Background
Objectives
-
to assess patients’ basic habits regarding the personal use of the internet
-
to assess patients’ attitudes towards clinic-ePRO or home-ePRO, and
-
to evaluate the feasibility of the clinic-ePRO and home-ePRO procedure.
Methods
Sample and procedure
Clinic-ePRO
Home-ePRO
Evaluation
Electronic data capture
Statistical analysis
Results
Patient characteristics
Clinic-ePRO patients
Clinic-ePRO at the hospital | Home-ePRO at home | ||
---|---|---|---|
(N = 113) | (N = 45) | ||
Age | mean (SD, range) | 45.1 years | 58.7 years |
(SD 14.4, 22 to 81) | (SD 10.4, 29 to 74) | ||
Sex | male | 83.2 % | 48.9 % |
Diagnosis | gastrointestinal tumours | 0.9 % | 31.2 % |
glioma | 15.7 % | - | |
gynaecological tumours | 0.9 % | 33.3 % | |
lung cancer | 0.9 % | 22.2 % | |
neuroendocrine tumours | 12.8 % | - | |
testicular cancer | 67.0 % | - | |
other | 1.8 % | 13.3 % | |
Treatment | chemotherapy | 5.3 % | 100 % |
follow-up | 88.5 % | - | |
other | 6.2 % | - | |
Device | iPad2 | - | 71.9 % |
own laptop or PC | 28.1 % | ||
Institution | Medical University of Innsbruck | Kufstein County Hospital |
Home-ePRO patients
Patients’ basic habits regarding their personal use of the internet
Clinic-ePRO patients
Agreement (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Clinic-ePRO | Home-ePRO | ||
N = 113 | N = 45 | ||
Personal internet use | yes | 81.4 | 77.8 |
Frequency of internet usea | several times per week | 66.4 | 51.1 |
several times per month | 7.1 | 15.6 | |
less than once per month | 8.8 | 6.7 | |
no internet use | 15.0 | 20.0 | |
missing | 2.7 | 2,2 | |
Used internet-ready devicec | laptop | 53.1 | 51.1 |
personal computer | 50.4 | 35.6 | |
smart phone | 45.1 | 8.9 | |
tablet-PC | 26.5 | 20.0 | |
Internet activitiesc | information search | 74.3 | 71.1 |
reading and writing e-mailsb | 82.2 | 53.3 | |
online shopping | 45.1 | 31.1 | |
online banking/bookingb | 72.6 | 31.1 | |
entertainmentb | 67.1 | 28.9 | |
social media | 40.7 | 15.6 | |
Number of pursued internet activities | no internet activities | 18.6 | 17.8 |
1 activity | 11.5 | 17.8 | |
2-3 activities | 28.3 | 28.9 | |
4 or more activities | 41.6 | 33.3 |
Home-ePRO patients
Patients’ attitudes towards clinic-ePRO/home-ePRO
Clinic-ePRO patients
Agreement (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Clinic-ePRO | Home-ePRO | ||
N = 113 | N = 45 | ||
Considering PROs as an useful and adequate method to provide information on QOL to physicians | 64.6 | 91.1 | |
Wish to see own PRO results | 61.1 | 77.8 | |
Wish to discuss PRO results with treating physiciana | - | 82.2 | |
Willingness to complete QLQ-C30 | at the hospital | 94.7 | 84.4 |
at homeb | 68.1 | - | |
For patients reasonable time frames for PRO completion at home | at least weekly | 14.2 | 53.3 |
monthly | 18.6 | 24.4 | |
yearly | 43.4 | 13.3 | |
missing | 23.8 | 8.9 | |
Preference of phone interview over home-ePROc | no | 97.3 | 93.2 |
Preferred mode of PRO assessment | paper-pencil | 7.1 | 17.8 |
electronic | 67.2 | 60.0 | |
no preference | 23.9 | 20.0 | |
decline of assessment | 1.8 | 2.2 |
Home-ePRO patients
Evaluation of the clinic-ePRO procedure
Agreement (%) | |||
Clinic-ePRO | Home-ePRO | ||
N = 113 | N = 45 | ||
Did you have any difficulties completing the questionnaire? | not at all | 82.3 | 97.8 |
a little | 14.2 | 2.2 | |
quite a bit | 3.5 | 0.0 | |
Did you have any difficulties handling the electronic device? | not at all | 92.8 | 88.9 |
a little | 3.6 | 8.9 | |
quite a bit | 2.7 | 2.2 | |
very much | 0.9 | 0.0 | |
Did you have any difficulties starting the app or entering your login data?b | not at all | - | 72.7 |
a little | 27.3 | ||
How satisfied are you with the presentation of the questionnaire on the screen? | very much | 91.0 | 95.5 |
quite a bit | 5.4 | 2.3 | |
not at all | 3.6 | 2.3 | |
How satisfied are you with the privacy during questionnaire completion?a | very much | 86.6 | - |
quite a bit | 6.2 | ||
a little | 2.7 | ||
not at all | 4.5 | ||
Agreement (%) | |||
Clinic-ePRO | Home-ePRO | ||
N = 113 | N = 45 | ||
perceived advantages | no personal contact needed | 11.0 | 6.7 |
no drive to the hospital neededb | - | 42.2 | |
availability of questionnaire at any time | 58.9 | 44.4 | |
low cost | 31.5 | 24.4 | |
feeling of being well cared for at homeb | - | 57.8 | |
perceived disadvantages | handling of the internet is so difficult | 0.0 | 1.4 |
the technical requirements are too extensive | 1.4 | 2.2 | |
does not come up to my individual situation | 30.1 | 8.9 | |
too complex/confusing | 2.7 | 0.0 | |
too impersonal | 57.5 | 13.3 | |
Overall, how satisfied are you with electronic quality of life assessment at home?b | Ø (SD, range) | 9.1 (1.14, 5–10) |