Discussion
We identified four patients with antibodies against native conformational MOG in a blinded cohort of 48 NMO/NMOSD patients. All four patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of NMO at disease onset (1/4) or at the time of second territorial involvement (3/4). Anti-MOG antibodies were detected in 4 out of 48 NMO/NMOSD patients and 4 out of 17 AQP4-seronegative patients. These findings are in line with other recent reports that identified antibodies against MOG in a subgroup of AQP4-seronegative patients with NMO/NMOSD [
8-
10,
12-
16] (Table
2).
Table 2
Review of literature on anti-MOG antibodies in adult NMO/NMOSD
|
n = 10 | CBA | 70 | n.a. | n.a. |
(39%) |
|
n = 8 | ELISA | n.a. | n.a. | No improvement of visual acuity |
(57%) |
|
n = 4 | CBA | 25 | Monophasic simultaneous or sequential TM and ON; lower spinal cord involvement on MRI | Excellent recovery (12) |
(15%) |
|
n = 16 | CBA | 38 | More restricted phenotype (ON > TM); bilateral simultaneous ON; single attack; lower spinal cord involvement on MRI | Good recovery in 88% (24) |
(21%) |
|
n = 9 | CBA | 44 | Simultaneous/sequential ON/TM; conus and deep gray nuclei involvement on MRI | Better outcomes; less risk for disability (18) |
(35%) |
|
n = 16 | CBA | 53 | Higher frequency of involvement of all spinal cord regions | Better outcomes; less risk for disability (67) |
(16%) |
|
n = 9 | CBA | 67 | Strong association with BON; optic disk swelling | Propensity to relapse (28) |
(39%) |
MOG-seropositive patients tended to have an earlier or even pediatric onset in our cohort. Two recent studies already indicated that anti-MOG antibodies are present in some pediatric NMO patients [
15,
17]. Since our samples were taken in adulthood later during the disease course, one can speculate that anti-MOG antibodies might develop early on and persist over many years in some of these patients. Since anti-MOG antibodies are also found in pediatric MS and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) [
18,
21-
26] the picture emerges that the age of disease onset influences the nature of the autoantigen.
Furthermore, compared to AQP4-seropositive and to seronegative patients, the anti-MOG-positive patients in our group resembled a more MS-like phenotype with more common brain involvement during the disease course and positive OCBs in the CSF. The presence of OCBs is different from other recent reports which have found no or less frequent OCBs in the MOG-seropositive NMOSD patients [
12-
16]. Regarding brain lesions on MRI in the MOG-seropositive group, the lesions were more reminiscent of MS than NMO lesions with supratentorial, periventricular localization. Moreover, brainstem lesions, which are a hallmark of AQP4-seropositive NMO, were absent in our MOG-seropositive patients, which has also been suggested by other recent reports [
13,
15].
Our long-term follow-up enabled us to also analyze the disease course over up to 44 years. Looking at the temporal dynamics of anti-MOG antibodies in two patients over up to 6 years indicates a fluctuating pattern of these antibodies as it has been seen in pediatric MS and NMO cases [
17,
18,
27]. It is therefore necessary to test patients longitudinally to assess anti-MOG serostatus.
Conclusion
We identified anti-MOG antibodies in a subgroup of anti-AQP4 antibody-negative NMO patients (about 25%), but not in anti-AQP4 antibody-positive patients. Interestingly, some of the MOG-seropositive patients presented with a pediatric disease onset. The MOG-seropositive patients might show a more benign clinical course with a lower relapse rate and a longer time to a second attack affecting a different CNS region compared to the AQP4-seropositive and seronegative patients.
Our data suggest that MOG-seropositive patients show a diverse clinical phenotype with clinical features resembling NMO (attacks confined to the spinal cord and the optic nerves) and MS with an opticospinal presentation (positive OCBs, brain lesions). Further studies with larger cohorts need to be conducted to consolidate these findings and potentially lead to therapeutic recommendations which also address the seemingly more benign clinical course with a lower relapse frequency in the majority of the MOG-seropositive patients.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
AKP has received travel support and holds a research fellowship from Genzyme. GR has no competing interests. KD received research support from the German National Science Foundation through the Collaborative Research Centres CRC TR 128 (Initiating/effector versus regulatory mechanisms in multiple sclerosis). NC, JBC, and NSRS have no competing interests. RLPL has received research support from the Swiss MS Society, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European FP6 and IMI JU programs, Roche Postdoc Fellowship Program (RPF-program), unrestricted research grants from Novartis and Biogen. LK received institutional research support from Acorda, Actelion, Allozyne, BaroFold, Bayer HealthCare, Bayer Schering, Bayhill, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elan, Genmab, Glenmark, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono, MediciNova, Novartis, sanofi-aventis, Santhera, Shire, Roche, Teva, UCB, Wyeth, the Swiss MS Society, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European Union, the Gianni Rubatto Foundation, and the Novartis and Roche Research Foundation. JdS has no competing interests. TD serves on scientific advisory boards for Novartis Pharma, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Mitsubishi Pharma, TEVA Pharma, and Bayer Schering Pharma; has received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck Serono, and Bayer Schering Pharma; and receives research support from Biogen Idec, Novartis Pharma, the European Union, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss MS Society.
Authors’ contributions
AKP participated in the design of the study, performed the antibody testing, carried out the analysis of the clinical data and the statistical analysis, and prepared the manuscript. GR participated in the collection of the material, the collection and analysis of the clinical data, and the preparation of the manuscript. KD produced the transfectant cell lines and prepared the manuscript. NC and JBC participated in the collection of the material and the clinical data. NSRS and RLPL participated in the data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. LK participated in the study design and in the preparation of the manuscript. JdS participated in the study design, the collection of the material, the analysis of the clinical data, and the preparation of the manuscript. TD participated in the study design, the analysis of the clinical data, and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.