Extended resection in pancreatic metastases: feasibility, frequency, and long-term outcome: a retrospective analysis

Metastases to the pancreas are rare and account only for 1–2 % of all pancreatic malignancies [1]. Most primaries that spread to the pancreas are renal cell carcinomas (RCC), lung cancers, malignant melanomas, and malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract [2, 3]. However, at the time of diagnosis, patients often present with widespread systemic disease and therefore, no curative treatment is applicable. Several studies have demonstrated survival benefit and improved quality of life after complete metastasectomy for isolated lung or liver metastases [4, 5]. Therefore, extended surgical intervention is a well-established approach in a multidisciplinary concept for select patients suffering from colorectal or pulmonary metastases in the liver [6]. However, extended surgery for pancreatic metastasectomy is rare and remains debatable as there have been few studies on the procedure, all of which have reported controversial results [7‐9]. Patients with localized extrapancreatic disease appear to be suitable for pancreatic resection but the ideal oncological approach has not been established and the benefit of multivisceral resection (MVR) remains undetermined. Our aim was to assess the frequency and feasibility of MVR for metastases to the pancreas. We also analyzed the influence of MVR on perioperative and long-term outcomes compared with standard resection.

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent pancreatic resection at the Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, between 1994 and 2012.

For this study ethical approval was obtained from the institutional local ethical committee (AZ 318-14-06102014, Ethical committee of the University Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig). Due to the retrospective design of the study and accordingly national guidelines, the local ethic committee confirmed, that informed consent was not necessary from participants.

All patients were operated on with curative intent. We included patients with extrapancreatic spread in this study only when extrapancreatic disease appeared to be resectable, and we excluded patients with primary tumors that had infiltrated the pancreas through direct extension.

We assessed the following patient characteristics: sex, age, body mass index, preoperative symptoms, comorbidities, type of resection, duration of operation, required units of fresh frozen plasma and/or packed red blood cells, median length of stay on the intensive care unit, total length of stay, time between surgery for the primary tumor and pancreatic resection, postoperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification [10], presence of pancreatic fistulae according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula criteria [11], hospital mortality defined as death within the first 60 days after resection, overall survival rate, disease-free survival, and histopathological data. Patients who died within the first 90 days after resection were excluded from further statistical analysis. MVR was defined as resection of one additional organ, excluding the spleen.

Surgical interventions for metastatic disease have increased over the last decade, concurrent with considerable improvement in quality of life and long-term survival of up to 10 years following resection for the most common (liver or lung) metastases [12, 13]. As a result, surgical resection of metastases is now an integral part of a multidisciplinary oncological approach [6]. In contrast, metastases to the pancreas are uncommon and the majority of patients present with no specific symptoms [14] and with non-resectable widespread disease at the time of diagnosis. However, in cases of isolated disease, surgical intervention may be beneficial in terms of overall survival, even in patients with localized extrapancreatic metastases, and in terms of the need for MVR to obtain complete tumor-free resection margins.

Based on our experience, surgical intervention is justified in select patients diagnosed with metastases to the pancreas. Our data showed that surgical resection for pancreatic metastases is feasible and provides good long term results, even in patients undergoing MVR. Perioperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality were comparable to studies evaluating standard pancreatic resection for primary malignancies [15]. In our study, morbidity after MVR tended to be higher than after standard resection. However, MVR for pancreatic metastases should not be considered an absolute contraindication for surgery, because our results indicated equivalent overall survival in the MVR group.

The limitations of our study are the small cohort and the absence of a control group treated by other therapeutic strategies. Therefore, general recommendations cannot be made based on our data, even though complete resection (R0) is generally considered a good prognostic marker for patients’ overall survival [16]. For instance, long-term survival of 10 years can be seen after complete resection of colorectal liver metastases, which emphasizes the importance of this therapeutic option [12]. In our study, the rate of microscopically-free resection margins (77.7 %) did not differ from other studies reporting positive resection margins for pancreatic cancer of 17–30 % [17‐19].

Because of the high incidence of metastatic disease originating from RCC, the most valid conclusions can be provided for this tumor type. Consequently, most reported data refer to RCC and are comparable with our results in terms of incidence and overall survival [1, 8, 20]. In our study, 10 patients (55.5 %) had pancreatic metastases from RCC and the overall survival of this subgroup was 60 %. In a recently published review, Tanis et al. reported a 5-year survival rate of 72.6 % in 311 cases following pancreatic surgery for RCC metastases [21]. In this context, time of metastatic onset is discussed as a prognostic marker for long-term survival. A small number of studies have observed a trend to better overall survival in patients with long disease-free interval when evaluating primary tumor resection and onset of metastases to the pancreas. We did not see a similar effect in our patients because overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with longer disease-free interval. These findings are supported by the results of a meta-analysis which identified 15 studies addressing pancreatic metastasectomy for RCC [1]. In the univariate analysis, time from resection of the primary tumor did not affect overall survival.

Many changes have been made, regarding the oncological treatment for metastatic RCC. Individualized immunotherapy based on immunoreactive cytokines and/or antiangiogenetic agents (e.g. bevacizumab, sunitinib, and sorafenib) have showed encouraging results. Therefore, surgical resection should not be considered as the only therapeutic option: An interdisciplinary approach including visceral surgeons, urologists and oncologists should be performed for the treatment against pancreatic metastases to obtain sufficient synergistic antitumor effects. However, the best way to combine surgery with oncological treatment has to be evaluated addressed by future studies.

Pancreatic metastases can occur after a long disease-free interval, with a median time between resection of the primary tumor and detection of pancreatic metastases of 72 months (range, 0–228 months). This biological tumor behavior reflects the importance of a prudent long-term follow-up in these patients, even if specific symptoms are missing. This point is supported by our findings, which revealed that only 44.4 % of the patients had specific symptoms. We recommend that regular follow-up including radiological imaging should be performed even after a long disease-free interval.

Very few data are available regarding the potential impact of MVR for pancreatic metastases on morbidity and mortality because of the low proportion of patients with MVR in most of the published studies [20]. However, in our study, the majority of patients (66.6 %) were treated by a multivisceral approach. In a retrospective analysis, Strobel et al. compared patients who received either standard resection or MVR for pancreatic metastases of different tumor types [22]. The authors reported no significant difference for morbidity and mortality between groups, although morbidity in the MVR group tended to be higher. Also, the majority of complications were surgical, with one patient dying in each group. These results are comparable to our results where the majority of postoperative complications were also surgical. We also saw that major surgical complications occurred more frequently in the MVR group, although this result was not statistically significant. Because of its potentially beneficial impact on long-term survival, we do not consider that MVR is an absolute contraindication but that the increased operative risk should be considered in the decision making process. The overall morbidity in our study was not increased compared with the reported morbidity rate for resection of primary pancreatic malignancies of up to 58.5 %, even though major surgical complications occurred more frequently in our study [15]. This might be attributable to the high proportion of patients who underwent MVR.

During our study follow-up, only one patient suffered from tumor recurrence in the pancreas and this was successfully treated by resection of the pancreatic remnant without further tumor recurrence. This might be interpreted as a sign of good local tumor control and is supported by other studies [22].

In total, nine of our patients (50 %) developed extrapancreatic recurrence, of which five (33.3 %) had undergone previous MVR. Four patients received primarily combined liver and pancreas resection for metastases of sarcoma or gallbladder cancer (n = 1 for each cancer) and for metastases of malignant melanoma in two cases. In the latter patients, hepatic recurrence occurred and further surgical intervention was performed in one patient, who is still alive. These results are consistent with other reports showing a survival rate of 50 % after liver resection for malignant melanoma [23]. Therefore, the type of the primary tumor should also be considered when deciding on surgery and the patient should be informed of the risk of recurrence.

A surgical approach with curative intent is justified in select patients suffering from metastases to the pancreas and offers good long-term survival. Our results showed that resection of pancreatic metastases of different tumor types was associated with favorable morbidity and mortality when compared with resection of the primary pancreatic malignancies. Our findings also demonstrated that MVR was feasible, with acceptable long term outcomes, even though morbidity tended to be higher than with standard resection.