Background
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a hemodynamic and pathophysiological condition characterized by abnormally elevated pressures in the pulmonary vasculature. It is defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 25 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization [
1]. PH can be caused by an increase in pulmonary blood flow, pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary venous pressure or a combination of these factors. It is classified into five main groups of causes, each group sharing similar pathophysiological features: pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1), PH due to left heart disease (group 2), PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia (group 3), chronic thromboembolic PH (group 4) and PH with unclear/multifactorial mechanisms (group 5) [
2].
Irrespective of the cause, PH is associated with debilitating symptoms and reduced life expectancy. Late diagnosis and ineffective treatment are the main drivers of its poor survival [
3,
4]. For instance, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a median survival of 2.8 years if the patient is not treated with improved treatment regimens [
5]. Following the introduction of PAH improved treatment regimens, the prognosis of PAH has improved considerably, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 85%, 68%, and 57%, respectively [
6]. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of PH are therefore paramount in order to improve its outcomes. Many known risk factors for PH are hyperendemic in Africa, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), rheumatic heart disease, chronic hepatitis B and C, hereditary hemoglobinopathies, tuberculosis, asthma, and schistosomiasis [
7‐
16]. Moreover, left heart disease which is increasingly prevalent in African populations has been shown to be an important cause of PH across the continent [
14,
15,
17]. Therefore, the epidemiological and clinical profiles of diseases differ from country to country and from continent to continent. It is why precise knowledge of region-specific epidemiology of PH is crucial to implement effective preventive strategies and for contextualized clinical guidelines.
Despite the point made above and the potential risk of highly prevalent PH, the epidemiology of PH remains poorly described in Africa. In fact, there is a lack of studies on PH prevalence from this continent [
16]. High prevalence of PH risk factors, specific genetic background and lifestyles, poor access to health care suggest that the epidemiology of PH in Africa may be unique.
Herein, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis which synthesizes the current knowledge on the epidemiology of PH in Africa. Our objective was to determine the prevalence, the incidence and the etiologies of PH among people residing in Africa. The ultimate goal of this review is to provide evidence which could guide contextualized policies for the prevention and treatment of PH in Africa, and underpin further research.
Discussion
Although, we have neither found studies reporting the prevalence of PH in the general population nor those reporting the incidence of PH in Africa, available studies showed that the prevalence of PH may vary widely across specific populations: from 7.4% in patients with systemic sclerosis to 68.7% in patients with cardiac surgery. The main driver of PH among patients presenting with cardiac complaints may be left-sided heart disease, which seems to represent two-thirds of PH etiologies in Africa.
Among patients presenting with cardiac complaints, the prevalence of PH was 9.8% which is in the 10–20% range reported in the US general population [
50]. In more specific populations, we found a high prevalence of PH in patients with well-known causes of PH including group 1: systemic lupus erythematous (25.4%), systemic sclerosis (7.4%), and HIV infection (10.6%). The prevalence of PH in patients with systemic sclerosis in this review was close to the prevalence reported in developed countries, albeit measured with right heart catheterization [
51]. Concerning HIV-infected people, our prevalence estimate is almost on par with a previous review in the same population in Africa [
9]. The prevalence of PH among HIV-infected individuals in Africa remains higher than the 0.5% reported from developed countries [
52‐
54]. This can be explained by several reasons including low access and retention in care of HIV-infected people in Africa leading to late diagnosis and management of HIV disease (antiretroviral therapy initiation) [
9,
55‐
58]. Further, we noticed a higher prevalence of PH among Africans with systemic lupus erythematous compared to the prevalence reported in developed countries (0.5–17.5%) [
51]. Due to fact, that many known risk factors for PH are hyperendemic in Africa [
7‐
16], patients with systemic lupus erythematous or HIV residing in Africa probably had other comorbid conditions favoring the occurrence of PH.
Group 2 causes included: rheumatic heart disease (12.9%), heart failure (32.9%), and cardiac surgery (68.7%). Similarly, a recent global systematic review by Dzudie and colleagues reported a prevalence of PH varying from 22 to 83.3% in adults with left heart disease [
17,
59]. Indeed, left heart diseases represent the most common causes of PH [
60‐
62]. Actually, it has been observed that even after surgery for rheumatic heart disease complicated by PH, some residual PH is seen to persist [
63].
For group 3 causes of PH, we found a single study from Egypt, which reported a prevalence of 62.7% among those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This is higher than findings from developed countries among patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (48.7%) [
64]. For group 5 causes of PH, the 23.2% prevalence of PH in patients with hemodialysis in our review falls within the range reported from other settings (18.8–68.8%) [
65]. In contrast to developed countries where the reviews on the prevalence of PH in sickle cell disease individuals reported a range between 6 and 11% [
66,
67], we found that 36.9% of patients with sickle cell disease had PH. We found no study conducted among patients with group 4 PH (chronic thromboembolic PH). While this might look like a rarity of chronic thromboembolic PH in Africa, the limited availability (and affordability) of the complex diagnostic tools investigating lung function required for accurate diagnosis of this form of PH, likely explains the dearth in studies and potentially underdiagnoses.
Overarchingly, one can note that the prevalence of PH in different specific populations in Africa is either similar to, or in the majority of situations higher than that reported in other non-African settings. This is potentially explained by the presence of many known endemic risk factors for PH in Africa (some not fully explored) [
7‐
16]. We found just one study classifying PH according to current guidelines. Despite the dearth in studies, available evidence suggests that the main class of PH in Africa is the one due to left heart diseases which is consistent with prior literature [
62,
68‐
70].
About half of studies included in this review had a low risk of bias in their methodological quality. We observed no publication bias, suggesting that future research endeavors are likely to have no important impact on the confidence in our estimates. A key exclusion criterion for studies during the review process was wrong diagnostic criteria for PH (i.e. a cut-off different from 35 mmHg for pulmonary arterial systolic pressure on echocardiography). Indeed, some studies used a cut-off between 20 and 30 mmHg [
71‐
79] and others between 37 and 50 mmHg [
80‐
85] on echocardiography. Most studies in this review used Doppler echography for the diagnosis of PH, and were hospital-based; moreover, PH was mainly symptom-driven (vs. general population). In this respect, interpretation of our findings should be done with caution.
Further studies are needed to investigate PH etiologies in Africa. Clinicians and researchers are invited to comply with updated guidelines for accurate diagnosis and classification of PH, as recommended by international guidelines [
86]. While the PAPUCO study [
17] was a commendable effort describing the natural history of PH in Africa, there is still need for further studies and collaborations to expand these strides and provide more robust evidence for Africa. However, the high prevalence of PH found in this review, albeit in specific populations, underscores the need for clinicians, policy makers, researchers and stakeholders to direct more attention towards PH in a bid to improve detection and management of the disease throughout the continent. What we need in Africa are studies that can develop some clinical screening methods that can help to identify almost all PH cases in community. Indeed, early diagnosis and timely access to care can improve the clinical course of the disease and potentially reduce its burden. The greatest difficulty is to know how to ensure that everyone at risk to develop PH has access to its eventual diagnosis in a weak healthcare system and in a context of constrained resources. We also hope that all these efforts will bring to define local and adapted guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PH in Africa, taking into account the specific patterns of the disease across the continent.
This review had some limitations. First, although we searched several databases, this review is based on a limited number of original studies published in specific populations. Second, the limited number of studies included in the review did not permit us to perform meaningful subgroup analyses to determine sources of heterogeneity. Third, not all African sub-regions were represented in all the specific populations, making the results of this study particular in terms of generalizability to the entire continent. Nonetheless, this is the first comprehensive review on the prevalence, incidence and etiologies of PH in Africa; it gives a clear overview of the burden of PH in Africa and crucial gaps to fill in future research.