0.2
6
60
Harari
10
0.2
5
50
Dire Dawa
17
0.4
14
82.4
Residence
Urban
433
11.2
337
77.8
Rural
3443
88.8
1768
51.4
Distance to health facility
Big Problem
2332
60.2
1114
47.8
Not a big problem
1545
39.8
991
64.1
Total
3876
100
2105
54.3
aCatholic, traditional and other unclassified
bDaughter-in-low, sister, other relative, no relation
Spatial pattern of childhood MCV1
The global spatial autocorrelation analysis based on feature locations and attribute values revealed a clustering pattern of childhood MCV1 across the study areas (Global Moran’s I = 0.134, p-value < 0.0001) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
The global spatial autocorrelation based on feature locations and attribute values (MCV1) across the study areas in Ethiopia, 2016
×
The SaTScan spatial analysis detected a total of seven statistically significant SaTScan clusters areas with low childhood MCV1 coverage, which means that the prevalence of MCV1 is lower inside the SaTScan circular window compared to outside the SaTScan window. The most likely primary SaTScan cluster of areas with low coverage of MCV1 was detected in Afar region (LLR = 33.79, p < 0.01), specifically in Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 4 administrative zones and the most likely secondary Spatial SaTScan cluster (LLR = 26.76, p < 0.01) in Eastern Ethiopia, specifically in Afder, Shabelle, Korah, Doolo, Nogob, Jarar, Fatan administrative zones of Somali region.
The 3rd and 4th most likely clusters of areas with low rates of MCV1 were detected in Nuer and Agnuak Administrative zones of Gambella region (LLR = 17.73, P < 0.01) and Zone 2 administration of Afar region (LLR = 14.54, P < 0.01), respectively. In addition, the 5th most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 14.49, P < 0.01) was detected in Illuababur and Jimma Administrative zones of Oromia Region, while the 6th most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 14.18, P < 0.01) in Zone 3 and Zone 4 of Afar region, North Shewa of Amhara region, West and East Hararge of Oromia Region and Siti zone of Somali region. The 7th most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 12.27, P < 0.01) was detected in East Hararge Zone of Oromia region, Harari Region and Fagan Zone of Somali region (Table 3 and Fig. 2).
Table 3
The most likely clusters from a purely spatial scan statistic (discrete Poisson model) of children received MCV1 in Ethiopia, 2016
Clusters
Regional location (Zones)
Number of clusters
Radius (km)
LLRa
C.Vb
P-Value
Primary cluster
Afar Region (Zone 1, Zone 2 & Zone 3)
30
265.1
33.79
9.85
0.001
Secondary cluster
Somali Region (Afder, Shabelle, Korah, Doolo, Nogob, Jarar, Fatan)
42
339.6
26.76
9.83
0.001
3rd cluster
Gambella Region (Nuer & Agnuak)
15
91.7
17.73
9.45
0.001
4th cluster
Afar Region (Zone 2)
2
8.9
14.54
9.28
0.001
5th cluster
Oromia Region (Illuababur & Jimma)
8
78.7
14.49
9.45
0.002
6th cluster
Afar Region (Zone 3 and 4), Amhara Region (North Shewa), Oromia Region (West and East Hararge) and Somali Region (Siti)
28
139.1
14.18
9.40
0.001
7th cluster
Oromia Region (East Hararge Zone), Harari and Somali Region (Fatan Zone)
26
39.8
12.27
9.69
0.005
aLog likelihood ratio
bStandard Monte Carlo Critical Value for 0.05 significance level
Fig. 2
The spatial clustering of areas with low childhood MCV1 coverage in Ethiopia, 2016
×
Factors associated with the childhood MCV1
In the multilevel analysis, both individual and community level variables were included (Table 4), and the final best fit model (model IV) revealed that child’s age; first and third dose pentavalent vaccination status; maternal age, maternal education; low household wealth index; region; and distance from health facility were factors significantly associated with childhood first dose measles vaccination.
Table 4
Multilevel logistic regression analysis of individual and community level factors associated with childhood MCV1 in Ethiopia, 2016
Variables
Model II
AOR (95% CI)
Model III
AOR (95% CI)
Model IV
AOR (95% CI)
Individual level factors
Child characteristics
Child’s age (months)
12–23
1.00
–
1.00
24–35
1.53 (1.2–1.88)
–
1.53 (1.25–1.88)
Sex of child
Male
1.00
–
1.00
Female
1.11 (0.92–1.35)
–
1.10 (0.91–1.34)
Birth Order
1
1.00
–
1.00
2–3
1.01 (0.62–1.63)
–
1.00 (0.61–1.63)
4–5
1.03 (0.55–1.93)
–
1.03 (0.55–1.92)
6+
0.86 (0.41–1.81)
–
0.87 (0.42–1.83)
Child Wanted
Wanted then
1.00
–
1.00
Wanted later
0.93 (0.70–1.23)
–
0.94 (0.71–1.25)
Wanted no more
1.52 (0.98–2.37)
–
1.58 (1.00–2.47)
DPT1-HepB1-Hib1 (Pentavalent first dose) vaccine
Not vaccinated
1.00
–
1.00
Vaccinated
9.23 (6.98–12.22)
–
9.09 (6.86–12.03)
DPT3-HepB3-Hib3 (Pentavalent third dose) vaccine
Not vaccinated
1.00
–
1.00
Vaccinated
8.15 (6.33–10.48)
–
7.12 (5.51–9.18)
Maternal Characteristics
Maternal age (in years)
15–19
1.00
–
1.00
20–34
0.46 (0.28–0.78)
–
0.45 (0.27–0.76)
35–49
0.49 (0.27–0.90)
–
0.45 (0.25–0.82)
Religion
Orthodox Christian
1.00
–
1.00
Muslim
0.71 (0.54–0.94)
–
0.95 (0.65–1.38)
Protestant
1.04 (0.74–1.46)
–
1.32 (0.85–2.03)
Othersa
1.05 (0.54–2.03)
–
1.32 (0.66–2.62)
Maternal Education
No education
1.00
–
1.00
Primary
1.00 (0.78–1.29)
–
0.99 (0.77–1.28)
Secondary and higher
1.71 (1.10–2.66)
–
1.62 (1.03–2.55)
Mother’s occupation
Did not work
1.00
–
1.00
Non-professional
1.07 (0.86–1.33)
–
1.04 (0.83–1.29)
Professional
0.97 (0.40–2.35)
–
0.93 (0.38–2.25)
Mather’s relation to the household head
Wife
1.00
–
1.00
Head
0.72 (0.37–1.42)
–
0.70 (0.35–1.38)
Daughter
1.39 (0.83–2.32)
–
1.35 (0.81–2.26)
Othersb
1.08 (0.61–1.91)
–
1.05 (0.58–1.87)
Sex of the household head
Male
1.00
–
1.00
Female
1.54 (0.83–2.87)
–
1.57 (0.84–2.93)
Number of living children
1.00
1
1.00
–
1.00
2–3
1.21 (0.74–1.97)
–
1.21 (0.74–1.98)
4–5
1.26 (0.66–2.40)
–
1.29 (0.68–2.47)
6+
1.16 (0.55–2.48)
–
1.18 (0.55–2.53)
Wealth index
Poorest
1.00
–
1.00
Poorer
1.12 (0.83–1.52)
–
1.16 (0.85–1.59)
Middle
0.94 (0.68–1.30)
–
0.99 (0.71–1.40)
Richer
1.06 (0.75–1.50)
–
1.18 (0.83–1.70)
Richest
1.35 (0.93–1.98)
–
1.34 (0.82–2.20)
Regular exposure to mass media
No
1.00
–
1.00
Yes
1.33 (0.98–1.80)
–
1.32 (0.97–1.79)
Community level factors
Region
Addis Ababa
–
1.00
1.00
Tigray
–
0.72 (0.30–1.73)
0.65 (0.27–1.56)
Afar
–
0.04 (0.02–0.09)
0.32 (0.13–0.81)
Amhara
–
0.25 (0.10–0.58)
0.46 (0.19–1.11)
Oromia
–
0.12 (0.05–0.27)
0.24 (0.10–0.58)
Somali
–
0.05 (0.02–0.13)
0.39 (0.16–0.95)
Benishangul
–
0.60 (0.25–1.47)
0.63 (0.25–1.56)
SNNPR
–
0.32 (0.14–0.75)
0.42 (0.17–1.01)
Gambella
–
0.15 (0.06–0.36)
0.39 (0.16–0.99)
Harari
–
0.11 (0.04–0.25)
0.27 (0.11–0.66)
Dire Dawa
–
0.63 (0.25–1.60)
0.69 (0.27–1.79)
Residence
Urban
–
1.00
1.00
Rural
–
0.30 (0.21–0.44)
1.03 (0.64–1.65)
Distance to Health facility
Big problem
–
1.00
1.00
Not a big problem
–
1.42 (1.17–1.72)
1.31 (1.12–1.61)
aCatholic, traditional and other unclassified
bDaughter-in-low, sister, other relative, no relation
Individual level factors: Children aged 24–35 months old were 1.53 times (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.25–1.88) more likely to be vaccinated for MCV1 than children aged 12–23 months old. Children who have received first dose pentavalent vaccine (DPT1-HepB1-Hib1) (AOR = 9.09; 95% CI: 6.86–12.03) and third dose pentavalent vaccine (DPT3-HepB3-Hib3) (AOR = 7.12; 95% CI: 5.51–9.18) were more likely to receive first dose of measles vaccine. Children whose mothers’ age 20–34 years were 55% (AOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.27–0.76) less likely to receive MCV1 compared to those children whose mothers age 15–19 years. In addition, children with maternal age 35–45 years were 55% (AOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25–0.82) less likely to receive MCV1 compared to those children whose mothers age 15–19 years. Children with secondary and higher maternal education were more likely to receive MVC1 vaccination (AOR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.03–2.55) compared to children whose mothers had no education (Table 4).
Community level factors: Children in Afar (AOR =0.32; 95% CI: 0.13–0.81), Oromia (AOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10–0.58), Somali (AOR =0.39; 95% CI: 0.16–0.95), Gambella (AOR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.16–0.99) and Harari (AOR = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.11–0.66) regions were less likely to receive MCV1 vaccination compared to children in Addis Ababa. The odds of MVC1 vaccination were increased by 31% (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.12–1.61) in children living in areas where distance to health facility is not a big problem compared to children living in areas where distance to health facility is a big problem (Table 4).
Measures of variation (random-effects) and model fit statistics
As the results of multilevel logistic regression analysis depicted in Table 5, the null model (Model I) revealed statistically significant variation in childhood MCV1 vaccination across communities [τ = 2.68,p < 0.001], in which 45% variation in the odds of a child being MCV1 vaccinated is attributed to community-level factors (ICC =45%).
Table 5
Measures of variation (random intercept models) and model fit statistics in childhood MCV1 in Ethiopia, 2016
Measures of variation
Model 1a
Model 2b
Model 3c
Model 4d
Community level
Variance (SE)
2.676 (0.091)*
0.556 (0.085)*
1.117 (0.074)*
0.479 (0.086)*
PCV (%)
Reference
79.2
58.3
82.1
ICC (%)
44.9
14.5
25.3
12.7
MORe
4.73
2.03
2.73
1.93
Model fit statistics
DIC (−2log likelihood)
4462
2984
4142
2953
AIC
4466
3050
4170
3043
SE Standard Error; PCV Proportional Change in Variance, ICC Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, MOR Median Odds Ratio, DIC Deviance Information Criterion, AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion
aModel 1 is an empty model, a baseline model without any explanatory variable
bModel 2 is adjusted for individual-level factors
cModel 3 is adjusted for community-level factors
dModel 4 is final model adjusted for both individual and community-level factors
eIncreased risk (in median) that one would have if moving to a neighborhood/cluster with a higher risk
*P-value < 0.001
After adjusting the model for individual level factors (Model 2), the variation in the odds of a child receiving MCV1 remained statistically significant [τ =0.56,p <0.001] across the communities, with 79% of variation in the odds of children who received MCV1 was attributed to the individual factors and 15% of the variance in MCV1 among the children was attributed to community-level factors.
Model 3, which is adjusted for community-level factors, revealed an increased variance of a child being vaccinated for MCV1 [τ =1.12,p <0.001] across the communities, as compared to the variance reported in model 2. In this model, the community level factors explained the 58% of the variability in the odds of children receiving MCV1 (PCV = 58.3%), and 25.3% of the variation among the clusters was attributed to community level factors (ICC = 25.3%).
The final best-fit model (model IV), which adjusted for both individual and community-level factors simultaneously, depicted statistically significant variability to the odds of a child being MCV1 vaccinated [τ =0.48,p <0.001]. In this final best fit model, about 13% of the variability among communities in the odds of a child being MCV1 vaccinated was due to the community-level factors (ICC = 12.7%) and about 82% of the variance in the odds of MCV1 vaccination (PCV = 82.1%) across communities was attributed to both individual and community-level factors.
In this study, the MOR shows the extent to which the child probability of receiving MCV1 is determined by residential area and is therefore appropriate for quantifying contextual phenomena. It quantifies the variation in MCV1 between clusters (the second-level variation) by comparing two children from two randomly chosen, different clusters. MOR greater than 1 in all models suggests a considerable between-cluster variation in childhood MCV1. Including both individual, and community level factors reduced the unexplained heterogeneity in MCV1 between communities from MOR of 4.73 in the null model to the MOR of 1.93 in the final model.
Discussion
In this study, a total of 3722 children aged 12–35 months nested within 611 clusters were included from the 2016 EDHS data. The prevalence of childhood MCV1 was found to be 54.3% (95% CI = 52.7–55.9) which was low compared to the recent DHS reports of most low and middle income countries such as Egypt, 96% [31], Kenya, 87% [32], Rwanda, 95% [33], Ghana, 89% [34], Zimbabwe, 82% [35] and Uganda, 80% [36]. It was also low as compared to a local survey finding in the selected zones of Ethiopia by JSI-l10k, 80% [37], the national report in 2015, 87% [38]. In addition the prevalence of MCV1 is lower than the 2016 national target for childhood MCV1, 91% [38] and the recommended herd immunity threshold, 95% [8, 39]. This childhood MCV1 coverage below the recommended herd immunity threshold (95%) may indicate that not only the country but also the regions with high levels of childhood MCV1 coverage may still be at considerable risk for measles outbreaks.
Exploring spatial heterogeneity in childhood vaccination is gaining attention at all spatial scales to identify gaps and intervene accordingly [40]. In the global spatial autocorrelation analysis of this study, a clustering pattern of childhood MCV1 across the study areas was observed (Global Moran’s I = 0.134, p-value< 0.0001). This indicates that approximately the same coverages of childhood MCV1 were aggregated in specific areas. Hence, the SaTScan spatial analysis detected seven statistically significant most likely SaTScan clusters of areas with low MCV1 coverage. The most likely primary SaTScan cluster of areas with low MCV1 coverage was detected in Afar region; specifically in Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 4 administrative zones (LLR = 33.79, p < 0.01), and the most likely secondary SaTScan cluster in Somali region, specifically in Afder, Shabelle, Korah, Doolo, Nogob, Jarar and Fatan administrative zones (LLR = 26.76, p < 0.01). The 3rd and 4th most likely clusters of areas with low MCV1 coverage were detected in Gambella region; specifically in Nuer and Agnuak Administrative zones (LLR = 17.73, P < 0.01) and Afar region, particularly in Zone 2 administrative zone (LLR = 14.54, P < 0.01), respectively. In addition, the 5th most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 14.49, P < 0.01) was detected in Illuababur & Jimma Administrative zones of Oromia Region, while the 6th most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 14.18, P < 0.01) in zone 3 and zone 4 administrative zones of Afar region, North Shewa zone of Amhara region, West and East Hararge zones of Oromia region and Siti zone of Somali region. The last (7th) most likely SaTScan cluster (LLR = 12.27, P < 0.01) was detected in East Hararge zone of Oromia region, Fatan zone of Somali region, and Harari region. This local clustering of low childhood MCV1 coverages indicates that children who lived in the above mentioned geographical locations had a low probability of receiving MCV1 compared with those who lived outside the SaTScan clusters. It may be due to differences in health service accessibility and utilization, as well as socio-cultural differences in the community. This geographical clustering low MCV1 coverage may suggest that regions with high coverage of childhood MCV1 may be at risk for measles outbreaks [41].
As the multilevel analysis showed, the variation in the childhood MCV1 vaccination was attributed to both individual and community level factors. In the final model (model IV), individual and community-level factors accounted for about 82.1% of the variation observed for childhood MCV1. It is supported by other findings in Ethiopia [42] and Democratic Republic of Congo [43].
Children aged 24–35 months were more likely to receive MCV1 compared to children aged 12–23 months (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.25–1.88). This could be due to late initiation of childhood vaccination and Vaccine hesitancy for early ages. This indicates delaying in childhood vaccination which extends the period of vulnerability of children to vaccine preventable diseases [44]. We also found that children who have received the first dose of pentavalent vaccine (AOR = 9.09; 95% CI: 6.86–12.03) and third dose of pentavalent vaccine (AOR = 7.12; 95% CI: 5.51–9.18) were more likely to receive MCV1. This may be due to differences in childhood vaccination service availability and utilization among communities. It could also be justified as; women whose children lacked the first and third doses of pentavalent vaccination may miss the opportunities for information on the importance of childhood measles vaccination. Pentavalent first dose vaccination coverage is a good proxy indicator for the availability of access to and initial use of childhood vaccination services [13]. Hence, a high proportion of pentavalent first dose coverage may indicate the availability of childhood vaccination services in the communities. In addition, the third dose pentavalent vaccination coverage indicates the continuity of use by parents or care takers, client satisfaction with services, and capability of the system to deliver a series of vaccinations [13]. Hence, a high proportion of pentavalent third dose vaccination may indicate better childhood vaccination service utilization and the health system performance in relation to vaccination services.
Maternal education was identified as a strong predictor of childhood immunization in other several studies [45‐48]. Children from mothers with secondary or higher education had higher odds of being vaccinated for MCV1 (AOR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.03–2.55). This finding is supported by other studies in Ethiopia [42], Democratic Republic of Congo [43], Nigeria [49, 50], Kenya [51] and in India [52] and it is not surprising that educated mothers are generally more likely to utilize health care services including childhood immunization services, and have better communication skills [53, 54].
From the community level characteristics, geographical region was a significant predictor of childhood MCV1. Children who were living in Afar, Oromia, Somali, Gambella and Harari regions were less likely to receive MCV1 as compared to children lived in Addis Ababa. This could be justified by the regional differences in some background characteristics such as culture, religion, economical status, vaccine supply, and availability and accessibility of immunization health services.
In contrast to the findings that have been documented elsewhere [55‐58], maternal place of residence was not a significant predictor of childhood MCV1. This may be due to differences in study period, and sample size. However, the finding is consistent with the findings of other studies conducted in central Ethiopia and Nigeria, in which a non-significant association between place of residence and likelihood of childhood MCV1 [45, 59]. This may suggest a need for further investigation.
Finally, this study revealed that children who lived in areas where distance from health facility is not a big problem were more likely to receive childhood MCV1 that is consistent with a study finding in sub-Saharan Africa [60].
EDHS is a national and subnational representative household survey with a high response rate and the findings are generalizable to the national and subnational populations. Hence, generalizability is the strength of this study. Applying spatial scan statistics and employing multilevel regression models to identify both individual and community level factors that could not be addressed with ordinary logistic regression model are other important strengths. However, recall bias may be introduced due to the retrospective nature of the data, and the maternal verbal reports for childhood vaccination.
Conclusion
A clustered pattern of areas with low childhood MCV1 coverage was observed in Ethiopia. Statistically significant local clusters of areas with low childhood MCV1 were detected in Somali, Afar, Gambella, and Oromia regions of the country. Both the individual level characteristics (child’s age, first and third doses of pentavalent vaccination, maternal age and education) and community level characteristics (geographic region and distance from health facility) were statistically significant predictors of childhood MCV1. Hence, it is good if the federal ministry of health and other concerned child health programmers give priority of the areas with low MCV1 coverage identified in this study. It is also better to consider the individual and community level determinant factors identified in this study.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the MeasureDHS program for their permission to download and use the 2016 Ethiopia demographic and Health survey datasets.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Public Health, the University of Gondar and the ICF International Institutional Review Board. The data has been used only for this registered research and it could not be passed on to other researchers.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
